Skip to content

Ability of Late Sodium or Calcium Current Block to Balance the ECG Effects of Potassium Current Block

Five Period Crossover Study of the Ability of Late Sodium or Calcium Current Block (Mexiletine, Lidocaine, or Diltiazem) to Balance the Electrocardiographic Effects of hERG Potassium Current Block (Dofetilide or Moxifloxacin)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02308748
Enrollment
22
Registered
2014-12-04
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2016-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Drug-induced QT Prolongation, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics

Brief summary

The primary objective of this research study is to test the hypothesis that late sodium current blocking drugs (mexiletine or lidocaine) can attenuate the effect of hERG potassium channel blocking drugs (dofetilide) on ventricular repolarization (QTc) by shortening early repolarization (J-Tpeakc). The secondary object is to assess the ability of calcium channel block (diltiazem) to reduce the QTc prolongation associated with hERG block (moxifloxacin).

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, 5-period crossover study in healthy male and female subjects, 18 to 35 years of age, to compare the electrophysiological response of hERG potassium channel blocking drugs with and without the addition of late sodium or calcium channel blocking drugs. The 5 treatment periods are 1) dofetilide alone, 2) mexiletine with and without dofetilide, 3) lidocaine with and without dofetilide, 4) moxifloxacin with and without diltiazem and 5) placebo. During each treatment period, 12 blood samples for pharmacokinetic measurements are obtained with matched 12-lead ECG recordings.

Interventions

* 8 am: Placebo * 12 pm (noon): 250 µg * 5:30 pm: 250 µg

DRUGMexiletine

* 8 am: weight x 4 mg/kg * 12 pm (noon): Same as at 8 am * 5:30 pm: Same as at 8 am

DRUGLidocaine

* 9 am : 30 µg/min per kg (loading) for 60 minutes and 10 µg/min per kg (maintenance) for 30 minutes * 2 pm: 55 µg/min per kg (loading) for 60 minutes and 20 µg/min per kg (maintenance) for 30 minutes * 7:30 pm: 52 µg/min per kg (loading) for 60 minutes and 20 µg/min per kg (maintenance) for 30 minutes

DRUGMoxifloxacin

* 9 am: 5.63 mg/h per kg (loading) for 1 hour and 0.26 mg/h per kg (maintenance for 30 minutes) * 2 pm: 6.14 mg/h per kg (loading) for 1 hour and 0.49 mg/h per kg (maintenance for 30 minutes) * 7:30 pm: 2.23 mg/h per kg (loading) for 1 hour and 0.49 mg/h per kg (maintenance for 30 minutes)

DRUGDiltiazem

• 7:30 pm: 330 µg/h per kg (loading) for 60 minutes and 61 µg/h per kg (maintenance) for 30 minutes

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo (#2 Gelcap or IV saline)

Sponsors

Spaulding Clinical Research LLC
CollaboratorOTHER
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is a healthy man or woman, 18 to 35 years of age, inclusive, who weighs at least 50 kg (110 pounds), no more than 85 kg (197 pounds) and has a body mass index of 18 to 27 kg/m2, inclusive, at Screening. 2. Subject has normal medical history findings, clinical laboratory results, vital sign measurements, 12 lead ECG results, and physical examination findings at Screening or, if abnormal, the abnormality is not considered clinically significant (as determined and documented by the investigator or designee). 3. Male or female subjects must agree to practice 2 highly effective methods of birth control (as determined by the investigator or designee; one of the methods must be a barrier technique) from Screening until 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Subject has a 12 lead safety ECG result at Screening or Check in of Period 1 with evidence of any of the following abnormalities: * QT corrected interval (QTc) using Fridericia correction (QTcF) \>430 milliseconds (ms) * PR interval \>220 ms or \<120 ms * QRS duration \>110 ms * Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block * Complete left or right bundle branch block or incomplete right bundle branch block * Heart rate \<50 or \>90 beats per minute * Pathological Q-waves (defined as Q wave \>40 ms) * Ventricular pre-excitation 2\. Subject has more than 12 ectopic beats during the 3 hour Holter ECG at Screening. 3\. Subject has a history of unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, long QT syndrome, heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina, unexplained cardiac arrhythmia, torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardia, or placement of a pacemaker or implantable defibrillator. Subjects will also be excluded if there is a family history of long QT syndrome (genetically proven or suggested by sudden death of a close relative due to cardiac causes at a young age) or Brugada syndrome. 4\. Subject has a history or current evidence of any clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) cardiovascular, dermatologic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic, neurologic, psychiatric, pulmonary, renal, urologic, and/or other major disease or malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). The investigator may allow exceptions to these criteria (e.g., stable mild joint disease \[that will not interfere with or influence the activities required by the protocol, in the opinion of the investigator\], cholecystectomy, childhood asthma) following discussion with the medical monitor. 5\. Subject has a history of thoracic surgery. 6\. Subject has any condition possibly affecting study drug absorption (e.g., gastrectomy, Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndrome). 7\. Subject has a skin condition likely to compromise ECG electrode placement. 8\. Subject is a female with breast implants. 9\. Subject's laboratory test results at Screening or Check in of Period 1 are outside the reference ranges provided by the clinical laboratory and considered clinically significant (as determined and documented by the investigator or designee). 10\. Subject's laboratory test results at Screening or Check in of Period 1 indicate hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, or hypomagnesemia according to lower limits of the reference ranges provided by the clinical laboratory. 11\. Subject's laboratory test results at Screening or Check in of Period 1 are \>2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) for alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase, \>1.5 × ULN for bilirubin, or \>1.5 × ULN for creatinine. 12\. Subject has a positive test result at Screening for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C antibodies, or hepatitis B surface antigen. 13\. Subject has a mean systolic blood pressure \<90 or \>140 mmHg or a mean diastolic blood pressure \<50 or \>90 mmHg at either Screening or Check in of Period 1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment Day5 weeksAfter 3rd dose of mexiletine or lidocaine (evening dose) on treatment day when combined with dofetilide to evening dose on dofetilide alone day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc Interval on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Moxifloxacin is Administered With Diltiazem at the Evening Dose Compared to When Moxifloxacin is Administered Alone at Afternoon Dose on Treatment Day.5 weeksEvening dose (moxifloxacin+diltiazem) versus afternoon dose (diltiazem alone).

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

44 healthy volunteers were assessed for eligibility. 15 subjects were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. 22 of 29 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomized and allocated to receive crossed-over intervention. Williams Latin square design balanced for first-order carryover effects was used for randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Participants who were randomized to receive either dofetilide alone, dofetilide + mexiletine, dofetilide + lidocaine, moxifloxacin + diltiazem or placebo.
22
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009
Period 1Withdrawal by Subject0010000000
Period 2Adverse Event0000000100
Period 3Protocol Violation0000000001
Period 5Adverse Event1000000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous26.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Diastolic blood pressure60.2 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Heart rate61.3 beats per minute (bpm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
J-Tpeakc (heart rate corrected J-Tpeak interval)229.5 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
PR interval160.8 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
QRS duration86.7 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
QTc (Fridericia's heart rate corrected QT interval)397.8 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
Systolic blood pressure109.5 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
Tpeak-Tend interval81.9 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Weight69.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 201 / 1911 / 216 / 203 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 190 / 210 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment Day

After 3rd dose of mexiletine or lidocaine (evening dose) on treatment day when combined with dofetilide to evening dose on dofetilide alone day.

Time frame: 5 weeks

Population: All study participants that completed placebo and dofetilide alone as well as dofetilide + mexiletine and/or dofetilide + lidocaine

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Dofetilide AloneChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment DayPlacebo corrected change from baseline in QTc37.9 ms
Dofetilide AloneChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment DayPlacebo corrected change from baseline in J-Tpeakc24.0 ms
Dofetilide + MexiletineChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment DayPlacebo corrected change from baseline in QTc20.4 ms
Dofetilide + MexiletineChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment DayPlacebo corrected change from baseline in J-Tpeakc0.8 ms
Dofetilide + LidocaineChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment DayPlacebo corrected change from baseline in QTc18 ms
Dofetilide + LidocaineChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc and J-Tpeakc Intervals on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Dofetilide is Administered With Mexiletine or Lidocaine Compared to When Dofetilide is Administered Alone at Evening Dose on Treatment DayPlacebo corrected change from baseline in J-Tpeakc3.5 ms
Comparison: Change in QTc interval on the ECG measured in milliseconds when dofetilide is administered with mexiletine compared to when dofetilide is administered alone at evening dose on treatment day.p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-25.2, -14.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change in QTc interval on the ECG measured in milliseconds when dofetilide is administered with lidocaine compared to when dofetilide is administered alone at evening dose on treatment day.p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-25.2, -14.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change in J-Tpeakc interval on the ECG measured in milliseconds when dofetilide is administered with mexiletine compared to when dofetilide is administered alone at evening dose on treatment day.p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-28, -18.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Change in J-Tpeakc interval on the ECG measured in milliseconds when dofetilide is administered with lidocaine compared to when dofetilide is administered alone at evening dose on treatment day.p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-25.5, -15.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc Interval on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Moxifloxacin is Administered With Diltiazem at the Evening Dose Compared to When Moxifloxacin is Administered Alone at Afternoon Dose on Treatment Day.

Evening dose (moxifloxacin+diltiazem) versus afternoon dose (diltiazem alone).

Time frame: 5 weeks

Population: All study participants that completed placebo, moxifloxacin and moxifloxacin + diltiazem

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Dofetilide AloneChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc Interval on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Moxifloxacin is Administered With Diltiazem at the Evening Dose Compared to When Moxifloxacin is Administered Alone at Afternoon Dose on Treatment Day.29.9 ms
Dofetilide + MexiletineChange in Placebo Corrected Change From Baseline QTc Interval on the ECG Measured in Milliseconds When Moxifloxacin is Administered With Diltiazem at the Evening Dose Compared to When Moxifloxacin is Administered Alone at Afternoon Dose on Treatment Day.31.3 ms
p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-1, 6.7]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026