Skip to content

Study of OTO-104 in Subjects With Unilateral Meniere's Disease

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of OTO-104 Given as a Single Intratympanic Injection in Subjects With Unilateral Meniere's Disease

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02717442
Acronym
AVERTS-2
Enrollment
176
Registered
2016-03-23
Start date
2016-03-21
Completion date
2017-09-15
Last updated
2023-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meniere's Disease

Keywords

Meniere's Disease, Vertigo

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of OTO-104 for the treatment of Meniere's disease.

Interventions

Single intratympanic injection of 12 mg OTO-104

DRUGPlacebo

Single intratympanic injection of placebo

Sponsors

Otonomy, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

includes, but is not limited to: * Subject has a diagnosis of unilateral Meniere's disease by 1995 American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) criteria and reports active vertigo for the 2 months prior to the study lead-in period. * Subject has experienced active vertigo during the lead-in period. * Subject has documented asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. * Subject agrees to maintain their current treatments for Meniere's disease while on-study.

Exclusion criteria

includes, but is not limited to: * Subject is pregnant or lactating. * Subject has a history of immunodeficiency disease. * Subject has a history of previous endolymphatic sac surgery. * Subject has a history of previous use of intratympanic (IT) gentamicin in the affected ear. * Subject has a history of tympanostomy tubes with evidence of perforation or lack of closure. * Subject has experienced an adverse reaction to IT injection of steroids. * Subject has used an investigational drug or device in the 3 months prior to screening. * Subject has previously been randomized to a trial of OTO-104.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-1 Population3 monthsIn the Full Analysis Set (FAS)-1 population, the number of DVDs at Week 12 (the 4-week \[28 days\] interval from Week 9 through Week 12) was compared between OTO-104 and placebo. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.
The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-2 Population3 monthsThe number of DVDs at Week 12 (the 4-week \[28 days\] interval from Week 9 through Week 12) was compared between OTO-104 and placebo. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Otoscopic Examination - Tympanic Membrane Perforation at Week 12 (Month 3)3 monthsOtoscopic examinations were conducted at each visit. It was considered important to understand if the tympanic perforation that resulted from the IT injection at the Baseline visit persisted at the end of study visit (Week12 \[Month 3\]). Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.
Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 500 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)3 MonthsThe number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment (\<=10 dB) to impairment (\>10 dB) when measure at 500 Hz. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.
Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-13 monthsWeek 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in. Questionnaire - subjects were instructed to record the effect on their daily activities of their total vertigo experienced that day using a 5-point scoring system: 0 = normal activity 1. = slight limitation 2. = moderate limitation 3. = sick at home 4. = bedridden
Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 2000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)3 monthsThe number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment at baseline (\<= 10 dB) to impairment at Month 3 (\>10 dB) when measured at 2000 Hz. Week 12 (Month 3) = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.
Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 1000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)3 monthsThe number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment at baseline (\<= 10 dB) to impairment at Month 3 (\>10 dB) when measured at 1000 Hz. Week 12 (Month 3) = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.
Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-23 monthsWeek 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in. Questionnaire - subjects were instructed to record the effect on their daily activities of their total vertigo experienced that day using a 5-point scoring system: 0 = normal activity 1. = slight limitation 2. = moderate limitation 3. = sick at home 4. = bedridden

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

176 subjects were randomized and 174 subjects received study drug. The most common reason for screen failure was insufficient number of definitive vertigo days in the 28-day lead-in period. The first subject enrolled March 21, 2016, and the last subject completed September 15, 2017. A total of 49 centers in Europe (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, United Kingdom) enrolled subjects.

Pre-assignment details

This study was terminated early based on results of study 104-201506, a US Phase 3 study that indicated no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of reduction in definitive vertigo days (DVD) for OTO-104 vs placebo nor for any of the secondary endpoints. Decision was made to terminate all ongoing studies on August 31, 2017, including this study. At the time of termination, 112/176 randomized subjects completed the study out to Week 12 (Month 3).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)
Subjects that were randomized to OTO-104, received study drug, had a baseline definitive vertigo measurement (i.e., at least 1 baseline daily diary entry) for the 4-week lead-in period and at least one 4-week definitive vertigo measurement post-baseline (i.e., at least 1 post baseline daily diary entry).
86
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)
Subjects that were randomized to placebo, received study drug, had a baseline definitive vertigo measurement(i.e., at least 1 baseline daily diary entry) for the 4-week lead-in period and at least one 4-week definitive vertigo measurement post-baseline (i.e., at least1 post baseline daily diary entry).
88
Total174

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyOther - Not Specified20
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor3129
Overall StudySubject Randomized, but Did not Receive Drug20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)TotalPlacebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants27 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
72 Participants147 Participants75 Participants
Age, Continuous53.0 years53.0 years53.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
77 Participants152 Participants75 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants21 Participants12 Participants
Previous IT Steroid Injection5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
82 Participants164 Participants82 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
3 participants8 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
4 participants9 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
13 participants28 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
12 participants18 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
28 participants62 participants34 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
26 participants49 participants23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants92 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants82 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 860 / 88
other
Total, other adverse events
52 / 8629 / 88
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 860 / 88

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-1 Population

In the Full Analysis Set (FAS)-1 population, the number of DVDs at Week 12 (the 4-week \[28 days\] interval from Week 9 through Week 12) was compared between OTO-104 and placebo. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: A subject is included in the analysis if they received study drug, had a baseline definitive vertigo measurement for the 4-week lead-in period and at least one 4-week definitive vertigo measurement post-baseline, i.e., at least one post-baseline daily diary entry. The model and corresponding method of estimation adjusted for overdispersion and addressed missing 4-week intervals under the assumption of Missing at Random (MAR).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-1 Population2.336 Definitive Vertigo Day
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-1 Population3.549 Definitive Vertigo Day
Comparison: The primary efficacy endpoint was compared between OTO-104 and placebo at the 2-tailed 0.05 alpha level using a generalized Poisson linear mixed model. The model included fixed effects for randomized treatment group, sex, study week, a treatment group by study week interaction, and the count of lead-in period DVD standardized to 28 days as a covariate.p-value: =0.02995% CI: [0.453, 0.957]Regression, Linear
Primary

The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-2 Population

The number of DVDs at Week 12 (the 4-week \[28 days\] interval from Week 9 through Week 12) was compared between OTO-104 and placebo. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: The FAS - 2 includes all subjects from FAS-1 who were randomized 12 weeks prior to the study termination decision date of August 31, 2017 (i.e., subjects that had the opportunity to complete 12 weeks of daily diary entries in the study at the time of study termination).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-2 Population2.044 Definitive Vertigo Day
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-2 Population3.467 Definitive Vertigo Day
Comparison: The primary efficacy endpoint was compared between OTO-104 and placebo at the 2-tailed 0.05 alpha level using a generalized Poisson linear mixed model. The model included fixed effects for randomized treatment group, sex, study week, a treatment group by study week interaction, and the count of lead-in period DVD standardized to 28 days as a covariate.p-value: =0.01495% CI: [0.388, 0.896]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 1000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)

The number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment at baseline (\<= 10 dB) to impairment at Month 3 (\>10 dB) when measured at 1000 Hz. Week 12 (Month 3) = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Subjects that had no impairment at the baseline visit (air-bone gap \<=10 dB) and had an audiogram collected at the Week 12 (Month 3) visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 1000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)11 Participants
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 1000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)3 Participants
Secondary

Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 2000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)

The number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment at baseline (\<= 10 dB) to impairment at Month 3 (\>10 dB) when measured at 2000 Hz. Week 12 (Month 3) = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Subjects that had no impairment at the baseline visit (air-bone gap \<=10 dB) and had an audiogram collected at the Week 12 (Month 3) visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 2000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)0 Participants
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 2000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)4 Participants
Secondary

Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 500 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)

The number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment (\<=10 dB) to impairment (\>10 dB) when measure at 500 Hz. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

Time frame: 3 Months

Population: Subjects that had no impairment at the baseline visit (air-bone gap \<=10 dB) and had an audiogram collected at the Week 12 (Month 3) visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 500 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)8 Participants
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 500 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)7 Participants
Secondary

Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-1

Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in. Questionnaire - subjects were instructed to record the effect on their daily activities of their total vertigo experienced that day using a 5-point scoring system: 0 = normal activity 1. = slight limitation 2. = moderate limitation 3. = sick at home 4. = bedridden

Time frame: 3 months

Population: A subject is included in the analysis if they received study drug, had a baseline definitive vertigo measurement for the 4-week lead-in period and at least one 4-week definitive vertigo measurement post-baseline, i.e., at least one post-baseline daily diary entry. The model and corresponding method of estimation adjusted for overdispersion and addressed missing 4-week intervals under the assumption of Missing at Random (MAR).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-11.2 daysStandard Deviation 2.32
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-12.3 daysStandard Deviation 4.58
Secondary

Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-2

Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in. Questionnaire - subjects were instructed to record the effect on their daily activities of their total vertigo experienced that day using a 5-point scoring system: 0 = normal activity 1. = slight limitation 2. = moderate limitation 3. = sick at home 4. = bedridden

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-21.2 daysStandard Deviation 2.18
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-22.2 daysStandard Deviation 4.68
Secondary

Otoscopic Examination - Tympanic Membrane Perforation at Week 12 (Month 3)

Otoscopic examinations were conducted at each visit. It was considered important to understand if the tympanic perforation that resulted from the IT injection at the Baseline visit persisted at the end of study visit (Week12 \[Month 3\]). Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Only subjects that had a Month 3 otoscopic examination are included in assessment of this emdpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OTO-104 (Full Analysis Set -1)Otoscopic Examination - Tympanic Membrane Perforation at Week 12 (Month 3)1 Participants
Placebo (Full Analysis Set - 1)Otoscopic Examination - Tympanic Membrane Perforation at Week 12 (Month 3)0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026