Skip to content

A Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo and to Adalimumab in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are on a Stable Dose of Methotrexate and Who Have an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo and to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are on a Stable Background of Methotrexate (MTX) and Who Have an Inadequate Response to MTX (MTX-IR)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02629159
Acronym
SELECT-COMPARE
Enrollment
1629
Registered
2015-12-14
Start date
2015-12-01
Completion date
2027-09-30
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Musculoskeletal disease, Arthritis, Joint disease, Anti-inflammatory agents, Antirheumatic agents

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess efficacy, including inhibition of radiographic progression, and safety with upadacitinib versus placebo and versus an active comparator, adalimumab, in adults with with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are on a stable background of methotrexate (MTX and who have an inadequate response to MTX.

Detailed description

This study consists of a 48-week double-blind treatment period (Period 1) and a long-term extension period (Period 2). Period 1 is a 48-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled period designed to compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib versus placebo, and versus adalimumab. Participants will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups: * Placebo (up to Week 26) * Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) * Adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) Participants randomized to placebo who do not achieve a ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) at Weeks 14, 18, or 22 compared to Baseline will be switched to blinded upadacitinib treatment. At Week 26, all participants still receiving placebo will be switched to blinded upadacitinib treatment regardless of clinical response. Participants randomized to adalimumab who do not achieve a ≥ 20% improvement in TJC and SJC at Weeks 14, 18, or 22 compared to Baseline will be switched to blinded upadacitinib. Participants still receiving adalimumab at Week 26 who do not achieve low disease activity (LDA) according to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; LDA is defined as CDAI ≤ 10) will be switched to blinded upadacitinib treatment to Week 48. Participants randomized to upadacitinib who do not achieve a ≥ 20% improvement in TJC and SJC at Weeks 14, 18, or 22 compared to Baseline will be switched to blinded adalimumab; participants still receiving upadacitinib at Week 26 who do not achieve LDA (CDAI ≤ 10) will be switched to blinded adalimumab treatment to Week 48. Participants who complete the Week 48 visit (end of Period 1) will enter the long-term extension phase of the study (Period 2), for up to 5 years. Participants will continue study treatment as assigned at the end of Period 1. Starting at the Week 48 and thereafter, at least 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC compared to Baseline is required to remain on study drug. Anyone who does not fulfill this criterion at 2 consecutive visits (starting at Week 48) will be discontinued.

Interventions

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every other week

DRUGAdalimumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every other week

Tablets taken orally once a day

DRUGUpadacitinib

Tablets taken orally once a day

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male or female, at least 18 years old. * Diagnosis of RA for greater than or equal to 3 months. * Subjects must have been on oral or parenteral methotrexate (MTX) therapy greater than or equal to 3 months and on a stable prescription of greater than or equal to 15 to 25 mg/week (or greater than or equal to 10 mg/week in subjects intolerant of MTX at doses greater than or equal to 12.5 mg/week) for at least 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. In addition all subjects should take a dietary supplement of folic acid or folinic acid throughout the study participation. * Meets the following minimum disease activity criteria: greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) and greater than or equal to 6 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits. * At least one of the following at Screening: greater than or equal to 3 bone erosions on x-ray OR greater than or equal to 1 bone erosion and a positive rheumatoid factor OR greater than or equal to 1 bone erosion and a positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibodies. * Subjects with prior exposure to only one biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) (except adalimumab) may be enrolled (up to 20% of total study population) if they have documented evidence of intolerance to the bDMARD or limited exposure (less than 3 months), but required washout periods need to be satisfied. * Except for MTX, subject must have discontinued all conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs).

Exclusion criteria

* Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib). * Subjects who have been exposed to adalimumab or who are considered inadequate responders to bDMARD therapy as determined by the Investigator. * History of inflammatory joint disease other than RA. History of secondary Sjogren's Syndrome is permitted.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12Week 12The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was clinical remission, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of \< 2.6 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12Week 12The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12Week 12Low disease activity based on the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the total tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.
Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.
Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)Baseline and Week 12The FACIT Fatigue scale is a 13-item tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past 7 days. Each of the fatigue and impact of fatigue items are measured on a four point Likert scale. The FACIT Fatigue Scale is the sum of the individual 13 scores and ranges from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate better the quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Participants were asked to indicate the severity of their arthritis pain within the previous week on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 100 indicates worst possible pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 26Baseline and Week 26No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in mTSS ≤ 0. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet, which were assessed by 2 independent, blinded readers. mTSS is calculated as the sum of the total joint erosion score and total joint space narrowing (JSN) score and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst).
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Participants were asked to indicate the time it took for them to get as limber as possible after awakening with morning stiffness over the past 7 days. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 26Baseline and Week 26The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet, assessed by 2 independent, blinded readers. mTSS is calculated as the sum of the total joint erosion score and total joint space narrowing (JSN) score. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). JSN was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). A negative change from Baseline in mTSS indicates improvement in joint damage whereas a change from Baseline greater than 0 indicates progression.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on a stable dose of methotrexate with an inadequate response were randomized at 286 study sites in 41 countries. This study is currently ongoing; results are reported as of the data cut-off date of 02 February 2018, when all participants were to have completed Week 26.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 2:1:2 ratio to receive placebo, adalimumab, or upadacitinib. Randomization was stratified by prior exposure to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug(s) (bDMARD) (yes/no) and geographic region. Rescue therapy was offered to participants who met protocol-specified criteria at Weeks 14, 18, 22, or 26.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo to upadacitinib orally once daily (QD) and placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection once every two weeks (eow) for up to 26 weeks. Participants who did not achieve a ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) at Weeks 14, 18, or 22 compared to Baseline were switched to 15 mg upadacitinib orally QD.
651
Adalimumab
Participants received placebo to upadacitinib orally QD and 40 mg adalimumab by subcutaneous injection eow for up to 48 weeks in Period 1. Participants who did not achieve a ≥ 20% improvement in TJC and SJC at Weeks 14, 18, or 22 compared to Baseline were switched to 15 mg upadacitinib orally QD.
327
Upadacitinib
Participants randomized to receive 15 mg upadacitinib orally QD and placebo to adalimumab by subcutaneous injection eow for up to 48 weeks in Period 1. Participants who did not achieve a ≥ 20% improvement in TJC and SJC at Weeks 14, 18, or 22 compared to Baseline were switched to 40 mg adalimumab eow.
651
Total1,629

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event172022
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy401
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up745
Overall StudyOther648
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject221115

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdalimumabUpadacitinibPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.24
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.07
Age, Customized
40 to 64 years
232 Participants439 Participants437 Participants1108 Participants
Age, Customized
< 40 years
39 Participants81 Participants91 Participants211 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
56 Participants131 Participants123 Participants310 Participants
Disease Activity Score 28 Based on CRP (DAS28[CRP])5.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
5.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97
5.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94
5.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnosis8.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.41
8.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
8.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
8.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.97
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
106 Participants215 Participants206 Participants527 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
221 Participants436 Participants445 Participants1102 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Geographic Region
Asia
10 Participants21 Participants21 Participants52 Participants
Geographic Region
Eastern Europe
132 Participants262 Participants262 Participants656 Participants
Geographic Region
North America
60 Participants122 Participants121 Participants303 Participants
Geographic Region
Other
20 Participants38 Participants39 Participants97 Participants
Geographic Region
South/Central America
86 Participants173 Participants173 Participants432 Participants
Geographic Region
Western Europe
19 Participants35 Participants35 Participants89 Participants
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)1.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.59
1.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
1.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61
1.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)19.8 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.51
17.9 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.49
18.0 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.52
18.3 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.91
Patient's Assessment of Pain66.2 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.51
65.7 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.02
65.0 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.67
65.5 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.77
Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity65.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.08
64.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.83
63.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.49
64.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.55
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity65.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6
65.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.06
66.0 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.17
65.7 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.62
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
15 Participants31 Participants39 Participants85 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
17 Participants33 Participants38 Participants88 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
2 Participants10 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
292 Participants576 Participants561 Participants1429 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
259 Participants521 Participants512 Participants1292 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants130 Participants139 Participants337 Participants
Swollen Joint Count16.3 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.19
16.6 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.31
16.2 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
16.4 swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57
Tender Joint Count26.4 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.16
26.4 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.15
26.0 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
26.2 tender joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.81

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 6522 / 3270 / 6500 / 3040 / 770 / 125
other
Total, other adverse events
43 / 65216 / 32772 / 6509 / 3046 / 774 / 125
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 65214 / 32724 / 6507 / 3040 / 772 / 125

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12

The primary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes was clinical remission, based on a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-CRP score of \< 2.6 at Week 12. The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom DAS28 data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 126.1 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1218.0 percentage of participants
UpadacitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1228.7 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [18.6, 26.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.3, 16.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12

The primary endpoint for United States (US)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory purposes was ACR 20% response (ACR20) at Week 12. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1236.4 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1263.0 percentage of participants
UpadacitinibPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1270.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.01895% CI: [1.2, 13.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [29, 39.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12

The DAS28 is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change from Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) indicates improvement in disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at Baseline; multiple imputation was used for missing post-baseline data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12-1.15 units on a scale
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12-2.01 units on a scale
UpadacitinibChange From Baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 12-2.48 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.469, -1.194]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.638, -0.295]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12

Participants were asked to indicate the time it took for them to get as limber as possible after awakening with morning stiffness over the past 7 days. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12-48.59 minutes
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12-82.71 minutes
UpadacitinibChange From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 12-92.63 minutes
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-55.39, -32.69]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: 0.16495% CI: [-23.89, 4.05]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at baseline; multiple imputation was used for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12-0.28 units on a scale
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12-0.49 units on a scale
UpadacitinibChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12-0.60 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.372, -0.253]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.184, -0.036]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)

The FACIT Fatigue scale is a 13-item tool that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past 7 days. Each of the fatigue and impact of fatigue items are measured on a four point Likert scale. The FACIT Fatigue Scale is the sum of the individual 13 scores and ranges from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate better the quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)4.81 units on a scale
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)7.44 units on a scale
UpadacitinibChange From Baseline in in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F)8.95 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.13, 5.16]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: 0.01795% CI: [0.27, 2.76]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 26

The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet, assessed by 2 independent, blinded readers. mTSS is calculated as the sum of the total joint erosion score and total joint space narrowing (JSN) score. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). JSN was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst). The mTSS is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). A negative change from Baseline in mTSS indicates improvement in joint damage whereas a change from Baseline greater than 0 indicates progression.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at Baseline; linear extrapolation was used for participants who discontinued prior to Week 26 or who were rescued prior to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 260.92 units on a scale
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 260.10 units on a scale
UpadacitinibChange From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 260.24 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.97, -0.37]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.44895% CI: [-0.23, 0.51]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 12

Participants were asked to indicate the severity of their arthritis pain within the previous week on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 100 indicates worst possible pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 12-15.46 mm
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 12-25.31 mm
UpadacitinibChange From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 12-31.76 mm
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-9.63, -3.27]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-18.89, -13.71]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12

The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with data from observed cases to Week 12 was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 123.56 units on a scale
AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 126.27 units on a scale
UpadacitinibChange From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 127.89 units on a scale
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.52, 5.15]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.62, 2.62]Mixed Effect Model Repeat Measurement
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 12

Low disease activity based on the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) is defined as a CDAI score ≤ 10. CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the total tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom CDAI data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 1216.3 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 1230.0 percentage of participants
UpadacitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity Based on CDAI at Week 1240.4 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [19.4, 28.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [4.2, 16.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 12

The DAS28(CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), and hsCRP (in mg/L). Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to approximately 10, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A DAS28(CRP) score less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom DAS28 data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1213.8 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1228.7 percentage of participants
UpadacitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28(CRP) at Week 1245.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [26.5, 35.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
95% CI: [10, 22.5]
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 1214.9 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 1229.1 percentage of participants
UpadacitinibPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 1245.2 percentage of participants
95% CI: [9.9, 22.3]
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [25.6, 35]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12

Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set; participants who prematurely discontinued from study drug prior to Week 12 or for whom ACR data were missing at Week 12 were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 124.9 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 1213.5 percentage of participants
UpadacitinibPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 1224.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [16.3, 23.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.5, 16.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 26

No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in mTSS ≤ 0. The mTSS measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet, which were assessed by 2 independent, blinded readers. mTSS is calculated as the sum of the total joint erosion score and total joint space narrowing (JSN) score and ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst). Joint erosion severity was assessed in 16 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 280 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 15 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, including subluxation, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 168 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at Baseline; linear extrapolation was used for participants who discontinued prior to Week 26 or who were rescued prior to Week 26.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 2676.0 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 2686.8 percentage of participants
UpadacitinibPercentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 2683.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3, 12.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.18795% CI: [-8.2, 1.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026