Skip to content

A 2-Part, Phase 2 Open-label and Crossover Study of Belumosudil for Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Randomized, Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Activity of Belumosudil in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02688647
Enrollment
76
Registered
2016-02-23
Start date
2016-05-26
Completion date
2021-04-13
Last updated
2022-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

Pulmonary Fibrosis, Fibrosis, Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias, Lung Diseases

Brief summary

This Phase 2 study is to be conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and activity of 400 mg of belumosudil orally (PO) once-daily (QD) compared to Best Supportive Care (BSC) in male and postmenopausal/surgically sterilized female subjects with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). The primary objectives are to evaluate the: * Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline to 24 weeks after dosing with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD in subjects with IPF compared to BSC * Safety and tolerability of belumosudil 400 mg PO QD when administered for 24 weeks to subjects with IPF compared to BSC

Detailed description

Study KD025-207 is a Phase 2, randomized, 2-part, open-label, crossover study in subjects with IPF. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and activity of 400 mg of belumosudil administered orally (PO) every day (QD) compared to Best Standard of Care (BSC) in subjects with IPF who have previously been treated with or declined treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib. The primary objectives are to evaluate the change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), and the safety and tolerability from baseline to 24 weeks in subjects with IPF after dosing with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD compared to BSC. Part 1: Randomized, Open-label for 24 Weeks Approximately 81 eligible subjects with IPF are to be enrolled, in 10 to 15 sites, and randomized in a 2:1 ratio (belumosudil:BSC) to 1 of the following 2 groups: * Belumosudil-R (Investigational Group): Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD for 24 weeks * BSC-R (Control Group): BSC for 24 weeks The study plan is for 54 subjects to be entered into the Belumosudil-R Treatment Group and 27 subjects into the BSC-R Treatment Group. This sample size provides over 90% power at the 2-sided 0.05 significance level to detect a 20% difference between treatment groups at 24 weeks in percentage change from baseline in FVC assuming a standard deviation (SD) in percentage change from baseline in FVC of 17%. The sample size of 54 subjects receiving belumosudil provides over 90% probability of ≥ 1 subject in the study experiencing an AE that had an underlying rate of ≥ 5%. Part 2: Continuation of Belumosudil Therapy or Crossover to Belumosudil Therapy Subjects in the Belumosudil-R group who complete 24 weeks of treatment with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD have the option of continuing therapy with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD up to an additional 72 weeks if there are no safety signals and if clinical progress continues. No subject in the Belumosudil-R group is to be permitted to receive therapy with belumosudil greater than a total of 96 weeks. Subjects in control group BSC-R who complete 24 weeks of BSC have the option of crossing over to therapy with belumosudil 400 mg PO QD for up to 96 weeks if there are no safety signals and if clinical progress continues. No subject in control group BSC-R is to be permitted to receive belumosudil 400 mg PO QD therapy greater than 96 weeks. Follow-up Period: Follow-up Visits are to occur 30 days (± 3 days) after the last dose of belumosudil during which subjects are to undergo safety assessments. (A Follow-up Visit is not necessary for subjects receiving BSC.) Duration of Study for Individual Subjects: 1. Subjects randomized to belumosudil: total up to 104 weeks (4-week screening, 96-week treatment with belumosudil, and 4-week follow-up) 2. Subject randomized to BSC: total up to 128 weeks (4-week screening; up to 24-week treatment with BSC, 96-week treatment with belumosudil, and 4-week follow-up) Efficacy Assessments * FVC * FVC% Predicted * 6-minute Walking Distance (6MWD) * Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) * Lung Fibrosis (by HRCT and Radiologist's Visual Assessments) * Time to Acute Exacerbation * Time to Progression of IPF * Time to Respiratory-related Hospitalization * Time to Respiratory-related Death * St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Biomarker Assessments * Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) * Chemokine Ligand 18 (CCL18) * Surfactant Protein-D (SPD) Safety Assessments * Adverse event (AE) * Serious adverse event (SAE) * Physical examination (PE) * Vital signs (VS) * Clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis) * Electrocardiogram (ECG) * Reason for treatment discontinuation due to toxicity Analyses Efficacy and safety are to be analyzed at the end of Part 1 (Week 24) and for the Entire Treatment Period (Parts 1 and 2). Analyses of study subjects are to be grouped and defined as follows: * Belumosudil-R: subjects randomized to belumosudil * BSC-R: subjects randomized to BSC * Belumosudil-WC: subjects randomized to belumosudil plus subjects randomized to BSC and who cross over to treatment with belumosudil * BSC-NC: subjects randomized to BSC and who cross over to treatment with belumosudil but have data censored by the date of crossover

Interventions

OTHERBSC

Treatment/drug as determined by each subject's prescribing physician

Sponsors

Kadmon Corporation, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

In Part 1: Subjects are randomized to treatment with either Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD (Belumosudil-R) or to BSC (BSC-R). In Part 2: Subjects who are randomized and receive Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD during Part 1 have the option to continue treatment with Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD and subjects randomized to BSC have the option to cross over to treatment with Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD. No subject is permitted \> 96 weeks of treatment with belumosudil

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A subject had to meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for the study: 1. Adult male and postmenopausal/surgically sterilized female subjects at least 18 years of age (if female, was surgically sterilized \[i.e., total hysterectomy, or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy\]). 2. Able to provide written informed consent before the performance of any study specific procedures. 3. IPF diagnosis within 5 years before study entry, proven according to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society consensus conference criteria, with surgical lung biopsy. In the absence of a surgical lung biopsy, high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) consistent with usual interstitial pneumonitis. 4. Resting state pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 88% with or without supplemental oxygen, Forced Vital Capacity % (FVC%) ≥ 50% normal predicted value, and diffusing capcity (in the lung) of carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥ 30% normal predicted value at baseline. 5. Men with partners of childbearing potential willing to use 2 medically acceptable methods of contraception during the trial and for 3 months after the last dose of study drug. Effective birth control includes: 1. Intrauterine device plus 1 barrier method 2. Stable doses of hormonal contraception for ≥ 3 months (e.g., oral, injectible, implant, transdermal) plus 1 barrier method 3. 2 barrier methods. Effective barrier methods were male or female condoms, diaphragms, and spermicides (creams or gels containing a chemical to kill sperm) 4. Vasectomy. 6. Have adequate bone marrow function: 1. Absolute neutrophil count \> 1500/mm\^3 2. Hemoglobin (Hb) \> 9.0 g/L 3. Platelets \> 100,000/mm\^3 7. Willing to complete all study measurements and assessments in compliance with protocol 8. Had either received pirfenidone and/or nintedanib or offered both treatments (with last dose administered at least 1 month before the expected start of study drug dosing). If either or both pirfenidone and nintedanib treatment had not been given, then documentation that the subject was offered both treatments must have been documented.

Exclusion criteria

A subject who met any of the following criteria was ineligible for the study: 1. Interstitial lung disease caused by conditions other than IPF 2. Severe concomitant illness limiting life expectancy (\< 1 year) 3. DLCO \< 30% predicted 4. Residual volume (RV) ≥ 120% predicted 5. Obstructive lung disease: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1/FVC ratio \< 0.70) 6. Documented sustained improvement of the subject's IPF condition up to 12 months before study entry with or without IPF-specific therapy 7. Pulmonary infection or upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) within 4 weeks before study entry 8. Acute or chronic impairment (other than dyspnea) limiting the ability to comply with study requirements (e.g., pulmonary function tests \[PFTs\]) 9. Chronic heart failure with New York Heart Association Class III/IV or known left ventricular ejection fraction \< 25% 10. Moderate to severe hepatic impairment (i.e., Child-Pugh Class B or C) 11. Estimated creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min 12. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.0 \* upper limit of normal (ULN) 13. Hb \< 75% of the lower limit of normal 14. Systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg 15. Pregnant or breastfeeding female subject 16. Men whose partner is pregnant or breastfeeding 17. Current drug or alcohol dependence 18. Chronic treatment with the following drugs within 4 weeks of study entry and during the study: 1. Immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs including cyclophosphamide and azathioprine 2. Antifibrotic drugs including pirfenidone, nintedanib, D-penicillamine, colchicine, tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers, imatinib, and interferon-γ 3. Chronic use of N-acetylcysteine prescribed for IPF (\> 600 mg/day) 4. Oral anticoagulants prescribed for IPF 19. Treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists within 4 weeks before study entry 20. Systemic treatment within 4 weeks before study entry with cyclosporine A or tacrolimus, everolimus, or sirolimus (calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors) 21. Previous exposure to belumosudil or known allergy/sensitivity to belumosudil or any other Rho-associated protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor 22. Planned treatment or treatment with another investigational drug within 4 weeks before study entry 23. Taking a medication with the potential for QTc prolongation 24. Taking a drug sensitive substrate of CYP enzymes 25. Taking a strong inducer of CYP3A4 26. Had consumed an herbal medication (e.g., St. John's Wort) or grapefruit/grapefruit juice within 14 days prior to the Week 1 Day 1 visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 2424 weeksChanges in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC-- Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 2424 weeksChanges in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC%: 80% to 120%
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC had the option of crossing over at 24 weeks.Percentage of subjects with non-serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Severity of TEAEs were measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 22.1 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = fatal).
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study TreatmentUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC and crossing over also up to 24 weeks of BSC.Percentage of subjects with serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil and/or BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related.
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudilPercentage of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to subjects discontinuing from treatment. Investigators assessed whether TEAEs leading to discontinuation were related to study drug (possibly, probably, or definitely), belumosudil 400 mg PO QD.
Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study TreatmentUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 8, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC also had the option of crossing over to treatment with belumosudil at 24 weeks.Percentage of subjects with deaths by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)The mean change in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, to Week 48, and to Week 96. Positive change = improvement; negative change = worsening
Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)The percentage of subjects who have at least a 50 meter improvement in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96.
Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40%
Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Percentage of the number of subjects who exhibit less than a -15% decrease in diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), measured as % from baseline at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40%
Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)The change in Total Lung Fibrosis mean score from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Measurements using quantitative high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) and include (1) extent of fibrotic abnormality; (2) fibrosis score; (3) ground glass opacity; (4) honeycombing score; (5) kurtosis of lung voxel intensity; (6) skewness of lung voxel intensity; (7) standard deviation of voxel; (8) CT total lung volume; (9) normal lung; (10) reticular score; and (11) evaluation of change on sequential scans. The Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score measures the extent of reticular patterns with architectural distortion due to fibrosis using a support vector machine classifier. Range: 0 to 100. Higher scores imply greater impairment.
Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)The categorical changes of lung fibrosis using subjective visual assessments by radiologists from sequential scans at baseline, Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96. Changes were categorized as: (1) much better; (2) slightly better; (3) same; (4) slightly worse; and (5) much worse. This categorization is simplified as Better (Much or Slightly); Same; and Worse (Slightly or Much).
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--24 weeksChanges in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC) at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. Normal FVC--Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy famles 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I Index = 0 to 3 points * Stage II Index= 4 to 5 points * Stage III Index = 6 to 8 points
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPFUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Acute exacerbation of IPF was defined by the following symptoms within 1 month that could not be explained by other reasons: (1) aggravated dyspnea; (2) newly discovered chest interstitial lung abnormality (by radiograph or HRCT); (3) SpO2 decrease to \< 88%. Acute exacerbation was diagnosed if Items #1 and #2 were present or if Items #1 and #3 were present and the following AEs did not occur: (A) any AE with the Preferred Term containing the word infection or cardiac failure; (B) pulmonary embolism; (C) pneumothorax.
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPFUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Progression of IPF exacerbation was defined as the probability of a subject exhibiting IPF time from baseline to any of the following: (1) probability of first respiratory-related hospitalization; (2) probability of respiratory-related death; absolute decline in FVC% Predicted value of ≥ 10% vs. FVC %; probability of predicted value recorded at baseline; and (4) probability of absolute decline in DLCO, adjusted for hemoglobin (Hb), Percent of predicted value of ≥ 15% vs. DLCO at baseline. Subjects randomized to and received BSC were censored on crossover.
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related HospitalizationUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Probability of first-related hospitalization defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the terms respiratory and the AE resulted in a hospitalization. Subjects randomized and received BSC were censored on crossover. Note: The hazard ratios for Belumosudil-R vs. BSC-NC and for Belumosudil-WC vs. BSC-NC were not calculable.
Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related DeathUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Probability of respiratory-related death, defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the term respiratory and the AE resulted in a death. Subjects randomized to and who received BSC were censored on crossover.
Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in subjects with obstructive airways disease consisting of 2 parts: (1) symptoms component (frequency & severity) with a 3-month recall; and (2) activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness. Impact components (social functioning, psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease) refer to current state as the recall. Changes were assessed from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96. The SGRQ scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater limitations. Based on empirical data and interviews with subjects, a mean change score of 4 units is associated with slightly efficacious treatment, 8 units for moderately efficacious change, and 12 units for very efficacious treatment
Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 Weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)The change in Data-driven Texture Analysis (DTA) Lung Fibrosis mean score using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline to Weeks 24, 48, and 96. The change in DTA Lung Fibrosis mean score was measured using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. DTA fibrosis score was computed as the number of Region of Interests (ROIs) classified as fibrotic divided by the total number of ROIs sampled from the lung segmentation volume. The DTA fibrosis score ranged from 0 - 100%, where higher scores indicated worsening of disease.
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Weeks 48 and 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FVC: Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.25 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L
Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTUp to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Change in the mean ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) divided by the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FEV1: 80% to 120% FEV1/FVC = Within 5% of predicted ratio
Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--24 weeksChanges in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC)% Predicted at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I = 0 to 3 points * Stage II = 4 to 5 points * Stage III = 6 to 8 points
Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Percentage of subjects exhibiting at least a 5% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96
Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)Percentage of subjects who exhibited at least a 10% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 76 unique subjects were randomized in this study. Subjects were randomized to belumosudil 400 mg PO QD or Best Standard of Care (BSC) for first 24 weeks. Subjects were randomized to belumosudil had the option of continuing treatment with belumosudil. No subject in either randomized group were permitted \> 96 weeks of treatment. After 24 weeks, subjects randomized to BSC were permitted to crossover to belumosudil; 17 subjects crossed over.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Belumosudil 400 mg PO QD
Randomized to treatment with belumosudil 400 mg (two 200-mg tablets) orally once daily.
51
BSC-R
Subjects randomized to treatment with best supportive care for 24 weeks.
24
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Cross-overed before Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks)05
Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Death01
Initial Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Subject was randomized but did not receive treatment10
Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks)Death72
Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up10
Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks)Other106
Post Switch Treatment Period (72 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject106

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBelumosudil 400 mg PO QDBSC-RTotal
Age, Continuous72.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
74.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants24 Participants69 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
GAP Stage
Stage I
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
GAP Stage
Stage II
31 Participants12 Participants43 Participants
GAP Stage
Stage III
9 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Presence of Aggravated Dyspnea Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent
No
33 Participants13 Participants46 Participants
Presence of Aggravated Dyspnea Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent
Yes
18 Participants11 Participants29 Participants
Presence of Chest Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent
No
28 Participants13 Participants41 Participants
Presence of Chest Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent
Yes
23 Participants11 Participants34 Participants
Prior Use of Nintedanib
No
41 Participants20 Participants61 Participants
Prior Use of Nintedanib
Yes
10 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Prior Use of Pirfenidone
No
38 Participants20 Participants58 Participants
Prior Use of Pirfenidone
Yes
13 Participants4 Participants17 Participants
Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib
No
32 Participants18 Participants50 Participants
Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib
Yes
19 Participants6 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
49 Participants24 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants6 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants18 Participants56 Participants
SpO2 < 88% Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent
No
44 Participants20 Participants64 Participants
SpO2 < 88% Within 6 Months Prior to Informed Consent
Yes
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 513 / 249 / 681 / 2410 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
50 / 5123 / 2467 / 6819 / 2473 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
29 / 5110 / 2438 / 684 / 2439 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24

Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC-- Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Analysis was performed using randomized population. Available data for change from baseline at Week 24 have been reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24At Week 242626.8 mLStandard Deviation 886.9
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline2608.2 mLStandard Deviation 829.6
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Change at Week 24-115.8 mLStandard Deviation 330.3
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24At Week 242438.1 mLStandard Deviation 757.1
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline2516.7 mLStandard Deviation 741.8
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Change at Week 24-71.2 mLStandard Deviation 254.2
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24At Week 242617.4 mLStandard Deviation 890.8
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline2608.8 mLStandard Deviation 840.4
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Change at Week 24-110.8 mLStandard Deviation 316.4
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline2516.7 mLStandard Deviation 741.8
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Change at Week 24-103.4 mLStandard Deviation 225
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24At Week 242436.8 mLStandard Deviation 784.5
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24At Week 242533.7 mLStandard Deviation 832.7
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Baseline2569.3 mLStandard Deviation 794.3
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline to Week 24Change at Week 24-99.5 mLStandard Deviation 281.4
Primary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24

Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24. Normal FVC%: 80% to 120%

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Analysis was performed using randomized population. Available data for change from baseline at Week 24 have been reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Baseline69.61 % of predictedStandard Deviation 18.07
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Change at Week 24-2.82 % of predictedStandard Deviation 7.57
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24At Week 2469.71 % of predictedStandard Deviation 19.2
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24At Week 2468.29 % of predictedStandard Deviation 13.41
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Baseline68.46 % of predictedStandard Deviation 15.63
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Change at Week 24-2.00 % of predictedStandard Deviation 7.36
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24At Week 2469.96 % of predictedStandard Deviation 18.43
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Baseline69.73 % of predictedStandard Deviation 17.7
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Change at Week 24-2.66 % of predictedStandard Deviation 7.49
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Baseline68.46 % of predictedStandard Deviation 15.63
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Change at Week 24-3.00 % of predictedStandard Deviation 6.41
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24At Week 2468.58 % of predictedStandard Deviation 13.98
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24At Week 2469.24 % of predictedStandard Deviation 16.25
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Baseline69.19 % of predictedStandard Deviation 16.71
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Week 24Change at Week 24-2.58 % of predictedStandard Deviation 7.16
Primary

Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment

Percentage of subjects with deaths by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 8, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC also had the option of crossing over to treatment with belumosudil at 24 weeks.

Population: All subjects treated in study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment0 Participants
BSC-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment0 Participants
Belumosudil-WCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment0 Participants
BSC-NCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment0 Participants
TotalSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Deaths Related to Study Treatment0 Participants
Primary

Safety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study Treatment

Percentage of subjects with non-serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil, BSC, or belumosudil and BSC. Severity of TEAEs were measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 22.1 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = fatal).

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC had the option of crossing over at 24 weeks.

Population: All subjects treated in study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades)23 Participants
Belumosudil-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4)2 Participants
BSC-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades)9 Participants
BSC-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4)0 Participants
Belumosudil-WCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades)32 Participants
Belumosudil-WCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4)2 Participants
BSC-NCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4)0 Participants
BSC-NCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades)2 Participants
TotalSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (All Grades)32 Participants
TotalSafety: Percentages of Subjects With Non-serious TEAEs and Relationship to Study TreatmentTEAEs Related to Treatment (Only Grades 3 & 4)2 Participants
Primary

Safety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment

Percentage of subjects with serious TEAEs by relationship to treatment with belumosudil and/or BSC. Investigators assessed whether events were related to treatment as possibly, probably, or definitely related.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil. Subjects randomized to BSC and crossing over also up to 24 weeks of BSC.

Population: All subjects treated in study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment2 Participants
BSC-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment0 Participants
Belumosudil-WCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment2 Participants
BSC-NCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment0 Participants
TotalSafety: Percentages of Subjects With SAEs Related to Study Treatment2 Participants
Primary

Safety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With Belumosudil

Percentage of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to subjects discontinuing from treatment. Investigators assessed whether TEAEs leading to discontinuation were related to study drug (possibly, probably, or definitely), belumosudil 400 mg PO QD.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96) of treatment with belumosudil

Population: Subjects who received belumosudil 400 mg PO QD were included. Subjects who only received BSC and did not cross over to treatment with belumosudil were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilAll TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation14 Participants
Belumosudil-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilTEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation5 Participants
BSC-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilTEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation1 Participants
BSC-RSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilAll TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation8 Participants
Belumosudil-WCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilAll TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation22 Participants
Belumosudil-WCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilTEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation6 Participants
BSC-NCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilAll TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation22 Participants
BSC-NCSafety: Percentages of Subjects With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment With BelumosudilTEAEs Related to Belumosudil Leading to Study Discontinuation6 Participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

The categorical changes of lung fibrosis using subjective visual assessments by radiologists from sequential scans at baseline, Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96. Changes were categorized as: (1) much better; (2) slightly better; (3) same; (4) slightly worse; and (5) much worse. This categorization is simplified as Better (Much or Slightly); Same; and Worse (Slightly or Much).

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: All randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Same6 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Worse13 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Same1 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Better0 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Better0 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Same22 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Worse3 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Worse10 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Better0 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Same1 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Better1 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Same13 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Worse4 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Better1 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Worse5 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Better1 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Same0 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Worse1 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Better1 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Same6 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Same25 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Better1 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Worse13 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Better1 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Worse3 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Same1 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Worse17 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Better0 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Same11 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Same0 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Worse4 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Better1 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Better1 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Same7 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Same1 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Better1 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48: Worse15 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Worse4 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Worse17 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96: Better1 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Categorical Changes in Lung Fibrosis as Observed by Sequential Scans of Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24: Same35 Participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

The change in Data-driven Texture Analysis (DTA) Lung Fibrosis mean score using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline to Weeks 24, 48, and 96. The change in DTA Lung Fibrosis mean score was measured using sequential scans from Radiologist's Visual Reads from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. DTA fibrosis score was computed as the number of Region of Interests (ROIs) classified as fibrotic divided by the total number of ROIs sampled from the lung segmentation volume. The DTA fibrosis score ranged from 0 - 100%, where higher scores indicated worsening of disease.

Time frame: Up to 96 Weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 483.1 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 7.51
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 240.3 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 4.82
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline23.1 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 11.99
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 967.5 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 9.57
BSC-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline22.7 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 10.77
BSC-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 965.0 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 7.07
BSC-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 482.9 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 4.88
BSC-REfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 240.6 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 4.29
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 241.2 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 6.86
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 967.5 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 9.57
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline22.3 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 12.07
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 482.9 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 7.26
BSC-NCEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline22.7 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 10.77
BSC-NCEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 240.6 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 4.43
TotalEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 966.7 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 8.16
TotalEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline22.5 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 11.35
TotalEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 240.9 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 5.7
TotalEfficacy: Changes in Mean DTA Lung Fibrosis Score, by Radiologist Visual Assessment, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 482.9 units on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 6.44
Secondary

Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF

Acute exacerbation of IPF was defined by the following symptoms within 1 month that could not be explained by other reasons: (1) aggravated dyspnea; (2) newly discovered chest interstitial lung abnormality (by radiograph or HRCT); (3) SpO2 decrease to \< 88%. Acute exacerbation was diagnosed if Items #1 and #2 were present or if Items #1 and #3 were present and the following AEs did not occur: (A) any AE with the Preferred Term containing the word infection or cardiac failure; (B) pulmonary embolism; (C) pneumothorax.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF48 weeks0.85 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF24 weeks0.91 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF96 weeks0.64 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF96 weeks0.66 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF48 weeks0.84 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF24 weeks0.91 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Event-free Probability of Acute Exacerbation of IPF24 weeks0.92 Event-free Probability
Comparison: Hazard ratio: 0.86 (0.16, 4.48)p-value: 0.8561Log Rank
Comparison: Hazard ratio: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.17, 4.33)p-value: 0.8608Log Rank
Secondary

Efficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization

Probability of first-related hospitalization defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the terms respiratory and the AE resulted in a hospitalization. Subjects randomized and received BSC were censored on crossover. Note: The hazard ratios for Belumosudil-R vs. BSC-NC and for Belumosudil-WC vs. BSC-NC were not calculable.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: Analysis was of the Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population, defined as consisting of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization24 weeks0.98 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization48 weeks0.89 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization96 weeks0.79 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization96 weeks0.75 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization24 weeks0.96 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization48 weeks0.85 Event-free Probability
Secondary

Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF

Progression of IPF exacerbation was defined as the probability of a subject exhibiting IPF time from baseline to any of the following: (1) probability of first respiratory-related hospitalization; (2) probability of respiratory-related death; absolute decline in FVC% Predicted value of ≥ 10% vs. FVC %; probability of predicted value recorded at baseline; and (4) probability of absolute decline in DLCO, adjusted for hemoglobin (Hb), Percent of predicted value of ≥ 15% vs. DLCO at baseline. Subjects randomized to and received BSC were censored on crossover.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF48 weeks0.52 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF24 weeks0.86 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF96 weeks0.20 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF96 weeks0.16 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF48 weeks0.47 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF24 weeks0.80 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Event-free Probability of Progression of IPF24 weeks0.66 Event-free Probability
Comparison: Hazard ratio: 0.34 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.79)p-value: 0.0084Log Rank
Comparison: Hazard Ratio: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.22, 1.03)p-value: 0.0508Log Rank
Secondary

Efficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death

Probability of respiratory-related death, defined as any AE where the high-level group term contained the term respiratory and the AE resulted in a death. Subjects randomized to and who received BSC were censored on crossover.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: Analysis was of the Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population, defined as consisting of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death48 weeks0.92 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death24 weeks0.98 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death96 weeks0.88 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death96 weeks0.88 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death48 weeks0.91 Event-free Probability
BSC-REfficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death24 weeks0.98 Event-free Probability
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Event-free Probability of Respiratory-related Death24 weeks0.95 Event-free Probability
Comparison: Hazard ratio: 0.34 (95% CI: 0.02, 5.54)p-value: 0.4251Log Rank
Comparison: Hazard ratio: 0.27 (95% CI: 0.02, 4.45)p-value: 0.3294Log Rank
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

The mean change in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, to Week 48, and to Week 96. Positive change = improvement; negative change = worsening

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-23.06 metersStandard Deviation 78.84
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline368.59 metersStandard Deviation 168.84
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 48-18.33 metersStandard Deviation 102.45
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-12.11 metersStandard Deviation 101.78
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-47.80 metersStandard Deviation 69.8
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline349.25 metersStandard Deviation 180.4
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-16.60 metersStandard Deviation 66.8
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 48119.00 metersStandard Deviation 364.61
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline350.12 metersStandard Deviation 168.88
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-20.98 metersStandard Deviation 72.8
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 247.53 metersStandard Deviation 177.88
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 48-18.83 metersStandard Deviation 95.33
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline323.11 metersStandard Deviation 126.64
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-0.77 metersStandard Deviation 49.08
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-26.34 metersStandard Deviation 71.6
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline345.17 metersStandard Deviation 163.88
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-0.04 metersStandard Deviation 140.22
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 486.23 metersStandard Deviation 178.69
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOT

Change in the mean ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) divided by the Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24, Week 48, Week 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FEV1: 80% to 120% FEV1/FVC = Within 5% of predicted ratio

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 24-0.006 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0444
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at EOT-0.010 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0362
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 480.001 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0251
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 96-0.012 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.042
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTBaseline0.829 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0613
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 48-0.005 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0141
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTBaseline0.816 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0674
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 240.013 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.031
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 96-0.014 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0378
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at EOT0.011 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0372
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 24-0.005 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.041
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 48-0.001 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0249
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 96-0.012 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0402
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTBaseline0.832 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0584
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at EOT-0.011 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0453
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at EOT-0.010 UnitsStandard Deviation 0
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 240.016 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0311
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTBaseline0.816 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0674
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 48-0.002 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0232
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTBaseline0.825 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0623
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at EOT-0.007 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0436
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 240.004 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0378
TotalEfficacy: Mean Change in Mean FEV1/FVC Ratio From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 and EOTChange at Week 96-0.012 UnitsStandard Deviation 0.0391
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40%

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 48-2.9 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 8.3
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline47.3 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 11.7
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-2.7 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 9.5
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-4.2 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 11.3
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-13.7 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 17.7
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 48-7.1 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 12.7
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline47.3 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 9.9
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-3.8 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 5.4
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline47.1 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 12
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-3.1 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 9.3
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 48-3.2 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 8
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-6.0 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 11.4
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-4.5 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 5.6
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline48.0 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 10.2
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 48-3.9 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 9
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 24-3.6 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 7.7
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline47.3 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 11.1
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in DLCO (%) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 96-8.2 % of diffusing capacity of COStandard Deviation 13.4
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--

Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC) at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. Normal FVC--Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.5 L; healthy famles 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I Index = 0 to 3 points * Stage II Index= 4 to 5 points * Stage III Index = 6 to 8 points

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage I-117.65 mL
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage II-219.90 mL
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage III101.95 mL
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--No Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-80.34 mL
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--No Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-46.21 mL
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage I-156.50 mL
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage III7.79 mL
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage II-179.94 mL
Comparison: GAP Stage I-- Difference: Belumosudil-WC minus BSC-NC = 38.85 (95% CI: -126.99, 204.69) mLp-value: 0.5733Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: GAP Stage II-- Difference: Belumosudil-WC minus BSC-NC = -39.96 (95% CI: -288.63, 208.71) mLp-value: 0.6967Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: GAP Stage III-- Difference: Belumosudil-WC minus BSC-NC = 94.16 (95% CI: -1103.56, 1291.88) mLp-value: 0.5003Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: No Prior Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-- Difference: Belumosudil-WC minus BSC-NC = -34.13 (95% CI: -137.08, 68.82)p-value: 0.4866Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOT

Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from baseline at Weeks 48 and 96, and End-of-Treatment (EOT) Normal FVC: Healthy males 20 to 60 years: 4.75 to 5.25 L; healthy females 20 to 60 years: 3.25 to 3.75 L

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTBaseline2608.2 mLStandard Deviation 829.6
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 48-197.2 mLStandard Deviation 331.5
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 96-141.0 mLStandard Deviation 401.1
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at EOT-227.9 mLStandard Deviation 367.7
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 48-82.5 mLStandard Deviation 329.7
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 96-264.0 mLStandard Deviation 896
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at EOT-110.7 mLStandard Deviation 397.7
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTBaseline2516.7 mLStandard Deviation 741.8
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 96-122.2 mLStandard Deviation 384.3
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 48-199.6 mLStandard Deviation 366.1
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at EOT-207.2 mLStandard Deviation 353.7
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTBaseline2608.8 mLStandard Deviation 840.4
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at EOT-180.9 mLStandard Deviation 355.8
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 48-177.8 mLStandard Deviation 358.8
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTBaseline2569.3 mLStandard Deviation 794.3
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC From Baseline at Week 48, Week 96, and EOTChange at Week 96-147.5 mLStandard Deviation 492.3
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--

Changes in the mean Forced Vital Capacities (FVC)% Predicted at Week 24 by Gender/Age/Physiology (GAP) Stage and by the previous use of pirfenidone and/or nintedanib prior to the study for Belumosudil-WC compared to BSC-NC. GAP is measured by points as follows: (G) Gender: Female = 0 points; Male = 1 point (A) Age: ≤ 60 years = 0 points; 61-65 years = 1 point; \> 65 years = 2 points (P) Physiology: * FVC% Predicted: \> 75% = 0 points; 50-75% = 1 point; ≤ 50% = 2 points * DLCO% (diffusing lung capacity of carbon monoxide by % predicted) Predicted: \> 55% = 0 points; 36-55% = 1 point, ≤ 35% = 2 points; cannot perform = 3 points GAP Stage: * Stage I = 0 to 3 points * Stage II = 4 to 5 points * Stage III = 6 to 8 points

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage I-4.65 % of predicted
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage II-6.42 % of predicted
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage III2.34 % of predicted
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-6.20 % of predicted
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--Prior Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib-14.91 % of predicted
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage I-6.53 % of predicted
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage III-0.15 % of predicted
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in FVC% Predicted at Week 24 by GAP Stage and by Use of Pirfenidone or Nintedanib--GAP Stage II-4.69 % of predicted
p-value: 0.3391Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.5201Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.4426Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.426Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96

The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in subjects with obstructive airways disease consisting of 2 parts: (1) symptoms component (frequency & severity) with a 3-month recall; and (2) activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness. Impact components (social functioning, psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease) refer to current state as the recall. Changes were assessed from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96. The SGRQ scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater limitations. Based on empirical data and interviews with subjects, a mean change score of 4 units is associated with slightly efficacious treatment, 8 units for moderately efficacious change, and 12 units for very efficacious treatment

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 480.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.34
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 24-5.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.74
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Baseline64.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.98
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 961.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.61
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Baseline74.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.94
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 969.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.54
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 482.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 24-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.59
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 24-2.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.38
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 961.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.76
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Baseline64.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.29
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 480.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.63
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Baseline74.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.94
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 24-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.59
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 962.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.75
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Baseline68.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.83
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 24-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.79
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in SGRQ From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48 and 96Change at Week 480.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.93
Secondary

Efficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

The change in Total Lung Fibrosis mean score from baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Measurements using quantitative high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) and include (1) extent of fibrotic abnormality; (2) fibrosis score; (3) ground glass opacity; (4) honeycombing score; (5) kurtosis of lung voxel intensity; (6) skewness of lung voxel intensity; (7) standard deviation of voxel; (8) CT total lung volume; (9) normal lung; (10) reticular score; and (11) evaluation of change on sequential scans. The Quantitative Lung Fibrosis (QLF) score measures the extent of reticular patterns with architectural distortion due to fibrosis using a support vector machine classifier. Range: 0 to 100. Higher scores imply greater impairment.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: The mITT Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline FVC assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 486.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.76
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 247.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.46
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline30.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.54
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 966.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.41
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline33.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.81
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 968.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.86
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 486.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.27
BSC-REfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 241.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 248.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.55
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 966.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.41
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline31.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.48
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 486.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.74
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline33.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.81
BSC-NCEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 241.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 966.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.09
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Baseline32.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.45
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 244.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.44
TotalEfficacy: Mean Changes in Total Lung Fibrosis Score, by HRCT, From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Change at Week 486.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.87
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

Percentage of subjects who exhibited at least a 10% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No15 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No22 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes7 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No33 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes5 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes5 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes2 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No3 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No17 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes1 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No7 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes4 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes5 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes6 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes9 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No40 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No18 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No26 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes4 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No15 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No18 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes10 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No50 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes10 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No30 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentage of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 10% in FVC% Predicted at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes7 Participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

The percentage of subjects who have at least a 50 meter improvement in the 6-mile Walking Distance (6MWD), i.e., the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes, from baseline to Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96.

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No12 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No24 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes6 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No31 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes5 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes6 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes2 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No3 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No16 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes2 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No6 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes4 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes5 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes8 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes8 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No37 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No15 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No28 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes2 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No11 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: No15 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: Yes11 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 24: No48 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: Yes10 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 48: No32 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With ≥ 50 Meter Improvement in 6MWD at Weeks 24, 48, and 96≥ 50 Meter Improvement at Week 96: Yes7 Participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

Percentage of the number of subjects who exhibit less than a -15% decrease in diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), measured as % from baseline at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 The diffusing capacity for carbon dioxide (DLCO) is a measure of the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells. Normal DLCO is \> 75% of predicted up to 140%. Severity is generally rated as: * Mild: 60% to lower limit of normal * Moderate: 40% to 60% * Severe: \< 40%

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No7 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No18 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes10 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No29 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes3 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes7 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes4 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No1 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No14 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes4 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No4 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes7 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes5 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes10 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes11 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No33 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No8 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No23 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes6 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No9 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: No8 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: Yes16 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 24 Change ≤ -15%: No43 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: Yes14 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 48 Change ≤ -15%: No24 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Change From Baseline in DLCO (%) ≤ -15% at Weeks 24, 48, and 96Week 96 Change ≤ -15%: Yes7 Participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96

Percentage of subjects exhibiting at least a 5% decrease in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% Predicted from baseline at Week 24, at Week 48, and at Week 96

Time frame: Up to 96 weeks (Weeks 24, 48, and 96)

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population was used which consisted of all subjects in the Safety Population who had an evaluable baseline and ≥ 1 evaluable post baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No14 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No15 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes14 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No27 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes6 Participants
Belumosudil-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes11 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes2 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No3 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No14 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes4 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No4 Participants
BSC-REfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes7 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes6 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes14 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes16 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No32 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No17 Participants
Belumosudil-WCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No19 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes7 Participants
BSC-NCEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No12 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: No17 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: Yes21 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 24: No42 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: Yes18 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 48: No20 Participants
TotalEfficacy: Percentages of Subjects With Decrease ≥ 5% in FVC% Predicted From Baseline at Weeks 24, 48, and 96At Week 96: Yes8 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026