Skip to content

Etanercept and Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Psoriatic Arthritis

A Multicenter Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of Etanercept and Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Subjects With Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02376790
Enrollment
851
Registered
2015-03-03
Start date
2015-03-03
Completion date
2018-07-06
Last updated
2022-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

Psoriatic Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriasis, Etanercept, Enbrel, Methotrexate, Minimal Disease Activity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the role of etanercept alone or in combination with methotrexate on disease activity in adults with psoriatic arthritis.

Detailed description

The study will consist of a 30-day screening period, a 48-week double-blind treatment period and a 30-day safety follow-up period. At or after week 24, participants with an inadequate response could receive rescue therapy with etanercept plus methotrexate until the end of the treatment period.

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept

Etanercept was administered by subcutaneous injection once a week

DRUGMethotrexate

Methotrexate capsules taken orally once a week. Dosing was initiated at 10 mg weekly and titrated up to a final dose of 20 mg weekly over a 4-week period.

Placebo to etanercept was administered by subcutaneous injection once a week.

Placebo to methotrexate capsules taken orally once a week.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Subject must have a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. * Subject has ≥ 3 tender and ≥ 3 swollen joints at screening and at baseline. * Subject has an active psoriatic skin lesion * Subject is naïve to etanercept and any other biologic for the treatment for PsA or psoriasis. * Subject has no prior use of methotrexate for PsA. * Subject has no history of tuberculosis * Subject has a negative test for tuberculosis, hepatitis B and C.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has known history of alcoholic hepatitis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or immunodeficiency syndromes, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. * Subject has any active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of investigational product. * Subject has a serious infection, defined as requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectives within 8 weeks prior to the first dose of investigational product.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 24Baseline and week 24A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein concentration.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48The tender joint count is an assessment of the pain and/or tenderness of 68 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total tender joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present tenderness.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48The swollen joint count is an assessment of the swelling of 66 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total swollen joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present swelling.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48A global assessment of the participant's arthritis assessed by the physician on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 mm = No activity at all and 100 mm = Worst activity imaginable.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48A global assessment of the participant's arthritis, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No arthritis activity at all and 100 mm = Worst arthritis activity imaginable.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48A global assessment of the severity of the participant's joint pain, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No pain at all and 100 mm = Worst pain imaginable.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48C-reactive protein (CRP) is a specific measure of inflammatory activity.
Percentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures: * Tender joint count (0-68) ≤ 1 * Swollen joint count (0-66) ≤ 1 * Body surface area (BSA) involvement with psoriasis (0% to 100%) ≤ 3% * Patient global assessment of joint pain VAS (0-100) ≤ 15 * Patient global assessment of disease activity VAS (0-100) ≤ 20 * HAQ-DI (0-3) ≤ 0.5 * Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index (18 sites assessed for enthesitis with an overall score of 0 - 16) ≤ 1
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeBaseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48PASDAS is a measure of disease activity derived from the following variables: * Physician and patient global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a 0-100 VAS) * 68 tender joint count * 66 swollen joint count * Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36) physical component summary (general health status on a scale from 0-100) * Tender dactylitis count (each digit assessed for tender dactylitis; total score 0-20) * Leeds enthesitis index (enthesitis assessed at 6 sites; total score of 0-6) * CRP level (mg/L) The composite score is a weighted index where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items: * 28 tender joint count, * 28 swollen joint count, * Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; * Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items: * 28 tender joint count, * 28 swollen joint count, * Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; * Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. * CRP The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86 with higher scores representing worse disease.
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint count * 28 swollen joint count * C-reactive protein (CRP) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24Baseline and week 24The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring in 8 functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24Baseline and week 24The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains. Two summary component scores are calculated: mental component summary score (MCS) and physical component summary score (PCS). The MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales and the PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning.
Percentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Week 24Week 24Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures: * Tender joint count (0-68) ≤ 1 * Swollen joint count (0-66) ≤ 1 * Body surface area (BSA) involvement with psoriasis (0% to 100%) ≤ 3% * Patient global assessment of joint pain VAS (0-100) ≤ 15 * Patient global assessment of disease activity VAS (0-100) ≤ 20 * HAQ-DI (0-3) ≤ 0.5 * Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index (18 sites assessed for enthesitis with an overall score of 0 - 16) ≤ 1
Percentage of Participants With Clear mNAPSI at Week 24Baseline and week 24The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features: * pitting (scores 0-3, depending on the number of pits) * nail plate crumbling (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * onycholysis and oil drop dyschromia (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * leukonychia (0 = absent, 1 = present) * red spots in lunula (0 = absent, 1 = present) * nail bed hyperkeratosis (0 = absent, 1 = present) * splinter hemorrhages (0 = absent, 1 = present) In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study. mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease. Clear mNAPSI is defined as a score = 0.
Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 24Baseline and week 24The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[worst\]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.
Percentage of Participants With Clear LDI at Week 24Baseline and week 24The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[worst\]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis. Clear LDI is defined as a score = 0.
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Week 24Baseline and week 24The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden.
Percentage of Participants With Clear SPARCC Enthesitis Index Score at Week 24Baseline and week 24The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden. Clear SPARCC enthesitis is defined as a score = 0.
Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis at Week 24Baseline and week 24The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline \* 100
Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement SubgroupsBaseline and week 24The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline \* 100
Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24Week 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement SubgroupsWeek 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Mean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24Week 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Mean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement SubgroupsWeek 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24Week 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement SubgroupsWeek 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24Baseline and week 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement SubgroupsBaseline and week 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24Baseline and week 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement SubgroupsBaseline and week 24The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).
Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Week 24Baseline and week 24The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features: * pitting (scores 0-3, depending on the number of pits) * nail plate crumbling (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * onycholysis and oil drop dyschromia (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * leukonychia (0 = absent, 1 = present) * red spots in lunula (0 = absent, 1 = present) * nail bed hyperkeratosis (0 = absent, 1 = present) * splinter hemorrhages (0 = absent, 1 = present) In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study. mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease.

Countries

Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, France, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Russia, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 124 centers in Europe, Latin America, North America, and South Africa. Participants were enrolled from 03 March 2015 to 07 July 2017.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a 30-day screening period, a 48-week randomized double blind treatment period, and a 30-day safety follow-up period. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Methotrexate Monotherapy
Participants received oral methotrexate 20 mg weekly plus placebo to etanercept subcutaneous injection once a week for 48 weeks.
284
Etanercept Monotherapy
Participants received etanercept 50 mg weekly by subcutaneous injection plus oral placebo to methotrexate for 48 weeks.
284
Etanercept + Methotrexate
Participants received etanercept 50 mg a week by subcutaneous injection and oral methotrexate 20 mg a week for 48 weeks.
283
Total851

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDecision by Sponsor214
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up151012
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject433637

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept MonotherapyEtanercept + MethotrexateMethotrexate MonotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
48.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Age, Customized
≤ 65 years
251 Participants259 Participants257 Participants767 Participants
Age, Customized
> 65 years
33 Participants24 Participants27 Participants84 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
≤ 30 kg/m²
153 Participants160 Participants146 Participants459 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
> 30 kg/m²
130 Participants123 Participants138 Participants391 Participants
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)28.45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
28.55 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.71
30.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.26
29.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.98
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration10.72 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.59
8.70 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.65
10.52 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.29
9.98 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.66
Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI)1.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)4.80 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13
4.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12
4.93 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.11
4.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12
Duration of Psoriatic Arthritis Disease3.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.96
2.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.99
3.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.85
3.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.28
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
70 Participants69 Participants58 Participants197 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
214 Participants214 Participants226 Participants654 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI)50.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 137.2
44.11 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 143.17
56.89 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 174.56
50.37 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 152.47
Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
MCS
45.107 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.496
46.256 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.236
45.174 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.073
45.511 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.946
Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2)
PCS
37.835 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.381
37.353 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.243
35.587 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.411
36.927 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity62.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.1
61.0 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.8
60.7 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.5
61.5 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain56.5 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3
55.7 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6
56.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.7
56.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8
Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis10.76 percent body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.66
10.74 percent body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.58
12.68 percent body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.78
11.40 percent body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.44
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity58.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
58.0 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
58.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4
58.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
Prior Use of Non-biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
No
258 Participants240 Participants246 Participants744 Participants
Prior Use of Non-biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
Yes
26 Participants43 Participants38 Participants107 Participants
Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS)6.02 units on a scale5.95 units on a scale6.10 units on a scale6.02 units on a scale
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
11 Participants8 Participants11 Participants30 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black (or African American)
0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
18 Participants6 Participants10 Participants34 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
252 Participants265 Participants255 Participants772 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
133 Participants139 Participants160 Participants432 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
151 Participants144 Participants124 Participants419 Participants
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)29.52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.19
29.43 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
31.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.52
30.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.23
Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA)2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Swollen Joint Count11.5 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
11.2 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
12.9 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
11.9 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Tender Joint Count18.8 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
20.0 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
20.9 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
19.9 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2820 / 2820 / 284
other
Total, other adverse events
210 / 282185 / 282214 / 284
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 28219 / 28217 / 284

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 24

A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein concentration.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: All randomized participants; missing postbaseline data were imputed using non-responder imputation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2450.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2460.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2465.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: The primary hypothesis of this study is that etanercept plus methotrexate therapy and etanercept monotherapy are more efficacious than methotrexate monotherapy as measured by the percentage of participants with psoriatic arthritis achieving ACR 20 response at week 24.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [5.8, 22]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The primary hypothesis of this study is that etanercept plus methotrexate therapy and etanercept monotherapy are more efficacious than methotrexate monotherapy as measured by the percentage of participants with psoriatic arthritis achieving ACR 20 response at week 24.p-value: 0.02995% CI: [1, 17.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over Time

The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items: * 28 tender joint count, * 28 swollen joint count, * Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; * Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 8-11.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 24-15.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 16-15.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 4-8.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 48-20.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 36-18.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 12-13.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 16-16.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 4-10.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 8-14.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 12-15.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 24-17.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 36-19.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 48-20.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 24-16.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 8-14.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 48-19.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 36-18.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 16-17.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 12-16.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Over TimeWeek 4-10.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in CDAI at week 24p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-2.93, 1.68]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in CDAI at week 24p-value: 0.2695% CI: [-3.63, 0.99]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over Time

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a specific measure of inflammatory activity.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 4-0.93 mg/LStandard Error 0.93
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 24-2.60 mg/LStandard Error 0.91
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 16-2.81 mg/LStandard Error 0.82
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 8-2.31 mg/LStandard Error 0.9
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 48-4.88 mg/LStandard Error 1.03
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 36-4.16 mg/LStandard Error 0.96
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 12-3.36 mg/LStandard Error 0.84
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 4-5.91 mg/LStandard Error 1.01
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 8-7.51 mg/LStandard Error 0.94
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 12-7.38 mg/LStandard Error 0.99
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 16-7.40 mg/LStandard Error 1.03
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 24-6.91 mg/LStandard Error 1.15
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 36-7.36 mg/LStandard Error 1.13
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 48-7.45 mg/LStandard Error 1.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 24-5.82 mg/LStandard Error 0.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 8-5.19 mg/LStandard Error 0.88
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 48-5.81 mg/LStandard Error 0.95
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 36-5.82 mg/LStandard Error 0.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 16-5.59 mg/LStandard Error 0.85
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 12-5.71 mg/LStandard Error 0.82
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Concentration Over TimeWeek 4-5.49 mg/LStandard Error 0.74
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring in 8 functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: All randomized participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24-0.412 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.036
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24-0.444 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24-0.468 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.038
p-value: 0.3495% CI: [-0.15, 0.05]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.6795% CI: [-0.12, 0.08]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over Time

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 8-0.277 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 24-0.412 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.036
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 16-0.378 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.036
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 4-0.188 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.024
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 48-0.526 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.041
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 36-0.452 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.038
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 12-0.310 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 16-0.454 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.033
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 4-0.266 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.024
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 8-0.365 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.031
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 12-0.404 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 24-0.444 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 36-0.496 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.039
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 48-0.557 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.038
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 24-0.468 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.038
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 8-0.403 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.032
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 48-0.554 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.041
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 36-0.548 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 16-0.483 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.036
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 12-0.450 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.033
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Over TimeWeek 4-0.306 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 24

The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[worst\]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with non-zero LDI score at baseline and available data at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 24-128.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 26.76
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 24-119.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 20.66
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 24-110.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 22.7
p-value: 0.6895% CI: [-51.52, 79.36]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.8595% CI: [-58.75, 71.42]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24

The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains. Two summary component scores are calculated: mental component summary score (MCS) and physical component summary score (PCS). The MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales and the PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: All randomized participants with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24Mental Component Summary3.259 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.589
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24Physical Component Summary5.952 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24Physical Component Summary7.808 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.546
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24Mental Component Summary2.835 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.624
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24Physical Component Summary8.011 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.598
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Health Survey Short Form 36 Items Version 2 (SF-36 v2) at Week 24Mental Component Summary3.321 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.572
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in Physical Component Summary at week 24p-value: 0.01595% CI: [0.37, 3.51]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in Physical Component Summary at week 24p-value: 0.03395% CI: [0.13, 3.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in Mental Component Summary at week 24p-value: 0.9795% CI: [-1.69, 1.63]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in Mental Component Summary at week 24p-value: 0.5695% CI: [-2.16, 1.16]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Week 24

The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features: * pitting (scores 0-3, depending on the number of pits) * nail plate crumbling (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * onycholysis and oil drop dyschromia (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * leukonychia (0 = absent, 1 = present) * red spots in lunula (0 = absent, 1 = present) * nail bed hyperkeratosis (0 = absent, 1 = present) * splinter hemorrhages (0 = absent, 1 = present) In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study. mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with non-zero mNAPSI score at baseline and available data at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Week 24-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Week 24-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Week 24-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
p-value: 0.0295% CI: [-1.03, -0.09]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.195% CI: [-0.88, 0.08]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over Time

A global assessment of the participant's arthritis, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No arthritis activity at all and 100 mm = Worst arthritis activity imaginable.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 8-15.6 mmStandard Error 1.6
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 24-23.0 mmStandard Error 1.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 16-22.7 mmStandard Error 1.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 4-11.0 mmStandard Error 1.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 48-28.9 mmStandard Error 1.9
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 36-26.0 mmStandard Error 1.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 12-18.6 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 16-30.9 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 4-21.9 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 8-27.3 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 12-29.9 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 24-32.3 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 36-36.4 mmStandard Error 1.8
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 48-38.8 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 24-29.6 mmStandard Error 1.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 8-26.4 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 48-33.3 mmStandard Error 1.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 36-32.4 mmStandard Error 1.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 16-29.3 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 12-28.0 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 4-21.0 mmStandard Error 1.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over Time

A global assessment of the severity of the participant's joint pain, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No pain at all and 100 mm = Worst pain imaginable.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 8-14.5 mmStandard Error 1.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 24-20.6 mmStandard Error 1.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 16-20.9 mmStandard Error 1.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 4-8.9 mmStandard Error 1.4
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 48-27.2 mmStandard Error 1.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 36-23.9 mmStandard Error 1.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 12-16.0 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 16-25.9 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 4-18.4 mmStandard Error 1.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 8-23.5 mmStandard Error 1.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 12-24.1 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 24-26.4 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 36-31.5 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 48-32.5 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 24-26.9 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 8-24.0 mmStandard Error 1.5
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 48-31.1 mmStandard Error 1.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 36-28.8 mmStandard Error 1.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 16-25.6 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 12-24.9 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Joint Pain Over TimeWeek 4-18.5 mmStandard Error 1.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over Time

A global assessment of the participant's arthritis assessed by the physician on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 mm = No activity at all and 100 mm = Worst activity imaginable.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 8-25.0 mmStandard Error 1.4
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 24-29.6 mmStandard Error 1.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 16-30.3 mmStandard Error 1.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 4-16.8 mmStandard Error 1.2
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 48-41.4 mmStandard Error 1.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 36-37.1 mmStandard Error 1.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 12-26.8 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 16-34.9 mmStandard Error 1.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 4-23.1 mmStandard Error 1.2
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 8-29.7 mmStandard Error 1.4
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 12-32.7 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 24-35.7 mmStandard Error 1.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 36-42.8 mmStandard Error 1.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 48-43.8 mmStandard Error 1.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 24-35.8 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 8-30.4 mmStandard Error 1.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 48-41.5 mmStandard Error 1.6
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 36-39.9 mmStandard Error 1.5
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 16-36.2 mmStandard Error 1.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 12-33.9 mmStandard Error 1.3
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Over TimeWeek 4-22.8 mmStandard Error 1.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over Time

PASDAS is a measure of disease activity derived from the following variables: * Physician and patient global assessment of disease activity (assessed on a 0-100 VAS) * 68 tender joint count * 66 swollen joint count * Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36) physical component summary (general health status on a scale from 0-100) * Tender dactylitis count (each digit assessed for tender dactylitis; total score 0-20) * Leeds enthesitis index (enthesitis assessed at 6 sites; total score of 0-6) * CRP level (mg/L) The composite score is a weighted index where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 12-1.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 24-1.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 36-2.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 48-2.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 48-3.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 12-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 36-3.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 24-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 48-3.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 24-2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 36-2.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Over TimeWeek 12-2.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in PASDAS at week 24p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.91, -0.34]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in PASDAS at week 24p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.92, -0.34]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over Time

The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items: * 28 tender joint count, * 28 swollen joint count, * Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; * Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. * CRP The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86 with higher scores representing worse disease.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 8-11.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 24-15.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 16-15.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 4-8.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 48-20.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 36-19.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 12-14.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 16-17.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 4-11.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 8-14.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 12-16.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 24-17.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 36-20.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 48-21.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 24-17.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 8-15.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 48-19.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 36-19.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 16-17.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 12-16.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Over TimeWeek 4-11.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in SDAI at week 24p-value: 0.4195% CI: [-3.35, 1.38]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in SDAI at week 24p-value: 0.1595% CI: [-4.09, 0.65]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Week 24

The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with non-zero SPARCC enthesitis index score at baseline and available data at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Week 24-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Week 24-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Week 24-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.795% CI: [-0.66, 0.98]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.9395% CI: [-0.79, 0.86]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over Time

The swollen joint count is an assessment of the swelling of 66 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total swollen joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present swelling.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 16-7.0 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 4-4.1 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 24-7.0 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 48-9.6 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 8-5.4 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 36-9.2 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 12-6.6 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 24-7.6 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 36-9.0 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 48-9.2 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 4-4.8 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.3
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 16-7.3 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 8-6.2 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 12-6.8 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 48-8.7 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 12-7.2 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 16-7.8 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 8-6.5 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 4-4.7 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 24-7.7 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Over TimeWeek 36-8.4 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over Time

The tender joint count is an assessment of the pain and/or tenderness of 68 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total tender joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present tenderness.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 8-7.8 tender jointsStandard Error 0.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 24-10.8 tender jointsStandard Error 0.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 16-10.0 tender jointsStandard Error 0.7
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 4-5.7 tender jointsStandard Error 0.6
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 48-14.5 tender jointsStandard Error 0.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 36-13.5 tender jointsStandard Error 0.8
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 12-9.7 tender jointsStandard Error 0.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 16-10.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 4-6.4 tender jointsStandard Error 0.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 8-8.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.6
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 12-9.8 tender jointsStandard Error 0.7
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 24-10.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.8
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 36-12.7 tender jointsStandard Error 0.8
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 48-13.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 24-11.0 tender jointsStandard Error 0.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 8-9.4 tender jointsStandard Error 0.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 48-12.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 36-12.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.9
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 16-11.9 tender jointsStandard Error 0.8
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 12-10.8 tender jointsStandard Error 0.7
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Over TimeWeek 4-7.4 tender jointsStandard Error 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over Time

The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: * 28 tender joint count * 28 swollen joint count * C-reactive protein (CRP) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 8-1.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 24-1.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 16-1.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 4-0.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 48-2.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 36-1.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Methotrexate MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 12-1.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 16-1.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 4-1.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 8-1.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 12-1.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 24-1.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 36-2.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 48-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 24-1.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 8-1.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 48-2.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 36-2.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 16-1.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 12-1.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Etanercept + MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Over TimeWeek 4-1.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in DAS28 at week 24p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-0.52, -0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline in DAS28 at week 24p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.62, -0.17]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants with ≥ 3% body surface area (BSA) psoriasis involvement at baseline and available sPGA data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 241.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 241.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 240.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Mean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Methotrexate MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Methotrexate MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept MonotherapyMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Etanercept + MethotrexateMean Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over Time

Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures: * Tender joint count (0-68) ≤ 1 * Swollen joint count (0-66) ≤ 1 * Body surface area (BSA) involvement with psoriasis (0% to 100%) ≤ 3% * Patient global assessment of joint pain VAS (0-100) ≤ 15 * Patient global assessment of disease activity VAS (0-100) ≤ 20 * HAQ-DI (0-3) ≤ 0.5 * Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index (18 sites assessed for enthesitis with an overall score of 0 - 16) ≤ 1

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 45.7 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 83.0 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 1211.6 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 2425.7 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 3630.3 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 4835.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 4851.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 411.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 2439.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 3643.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 89.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 1229.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 87.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 1229.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 4853.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 2439.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 412.6 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a American Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response Over TimeWeek 3646.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Week 24

Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures: * Tender joint count (0-68) ≤ 1 * Swollen joint count (0-66) ≤ 1 * Body surface area (BSA) involvement with psoriasis (0% to 100%) ≤ 3% * Patient global assessment of joint pain VAS (0-100) ≤ 15 * Patient global assessment of disease activity VAS (0-100) ≤ 20 * HAQ-DI (0-3) ≤ 0.5 * Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index (18 sites assessed for enthesitis with an overall score of 0 - 16) ≤ 1

Time frame: Week 24

Population: All randomized participants; missing postbaseline data were imputed using non-responder imputation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Week 2422.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Week 2435.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Week 2435.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: The secondary hypothesis of this study was that etanercept plus methotrexate therapy and etanercept monotherapy are more efficacious than methotrexate monotherapy as measured by the percentage of participants with PsA achieving MDA response at week 24.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [4.9, 19.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The secondary hypothesis of this study was that etanercept plus methotrexate therapy and etanercept monotherapy are more efficacious than methotrexate monotherapy as measured by the percentage of participants with PsA achieving MDA response at week 24.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [4.2, 18.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over Time

A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 425.0 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 1658.5 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 1246.8 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 4870.7 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 3666.3 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 2456.9 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 846.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 1265.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 4883.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 444.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 860.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 1669.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 2467.6 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 3677.0 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 1671.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 446.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 3674.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 2471.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 1270.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 860.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Over TimeWeek 4880.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time

A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 1629.2 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 815.1 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 3641.8 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 1216.9 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 2430.6 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 46.0 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 4849.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 3657.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 4863.0 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 416.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 831.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 1240.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 1643.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 2444.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 418.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 2445.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 1643.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 4860.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 830.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 3656.0 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over TimeWeek 1239.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: Analysis of the percentage of participants with an ACR50 response at week 24.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.4, 23]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Analysis of the percentage of participants with an ACR50 response at week 24.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [3.4, 20.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over Time

A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in 68 tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of joint pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-reactive protein.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 1610.7 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 4825.2 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 3619.6 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 125.2 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 84.4 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 42.8 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 2413.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 3638.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 1224.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 1624.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 2429.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 4839.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 43.6 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 815.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 4839.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 1625.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 814.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 45.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 3633.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 2427.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Over TimeWeek 1222.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Analysis of the percentage of participants with an ACR70 response at week 24.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.5, 20.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Analysis of the percentage of participants with an ACR70 response at week 24.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.7, 20.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants with ≥ 3% body surface area (BSA) psoriasis involvement at baseline and available sPGA data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 2466.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 2472.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 2477.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.01995% CI: [2, 20.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.495% CI: [-5.6, 14]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline73.6 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline72.0 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline59.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline64.0 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline71.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline79.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline87.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline78.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline76.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Analysis of percentage of participants with an sPGA of 0 or 1 at Week 24 in participants with baseline BSA involvement with psoriasis ≥ 10%.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [6.8, 33.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Analysis of percentage of participants with an sPGA of 0 or 1 at Week 24 in participants with baseline BSA involvement with psoriasis ≥ 10%.p-value: 0.01295% CI: [4, 30.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with ≥ 3% body surface area (BSA) psoriasis involvement at baseline and available sPGA data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 2429.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 2428.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 2418.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline27.9 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline37.0 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline31.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline38.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline44.6 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline20.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline43.8 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline15.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline21.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with ≥ 3% body surface area (BSA) psoriasis involvement at baseline and available sPGA data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 2430.5 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 2428.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 2435.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline34.9 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline15.1 percentage of participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline26.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline25.3 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline20.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline31.9 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline30.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline37.6 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement in sPGA From Baseline at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline32.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clear LDI at Week 24

The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[worst\]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis. Clear LDI is defined as a score = 0.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with non-zero LDI score at baseline and available data at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Clear LDI at Week 2465.2 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Clear LDI at Week 2476.4 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Clear LDI at Week 2479.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.05795% CI: [-0.4, 26.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.1295% CI: [-2.5, 24.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clear mNAPSI at Week 24

The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features: * pitting (scores 0-3, depending on the number of pits) * nail plate crumbling (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * onycholysis and oil drop dyschromia (scores 0-3, depending on the % of nail involvement) * leukonychia (0 = absent, 1 = present) * red spots in lunula (0 = absent, 1 = present) * nail bed hyperkeratosis (0 = absent, 1 = present) * splinter hemorrhages (0 = absent, 1 = present) In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study. mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease. Clear mNAPSI is defined as a score = 0.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with non-zero mNAPSI score at baseline and available data at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Clear mNAPSI at Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Clear mNAPSI at Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Clear mNAPSI at Week 240.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clear SPARCC Enthesitis Index Score at Week 24

The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden. Clear SPARCC enthesitis is defined as a score = 0.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with non-zero SPARCC enthesitis index score at baseline and available data at week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Clear SPARCC Enthesitis Index Score at Week 2443.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Clear SPARCC Enthesitis Index Score at Week 2452.6 percentage of participants
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Clear SPARCC Enthesitis Index Score at Week 2447.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.5595% CI: [-7.3, 13.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-1.9, 19.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis at Week 24

The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline \* 100

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with ≥ 3% body surface area (BSA) psoriasis involvement at baseline and available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis at Week 2466.12 percent changeStandard Error 2.76
Etanercept MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis at Week 2469.80 percent changeStandard Error 2.73
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis at Week 2475.53 percent changeStandard Error 3.71
p-value: 0.03195% CI: [0.85, 17.87]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.4995% CI: [-5.49, 11.54]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis. Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline \* 100

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Randomized participants with available BSA data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline66.61 percent changeStandard Error 4.18
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline-24.49 percent changeStandard Error 46.71
Methotrexate MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline65.66 percent changeStandard Error 3.66
Etanercept MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline64.42 percent changeStandard Error 4.43
Etanercept MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline-92.18 percent changeStandard Error 108.54
Etanercept MonotherapyPercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline74.23 percent changeStandard Error 3.32
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline17.66 percent changeStandard Error 51.97
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline81.61 percent changeStandard Error 2.55
Etanercept + MethotrexatePercent Improvement From Baseline in the Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved in Psoriasis by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline68.76 percent changeStandard Error 7.26
Comparison: Analysis of percent improvement from baseline in the percentage of BSA involved in psoriasis in the subgroup of participants with ≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.99, 24.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of percent improvement from baseline in the percentage of BSA involved in psoriasis in the subgroup of participants with ≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline.p-value: 0.1295% CI: [-1.89, 15.83]ANCOVA
Secondary

Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants with ≥ 3% body surface area (BSA) psoriasis involvement at baseline and available sPGA data.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 240 (clear)38 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 241 (almost clear)80 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 242 (mild)34 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 243 (moderate)22 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 244 (marked)3 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 245 (severe)1 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 245 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 240 (clear)36 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 243 (moderate)12 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 244 (marked)6 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 241 (almost clear)84 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 242 (mild)28 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 241 (almost clear)62 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 242 (mild)25 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 245 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 243 (moderate)10 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 240 (clear)63 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 244 (marked)1 Participants
Secondary

Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups

The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5: 0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 1. = almost clear (minimal plaque elevation, erythema or scaling) 2. = mild (mild plaque elevation or scaling, light red coloration) 3. = moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scaling, light red coloration) 4. = marked (marked plaque elevation, thick, non-tenacious scale predominates, bright red coloration) 5. = severe (severe plaque elevation, very thick tenacious scaling, dusky to deep red coloration).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants with available data

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)2 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)28 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)15 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)4 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)26 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)23 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)41 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)13 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)10 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)0 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)15 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)39 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)21 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)12 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)3 Participants
Methotrexate MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)1 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)29 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)7 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)20 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)37 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)10 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)5 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)19 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)2 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)4 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)6 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)18 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)52 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)1 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)32 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept MonotherapyStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)16 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)35 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)23 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)13 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)12 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)5 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)1 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)5 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 3% to < 10% BSA involvement at baseline5 (severe)0 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)52 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)32 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline0 (clear)28 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline2 (mild)9 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline3 (moderate)3 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups< 3% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)0 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline1 (almost clear)39 Participants
Etanercept + MethotrexateStatic Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Week 24 by Baseline BSA Involvement Subgroups≥ 10% BSA involvement at baseline4 (marked)0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026