Skip to content

Pretomanid in Adults With Hepatic Impairment

A Phase I, Single Dose, Open-Label Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Pretomanid in Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Hepatic Impairment to Matched, Non-Hepatically Impaired Subjects

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02422524
Enrollment
14
Registered
2015-04-21
Start date
2018-03-29
Completion date
2023-11-17
Last updated
2025-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tuberculosis

Keywords

Hepatic, impairment, PA-824, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tuberculosis

Brief summary

This is a Phase 1, single dose (200 mg), open-label study comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of Pretomanid in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment to matched, non-hepatically impaired subjects. There will be approximately 36 total subjects, adult males and females, 18 to 70 years of age, inclusive. The study will be conducted at 2 sites, study duration is approximately 24 months, and subject participation duration is approximately 5 weeks (including screening). Primary objective: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of Pretomanid in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (as assessed by Child-Pugh score), relative to matched non-hepatically impaired subjects. Secondary objective: To evaluate the safety of a single oral dose of Pretomanid in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (as assessed by Child-Pugh score), relative to matched non-hepatically impaired subjects.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 1, single dose (200 mg), open-label study comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of Pretomanid in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment to matched, non-hepatically impaired subjects. This study will enroll approximately 6 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A), approximately 6 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B), approximately 6 subjects with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C), and approximately 18 matched non-hepatically impaired subjects. Non-hepatically impaired subjects in the control group will be matched to subjects with hepatic impairment based on age (+/- 10 years) and body weight (+/- 20 percent) as measured at screening (Visit 00A). There will be approximately 36 total subjects, adult males and females, 18 to 70 years of age, inclusive. The study will be conducted at 2 sites, study duration is approximately 24 months, and subject participation duration is approximately 5 weeks (including screening). Primary objective: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of Pretomanid in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (as assessed by Child-Pugh score), relative to matched non-hepatically impaired subjects. Secondary objective: To evaluate the safety of a single oral dose of Pretomanid in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (as assessed by Child-Pugh score), relative to matched non-hepatically impaired subjects.

Interventions

DRUGPA-824

Pretomanid (PA-824) is a nitroimidazooxazine. All subjects will receive a single oral dose of 200 mg Pretomanid on day 1.

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria for Patients with Hepatic Impairment (Groups 1-3): 1. Subject is able to give voluntary written informed consent before any study related procedure is performed. 2. 18-70 years of age, inclusive. 3. Acceptable laboratory values\* obtained at screening (within 21 days prior to admission to the confinement/hospital unit) and either at or within 72 hours of admission to the confinement/hospital unit. \*Chemistry, complete blood count, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and urinalysis deemed not clinically significant by the investigator. 4. Hepatic impairment classified as Child-Pugh class A (mild), B (moderate), or C (severe) criteria at screening for Groups 1, 2, or 3, respectively, and documented evidence of hepatic cirrhosis\*. \*by biopsy, nuclear scan, CT, MRI, ultrasound, or other clinically acceptable methods 5. If female, not of childbearing potential\* or agrees to avoid becoming pregnant by using acceptable contraception\*\* during the duration of the study. \*Non-childbearing potential is defined as being post-menopausal for at least 2 years, status after bilateral oophorectomy or status after hysterectomy. * Females of childbearing potential must agree to use two acceptable methods of contraceptives: bilateral tubal ligation; barrier method (condom) by the male partner (even if vasectomized); hormonal contraceptives; intrauterine contraceptive devices; diaphragm in combination with contraceptive jelly, cream, foam, or spermicide; and abstinence from sexual intercourse with men. 6. If subject is male and capable of reproduction, agrees to avoid fathering a child for three months after dosing by using an acceptable method of birth control\*. \*In addition to the use of a barrier method (condom) even if vasectomized, acceptable methods of birth control are restricted to a monogamous relationship with a woman who agrees to use acceptable contraception as outlined in inclusion criterion #5, and abstinence from sexual intercourse with women. 7. If the subject is female, a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at admission to the confinement/hospital unit. 8. Willingness to comply with all protocol requirements. Inclusion Criteria for Non-Hepatically Impaired Controls (Group 4): 1. Subject is able to give voluntary written informed consent before any study related procedure is performed. 2. 18-70 years of age, inclusive. 3. Subject is a healthy volunteer as determined by no clinically significant findings from medical history, physical examination, vital signs, and 12-lead ECG as determined by the Site Investigator. 4. Acceptable laboratory values\* obtained at screening (within 21 days prior to admission to the confinement/hospital unit) and either at or within 72 hours of admission to the confinement/hospital unit. \*Chemistry, complete blood count, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and urinalysis within the reference range for the test laboratory, unless deemed not clinically significant by the investigator. 5. If female, not of childbearing potential\* or agrees to avoid becoming pregnant by using acceptable contraception\*\* during the duration of the study. \*Non-childbearing potential is defined as being post-menopausal for at least 2 years, status after bilateral oophorectomy or status after hysterectomy. \*\*Females of childbearing potential must agree to use two acceptable methods of contraceptives: bilateral tubal ligation; barrier method (condom) by the male partner (even if vasectomized); hormonal contraceptives; intrauterine contraceptive devices; diaphragm in combination with contraceptive jelly, cream, foam, or spermicide; and abstinence from sexual intercourse with men. 6. If subject is male and capable of reproduction, agrees to avoid fathering a child for three months after dosing by using an acceptable method of birth control\*. \*In addition to the use of a barrier method (condom) even if vasectomized, acceptable methods of birth control are restricted to a monogamous relationship with a woman who agrees to use acceptable contraception as outlined in inclusion criterion #5, and abstinence from sexual intercourse with women. 7. If the subject is female, a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at admission to the confinement/hospital unit. 8. Willingness to comply with all protocol requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vd/F: Apparent Volume of Distribution at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time PointsDay 1 to Day 5Apparent Volume of Distribution at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints is the volume that the total amount of administered drug would occupy to provide the same concentration as it currently is in blood plasma divided by the bioavailability. It is calculated by Dose/\[Lambda\_z x AUC(0-infinity)\]
AUC(0-infinity): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve Extrapolated to Infinity at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time PointsDay 1 to Day 5AUC(0-infinity) was calculated by noncompartmental analysis using the linear up log down method with the area extrapolated to infinity as Clast/Lambda\_z where Clast was the last observed concentration and Lambda\_z is the elimination rate constant.
AUC(0-last): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve to the Last Concentration Above the Lower Limit of Quantitation at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time PointsDay 1 to Day 5AUC(0-last) Area under the concentration time-curve to the last concentration above the lower limit of quantitation at specified pre-dose and post-dose time points was calculated by noncompartmental analysis using the linear up log down method.
CL/F: Apparent Oral Clearance Calculated From Dose/AUC(0-infinifty) at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time PointsDay 1 to Day 5Apparent oral clearance was calculated by noncompartmental analysis using the formula Dose/AUC(0-infinity).
Cmax: Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time PointsDay 1 to Day 5Maximum Pretomanid concentration is the maximum observed drug concentration in blood plasma at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints.
t(1/2): Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time PointsDay 1 to Day 5Apparent terminal half-life at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints was estimated by ln(2)/Lambda\_z, where Lambda\_z is the elimination rate constant.
Tmax: Time of Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time PointsDay 1 to Day 5Time of maximum Pretomanid concentration (Tmax) at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsDay 1 to Day 12A serious adverse event (SAE) is any adverse event occurring at any dose and regardless of causality that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect in an offspring of a subject taking study drug, or is an important medical event.
Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataDay 12ECG data was collected, including PR interval, QRS duration, QT Interval, QTc interval, RR interval, and Ventricular rate. Abnormal ECG data was evaluated for clinical significance.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsDay 3, 4, 5 and 12Summary of physical examination findings were obtained from a comprehensive physical examination including the following body system assessments: skin; head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat; thyroid; neurological; chest and lungs; cardiovascular; abdomen (liver and spleen); lymph nodes; musculoskeletal, and extremities.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersDay 2, 5, and 12Summary of abnormal laboratory parameters were collected following dose of study product through day 12. Abnormal findings were evaluated based on relationship to study product and clinical significance.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDays 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12Vital signs were collected at each study visit following study product administration. Abnormal vital signs were graded as mild, moderate or severe.
Incidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsDay 1 to Day 12Events were determined to be related if there was a reasonable possibility that the study product caused the adverse event (AE); that is, there was evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the study product and the AE. Each event was graded as mild, moderate or severe. Participants are counted according to their maximum severity of the event reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were hepatically impaired or non-hepatically impaired males and females, 18 to 70 years of age, inclusive, and met all eligibility criteria. Enrollment occurred between 29MAR2018 and 22AUG2023.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mild Hepatic Impairment
Participants with mild hepatic impairment received a single oral dose of 200mg Pretomanid tablets on day 1
6
Moderate Hepatic Impairment
Participants with moderate hepatic impairment received a single oral dose of 200mg Pretomanid tablets on day 1
2
Severe Hepatic Impairment
Participants with severe hepatic impairment received a single oral dose of 200mg Pretomanid tablets on day 1
0
Non-hepatically Impaired Controls
Participants with no hepatic impairment received a single oral dose of 200mg Pretomanid tablets on day 1
6
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-hepatically Impaired ControlsMild Hepatic ImpairmentTotalModerate Hepatic ImpairmentSevere Hepatic Impairment
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
BMI27.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
31.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
31.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
36.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants6 Participants14 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height172.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
172.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
171.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.34
166.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants3 Participants7 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants6 participants14 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants4 Participants10 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Weight88.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5
92.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
92.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4
102.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 20 / 00 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 61 / 20 / 04 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 20 / 00 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

AUC(0-infinity): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve Extrapolated to Infinity at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points

AUC(0-infinity) was calculated by noncompartmental analysis using the linear up log down method with the area extrapolated to infinity as Clast/Lambda\_z where Clast was the last observed concentration and Lambda\_z is the elimination rate constant.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Population consisted of participants in the safety population who had evaluable plasma PK samples for the estimation of Cmax or AUC (0-infinity).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentAUC(0-infinity): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve Extrapolated to Infinity at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points34800 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 10900
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentAUC(0-infinity): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve Extrapolated to Infinity at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points55900 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 34100
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsAUC(0-infinity): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve Extrapolated to Infinity at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points30700 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 6410
Primary

AUC(0-last): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve to the Last Concentration Above the Lower Limit of Quantitation at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points

AUC(0-last) Area under the concentration time-curve to the last concentration above the lower limit of quantitation at specified pre-dose and post-dose time points was calculated by noncompartmental analysis using the linear up log down method.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Population consisted of participants in the safety population who had evaluable plasma PK samples for the estimation of Cmax or AUC (0-infinity).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentAUC(0-last): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve to the Last Concentration Above the Lower Limit of Quantitation at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points30800 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 9860
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentAUC(0-last): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve to the Last Concentration Above the Lower Limit of Quantitation at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points47500 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 26700
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsAUC(0-last): Area Under the Concentration Time-curve to the Last Concentration Above the Lower Limit of Quantitation at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points28400 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 5130
Primary

CL/F: Apparent Oral Clearance Calculated From Dose/AUC(0-infinifty) at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points

Apparent oral clearance was calculated by noncompartmental analysis using the formula Dose/AUC(0-infinity).

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Population consisted of participants in the safety population who had evaluable plasma PK samples for the estimation of Cmax or AUC (0-infinity).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentCL/F: Apparent Oral Clearance Calculated From Dose/AUC(0-infinifty) at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points6.6 L/hrStandard Deviation 3.3
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentCL/F: Apparent Oral Clearance Calculated From Dose/AUC(0-infinifty) at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points4.4 L/hrStandard Deviation 2.7
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsCL/F: Apparent Oral Clearance Calculated From Dose/AUC(0-infinifty) at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points6.8 L/hrStandard Deviation 1.6
Primary

Cmax: Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points

Maximum Pretomanid concentration is the maximum observed drug concentration in blood plasma at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Population consisted of participants in the safety population who had evaluable plasma PK samples for the estimation of Cmax or AUC (0-infinity).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentCmax: Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points866 ng/mLStandard Deviation 391
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentCmax: Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points1070 ng/mLStandard Deviation 475
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsCmax: Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points786 ng/mLStandard Deviation 151
Primary

t(1/2): Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points

Apparent terminal half-life at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints was estimated by ln(2)/Lambda\_z, where Lambda\_z is the elimination rate constant.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Population consisted of participants in the safety population who had evaluable plasma PK samples for the estimation of Cmax or AUC (0-infinity).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Hepatic Impairmentt(1/2): Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points29.9 hrStandard Deviation 8.1
Moderate Hepatic Impairmentt(1/2): Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points33.6 hrStandard Deviation 8.1
Non-hepatically Impaired Controlst(1/2): Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points23.6 hrStandard Deviation 8.2
Primary

Tmax: Time of Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points

Time of maximum Pretomanid concentration (Tmax) at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Population consisted of participants in the safety population who had evaluable plasma PK samples for the estimation of Cmax or AUC (0-infinity).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentTmax: Time of Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points3.2 hrStandard Deviation 1.3
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentTmax: Time of Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points7.0 hrStandard Deviation 7.1
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsTmax: Time of Maximum Pretomanid Concentration at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points5.7 hrStandard Deviation 2.3
Primary

Vd/F: Apparent Volume of Distribution at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points

Apparent Volume of Distribution at specified pre-dose and post-dose timepoints is the volume that the total amount of administered drug would occupy to provide the same concentration as it currently is in blood plasma divided by the bioavailability. It is calculated by Dose/\[Lambda\_z x AUC(0-infinity)\]

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Population consisted of participants in the safety population who had evaluable plasma PK samples for the estimation of Cmax or AUC (0-infinity).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentVd/F: Apparent Volume of Distribution at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points280.7 LStandard Deviation 142.8
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentVd/F: Apparent Volume of Distribution at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points197.3 LStandard Deviation 78.5
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsVd/F: Apparent Volume of Distribution at Specified Pre-dose and Post-dose Time Points222.2 LStandard Deviation 58.6
Secondary

Incidence and Severity of Related Adverse Events

Events were determined to be related if there was a reasonable possibility that the study product caused the adverse event (AE); that is, there was evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the study product and the AE. Each event was graded as mild, moderate or severe. Participants are counted according to their maximum severity of the event reported.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 12

Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received study product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsSevere0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsMild0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsModerate1 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsSevere0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsModerate0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsMild0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsMild0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsModerate0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsSevere0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsSevere0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsMild0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsIncidence and Severity of Related Adverse EventsModerate1 Participants
Secondary

Incidence and Severity of Serious Adverse Events

A serious adverse event (SAE) is any adverse event occurring at any dose and regardless of causality that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect in an offspring of a subject taking study drug, or is an important medical event.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 12

Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received study product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsModerate0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsMild0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsSevere0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsModerate0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsMild0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsSevere0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsMild0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsSevere0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsIncidence and Severity of Serious Adverse EventsModerate0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Data

ECG data was collected, including PR interval, QRS duration, QT Interval, QTc interval, RR interval, and Ventricular rate. Abnormal ECG data was evaluated for clinical significance.

Time frame: Day 12

Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received study product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataClinically Significant0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataNo Events Reported4 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataNot Clinically Significant2 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataNot Clinically Significant0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataNo Events Reported0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataClinically Significant0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataNot Clinically Significant2 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataNo Events Reported4 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECG DataClinically Significant0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam Findings

Summary of physical examination findings were obtained from a comprehensive physical examination including the following body system assessments: skin; head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat; thyroid; neurological; chest and lungs; cardiovascular; abdomen (liver and spleen); lymph nodes; musculoskeletal, and extremities.

Time frame: Day 3, 4, 5 and 12

Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received study product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsChest and Lungs0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsSkin2 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsAbdomen (liver and spleen)0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsNeurological0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsThyroid0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsExtremities0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsMusculoskeletal1 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsHead, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsCardiovascular0 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsPulmonary1 participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsLymph Nodes0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsThyroid0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsExtremities1 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsHead, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsMusculoskeletal0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsPulmonary0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsSkin0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsNeurological0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsChest and Lungs0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsCardiovascular0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsAbdomen (liver and spleen)0 participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsLymph Nodes0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsAbdomen (liver and spleen)0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsChest and Lungs0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsMusculoskeletal0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsExtremities0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsCardiovascular0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsHead, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat1 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsThyroid0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsSkin0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsLymph Nodes0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsNeurological0 participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Exam FindingsPulmonary0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory Parameters

Summary of abnormal laboratory parameters were collected following dose of study product through day 12. Abnormal findings were evaluated based on relationship to study product and clinical significance.

Time frame: Day 2, 5, and 12

Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received study product.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNo Events6 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNo Events5 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNo Events6 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNo Events6 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenRelated, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNo Events6 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNo Events2 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNo Events2 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNot Related, Clinically Significant1 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNo Events1 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNo Events1 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNot Related, Clinically Significant1 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNo Events2 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNo Events0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNo Events0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNo Events0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNo Events0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNo Events0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNo Events5 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNo Events5 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminRelated, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineRelated, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAspartate AminotransferaseRelated, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersAlbuminNo Events6 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNo Events5 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumRelated, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNo Events6 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCreatinineNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersCalciumNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Safety Laboratory ParametersBlood Urea NitrogenNot Related, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs

Vital signs were collected at each study visit following study product administration. Abnormal vital signs were graded as mild, moderate or severe.

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12

Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received study product.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureSevere1 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateNone5 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureModerate1 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureModerate0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureMild1 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateModerate0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureNone4 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateMild1 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureMild0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateSevere0 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureSevere1 Participants
Mild Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureNone4 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureMild0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateMild0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateModerate0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateSevere0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateNone2 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureMild0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureModerate0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureSevere0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureNone2 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureModerate0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureSevere0 Participants
Moderate Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureNone2 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureSevere0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureSevere0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateSevere0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateMild0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureNone0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateModerate0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureMild0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureModerate0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureNone0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureMild0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateNone0 Participants
Severe Hepatic ImpairmentNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureModerate0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateNone4 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureModerate0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateSevere0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureSevere0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureNone4 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureSevere1 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureMild1 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureModerate1 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateMild2 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic Blood PressureNone4 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse RateModerate0 Participants
Non-hepatically Impaired ControlsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsDiastolic Blood PressureMild1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026