Skip to content

Efficacy of All-Oral Anti-Viral Therapy for Symptomatic Hepatitis C Virus Infection-Related Cryoglobulinemia

Efficacy of All-Oral Anti-Viral Therapy for Symptomatic Hepatitis C Virus Infection-Related Cryoglobulinemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02825212
Enrollment
10
Registered
2016-07-07
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2019-07-19
Last updated
2020-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C, Cryoglobulinemia

Keywords

Hepatitis C, Cryoglobulinemia

Brief summary

10 patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection and mixed cryoglobulinemia will be treated with Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir 90mg/400 mg FDC once daily for 12 weeks (naïve subjects or non-cirrhotic treatment experienced subjects) or 24 weeks (treatment experienced subjects with cirrhosis). The researchers anticipate that approximately 20% of subjects may have cirrhosis.

Detailed description

The treatment of extrahepatic disease manifestations of HCV has largely paralleled that of hepatic disease. Interferon was reported to have efficacy for MC even before linkage of the syndrome to HCV in 1989, and successful combination therapy with ribavirin was found to eliminate virus and lead to the resolution of immunologic abnormalities associated with extrahepatic disease. In addition, \ 75% of HCV-associated indolent asymptomatic lymphoproliferative diseases remit with successful antiviral therapy. However, in many instances, MC (notably cutaneous vasculitis) will relapse with recurrence of virus, and may occasionally persist even after clearance. In particular, side effects of Interferon alpha, including the uncovering of frank autoimmune disease, theoretically may mitigate response of extrahepatic disease to treatment. Peg-interferon increased the response rate of MC, and decreased the duration of treatment, but side effects remained problematic. An alternative approach to the treatment of MC has been the use of immunomodulatory agents. In particular, B-cell expansion in peripheral blood and in lymphoid follicles in the liver prevalent amongst HCV-infected persons provided a rationale for the use of depletion as a therapeutic strategy. Rituximab (anti-CD20) monotherapy has been used mostly for treatment failures/intolerance or in the setting NHL, and has yielded response rates in the setting of involvement of skin (73%); MPGN (70%); joint (53%); and nerve (36%). However, this monoclonal antibody (MAb) has the potential to form immune-complexes with mixed cryoglobulin RF and cause clinical vasculitis in patients with high cryocrits, and may raise the HCV RNA level in rare patients, causing cytotoxicity. Following Rituximab with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin achieved greater than a 60% complete response (CR) in patients resistant to combination treatment alone. Other approaches include the use of Aldesleukin, an inducer of regulatory T-cell activity, MAbs targeted to specific B-cell subsets or costimulatory signal molecules (e.g. BAFF) or agents inhibiting the interaction of HCV core antigen with C1q in cryoprecipitates via the receptor for the globular domain of C1q (gC1qR). The development of low molecular weight inhibitors of the non-structural proteins (NSPs) elaborated by HCV, in particular 5A, 5B nucleoside and non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors, and inhibitors of 3/4A serine proteases; to selectively inhibit HCV replication has raised the prospect of all-oral treatment for both hepatic and extrahepatic manifestations of disease. However, the use of first generation direct-acting antiviral agents (Telaprevir® and Boceprevir® linear NS3/4A protease inhibitors) was limited by frequent escape mutants, efficacy restricted to genotype-1, need to retain protocols including PegIFN and ribavirin, potential for significant drug interactions, and serious side effects. In a trial of combination therapy including Telaprevir® for 13 patients with MC, all had significant AEs, including asthenia (92%), anemia (84%), neutropenia and bacterial infection (54%). Approval of an uridine nucleoside analogue that selectively inhibits HCV NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Sofosbuvir) by the FDA late 2013 has led to proof-of-concept trials in which combination all-oral therapy has proven effective for both genotype 1 and other genotypes, with a number of other regimens under development. In particular, the combination of Sobosbuvir (SOF) and Ledipasvir (LDV) has been reported to have almost universal efficacy in a 12 week regimen for genotype 1, and the combination of SOF and Ribavirin (RBV) for genotypes 2-6 in a 24 week regimen. However, persistence of cryoglobulinemia even after viral clearance with the newer regimens has also raised the question of whether longer treatment regimens may be appropriate in the setting of significant extrahepatic disease. Thus, the timing is right to initiate a trial of all-oral treatment to rigorously evaluate the effect on extrahepatic disease, and to re-establish the efficacy of antiviral therapy in halting the direct and indirect role of HCV in driving autoimmune disease and lymphoproliferation. Using an interferon-sparing regimen to treat patients with HCV-related cryoglobulinemia will help answer the question as to whether immunomodulating therapy plays a role at all in eradicating cryoglobulins long-term, and whether antiviral therapy alone is adequate. If the latter, appreciable morbidity and mortality may be saved in avoiding treating these potentially sick, often cirrhotic patients, with immunomodulatory therapies.

Interventions

12 weeks for naïve subjects or non-cirrhotic treatment experienced subjects; or 24 weeks for treatment experienced subjects with cirrhosis

once daily for 12 weeks (naïve subjects, non-cirrhotic treatment experienced or treatment experienced subjects with compensated cirrhosis) for genotype 1-6 subjects.

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation in this study. 1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent 2. Male or female, age ≥18 years 3. HCV RNA ≥ 15 IU/mL at Screening 4. HCV genotype 1 5. Chronic HCV infection (≥ 6 months) documented by prior medical history or liver biopsy 6. Classification as treatment naïve or treatment experienced: 1. Treatment naïve is defined as having never been exposed to approved or experimental HCV-specific direct-acting antiviral agents or prior treatment of HCV with interferon or ribavirin or DAAs (except for SOF-containing regimens). 2. Treatment experienced is defined as prior treatment failure or relapse to a regimen containing interferon either with or without RBV or DAAs (except for SOF-containing regimens) that was completed at least 8 weeks prior to Baseline/Day 1. The subject's medical records must include sufficient detail of prior virologic failure to allow for categorization of prior response, as either: 1. Non-Responder: Subject did not achieve undetectable HCV RNA levels while on treatment, or 2. Relapse/Breakthrough: Subject achieved undetectable HCV RNA levels during treatment or within 4 weeks of the end of treatment but did not achieve SVR. 7. Cirrhosis determination (approximately 20% of subjects may have cirrhosis) a. Cirrhosis is defined as any one of the following: i) Any previous liver biopsy showing cirrhosis (e.g., Metavir score = 4 or Ishak score ≥5) ii) FibroMeter® score \>0.442 or an AST:platelet ratio index (APRI) \>2 during Screening iii) Fibroscan with a result of \>12.5 kPa at any time prior to or during screening. b. Absence of cirrhosis is defined as any one of the following: i) Liver biopsy within 2 years of Screening showing absence of cirrhosis ii) FibroMeter® score \<0.442 or APRI ≤ 1 performed during Screening iii) Fibroscan with a result of ≤12.5 kPa within 6 months of Baseline/Day 1 Fibroscan results will supersede FibroMeter® /APRI; liver biopsy results will supersede Fibrotest® /APRI or Fibroscan results and be considered definitive. 8. Liver imaging (ultrasound, CT scan or MRI) within 6 months of screening is required in patients with cirrhosis to exclude hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 9. Presence of MC vasculitis (please see criteria on the note below). 10. Null or partial response to previous therapies for MC, including corticosteroids, cytotoxic agents (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine), hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, mono- or combination therapy with IFNα/PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and/or CD20 depletion with Rituximab. a. Patients can be on ongoing treatment with one of the drugs described above at inclusion unless there is significant DDI. 11. Subjects has the following laboratory parameters at screening: 1. ALT \<10 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) 2. AST \<10 x ULN 3. Adequate bone marrow function as indicated hematologic parameters listed below and/or bone marrow cellularity \>60-70% average for age. i. WBC \>1500 /uL ii.Platelets \> 50,000/uL d) Direct bilirubin \>2 x ULN e) INR \>1.5 x ULN unless subject has known hemophilia or is stable on an anticoagulant regimen affecting INR 12. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening and a negative urine pregnancy test on Baseline/Day 1 prior to treatment. 13. Male subjects and female subjects of childbearing potential who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use protocol specified method(s) of contraception. 14. Lactating females must agree to discontinue nursing before the study drug is administered. 15. Subject must be of generally good health, with the exception of chronic HCV infection, as determined by the Investigator. 16. Subject must be able to comply with the dosing instructions for study drug administration and able to complete the study schedule of assessments. Note: Definition of Mixed Cryoglobulinemia (patients must meet one of the five overlapping syndromes listed below and the presence of cold-precipitable immune complexes in blood on two different occasions. * Clinical evidence of cryoglobulinemia, overlapping syndromes: 1. Cutaneous vasculitis (Raynaud's phenomenon, purpura, skin ulcers, livedo, acrocyanosis) 2. Glomerulonephritis (hypertension, hematuria, nephrotic syndrome) 3. Arthropathy (arthralgias, arthritis) 4. Neuropathy (peripheral and/or central nervous system, distal sensorimotor, mononeuritis multiplex) 5. Sicca syndrome (xerostomia, xerophthalmia) Other factors that will be assessed / recorded in patients with MC will be: 1\. Associated laboratory abnormalities including: * Positive HCV serology (recombinant immunoblot assay), viral nucleic acid quantitation diagnostic for HCV infection, and reflex genotyping. * Evidence of glomerulonephritis, including an active urinary sediment, hypoalbuminemia (albumin \<3gm/dL) and/or significant proteinuria (\>300mg/day). * Abnormal nerve conduction testing. 2. Pathologic evidence of cryoglobulinemia including: * Leukocytoclastic vasculitis. * Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. * Vasculopathy and/or mononuclear cell infiltrates on sural nerve biopsy. * Lip biopsy suggestive for Sjogren's syndrome. 3. Laboratory evidence of cryoglobulinemia including: * Characterization of cryoprecipitable material in serum by immunofixation, cryocrit, and/or quantitation of protein. * Associated immunological abnormalities, such as depressed levels of complement, elevated titers of rheumatoid factor, abnormal immunoglobulin quantitations, and serum immunofixation carried out on serum and/or isolated cryoglobulins. 4\. Laboratory evidence of B-cell clonality, including: * IgMk determined by immunofixation of serum and/or cryoglobulin, and kappa excess \>2.65:1 on Free Light Chain (FLC) assay

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)2-4 weeks and 24 weeks after treatmentNumber of participants who attain SVR, ie, cleared HCV
Response in Patients With Mixed Cryoglobulinemia (MC)up to 24 weeks after treatmentResponse to medication in patients with MC categorized as either complete response (100% response) vs partial response (50% response).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were self referred after discussion with their physicians, enrolled sequentially over a two year period (2016-2018)

Pre-assignment details

Long recruitment, with part of the problem of finding patients not already on antivirals. The original protocol was for Harvoni, which had been specifically licensed for Hepatitis C Virus genotype 1. Protocol was modified after discussion with Gilead with the licensing of Epclusa, which is active for other genotypes, specifically to be able to include two patients with genotype 2 thus enabling the study to reach full enrollment. Study objective is not to compare medications.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pts With Hep C Virus Infection-Related Cryoglobulinemia
Participants with Symptomatic Hepatitis C Virus Infection-Related Cryoglobulinemia who were treated with antivirals. Antivirals were either Harvoni or Epclusa. Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (Harvoni) 90mg/400 mg FDC once daily for 12 weeks (naïve subjects, non-cirrhotic treatment experienced subjects) or 24 weeks (treatment experienced subjects with compensated cirrhosis) for genotype 1 . Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (Epclusa) 400mg/100mg 400mg/100mg FDC once daily for 12 weeks (naïve subjects, non-cirrhotic treatment experienced or treatment experienced subjects with compensated cirrhosis) for genotype 1-6 subjects.
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPts With Hep C Virus Infection-Related Cryoglobulinemia
Age, Continuous60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.03
AST levels74.7 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 99.41
Bilirubin0.93 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66
Cirrhosis2 Participants
HCV genotype
1a
3 Participants
HCV genotype
1b
5 Participants
HCV genotype
2
1 Participants
HCV genotype
2a
1 Participants
Hepa Score for Fibrosis
F0-F1
2 Participants
Hepa Score for Fibrosis
F1
1 Participants
Hepa Score for Fibrosis
F1-F2
1 Participants
Hepa Score for Fibrosis
F2
1 Participants
Hepa Score for Fibrosis
F2-F4
1 Participants
Hepa Score for Fibrosis
F3
3 Participants
Hepa Score for Fibrosis
F4
1 Participants
Platelets level192.7 K/uL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 73.96
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Treatment Naive3 Participants
Viral Count78.98 IU/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 136.72
Years Since HCV Diagnosis16.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Response in Patients With Mixed Cryoglobulinemia (MC)

Response to medication in patients with MC categorized as either complete response (100% response) vs partial response (50% response).

Time frame: up to 24 weeks after treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pts With Hep C Virus Infection-Related CryoglobulinemiaResponse in Patients With Mixed Cryoglobulinemia (MC)Partial Response9 Participants
Pts With Hep C Virus Infection-Related CryoglobulinemiaResponse in Patients With Mixed Cryoglobulinemia (MC)Complete Response0 Participants
Pts With Hep C Virus Infection-Related CryoglobulinemiaResponse in Patients With Mixed Cryoglobulinemia (MC)No Response1 Participants
Primary

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)

Number of participants who attain SVR, ie, cleared HCV

Time frame: 2-4 weeks and 24 weeks after treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pts With Hep C Virus Infection-Related CryoglobulinemiaSustained Virologic Response (SVR)2-4 weeks after treatment10 Participants
Pts With Hep C Virus Infection-Related CryoglobulinemiaSustained Virologic Response (SVR)24 weeks after treatment10 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026