Skip to content

A Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab for the Treatment of Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-dose, Placebo-controlled Phase 2/3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02620020
Enrollment
563
Registered
2015-12-02
Start date
2016-01-26
Completion date
2017-09-13
Last updated
2020-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

The main objective of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to placebo as measured by the change from baseline in the average daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to placebo as measured by: * Change from baseline in the Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) total score * Change from baseline in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) score * Change from baseline in the average daily LBPI NRS score

Interventions

Participants received fasinumab SC or IV, Q4W or Q8W.

DRUGplacebo

Participants received placebo matching to fasinumab SC or IV, Q4W or Q8W.

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female ≥35 years of age at the screening visit 2. Clinical diagnosis of chronic moderate to severe LBP (nonradiculopathic)for ≥3 months 3. History of regular analgesic medication 4. History of inadequate pain relief or intolerance to analgesics used for chronic LBP 5. Willing to discontinue current pain medication Key

Exclusion criteria

1. History of lumbosacral radiculopathy within the past 2 years 2. Evidence on baseline lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging of potentially confounding conditions 3. Recent use of longer acting pain medications 4. Evidence of destructive arthropathy 5. Other medical conditions that may interfere with participation or accurate assessments during the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale (LBPI NRS) ScoreBaseline to Week 16Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total ScoreBaseline to Week 16The RMDQ is a self-administered, widely used health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function, using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked - that is from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores indicative of better function.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) ScoreBaseline to Week 16The PGA of LBP is a participant assessed 5 point Likert scale of LBP ranging from 0-5 where 1=very well; 2=well; 3=fair; 4=poor; and 5=very poor.

Countries

Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 105 sites in US, CA & EU from 26Jan2016 - 13Sep2017. Of 1,783 participants screened, 563 randomized to 1 of 4 groups stratified by baseline low back pain numerical rating scale (LBP NRS) score (\<7, ≥7), duration of chronic LBP (\<5, ≥5yrs) & max. Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) score (≤2, \>2) at any knee/ hip joint at screening.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening period of up to 30 days & a 7-day pre-randomization period during which pain medication, except study-provided rescue medication, was discontinued. Confirmation of no exclusionary findings on joint on which imaging was performed during screening must have been received before a participant could be randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8W
Participants randomized to the matching placebo subcutaneously (SC) every four weeks (Q4W) arm received SC placebo in a manner similar to the SC loading dose of the active groups (placebo loading dose) on Day 1 and then an SC injection of placebo at weeks 4, 8, and 12 for a total of 4 doses. Matching placebo intravenously (IV) every 8 weeks (Q8W) was received on Day 1 and at Week 8.
141
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8W
Participants randomized to the fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W arm received fasinumab 12 mg SC on Day 1 (loading dose) and then 6 mg SC (planned maintenance dose) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 for a total of 4 doses. Matching placebo was received via intravenous (IV) infusion Q8W on Day 1 and at Week 8.
141
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8W
Participants randomized to the fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W arm received 18 mg SC on day 1 (loading dose) and then 9 mg SC (planned maintenance dose) at weeks 4, 8, and 12 for a total of 4 doses. Matching placebo IV Q8W was received on Day 1 and at Week 8.
140
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4W
Participants randomized to the fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W arm received IV infusions of fasinumab 9 mg on Day 1 and Week 8, for a total of 2 doses. Matching placebo SC Q4W was received on day 1 and at weeks 4, 8, and 12.
141
Total563

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event8435
Overall StudyDeath0100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4814
Overall StudyPhysician Decision7434
Overall StudyProtocol Violation5211
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20161712

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WFasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WFasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WFasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WTotal
Age, Continuous58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.54
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.99
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.49
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.38
Age, Customized
< 65 years
93 Participants95 Participants109 Participants117 Participants414 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
48 Participants46 Participants31 Participants24 Participants149 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants4 Participants4 Participants10 Participants25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
134 Participants135 Participants135 Participants131 Participants535 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Low Back Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (LBPI NRS) Baseline Score6.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.297
6.49 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2481
6.66 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
6.45 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.191
6.53 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.267
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 Participants19 Participants19 Participants21 Participants72 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
127 Participants119 Participants118 Participants116 Participants480 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
83 Participants85 Participants84 Participants81 Participants333 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants56 Participants56 Participants60 Participants230 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1401 / 1390 / 1390 / 140
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 14035 / 13952 / 13949 / 140
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1402 / 1393 / 1395 / 140

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale (LBPI NRS) Score

Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Analysis performed on modified intent to treat set (mITT) included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug based on the treatment allocated (as randomized) including data up to 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale (LBPI NRS) Score-1.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale (LBPI NRS) Score-2.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale (LBPI NRS) Score-2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale (LBPI NRS) Score-2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
p-value: 0.387695% CI: [-0.88, 0.34]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.01895% CI: [-1.32, -0.12]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.028895% CI: [-1.26, -0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score

The RMDQ is a self-administered, widely used health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function, using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked - that is from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores indicative of better function.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score-3.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score-6.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score-5.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score-6.3 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
p-value: 0.002895% CI: [-3.65, -0.77]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.006895% CI: [-3.36, -0.54]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-3.88, -1.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score

The PGA of LBP is a participant assessed 5 point Likert scale of LBP ranging from 0-5 where 1=very well; 2=well; 3=fair; 4=poor; and 5=very poor.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed=participants with available data for specified time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
p-value: 0.150195% CI: [-0.46, 0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.260395% CI: [-0.41, 0.11]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.013595% CI: [-0.59, -0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)

Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Population: Analysis performed on modified intent to treat set (mITT) included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug based on the treatment allocated (as randomized) including data up to 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 2-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 4-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 8-1.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Placebo SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 12-1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 4-1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 8-1.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 12-2.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fasinumab 6 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 2-1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 8-2.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 4-2.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 12-2.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fasinumab 9 mg SC Q4W and Placebo IV Q8WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 2-1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 12-2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 4-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 2-1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Fasinumab 9 mg IV Q8W and Placebo SC Q4WChange From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the Average Low Back Pain Index Numeric Rating Scale Score (LBPI NRS)Change from Baseline to Week 8-2.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026