Anemia, Sickle Cell
Conditions
Keywords
Sickle Cell Anemia, Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Disorders, pain crisis, vaso-occlusive crisis, rivipansel, GMI-1070, selectin inhibitor, SCD, VOC
Brief summary
This is a clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of rivipansel (GMI-1070) in treating subjects with sickle cell disease (SCD) who are 6 years of age or older experiencing a pain crisis necessitating hospitalization.
Interventions
Rivipansel (GMI-1070) will be infused intravenously every 12 hours up to 15 doses maximum. Subjects aged 12 and over who weigh more than 40 kilograms will receive a dose of 1680 mg of rivipansel, followed by a dose of 840 mg of rivipansel every 12 hours. All subjects aged 6 to 11 years and any subject who weighs 40 kilograms or less, will receive weight-based dosing (mg/kg) of 40 mg/kg of rivipansel (maximum of 1680 mg) followed by a dose of 20 mg/kg of rivipansel (maximum of 840 mg) every 12 hours.
Placebo (phosphate buffered saline) will be infused intravenously every 12 hours up to 15 doses maximum.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* At least 6 years of age. * Documented diagnosis of sickle cell disease. * Diagnosis of vaso-occlusive crisis necessitating admission to the hospital with treatment including IV opioids. * Able to receive the first dose of study drug within 24 hours from the administration of IV opioids.
Exclusion criteria
* Serious systemic infection * Acute Chest Syndrome * Serious concomitant medical problems (for example, stroke) * SCD pain atypical of VOC * Severe renal or hepatic impairment * Chronic pain rather than a presentation of acute VOC
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Readiness for Discharge From Hospital | Day 1 up to the latest day when all 6 criteria of readiness-for-discharge were met (up to an average of Day 8) | Time to readiness-for-discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date when all criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug. Criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met when all of the applicable 6 criteria (in relation to treatment of VOC and complications related to the VOC) were documented to have occurred. The six criteria were: 1) only oral pain medication was required, 2) acute complications related to the VOC (such as acute chest syndrome, stroke, priapism) had resolved to the extent that management could be in an outpatient setting, 3) IV opioids had been discontinued, 4) IV hydration had been discontinued, 5) IV antibiotics had been discontinued and 6) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was no longer required for treatment of this VOC. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Discharge From Hospital | Day 1 up to the latest day when the order of hospital discharge was issued by a qualified healthcare provider (up to an average of Day 8) | Time to discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date of the hospital discharge order from a qualified healthcare provider and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug. |
| Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From Hospital | Day 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8) | Cumulative IV opioid consumption was reported as cumulative IV opioid use (standardized using morphine equivalent units \[MEU\]), from the start of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug until hospital discharge. |
| Time to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) Opioids | Day 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8) | Time to discontinuation of IV opioids was defined as the difference (in hours) between the stop time and date of the latest IV opioid dose and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug. |
| Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug | 24 hours post first IV infusion of loading dose of study drug on Day 1 | Cumulative IV opioid consumption (standardized using MEU) was reported as IV opioid use in the first 24 hours from the start time of the first IV infusion (loading dose) of study drug. |
| Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 3 days of discharge from hospital, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8 | Percentage of participants who were re-hospitalized for a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) within 3 days of discharge from hospital are reported. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) | Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43) | Investigator reported events of Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) and other reported respiratory events were sent for adjudication by the Acute Chest Syndrome Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of physicians with relevant SCD expertise, evaluated these events and determined whether they were consistent with cases of ACS. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the Study | Baseline (Day 1) up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43) | Vital signs included temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by the Investigator. |
| Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 7 days of discharge; Within 14 days of discharge; Within 30 days of discharge, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8 | Percentage of participants re-hospitalized for VOC within 7, 14 and 30 days of hospital discharge. |
| Percentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous Manifestations | Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43) | Investigator reported cutaneous events were sent for adjudication by the Cutaneous Manifestations Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of dermatologists, evaluated these events and determined whether they were cases of severe and/or generalized cutaneous manifestations and specifically whether any event was consistent with Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43) | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. An adverse event was considered a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) if the event started during the effective duration of treatment (all events that started on or after the first dosing). AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. Participants with AEs and SAEs were categorized by genotype categories. Category 1= participants with hemoglobin SS, hemoglobin S beta0 thalassemia and hemoglobin SD; category 2= participants with hemoglobin SC, hemoglobin S beta+ thalassemia and hemoglobin S-Variant (other than HbSD). |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity | Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43) | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. AEs were classified according to the severity in 3 categories a) mild - AEs did not interfere with participant's usual function, b) moderate - AEs interfered to some extent with participant's usual function, c) severe - AEs interfered significantly with participant's usual function. |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities | Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43) | Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), reticulocytes \<0.5\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, platelets\<0.5\*LLN\>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), reticulocytes/erythrocytes\<0.5\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin, indirect bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN, urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN\>1.1\*ULN, glucose\<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, estimated glomerular filtration rate \<=60. Urinalysis: urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase \>=1. |
| Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Baseline up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43) | Hemoglobin(grade \[G\] 0:\>11g/dl,G1:\>9-11g/dl,G2:\>7-9g/dl,G3:5-7g/dl,G4:\<5g/dl),reticulocytes count(G0:\<1%,G1:1-5%,G2:\>5-10%,G3:\>10-20%,G4:\>20%),leukocytes(G0:\<=upper limit of normal \[ULN\],G1:\>ULN-15,000/mm\^3,G2:\>15,000- 20,000/mm\^3,G3:\>20,000- 50,000/mm\^, G4:\>50,000/mm\^3),neutrophils(G0:\>=LLN, G1:\<LLN-1,500/mm\^3, G2:\<1,500-1,000/mm\^3, G3:\<1,000-500/mm\^3, G4:\<500/mm\^3),blood urea nitrogen, creatinine(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*UL, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0\*ULN, G4:\>6.0\*ULN), lactate dehydrogenase, alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-3.0\*ULN, G2:\>3.0-5.0\*ULN, G3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN, G4:\>20.0\*ULN), bilirubin(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0-10.0\*ULN, G4:\>10.0\*ULN), urine protein(G0:0-15mg/dL, G1:\>15-30mg/dL, G2:\>30-100mg/dL, G3:\>100-300mg/dL, G4:\>300mg/dL), platelet(G0:\>=150K, G1:\>=100K-\<150K, G2:\>=50K \<100K, G3:\<50K), eGFR (G0:\>=90 mL/min/1.73m\^2, G1:\>=60-\<90mL/min/1.73m\^2, G2:\>=30-\<60mL/min/1.73m\^2, G3:\>=15-\<30mL/min/1.73m\^2, G4:\<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2) |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination | From Post-screening up to end of treatment (up to an average of Day 8), From Post-discharge up to 35 days post-discharge (up to an average of Day 43) | Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, spine, neck, thyroid, chest, extremities, lymph nodes and abdomen (including liver and kidneys) plus the respiratory, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurological and genitourinary systems. Clinical significance was assessed by the Investigator. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This was a randomized, blinded study to treat subjects \>=6 years of age with SCD, experiencing an acute VOC event requiring hospitalization. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.
Pre-assignment details
Due to the short duration of time allowed to dose upon a VOC event, an optional screening may have occurred while the participant was well. Patients were neither enrolled nor randomized to study treatment until a VOC occurred, at which time the formal assessment of eligibility for enrollment into the study was performed. Of the 475 screened participants, 345 participants experiencing an acute VOC event were randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm Participants with sickle cell disease (SCD) received intravenous (IV) infusion of rivipansel while hospitalized for treatment of a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC). Participants aged \>=12 years, with body weight \>40 kilogram (kg) received a loading dose of 1680 milligram (mg) rivipansel on Day 1 followed by maintenance doses of 840 mg rivipansel administered at 12 hourly intervals.
Participants aged 6 to 11 years or any participant weighing \<=40 kg received a loading dose of 40 milligram per kilogram body weight (mg/kg) rivipansel on Day 1 (maximum of 1680 mg) followed by maintenance doses of 20 mg/kg rivipansel (maximum of 840 mg) administered at 12 hourly intervals. Participants received rivipansel until they met the protocol-defined criteria for readiness-for-discharge from hospital or up to a maximum of 15 doses (1 loading dose and 14 maintenance doses), whichever occurred first. Dosing therefore continued for a maximum of 8 days. | 173 |
| Placebo Treatment Arm Participants with SCD received IV infusion of placebo (matched to rivipansel infusion) while hospitalized for treatment of a VOC. Participants received placebo on the same schedule used for rivipansel until they met the protocol-defined criteria for readiness-for- discharge from hospital or up to a maximum of 15 doses (1 loading dose and 14 maintenance doses), whichever occurred first. Dosing therefore continued for a maximum of 8 days | 172 |
| Total | 345 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 14 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Other | 5 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 2 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Parent/Guardian | 1 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo Treatment Arm | Total | Rivipansel Treatment Arm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 21.34 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 | 21.67 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 | 22.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 16 Participants | 23 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 155 Participants | 320 Participants | 165 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race: Black | 159 Participants | 326 Participants | 167 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race: Other | 7 Participants | 13 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race: White | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 99 Participants | 183 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 73 Participants | 162 Participants | 89 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 162 | 0 / 158 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 137 / 162 | 124 / 158 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 52 / 162 | 49 / 158 |
Outcome results
Time to Readiness for Discharge From Hospital
Time to readiness-for-discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date when all criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug. Criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met when all of the applicable 6 criteria (in relation to treatment of VOC and complications related to the VOC) were documented to have occurred. The six criteria were: 1) only oral pain medication was required, 2) acute complications related to the VOC (such as acute chest syndrome, stroke, priapism) had resolved to the extent that management could be in an outpatient setting, 3) IV opioids had been discontinued, 4) IV hydration had been discontinued, 5) IV antibiotics had been discontinued and 6) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was no longer required for treatment of this VOC.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when all 6 criteria of readiness-for-discharge were met (up to an average of Day 8)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Time to Readiness for Discharge From Hospital | 87.78 Hours |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Time to Readiness for Discharge From Hospital | 93.47 Hours |
Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From Hospital
Cumulative IV opioid consumption was reported as cumulative IV opioid use (standardized using morphine equivalent units \[MEU\]), from the start of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug until hospital discharge.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From Hospital | 2.30 MEU per kg |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From Hospital | 2.36 MEU per kg |
Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug
Cumulative IV opioid consumption (standardized using MEU) was reported as IV opioid use in the first 24 hours from the start time of the first IV infusion (loading dose) of study drug.
Time frame: 24 hours post first IV infusion of loading dose of study drug on Day 1
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug | 0.80 MEU per kg |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug | 0.82 MEU per kg |
Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From Hospital
Percentage of participants who were re-hospitalized for a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) within 3 days of discharge from hospital are reported.
Time frame: Within 3 days of discharge from hospital, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From Hospital | 3 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From Hospital | 5 Participants |
Time to Discharge From Hospital
Time to discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date of the hospital discharge order from a qualified healthcare provider and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when the order of hospital discharge was issued by a qualified healthcare provider (up to an average of Day 8)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Time to Discharge From Hospital | 86.75 Hours |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Time to Discharge From Hospital | 90.67 Hours |
Time to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) Opioids
Time to discontinuation of IV opioids was defined as the difference (in hours) between the stop time and date of the latest IV opioid dose and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Time to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) Opioids | 67.20 Hours |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Time to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) Opioids | 68.45 Hours |
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), reticulocytes \<0.5\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, platelets\<0.5\*LLN\>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), reticulocytes/erythrocytes\<0.5\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin, indirect bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN, urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN\>1.1\*ULN, glucose\<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, estimated glomerular filtration rate \<=60. Urinalysis: urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase \>=1.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities | 98 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities | 107 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination
Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, spine, neck, thyroid, chest, extremities, lymph nodes and abdomen (including liver and kidneys) plus the respiratory, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurological and genitourinary systems. Clinical significance was assessed by the Investigator.
Time frame: From Post-screening up to end of treatment (up to an average of Day 8), From Post-discharge up to 35 days post-discharge (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination | Post-screening up to end of treatment | 38 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination | Post-discharge to 35 days post-discharge | 25 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination | Post-screening up to end of treatment | 41 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination | Post-discharge to 35 days post-discharge | 25 Participants |
Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study
Hemoglobin(grade \[G\] 0:\>11g/dl,G1:\>9-11g/dl,G2:\>7-9g/dl,G3:5-7g/dl,G4:\<5g/dl),reticulocytes count(G0:\<1%,G1:1-5%,G2:\>5-10%,G3:\>10-20%,G4:\>20%),leukocytes(G0:\<=upper limit of normal \[ULN\],G1:\>ULN-15,000/mm\^3,G2:\>15,000- 20,000/mm\^3,G3:\>20,000- 50,000/mm\^, G4:\>50,000/mm\^3),neutrophils(G0:\>=LLN, G1:\<LLN-1,500/mm\^3, G2:\<1,500-1,000/mm\^3, G3:\<1,000-500/mm\^3, G4:\<500/mm\^3),blood urea nitrogen, creatinine(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*UL, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0\*ULN, G4:\>6.0\*ULN), lactate dehydrogenase, alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-3.0\*ULN, G2:\>3.0-5.0\*ULN, G3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN, G4:\>20.0\*ULN), bilirubin(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0-10.0\*ULN, G4:\>10.0\*ULN), urine protein(G0:0-15mg/dL, G1:\>15-30mg/dL, G2:\>30-100mg/dL, G3:\>100-300mg/dL, G4:\>300mg/dL), platelet(G0:\>=150K, G1:\>=100K-\<150K, G2:\>=50K \<100K, G3:\<50K), eGFR (G0:\>=90 mL/min/1.73m\^2, G1:\>=60-\<90mL/min/1.73m\^2, G2:\>=30-\<60mL/min/1.73m\^2, G3:\>=15-\<30mL/min/1.73m\^2, G4:\<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2)
Time frame: Baseline up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of drug. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure; Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specific rows. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=3 grade | 1 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=2 grade | 3 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=1 grade | 12 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=3 grade | 1 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=1 grade | 11 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=1 grade | 20 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=2 grade | 4 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=1 grade | 60 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=1 grade | 32 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=2 grade | 7 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=3 grade | 1 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=1 grade | 23 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=1 grade | 22 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=2 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=1 grade | 23 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=1 grade | 16 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=2 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=1 grade | 2 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=2 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=1 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=2 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=1 grade | 3 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=2 grade | 2 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=1 grade | 3 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=2 grade | 3 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=1 grade | 4 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=2 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=1 grade | 6 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=1 grade | 47 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=1 grade | 19 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=2 grade | 5 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=2 grade | 4 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Hemoglobin : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=1 grade | 9 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=2 grade | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Alanine Aminotransferase : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=1 grade | 7 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=1 grade | 15 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=1 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Platelets : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=3 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=1 grade | 16 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=2 grade | 3 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=2 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Lactate Dehydrogenase : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Leukocytes : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=1 grade | 28 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=1 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=2 grade | 10 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=3 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=2 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Direct Bilirubin : >=4 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=1 grade | 20 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=2 grade | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urine Protein : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Urea Nitrogen : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Indirect Bilirubin : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | eGFR : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=1 grade | 25 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=1 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=2 grade | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Neutrophils : >=1 grade | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=3 grade | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Creatinine : >=2 grade | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study | Aspartate Aminotransferase : >=4 grade | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. AEs were classified according to the severity in 3 categories a) mild - AEs did not interfere with participant's usual function, b) moderate - AEs interfered to some extent with participant's usual function, c) severe - AEs interfered significantly with participant's usual function.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity | Mild | 49 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity | Moderate | 58 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity | Severe | 36 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity | Mild | 43 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity | Moderate | 53 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity | Severe | 34 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. An adverse event was considered a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) if the event started during the effective duration of treatment (all events that started on or after the first dosing). AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. Participants with AEs and SAEs were categorized by genotype categories. Category 1= participants with hemoglobin SS, hemoglobin S beta0 thalassemia and hemoglobin SD; category 2= participants with hemoglobin SC, hemoglobin S beta+ thalassemia and hemoglobin S-Variant (other than HbSD).
Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent AEs | Genotype Category 1 | 112 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent AEs | Genotype Category 2 | 31 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent SAEs | Genotype Category 1 | 44 Participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent SAEs | Genotype Category 2 | 8 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent SAEs | Genotype Category 2 | 9 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent AEs | Genotype Category 1 | 101 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent SAEs | Genotype Category 1 | 40 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype | Treatment Emergent AEs | Genotype Category 2 | 29 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the Study
Vital signs included temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by the Investigator.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the Study | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the Study | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital
Percentage of participants re-hospitalized for VOC within 7, 14 and 30 days of hospital discharge.
Time frame: Within 7 days of discharge; Within 14 days of discharge; Within 30 days of discharge, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 7 Days | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 14 Days | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 30 Days | 16.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 7 Days | 5.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 14 Days | 8.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital | Within 30 Days | 17.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS)
Investigator reported events of Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) and other reported respiratory events were sent for adjudication by the Acute Chest Syndrome Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of physicians with relevant SCD expertise, evaluated these events and determined whether they were consistent with cases of ACS.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) | 10.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous Manifestations
Investigator reported cutaneous events were sent for adjudication by the Cutaneous Manifestations Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of dermatologists, evaluated these events and determined whether they were cases of severe and/or generalized cutaneous manifestations and specifically whether any event was consistent with Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis.
Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rivipansel Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous Manifestations | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Treatment Arm | Percentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous Manifestations | 1.3 Percentage of participants |