Skip to content

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Fasinumab in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee or Hip

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and the Efficacy of Fasinumab in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02683239
Acronym
FACT LTS & OA
Enrollment
5331
Registered
2016-02-17
Start date
2016-02-17
Completion date
2021-06-15
Last updated
2023-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to describe the safety and tolerability of fasinumab, including adverse events of special interest (AESIs), in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed OA of the knee or hip.

Interventions

Participants will receive sub-cutaneous (SC) injections of fasinumab

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive sub-cutaneous (SC) injections of matching placebo

Sponsors

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female ≥18 years of age at the screening visit 2. Clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2) for the index joint at the screening visit 3. Moderate to severe pain in the index joint defined as a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) average pain subscale score of ≥4 4. A history of 12 weeks of analgesic use for OA of the knee or hip 5. History of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain Key

Exclusion criteria

1. History or presence at the screening visit of non OA inflammatory joint disease 2. History or presence on imaging of arthropathy, stress fracture, recent stress fracture, neuropathic joint arthropathy, hip dislocation, knee dislocation, congenital hip dysplasia with degenerative joint disease, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of bone fragmentation or collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fracture during the screening period 3. Signs or symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome within 6 months of screening 4. Patient is not a candidate for MRI 5. Is scheduled for a joint replacement surgery to be performed during the study period 6. Systemic (i.e., oral or intramuscular) corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the screening visit. 7. History or presence at the screening visit of multiple sclerosis, autonomic neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, or other peripheral neuropathy, including reflex sympathetic dystrophy 8. History or diagnosis of chronic autonomic failure syndrome including pure autonomic failure, multiple system atrophy 9. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 10. Women of childbearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test result or do not have their pregnancy test result at baseline Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale ScoreBaseline to Week 16The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Baseline up to week 72Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than (\<) 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, greater than or equal to (≥) 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the fasinumab ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale ScoreBaseline to Week 16The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Baseline up to week 52
Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAEBaseline up to week 52
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Baseline up to week 52 and week 72Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaBaseline up to week 52 and week 72DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.
Number of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology ConsultationBaseline up to week 72Any participant with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an adverse event of special interest (AESI).
Number of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) DysfunctionBaseline up to week 72Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
Number of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryBaseline up to weeks 52, 72, and end of study (52 weeks post last dose)All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause at weeks 52 and 72. An end of study phone contact was also conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Baseline to week 52Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72End of treatment up to week 72Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the post-treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreBaseline to Week 16The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. Participants who achieved a response, where response was defined as an improvement by ≥30% in WOMAC pain subscale score
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of OsteoarthritisBaseline to Week 16The PGA of OA is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor).

Countries

Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

13,945 participants were screened. Of those, 5,331 met the eligibility criteria and were randomized to 1 of 7 treatment arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8W
Participants received fasinumab matching placebo SC injection, Q4W or Q8W from Day 1 up to 52 weeks.
1,260
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8W
Participants received fasinumab 1 mg SC injection, Q8W from day 1 up to 52 weeks.
971
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4W
Participants received fasinumab 1 mg SC injection Q4W from day 1 up to 52 weeks.
975
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4W
Participants received fasinumab 3 mg SC injection, Q4W from day 1 up to 52 weeks.
214
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8W
Participants received fasinumab 6 mg SC injection, Q8W from day 1 up to 52 weeks.
1,680
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W
Participants received fasinumab 6 mg SC injection Q4W from day 1 up to 37 weeks of 52-week treatment period.
116
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W
Participants received fasinumab 9 mg SC injection, Q4W from day 1 up to 37 weeks of 52-week treatment period.
115
Total5,331

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse Event6439421618999
Overall StudyDeath95801210
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy50231222923
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up772425788811
Overall StudyMissing data0110100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision381914731431415
Overall StudyProtocol Violation35232643545
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1879991182482228

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WTotalFasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WFasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WFasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WFasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WFasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WFasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W
Age, Continuous63.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.89
64.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28
63.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24
65.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.24
65.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.57
65.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.19
62.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61
62.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.38
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants622 Participants117 Participants177 Participants182 Participants6 Participants124 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
107 Participants4686 Participants1139 Participants791 Participants787 Participants207 Participants1547 Participants108 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants23 Participants4 Participants3 Participants6 Participants1 Participants9 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants131 Participants19 Participants50 Participants53 Participants0 Participants8 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants93 Participants25 Participants7 Participants9 Participants0 Participants52 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants542 Participants156 Participants64 Participants66 Participants16 Participants213 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants327 Participants63 Participants91 Participants109 Participants8 Participants55 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
102 Participants4236 Participants996 Participants759 Participants738 Participants190 Participants1352 Participants99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants3886 Participants913 Participants723 Participants705 Participants149 Participants1237 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants1445 Participants347 Participants248 Participants270 Participants65 Participants443 Participants33 Participants
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score6.6 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47
6.6 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.55
6.70 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44
6.6 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.49
6.5 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47
6.6 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41
WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score6.42 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.602
6.47 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.583
6.56 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.631
6.41 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.495
6.27 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.699
6.38 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.598

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 1,2575 / 9668 / 9740 / 21412 / 1,6771 / 1160 / 115
other
Total, other adverse events
988 / 1,257793 / 966817 / 974181 / 2141,447 / 1,67795 / 11688 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
183 / 1,257146 / 966186 / 97451 / 214441 / 1,67729 / 11626 / 115

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score

The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The full analysis set for the efficacy substudy (FAS-Substudy) included all randomized participants in the efficacy substudy. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed = Number of participants within a specified category.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score-1.55 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.178
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score-2.28 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.175
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score-2.77 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.171
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score-2.78 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.174
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score-2.59 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.174
p-value: =0.00195% CI: [-1.159, -0.293]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.646, -0.793]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.664, -0.793]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.477, -0.606]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score

The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The full analysis set for the efficacy substudy (FAS-Substudy) included all randomized participants in the efficacy substudy. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed = Number of participants within a specified category.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score-1.35 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.177
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score-2.09 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.175
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score-2.55 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.173
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score-2.61 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.177
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score-2.48 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.177
p-value: =0.000795% CI: [-1.163, -0.309]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.624, -0.768]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.698, -0.822]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.564, -0.695]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)

Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 52 and week 72

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 5223 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 7232 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 7271 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 5252 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 5262 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 7289 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 7227 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 5225 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 52238 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 72303 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 5214 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 7218 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 7213 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Week 528 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria

DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 52 and week 72

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 520 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 720 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 521 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 721 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 523 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 725 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 521 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 721 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 5220 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 7231 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 521 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 721 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 521 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaWeek 721 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72

Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than (\<) 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, greater than or equal to (≥) 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the fasinumab ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 72

Population: The ADA analysis set for the long-term safety population included all participants who received any study drug (SAF-LTS) and had at least 1 non-missing ADA result following the first dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72ADA Negative Status1115 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Pre-existing Immunoreactivity22 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Emergent Response16 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72ADA Negative Status885 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Pre-existing Immunoreactivity16 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Emergent Response10 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72ADA Negative Status907 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Emergent Response10 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Pre-existing Immunoreactivity12 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Emergent Response2 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Pre-existing Immunoreactivity6 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72ADA Negative Status200 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72ADA Negative Status1547 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Pre-existing Immunoreactivity37 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Emergent Response19 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Pre-existing Immunoreactivity2 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72ADA Negative Status108 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Emergent Response1 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Boosted Response0 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Pre-existing Immunoreactivity1 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Treatment-Emergent Response0 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72ADA Negative Status104 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72

Time frame: Baseline up to week 72

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 721112 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72867 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72902 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72192 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 721570 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72106 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72106 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72

Time frame: Baseline up to week 72

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72173 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72138 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72176 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 7244 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72413 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 7228 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 7226 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE

Time frame: Baseline up to week 52

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAE82 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAE57 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAE70 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAE13 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAE107 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAE5 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAE3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

Time frame: Baseline up to week 52

Population: The safety analysis set for the evaluation of long-term safety (SAF-LTS) included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)1055 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)840 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)885 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)185 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)1487 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)93 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)92 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery

All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause at weeks 52 and 72. An end of study phone contact was also conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline up to weeks 52, 72, and end of study (52 weeks post last dose)

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryEnd of Study (52 weeks post-last dose)79 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 7255 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 5237 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 7255 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 5227 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryEnd of Study (52 weeks post-last dose)81 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryEnd of Study (52 weeks post-last dose)118 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 5237 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 7271 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 7223 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 5215 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryEnd of Study (52 weeks post-last dose)30 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 72197 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 52109 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryEnd of Study (52 weeks post-last dose)309 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 528 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryEnd of Study (52 weeks post-last dose)18 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 7211 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryEnd of Study (52 weeks post-last dose)15 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 729 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryWeek 524 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation

Any participant with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an adverse event of special interest (AESI).

Time frame: Baseline up to week 72

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation29 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation65 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation62 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation21 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation75 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation3 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72

Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the post-treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: End of treatment up to week 72

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Chemistry267 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Hematology171 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Urinalysis16 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Chemistry228 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Hematology149 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Urinalysis24 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Chemistry225 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Hematology154 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Urinalysis18 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Hematology23 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Urinalysis1 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Chemistry59 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Chemistry474 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Hematology279 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Urinalysis37 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Hematology29 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Chemistry36 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Urinalysis5 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Chemistry40 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Hematology32 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72Urinalysis3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52

Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Urinalysis32 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Chemistry403 Participants
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Hematology195 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Chemistry365 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Hematology236 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Urinalysis42 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Urinalysis45 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Hematology241 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Chemistry403 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Chemistry105 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Hematology28 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Urinalysis2 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Chemistry717 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Hematology304 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Urinalysis55 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Hematology7 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Urinalysis1 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Chemistry36 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Urinalysis1 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Chemistry34 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Hematology11 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction

Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 72

Population: The SAF-LTS included all randomized participants in the overall study who received any study drug; it was based on the treatment-as-received (as treated).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction0 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction0 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction0 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction0 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction1 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction0 Participants
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis

The PGA of OA is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The full analysis set for the efficacy substudy (FAS-Substudy) included all randomized participants in the efficacy substudy. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed = Number of participants within a specified category.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis-0.66 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.07
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis-0.87 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.071
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis-0.93 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.069
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis-0.99 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.071
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis-0.96 Score on a ScaleStandard Error 0.072
p-value: =0.02395% CI: [-0.38, -0.028]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.002595% CI: [-0.437, -0.093]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.000395% CI: [-0.496, -0.145]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.00195% CI: [-0.466, -0.118]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score

The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. Participants who achieved a response, where response was defined as an improvement by ≥30% in WOMAC pain subscale score

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The full analysis set for the efficacy substudy (FAS-Substudy) included all randomized participants in the efficacy substudy. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed = Number of participants within a specified category. Participants with missing data are considered as a non-response.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fasinumab-matching Placebo Q4W/Q8WNumber of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score76 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score108 Participants
Fasinumab 1 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score126 Participants
Fasinumab 3 mg SC Q4WNumber of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score118 Participants
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q8WNumber of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score114 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026