Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Conditions
Keywords
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Fibrosis, Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias, Lung Diseases
Brief summary
This Phase 2 study is to be conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and activity of 400 mg of belumosudil orally (PO) once-daily (QD) compared to Best Supportive Care (BSC) in male and postmenopausal/surgically sterilized female subjects with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). The primary objectives are to evaluate the: * Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline to 24 weeks after dosing with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD in subjects with IPF compared to BSC * Safety and tolerability of belumosudil 400 mg PO QD when administered for 24 weeks to subjects with IPF compared to BSC
Detailed description
Study KD025-207 is a Phase 2, randomized, 2-part, open-label, crossover study in subjects with IPF. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and activity of 400 mg of belumosudil administered orally (PO) every day (QD) compared to Best Standard of Care (BSC) in subjects with IPF who have previously been treated with or declined treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib. The primary objectives are to evaluate the change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), and the safety and tolerability from baseline to 24 weeks in subjects with IPF after dosing with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD compared to BSC. Part 1: Randomized, Open-label for 24 Weeks Approximately 81 eligible subjects with IPF are to be enrolled, in 10 to 15 sites, and randomized in a 2:1 ratio (belumosudil:BSC) to 1 of the following 2 groups: * Belumosudil-R (Investigational Group): Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD for 24 weeks * BSC-R (Control Group): BSC for 24 weeks The study plan is for 54 subjects to be entered into the Belumosudil-R Treatment Group and 27 subjects into the BSC-R Treatment Group. This sample size provides over 90% power at the 2-sided 0.05 significance level to detect a 20% difference between treatment groups at 24 weeks in percentage change from baseline in FVC assuming a standard deviation (SD) in percentage change from baseline in FVC of 17%. The sample size of 54 subjects receiving belumosudil provides over 90% probability of ≥ 1 subject in the study experiencing an AE that had an underlying rate of ≥ 5%. Part 2: Continuation of Belumosudil Therapy or Crossover to Belumosudil Therapy Subjects in the Belumosudil-R group who complete 24 weeks of treatment with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD have the option of continuing therapy with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD up to an additional 72 weeks if there are no safety signals and if clinical progress continues. No subject in the Belumosudil-R group is to be permitted to receive therapy with belumosudil greater than a total of 96 weeks. Subjects in control group BSC-R who complete 24 weeks of BSC have the option of crossing over to therapy with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD for up to 96 weeks if there are no safety signals and if clinical progress continues. No subject in control group BSC-R is to be permitted to receive belumosudil 400 mg PO QD therapy greater than 96 weeks. Follow-up Period: Follow-up Visits are to occur 30 days (± 3 days) after the last dose of belumosudil during which subjects are to undergo safety assessments. (A Follow-up Visit is not necessary for subjects receiving BSC.) Duration of Study for Individual Subjects: 1. Subjects randomized to belumosudil: total up to 104 weeks (4-week screening, 96-week treatment with belumosudil, and 4-week follow-up) 2. Subject randomized to BSC: total up to 128 weeks (4-week screening; up to 24-week treatment with BSC, 96-week treatment with belumosudil, and 4-week follow-up) Efficacy Assessments * FVC * FVC% Predicted * 6-minute Walking Distance (6MWD) * Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) * Lung Fibrosis (by HRCT and Radiologist's Visual Assessments) * Time to Acute Exacerbation * Time to Progression of IPF * Time to Respiratory-related Hospitalization * Time to Respiratory-related Death * St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Biomarker Assessments * Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) * Chemokine Ligand 18 (CCL18) * Surfactant Protein-D (SPD) Safety Assessments * Adverse event (AE) * Serious adverse event (SAE) * Physical examination (PE) * Vital signs (VS) * Clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis) * Electrocardiogram (ECG) * Reason for treatment discontinuation due to toxicity Analyses Efficacy and safety are to be analyzed at the end of Part 1 (Week 24) and for the Entire Treatment Period (Parts 1 and 2). Analyses of study subjects are to be grouped and defined as follows: * Belumosudil-R: subjects randomized to belumosudil * BSC-R: subjects randomized to BSC * Belumosudil-WC: subjects randomized to belumosudil plus subjects randomized to BSC and who cross over to treatment with belumosudil * BSC-NC: subjects randomized to BSC and who cross over to treatment with belumosudil but have data censored by the date of crossover
Interventions
Treatment/drug as determined by each subject's prescribing physician
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
In Part 1: Subjects are randomized to treatment with either Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD (Belumosudil-R) or to BSC (BSC-R). In Part 2: Subjects who are randomized and receive Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD during Part 1 have the option to continue treatment with Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD and subjects randomized to BSC have the option to cross over to treatment with Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD. No subject is permitted \> 96 weeks of treatment with belumosudil
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
A subject had to meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for the study: 1. Adult male and postmenopausal/surgically sterilized female subjects at least 18 years of age (if female, was surgically sterilized \[i.e., total hysterectomy, or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy\]). 2. Able to provide written informed consent before the performance of any study specific procedures. 3. IPF diagnosis within 5 years before study entry, proven according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society consensus conference criteria, with surgical lung biopsy. In the absence of a surgical lung biopsy, high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) consistent with usual interstitial pneumonitis. 4. Resting state pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 88% with or without supplemental oxygen, Forced Vital Capacity % (FVC%) ≥ 50% normal predicted value, and diffusing capcity (in the lung) of carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥ 30% normal predicted value at baseline. 5. Men with partners of childbearing potential willing to use 2 medically acceptable methods of contraception during the trial and for 3 months after the last dose of study drug. Effective birth control includes: 1. Intrauterine device plus 1 barrier method 2. Stable doses of hormonal contraception for ≥ 3 months (e.g., oral, injectible, implant, transdermal) plus 1 barrier method 3. 2 barrier methods. Effective barrier methods were male or female condoms, diaphragms, and spermicides (creams or gels containing a chemical to kill sperm) 4. Vasectomy. 6. Have adequate bone marrow function: 1. Absolute neutrophil count \> 1500/mm\^3 2. Hemoglobin (Hb) \> 9.0 g/L 3. Platelets \> 100,000/mm\^3 7. Willing to complete all study measurements and assessments in compliance with protocol 8. Had either received pirfenidone and/or nintedanib or offered both treatments (with last dose administered at least 1 month before the expected start of study drug dosing). If either or both pirfenidone and nintedanib treatment had not been given, then documentation that the subject was offered both treatments must have been documented.
Exclusion criteria
A subject who met any of the following criteria was ineligible for the study: 1. Interstitial lung disease caused by conditions other than IPF 2. Severe concomitant illness limiting life expectancy (\< 1 year) 3. DLCO \< 30% predicted 4. Residual volume (RV) ≥ 120% predicted 5. Obstructive lung disease: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1/FVC ratio \< 0.70) 6. Documented sustained improvement of the subject's IPF condition up to 12 months before study entry with or without IPF-specific therapy 7. Pulmonary infection or upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) within 4 weeks before study entry 8. Acute or chronic impairment (other than dyspnea) limiting the ability to comply with study requirements (e.g., pulmonary function tests \[PFTs\]) 9. Chronic heart failure with New York Heart Association Class III/IV or known left ventricular ejection fraction \< 25% 10. Moderate to severe hepatic impairment (i.e., Child-Pugh Class B or C) 11. Estimated creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min 12. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.0 \* upper limit of normal (ULN) 13. Hb \< 75% of the lower limit of normal 14. Systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg 15. Pregnant or breastfeeding female subject 16. Men whose partner is pregnant or breastfeeding 17. Current drug or alcohol dependence 18. Chronic treatment with the following drugs within 4 weeks of study entry and during the study: 1. Immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs including cyclophosphamide and azathioprine 2. Antifibrotic drugs including pirfenidone, nintedanib, D-penicillamine, colchicine, tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers, imatinib, and interferon-γ 3. Chronic use of N-acetylcysteine prescribed for IPF (\> 600 mg/day) 4. Oral anticoagulants prescribed for IPF 19. Treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists within 4 weeks before study entry 20. Systemic treatment within 4 weeks before study entry with cyclosporine A or tacrolimus, everolimus, or sirolimus (calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors) 21. Previous exposure to belumosudil or known allergy/sensitivity to belumosudil or any other Rho-associated protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor 22. Planned treatment or treatment with another investigational drug within 4 weeks before study entry 23. Taking a medication with the potential for QTc prolongation 24. Taking a drug sensitive substrate of CYP enzymes 25. Taking a strong inducer of CYP3A4 26. Had consumed an herbal medication (e.g., St. John's Wort) or grapefruit/grapefruit juice within 14 days prior to the Week 1 Day 1 visit
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | 24 weeks | Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC-- Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L |
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | 24 weeks | Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC%: 80% to 120% |
| Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC had the option of crossing over at 24 weeks. | Percentage of subjects with non-serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Severity of TEAEs were measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 22.1 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = fatal). |
| Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC and crossing over also up to 24 weeks of BSC. | Percentage of subjects with serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil and/or BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related. |
| Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil | Percentage of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to subjects discontinuing from treatment. Investigators assessed whether TEAEs leading to discontinuation were related to study drug (possibly, probably, or definitely), belumosudil 400 mg PO QD. |
| Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 8, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC also had the option of crossing over to treatment with belumosudil at 24 weeks. | Percentage of subjects with deaths by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | The mean change in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, to Week 48, and to Week 96. Positive change = improvement; negative change = worsening |
| Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | The percentage of subjects who have at least a 50 meter improvement in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96. |
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40% |
| Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Percentage of the number of subjects who exhibit less than a -15% decrease in diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), measured as % from baseline at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40% |
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | The change in Total Lung Fibrosis mean score from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Measurements using quantitative high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) and include (1) extent of fibrotic abnormality; (2) fibrosis score; (3) ground glass opacity; (4) honeycombing score; (5) kurtosis of lung voxel intensity; (6) skewness of lung voxel intensity; (7) standard deviation of voxel; (8) CT total lung volume; (9) normal lung; (10) reticular score; and (11) evaluation of change on sequential scans. The Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score measures the extent of reticular patterns with architectural distortion due to fibrosis using a support vector machine classifier. Range: 0 to 100. Higher scores imply greater impairment. |
| Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | The categorical changes of lung fibrosis using subjective visual assessments by radiologists from sequential scans at baseline, Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96. Changes were categorized as: (1) much better; (2) slightly better; (3) same; (4) slightly worse; and (5) much worse. This categorization is simplified as Better (Much or Slightly); Same; and Worse (Slightly or Much). |
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | 24 weeks | Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC) at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. Normal FVC--Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy famles 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I Index = 0 to 3 points * Stage II Index= 4 to 5 points * Stage III Index = 6 to 8 points |
| Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Acute exacerbation of IPF was defined by the following symptoms within 1 month that could not be explained by other reasons: (1) aggravated dyspnea; (2) newly discovered chest interstitial lung abnormality (by radiograph or HRCT); (3) SpO2 decrease to \< 88%. Acute exacerbation was diagnosed if Items #1 and #2 were present or if Items #1 and #3 were present and the following AEs did not occur: (A) any AE with the Preferred Term containing the word infection or cardiac failure; (B) pulmonary embolism; (C) pneumothorax. |
| Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Progression of IPF exacerbation was defined as the probability of a subject exhibiting IPF time from baseline to any of the following: (1) probability of first respiratory-related hospitalization; (2) probability of respiratory-related death; absolute decline in FVC% Predicted value of ≥ 10% vs. FVC %; probability of predicted value recorded at baseline; and (4) probability of absolute decline in DLCO, adjusted for hemoglobin (Hb), Percent of predicted value of ≥ 15% vs. DLCO at baseline. Subjects randomized to and received BSC were censored on crossover. |
| Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Probability of first-related hospitalization defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the terms respiratory and the AE resulted in a hospitalization. Subjects randomized and received BSC were censored on crossover. Note: The hazard ratios for Belumosudil-R vs. BSC-NC and for Belumosudil-WC vs. BSC-NC were not calculable. |
| Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Probability of respiratory-related death, defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the term respiratory and the AE resulted in a death. Subjects randomized to and who received BSC were censored on crossover. |
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in subjects with obstructive airways disease consisting of 2 parts: (1) symptoms component (frequency & severity) with a 3-month recall; and (2) activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness. Impact components (social functioning, psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease) refer to current state as the recall. Changes were assessed from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96. The SGRQ scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater limitations. Based on empirical data and interviews with subjects, a mean change score of 4 units is associated with slightly efficacious treatment, 8 units for moderately efficacious change, and 12 units for very efficacious treatment |
| Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 Weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | The change in Data-driven Texture Analysis (DTA) Lung Fibrosis mean score using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline to Weeks 24, 48, and 96. The change in DTA Lung Fibrosis mean score was measured using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. DTA fibrosis score was computed as the number of Region of Interests (ROIs) classified as fibrotic divided by the total number of ROIs sampled from the lung segmentation volume. The DTA fibrosis score ranged from 0 - 100%, where higher scores indicated worsening of disease. |
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Weeks 48 and 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FVC: Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.25 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L |
| Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Change in the mean ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) divided by the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FEV1: 80% to 120% FEV1/FVC = Within 5% of predicted ratio |
| Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | 24 weeks | Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC)% Predicted at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I = 0 to 3 points * Stage II = 4 to 5 points * Stage III = 6 to 8 points |
| Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Percentage of subjects exhibiting at least a 5% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96 |
| Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) | Percentage of subjects who exhibited at least a 10% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96 |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 76 unique subjects were randomized in this study. Subjects were randomized to belumosudil 400 mg PO QD or Best Standard of Care (BSC) for first 24 weeks. Subjects were randomized to belumosudil had the option of continuing treatment with belumosudil. No subject in either randomized group were permitted \> 96 weeks of treatment. After 24 weeks, subjects randomized to BSC were permitted to crossover to belumosudil; 17 subjects crossed over.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD Randomized to treatment with belumosudil 400 mg (two 200-mg tablets) orally once daily. | 51 |
| BSC-R Subjects randomized to treatment with best supportive care for 24 weeks. | 24 |
| Total | 75 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Cross-overed before Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | 0 | 5 |
| Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Death | 0 | 1 |
| Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Subject was randomized but did not receive treatment | 1 | 0 |
| Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks) | Death | 7 | 2 |
| Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks) | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks) | Other | 10 | 6 |
| Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks) | Withdrawal by Subject | 10 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD | BSC-R | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 72.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 | 74.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 | 73.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 45 Participants | 24 Participants | 69 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| GAP Stage Stage I | 11 Participants | 7 Participants | 18 Participants |
| GAP Stage Stage II | 31 Participants | 12 Participants | 43 Participants |
| GAP Stage Stage III | 9 Participants | 5 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Presence of Aggravated Dyspnea Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent No | 33 Participants | 13 Participants | 46 Participants |
| Presence of Aggravated Dyspnea Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent Yes | 18 Participants | 11 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Presence of Chest Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent No | 28 Participants | 13 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Presence of Chest Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent Yes | 23 Participants | 11 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Prior Use of Nintedanib No | 41 Participants | 20 Participants | 61 Participants |
| Prior Use of Nintedanib Yes | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Prior Use of Pirfenidone No | 38 Participants | 20 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Prior Use of Pirfenidone Yes | 13 Participants | 4 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib No | 32 Participants | 18 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib Yes | 19 Participants | 6 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 49 Participants | 24 Participants | 73 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants | 6 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 38 Participants | 18 Participants | 56 Participants |
| SpO2 < 88% Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent No | 44 Participants | 20 Participants | 64 Participants |
| SpO2 < 88% Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent Yes | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 7 / 51 | 3 / 24 | 9 / 68 | 1 / 24 | 10 / 75 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 50 / 51 | 23 / 24 | 67 / 68 | 19 / 24 | 73 / 75 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 29 / 51 | 10 / 24 | 38 / 68 | 4 / 24 | 39 / 75 |
Outcome results
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24
Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC-- Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Analysis was performed using randomized population. Available data for change from baseline at Week 24 have been reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | At Week 24 | 2626.8 mL | Standard Deviation 886.9 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline | 2608.2 mL | Standard Deviation 829.6 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -115.8 mL | Standard Deviation 330.3 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | At Week 24 | 2438.1 mL | Standard Deviation 757.1 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline | 2516.7 mL | Standard Deviation 741.8 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -71.2 mL | Standard Deviation 254.2 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | At Week 24 | 2617.4 mL | Standard Deviation 890.8 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline | 2608.8 mL | Standard Deviation 840.4 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -110.8 mL | Standard Deviation 316.4 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline | 2516.7 mL | Standard Deviation 741.8 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -103.4 mL | Standard Deviation 225 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | At Week 24 | 2436.8 mL | Standard Deviation 784.5 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | At Week 24 | 2533.7 mL | Standard Deviation 832.7 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Baseline | 2569.3 mL | Standard Deviation 794.3 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -99.5 mL | Standard Deviation 281.4 |
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24
Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC%: 80% to 120%
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: Analysis was performed using randomized population. Available data for change from baseline at Week 24 have been reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Baseline | 69.61 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 18.07 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -2.82 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 7.57 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | At Week 24 | 69.71 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | At Week 24 | 68.29 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 13.41 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Baseline | 68.46 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 15.63 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -2.00 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 7.36 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | At Week 24 | 69.96 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 18.43 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Baseline | 69.73 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -2.66 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 7.49 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Baseline | 68.46 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 15.63 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -3.00 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 6.41 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | At Week 24 | 68.58 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 13.98 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | At Week 24 | 69.24 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 16.25 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Baseline | 69.19 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 16.71 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24 | Change at Week 24 | -2.58 % of predicted | Standard Deviation 7.16 |
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment
Percentage of subjects with deaths by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 8, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC also had the option of crossing over to treatment with belumosudil at 24 weeks.
Population: All subjects treated in study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment | 0 Participants |
| BSC-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment | 0 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Total | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment | 0 Participants |
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment
Percentage of subjects with non-serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Severity of TEAEs were measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 22.1 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = fatal).
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC had the option of crossing over at 24 weeks.
Population: All subjects treated in study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades) | 23 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4) | 2 Participants |
| BSC-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades) | 9 Participants |
| BSC-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4) | 0 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades) | 32 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4) | 2 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4) | 0 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades) | 2 Participants |
| Total | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades) | 32 Participants |
| Total | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment | TEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4) | 2 Participants |
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment
Percentage of subjects with serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil and/or BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC and crossing over also up to 24 weeks of BSC.
Population: All subjects treated in study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment | 2 Participants |
| BSC-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment | 2 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment | 0 Participants |
| Total | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment | 2 Participants |
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil
Percentage of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to subjects discontinuing from treatment. Investigators assessed whether TEAEs leading to discontinuation were related to study drug (possibly, probably, or definitely), belumosudil 400 mg PO QD.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil
Population: Subjects who received belumosudil 400 mg PO QD were included. Subjects who only received BSC and did not cross over to treatment with belumosudil were not included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | All TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation | 14 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | TEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation | 5 Participants |
| BSC-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | TEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation | 1 Participants |
| BSC-R | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | All TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation | 8 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | All TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation | 22 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | TEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation | 6 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | All TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation | 22 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil | TEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation | 6 Participants |
Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
The categorical changes of lung fibrosis using subjective visual assessments by radiologists from sequential scans at baseline, Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96. Changes were categorized as: (1) much better; (2) slightly better; (3) same; (4) slightly worse; and (5) much worse. This categorization is simplified as Better (Much or Slightly); Same; and Worse (Slightly or Much).
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: All randomized subjects.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Same | 6 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Worse | 13 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Same | 1 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Better | 0 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Better | 0 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Same | 22 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Worse | 3 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Worse | 10 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Better | 0 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Same | 1 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Better | 1 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Same | 13 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Worse | 4 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Better | 1 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Worse | 5 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Better | 1 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Same | 0 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Worse | 1 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Better | 1 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Same | 6 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Same | 25 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Better | 1 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Worse | 13 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Better | 1 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Worse | 3 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Same | 1 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Worse | 17 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Better | 0 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Same | 11 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Same | 0 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Worse | 4 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Better | 1 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Better | 1 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Same | 7 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Same | 1 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Better | 1 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48: Worse | 15 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Worse | 4 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Worse | 17 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96: Better | 1 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24: Same | 35 Participants |
Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
The change in Data-driven Texture Analysis (DTA) Lung Fibrosis mean score using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline to Weeks 24, 48, and 96. The change in DTA Lung Fibrosis mean score was measured using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. DTA fibrosis score was computed as the number of Region of Interests (ROIs) classified as fibrotic divided by the total number of ROIs sampled from the lung segmentation volume. The DTA fibrosis score ranged from 0 - 100%, where higher scores indicated worsening of disease.
Time frame: Up to 96 Weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: All randomized subjects
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 3.1 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 7.51 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 0.3 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 4.82 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 23.1 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 11.99 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 7.5 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 9.57 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 22.7 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 10.77 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 5.0 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 2.9 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 4.88 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 0.6 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 4.29 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 1.2 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 6.86 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 7.5 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 9.57 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 22.3 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 12.07 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 2.9 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 7.26 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 22.7 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 10.77 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 0.6 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 4.43 |
| Total | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 6.7 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 8.16 |
| Total | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 22.5 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 11.35 |
| Total | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 0.9 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Total | Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 2.9 units on a scale (0-100) | Standard Deviation 6.44 |
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF
Acute exacerbation of IPF was defined by the following symptoms within 1 month that could not be explained by other reasons: (1) aggravated dyspnea; (2) newly discovered chest interstitial lung abnormality (by radiograph or HRCT); (3) SpO2 decrease to \< 88%. Acute exacerbation was diagnosed if Items #1 and #2 were present or if Items #1 and #3 were present and the following AEs did not occur: (A) any AE with the Preferred Term containing the word infection or cardiac failure; (B) pulmonary embolism; (C) pneumothorax.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | 48 weeks | 0.85 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | 24 weeks | 0.91 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | 96 weeks | 0.64 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | 96 weeks | 0.66 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | 48 weeks | 0.84 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | 24 weeks | 0.91 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF | 24 weeks | 0.92 Event-free Probability |
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization
Probability of first-related hospitalization defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the terms respiratory and the AE resulted in a hospitalization. Subjects randomized and received BSC were censored on crossover. Note: The hazard ratios for Belumosudil-R vs. BSC-NC and for Belumosudil-WC vs. BSC-NC were not calculable.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: Analysis was of the Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population, defined as consisting of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post-baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization | 24 weeks | 0.98 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization | 48 weeks | 0.89 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization | 96 weeks | 0.79 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization | 96 weeks | 0.75 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization | 24 weeks | 0.96 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization | 48 weeks | 0.85 Event-free Probability |
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF
Progression of IPF exacerbation was defined as the probability of a subject exhibiting IPF time from baseline to any of the following: (1) probability of first respiratory-related hospitalization; (2) probability of respiratory-related death; absolute decline in FVC% Predicted value of ≥ 10% vs. FVC %; probability of predicted value recorded at baseline; and (4) probability of absolute decline in DLCO, adjusted for hemoglobin (Hb), Percent of predicted value of ≥ 15% vs. DLCO at baseline. Subjects randomized to and received BSC were censored on crossover.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | 48 weeks | 0.52 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | 24 weeks | 0.86 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | 96 weeks | 0.20 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | 96 weeks | 0.16 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | 48 weeks | 0.47 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | 24 weeks | 0.80 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF | 24 weeks | 0.66 Event-free Probability |
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death
Probability of respiratory-related death, defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the term respiratory and the AE resulted in a death. Subjects randomized to and who received BSC were censored on crossover.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: Analysis was of the Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population, defined as consisting of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post-baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | 48 weeks | 0.92 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | 24 weeks | 0.98 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | 96 weeks | 0.88 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | 96 weeks | 0.88 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | 48 weeks | 0.91 Event-free Probability |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | 24 weeks | 0.98 Event-free Probability |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death | 24 weeks | 0.95 Event-free Probability |
Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
The mean change in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, to Week 48, and to Week 96. Positive change = improvement; negative change = worsening
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: All randomized subjects
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -23.06 meters | Standard Deviation 78.84 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 368.59 meters | Standard Deviation 168.84 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | -18.33 meters | Standard Deviation 102.45 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -12.11 meters | Standard Deviation 101.78 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -47.80 meters | Standard Deviation 69.8 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 349.25 meters | Standard Deviation 180.4 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -16.60 meters | Standard Deviation 66.8 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 119.00 meters | Standard Deviation 364.61 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 350.12 meters | Standard Deviation 168.88 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -20.98 meters | Standard Deviation 72.8 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 7.53 meters | Standard Deviation 177.88 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | -18.83 meters | Standard Deviation 95.33 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 323.11 meters | Standard Deviation 126.64 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -0.77 meters | Standard Deviation 49.08 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -26.34 meters | Standard Deviation 71.6 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 345.17 meters | Standard Deviation 163.88 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -0.04 meters | Standard Deviation 140.22 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 6.23 meters | Standard Deviation 178.69 |
Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT
Change in the mean ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) divided by the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FEV1: 80% to 120% FEV1/FVC = Within 5% of predicted ratio
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: All randomized subjects
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 24 | -0.006 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0444 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at EOT | -0.010 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0362 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 48 | 0.001 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0251 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -0.012 Units | Standard Deviation 0.042 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Baseline | 0.829 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0613 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 48 | -0.005 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0141 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Baseline | 0.816 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0674 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 24 | 0.013 Units | Standard Deviation 0.031 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -0.014 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0378 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at EOT | 0.011 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0372 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 24 | -0.005 Units | Standard Deviation 0.041 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 48 | -0.001 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0249 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -0.012 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0402 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Baseline | 0.832 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0584 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at EOT | -0.011 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0453 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at EOT | -0.010 Units | Standard Deviation 0 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 24 | 0.016 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0311 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Baseline | 0.816 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0674 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 48 | -0.002 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0232 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Baseline | 0.825 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0623 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at EOT | -0.007 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0436 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 24 | 0.004 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0378 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -0.012 Units | Standard Deviation 0.0391 |
Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40%
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: All randomized subjects
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | -2.9 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 47.3 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -2.7 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -4.2 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -13.7 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | -7.1 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 47.3 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -3.8 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 47.1 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -3.1 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | -3.2 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -6.0 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -4.5 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 48.0 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | -3.9 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -3.6 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 47.3 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | -8.2 % of diffusing capacity of CO | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--
Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC) at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. Normal FVC--Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy famles 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I Index = 0 to 3 points * Stage II Index= 4 to 5 points * Stage III Index = 6 to 8 points
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage I | -117.65 mL |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage II | -219.90 mL |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage III | 101.95 mL |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | No Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib | -80.34 mL |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | No Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib | -46.21 mL |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage I | -156.50 mL |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage III | 7.79 mL |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage II | -179.94 mL |
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT
Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Weeks 48 and 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FVC: Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.25 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: All randomized subjects
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Baseline | 2608.2 mL | Standard Deviation 829.6 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 48 | -197.2 mL | Standard Deviation 331.5 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -141.0 mL | Standard Deviation 401.1 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at EOT | -227.9 mL | Standard Deviation 367.7 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 48 | -82.5 mL | Standard Deviation 329.7 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -264.0 mL | Standard Deviation 896 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at EOT | -110.7 mL | Standard Deviation 397.7 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Baseline | 2516.7 mL | Standard Deviation 741.8 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -122.2 mL | Standard Deviation 384.3 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 48 | -199.6 mL | Standard Deviation 366.1 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at EOT | -207.2 mL | Standard Deviation 353.7 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Baseline | 2608.8 mL | Standard Deviation 840.4 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at EOT | -180.9 mL | Standard Deviation 355.8 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 48 | -177.8 mL | Standard Deviation 358.8 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Baseline | 2569.3 mL | Standard Deviation 794.3 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT | Change at Week 96 | -147.5 mL | Standard Deviation 492.3 |
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--
Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC)% Predicted at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I = 0 to 3 points * Stage II = 4 to 5 points * Stage III = 6 to 8 points
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage I | -4.65 % of predicted |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage II | -6.42 % of predicted |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage III | 2.34 % of predicted |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib | -6.20 % of predicted |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib | -14.91 % of predicted |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage I | -6.53 % of predicted |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage III | -0.15 % of predicted |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- | GAP Stage II | -4.69 % of predicted |
Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96
The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in subjects with obstructive airways disease consisting of 2 parts: (1) symptoms component (frequency & severity) with a 3-month recall; and (2) activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness. Impact components (social functioning, psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease) refer to current state as the recall. Changes were assessed from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96. The SGRQ scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater limitations. Based on empirical data and interviews with subjects, a mean change score of 4 units is associated with slightly efficacious treatment, 8 units for moderately efficacious change, and 12 units for very efficacious treatment
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: All randomized subjects
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 0.36 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.34 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -5.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.74 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Baseline | 64.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.98 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 1.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.61 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Baseline | 74.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.94 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 9.35 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.54 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 2.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -2.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.59 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -2.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.38 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 1.37 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.76 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Baseline | 64.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.29 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 0.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.63 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Baseline | 74.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.94 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -2.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.59 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 2.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.75 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Baseline | 68.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.83 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 24 | -2.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.79 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 0.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.93 |
Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
The change in Total Lung Fibrosis mean score from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Measurements using quantitative high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) and include (1) extent of fibrotic abnormality; (2) fibrosis score; (3) ground glass opacity; (4) honeycombing score; (5) kurtosis of lung voxel intensity; (6) skewness of lung voxel intensity; (7) standard deviation of voxel; (8) CT total lung volume; (9) normal lung; (10) reticular score; and (11) evaluation of change on sequential scans. The Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score measures the extent of reticular patterns with architectural distortion due to fibrosis using a support vector machine classifier. Range: 0 to 100. Higher scores imply greater impairment.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: The mITT Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline FVC assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 6.51 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.76 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 7.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.46 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 30.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.54 |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 6.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.41 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 33.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.81 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 8.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.86 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 6.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.27 |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 1.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.31 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 8.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.55 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 6.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.41 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 31.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.48 |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 6.01 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.74 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 33.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.81 |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 1.41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.31 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 96 | 6.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.09 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Baseline | 32.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.45 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 24 | 4.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.44 |
| Total | Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Change at Week 48 | 6.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.87 |
Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Percentage of subjects who exhibited at least a 10% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 15 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 22 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 7 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 33 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 5 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 5 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 2 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 3 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 17 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 1 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 7 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 4 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 5 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 6 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 9 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 40 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 18 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 26 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 4 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 15 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 18 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 10 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 50 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 10 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 30 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 7 Participants |
Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
The percentage of subjects who have at least a 50 meter improvement in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96.
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No | 12 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No | 24 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes | 6 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No | 31 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes | 5 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes | 6 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes | 2 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No | 3 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No | 16 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes | 2 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No | 6 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes | 4 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes | 5 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes | 8 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes | 8 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No | 37 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No | 15 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No | 28 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes | 2 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No | 11 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No | 15 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes | 11 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No | 48 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes | 10 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No | 32 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | ≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes | 7 Participants |
Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Percentage of the number of subjects who exhibit less than a -15% decrease in diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), measured as % from baseline at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40%
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No | 7 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No | 18 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 10 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No | 29 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 3 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 7 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 4 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No | 1 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No | 14 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 4 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No | 4 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 7 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 5 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 10 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 11 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No | 33 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No | 8 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No | 23 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 6 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No | 9 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No | 8 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 16 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No | 43 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 14 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No | 24 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes | 7 Participants |
Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Percentage of subjects exhibiting at least a 5% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96
Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)
Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 14 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 15 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 14 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 27 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 6 Participants |
| Belumosudil-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 11 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 2 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 3 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 14 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 4 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 4 Participants |
| BSC-R | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 7 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 6 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 14 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 16 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 32 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 17 Participants |
| Belumosudil-WC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 19 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 7 Participants |
| BSC-NC | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 12 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: No | 17 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: Yes | 21 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 24: No | 42 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: Yes | 18 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 48: No | 20 Participants |
| Total | Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 | At Week 96: Yes | 8 Participants |