Skip to content

Perioperative Chemotherapy Compared To Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus

Perioperative Chemotherapy (FLOT Protocol) Compared To Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation (CROSS Protocol) in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02509286
Acronym
ESOPEC
Enrollment
438
Registered
2015-07-28
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction, Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (UICC TNM7)

Keywords

Esophageal neoplasms, gastro-esophageal junction neoplasms, adenocarcinoma, esophagectomy, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy

Brief summary

The trial is designed to investigate differences in outcome of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and junctional adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative (neoadjuvant + adjuvant) chemotherapy (FLOT) plus surgical resection versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS) plus surgical resection.

Detailed description

According to the given evidence a survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy (periCTX) over Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (neoCRT) for patients with Esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC) has not been proven in any randomized controlled trials (RCT). Data supporting the value of periCTX have all been obtained in studies including mixed patient cohorts with EAC and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Due to relevant differences of histologic subtype distribution, response to periCTX and survival rates between EAC and GAC there is a clear need to obtain evidence concerning the value of periCTX for EAC. As nowadays periCTX is extensively and successfully applied in clinical practice in patients with EAC there is an obvious need to obtain evidence from a multicentre RCT. Moreover a confirmation of the superior survival rates of the recent RCT on neoCRT should be obtained in a RCT conducted exclusively on EAC. Therefore, this prospective RCT with the primary objective of longterm patient survival comparing periCTX and neoCRT was designed. Translational Projects: Project 1+2: Circulating Tumor Cells as Biomarker in EAC CTC laboratories at University of Hamburg and University of Freiburg Project 3: Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in EAC University of Leipzig, UCCL

Interventions

DRUG5-Fluorouracil

2600 mg/m² (24 hours), d1 every two weeks;

DRUGLeucovorin

200 mg/m² in 250 ml NaCl 0.9%, d1 every two weeks;

DRUGOxaliplatin

85 mg/m² in 500 ml G5% over 2h, d1 every two weeks;

DRUGDocetaxel

50mg/m2 in 250 ml NaCl 0.9% over 1h, d1 every two weeks;

DRUGCarboplatin

Dose-dependant: 2mg/ml/min AUC in 500ml Glucose 5%, day 1, 8, 15, 22 and day 29.

DRUGPaclitaxel

50mg/m2 in 500ml NaCl 0.9% over 1 h, day 1, 8, 15, 22 and day 29;

41.4Gy given in 23 fractions of 1.8Gy on days 1-5, days 8-12, days 15-19, days 22-26 and days 29-31.

Sponsors

Clinical Trials Unit Freiburg
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Freiburg
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Leipzig
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Luebeck
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Hamburg-Eppendorf
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically verified adenocarcinoma of the esophagus according to the UICC definition (TNM7) * Pre-treatment stage cT1N+, M0 or cT2-4a, N0/+, M0 * Age ≥18 years * No prior abdominal or thoracic radiotherapy * ECOG Performance status 0-2 * Adequate cardiac function ( Patients with a cardiac history (e.g. myocardial infarction, heart failure, coronary artery disease) should have a cardiology review) * Adequate bone marrow function (WBC\>3x10\^9/l; Hb\>9g/dl; platelets \>100x10\^9/l) * Adequate respiratory function. Symptomatic Patients should have pulmonary function tests with FEV1 \>65% of predicted) * Adequate renal function (GFR \>60ml/min) * Adequate liver function (serum bilirubin \<1.5x Upper level of Normal (ULN); AST \<2.5x ULN and ALT \<3x ULN (ULN as per institutional standard) * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Tumors of squamous or other non-adenocarcinoma histology * Patients with advanced inoperable or metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma * Stage cT1N0 and cT4b * Gastric carcinoma * Prior chemotherapy for cancer, * Clinically significant (i.e. active) cardiac disease (e.g. symptomatic coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction within last 12 months) * Clinical significant lung disease (FEV1 \<65% of predicted) * Peripheral neuropathy Grade \>1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalAt end of trial- up to 3 years in follow upOverall survival will be calculated as time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survival time (PFS)From randomisation up to 3 years in follow upPFS will be calculated as the time interval from randomisation to the first event of locoregional failure, metastatic progression or death.
Site of failure: local, regional or distant FailureFrom time of surgery up to 3 years in follow up
Recurrence free survival timeFrom time of surgery up to 3 years in follow upRFS will be calculated in resected patients who achieved an R0 or R1 resection as the time interval from surgery to the date of first recurrence (local, regional or distant) or death, whatever comes first.
Postsurgical Quality of LifeFrom randomization up to 3 years in follow up
Postoperative complicationsFrom time of surgery up to 90 days postoperatively
Non-surgical site complicationsFrom time of surgery up to 90 days postoperatively

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026