Skip to content

Study and Treatment of Visual Dysfunction and Motor Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis

Study and Treatment of Visual Dysfunction and Motor Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02391961
Enrollment
23
Registered
2015-03-18
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2020-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fatigue, Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia, Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

Primary fatigue represents a major cause of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), being reported in about 90% of cases. Fatigue interferes with everyday functioning but, unfortunately, little is known about its mechanisms. The investigators propose a characteristic eye movement abnormality (internuclear ophthalmoparesis, INO), commonly encountered in MS, as a simple model for primary motor fatigue. The investigators described worsening of ocular performance in MS patients with INO following visual tasks (ocular motor fatigue), which is likely due to decreased neural conduction along brain pathways injured by MS. This mechanism could represent a major component of MS-related primary motor fatigue. Relevant to Veterans' care, INO is a significant cause of visual disability, especially when complicated by ocular fatigue, and limits daily activities such as reading and driving. The investigators propose a medical treatment to improve ocular performance/fatigue in INO, which can reduce visual disability and improve quality of life in Veterans with MS.

Detailed description

This project focuses on fatigue, an extremely common yet poorly understood complaint in patients affected by multiple sclerosis (MS). Primary fatigue, that is fatigue not secondary to other MS-associated symptoms (e.g., sleep disorder or depression), is a distinct clinical entity and a cause of severe disability in most patients. As fatigue limits everyday activities and interferes with exercise-based rehabilitation, understanding its mechanisms is crucial to improving function and quality of life of Veterans with MS. Primary fatigue is divided in two broad categories, mental (cognitive) and physical (motor) fatigue, the latter being the focus of this proposal. Evidence suggests that primary motor fatigue originates within the central nervous system (CNS) but, although several factors have been invoked (e.g., demyelination, axonal loss, inflammation), a neurophysiological model to explain its underlying mechanisms is still lacking. First, with this project, the investigators propose a characteristic eye movement abnormality, internuclear ophthalmoparesis (INO), as a simple and accessible model for primary motor fatigue in MS. INO is a disorder of binocular coordination (conjugacy), in which fast eye movements (saccades) of the adducting eye (i.e., the eye moving towards the nose) are slow during horizontal gaze shifts, due to demyelination of a specific CNS pathway (the medial longitudinal fasciculus, MLF). Preliminary results in a small MS group of patients show that patients with INO exhibit changes in ocular conjugacy (i.e., ocular motor fatigue) during a 10-minute saccadic fatigue test, but normal subjects do not. The investigators hypothesize that ocular motor fatigue is representative of a major component of primary motor fatigue in MS, as it likely reflects deterioration of neural conduction fidelity along the demyelinated MLF axons. The investigators aim at showing that ocular motor fatigue occurs in a larger MS population with INO by measuring changes of binocular conjugacy on eye movement recordings using two main measures: 1) abducting/adducting eye ratio for saccadic peak velocity (pulse size ratio); 2) time difference in occurrence of peak acceleration in the adducting vs. the abducting eye (pulse time delay), during the 10-minute fatigue test. The investigators will determine whether ocular motor fatigue is associated with symptomatic subjective fatigue as assessed with standard fatigue questionnaires. Second, The investigators intend to test efficacy of dalfampridine, a potassium channel blocker that enhances neural conduction along demyelinated axons, in MS patients with INO with or without associated ocular motor fatigue. Visual dysfunction in MS patients with INO is a major cause of disability as they are severely limited in daily activities such as driving and can suffer further disability when developing ocular motor fatigue during a sustained visual task (e.g., reading). However, no medical therapy is available for INO/ocular motor fatigue. Preliminary results document improved binocular conjugacy in three MS patients taking dalfampridine for gait impairment (the FDA-approved indication for this medication). These data also showed improvement of ocular motor fatigue after dalfampridine in one patient. The investigators hypothesize that dalfampridine improves visual performance in MS patients with INO and counteracts ocular motor fatigue and, in turn, diminishes visual disability and improves quality of life. Thus, the investigators will conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial of dalfampridine (10mg twice a day) of 10 weeks duration. Before and after treatment, the investigators will assess for changes in binocular conjugacy by eye movement measures as above, as well as changes in clinical measures, such as reading acuity and speed, saccades performance, gait performance, symptomatic fatigue, visual disability and quality of life. the investigators will determine whether improvement of visual performance has positive effects on overall disability and quality of life of MS patients with INO. The investigators will also determine whether there is an association between response of eye movement and gait performances to dalfampridine.

Interventions

10-week randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, crossover trial, which includes a period of wash out of two weeks between treatment with dalfampridine and placebo.

DRUGPlacebo

10-week randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, crossover trial, which includes a period of wash out of two weeks between treatment with dalfampridine and placebo.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of MS of any course and duration * Evidence of mild to moderate internuclear ophthalmoparesis (INO), that is slowing of the adducting eye on physical examination of saccadic speed, whether INO is unilateral or bilateral, symmetrical or asymmetrical * Medically stable conditions, ability to give informed consent and understand and cooperate with the testing * Dalfampridine-naive as well as history of taking dalfampridine in the past, whether there was benefit in gait impairment or not, after a washout period of at least 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of evidence of INO (slowing of the adducting eye) on physical examination of saccadic speed * Severe INO (i.e., exotropia in primary gaze) on physical examination * Medically unstable conditions, inability to give informed consent and understand and cooperate with the testing * History of side effects from dalfampridine * History of seizures * Moderate or severe renal failure, assessed by clearance of creatinine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.Average PSR values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.For each saccade made by the subject, the ratio of the maximum velocity (deg/sec) of the eye moving away from the nose and of the eye moving towards the nose was calculated. Subjects' horizontal saccades were recorded for 10 minutes, and an average of PSR for all saccades recorded was taken.
Pulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.Average PTD values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.For each saccade made by the subject, we calculated the difference (in sec) between the onset (based on a velocity threshold) of the movement in the adducting eye (the eye moving towards the nose) and the onset of the movement in the abducting eye (the eye moving away from the nose). Subjects' horizontal saccades were recorded for 10 minutes, and an average of PTD for all saccades recorded was taken.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait AssessmentMeasures were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.25-foot Walk Test (FWT)
Reading Acuity (RA)Average RA values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.MNREAD acuity charts for reading acuity (RA)
10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS)10-Item NOS was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).We used a validated questionnaire to assess visual disability, the 10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement. Min value 0; Max value 100; Higher scores mean a better outcome.
National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25)VFQ25 was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).We used a validated questionnaire to assess visual disability, the National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25. Min value 0; Max value 100; Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Maximum Reading Speed (MRS)Average MRS values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.MNREAD acuity charts for reading speed (maximum reading speed, MRS)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

(4) subjects were enrolled, but did not pass initial screening procedures at study visit 1 and therefore were not assigned to a study group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dalfampridine, Then Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive dalfampridine 10 mg tablet twice a day for 4 weeks (First Intervention) then, after a washout period of 2 weeks, did receive placebo tablet twice a day (matching dalfampridine 10 mg tablet) for 4 weeks (Second Intervention).
10
Dalfampridine, Then Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive dalfampridine 10 mg tablet twice a day for 4 weeks (First Intervention) then, after a washout period of 2 weeks, did receive placebo tablet twice a day (matching dalfampridine 10 mg tablet) for 4 weeks (Second Intervention).
17
Placebo, Then Dalfampridine
Participants were randomized to receive placebo tablet (matching dalfampridine 10 mg tablet) twice a day for 4 weeks (First Intervention) then, after a washout period of 2 weeks, did receive dalfampridine 10 mg tablet twice a day for 4 weeks (Second Intervention).
9
Placebo, Then Dalfampridine
Participants were randomized to receive placebo tablet (matching dalfampridine 10 mg tablet) twice a day for 4 weeks (First Intervention) then, after a washout period of 2 weeks, did receive dalfampridine 10 mg tablet twice a day for 4 weeks (Second Intervention).
15
Total51

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Intervention (4 Weeks)Adverse Event20
Second Intervention (4 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject11
Washout (2 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo, Then DalfampridineTotalDalfampridine, Then Placebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Age, Continuous47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants13 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 170 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Pulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.

For each saccade made by the subject, the ratio of the maximum velocity (deg/sec) of the eye moving away from the nose and of the eye moving towards the nose was calculated. Subjects' horizontal saccades were recorded for 10 minutes, and an average of PSR for all saccades recorded was taken.

Time frame: Average PSR values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.

Population: Some participants withdrew after visit 1, visit 2 or 3. (1) more participant was not included in the final analysis as missing a datapoint (baseline data at Visit 2). Thus, the number above (12) is the number of participants who completed the full protocol from visit 1 to visit 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalfampridinePulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.average pulse size ratio baseline1.914 ratioStandard Deviation 0.454
DalfampridinePulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.average pulse size ratio after 3 hours1.805 ratioStandard Deviation 0.451
PlaceboPulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.average pulse size ratio baseline1.937 ratioStandard Deviation 0.553
PlaceboPulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.average pulse size ratio after 3 hours1.898 ratioStandard Deviation 0.508
Comparison: Statistical Analysis applies to the 4 subgroups: average PSR at baseline and after 3 hours on dalfampridine, and average PSR at baseline and after 3 hours on placebo.p-value: 0.842672ANOVA
Primary

Pulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.

For each saccade made by the subject, we calculated the difference (in sec) between the onset (based on a velocity threshold) of the movement in the adducting eye (the eye moving towards the nose) and the onset of the movement in the abducting eye (the eye moving away from the nose). Subjects' horizontal saccades were recorded for 10 minutes, and an average of PTD for all saccades recorded was taken.

Time frame: Average PTD values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.

Population: Some participants withdrew after visit 1, visit 2 or 3. (1) more participant was not included in the final analysis as missing a datapoint (baseline data at Visit 2). Thus, the number above (12) is the number of participants who completed the full protocol from visit 1 to visit 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalfampridinePulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.Average PTD at baseline0.007 secondsStandard Deviation 0.005
DalfampridinePulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.Average PTD after 3 hours0.008 secondsStandard Deviation 0.004
PlaceboPulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.Average PTD at baseline0.007 secondsStandard Deviation 0.005
PlaceboPulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.Average PTD after 3 hours0.008 secondsStandard Deviation 0.004
Comparison: Statistical Analysis applies to the 4 subgroups: average PTD at baseline and after 3 hours on dalfampridine, and average PTD at baseline and after 3 hours on placebo.p-value: 0.972866ANOVA
Secondary

10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS)

We used a validated questionnaire to assess visual disability, the 10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement. Min value 0; Max value 100; Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame: 10-Item NOS was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dalfampridine10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS)64.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Placebo10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS)64.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Comparison: Statistical Analysis applies to the 2 groups, mean 10-item NOS scores on dalfampridine vs mean 10-item NOS scores on placebop-value: 0.95Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Gait Assessment

25-foot Walk Test (FWT)

Time frame: Measures were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalfampridineGait Assessment25 FWT baseline8.986 secondsStandard Deviation 4.957
DalfampridineGait Assessment25 FWT after 3 hours8.567 secondsStandard Deviation 5.352
PlaceboGait Assessment25 FWT baseline9.113 secondsStandard Deviation 4.639
PlaceboGait Assessment25 FWT after 3 hours9.184 secondsStandard Deviation 5.4
Comparison: Statistical Analysis applies to the 4 subgroups: 25 FWT at baseline and after 3 hours on dalfampridine, and 25 FWT at baseline and after 3 hours on placebo.p-value: 0.990995ANOVA
Secondary

Maximum Reading Speed (MRS)

MNREAD acuity charts for reading speed (maximum reading speed, MRS)

Time frame: Average MRS values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalfampridineMaximum Reading Speed (MRS)MRS at baseline156 words per minuteStandard Deviation 31
DalfampridineMaximum Reading Speed (MRS)MRS after 3 hours158 words per minuteStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboMaximum Reading Speed (MRS)MRS at baseline151.7 words per minuteStandard Deviation 20
PlaceboMaximum Reading Speed (MRS)MRS after 3 hours158.7 words per minuteStandard Deviation 25
Comparison: Statistical Analysis applies to the 4 subgroups: MRS at baseline and after 3 hours on dalfampridine, and MRS at baseline and after 3 hours on placebo.p-value: 0.9ANOVA
Secondary

National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25)

We used a validated questionnaire to assess visual disability, the National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25. Min value 0; Max value 100; Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame: VFQ25 was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalfampridineNational Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25)73.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.65
PlaceboNational Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25)71.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Comparison: Statistical Analysis applies to the 2 groups, mean VFQ-25 scores on dalfampridine vs mean VFQ-25 scores on placebop-value: 0.71Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Reading Acuity (RA)

MNREAD acuity charts for reading acuity (RA)

Time frame: Average RA values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DalfampridineReading Acuity (RA)RA at baseline0.111 logMAR for RAStandard Deviation 0.117
DalfampridineReading Acuity (RA)RA after 3 hours0.088 logMAR for RAStandard Deviation 0.121
PlaceboReading Acuity (RA)RA at baseline0.108 logMAR for RAStandard Deviation 0.138
PlaceboReading Acuity (RA)RA after 3 hours0.086 logMAR for RAStandard Deviation 0.141
Comparison: Statistical Analysis applies to the 4 subgroups: RA at baseline and after 3 hours on dalfampridine, and RA at baseline and after 3 hours on placebo.p-value: 0.95ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026