Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Rivipansel (GMI-1070) in the Treatment of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis in Hospitalized Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease

A Phase 3, Multicenter ,Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rivipansel (GMI-1070) in the Treatment of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis in Hospitalized Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02187003
Enrollment
345
Registered
2014-07-10
Start date
2015-06-17
Completion date
2019-06-27
Last updated
2025-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia, Sickle Cell

Keywords

Sickle Cell Anemia, Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Disorders, pain crisis, vaso-occlusive crisis, rivipansel, GMI-1070, selectin inhibitor, SCD, VOC

Brief summary

This is a clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of rivipansel (GMI-1070) in treating subjects with sickle cell disease (SCD) who are 6 years of age or older experiencing a pain crisis necessitating hospitalization.

Interventions

Rivipansel (GMI-1070) will be infused intravenously every 12 hours up to 15 doses maximum. Subjects aged 12 and over who weigh more than 40 kilograms will receive a dose of 1680 mg of rivipansel, followed by a dose of 840 mg of rivipansel every 12 hours. All subjects aged 6 to 11 years and any subject who weighs 40 kilograms or less, will receive weight-based dosing (mg/kg) of 40 mg/kg of rivipansel (maximum of 1680 mg) followed by a dose of 20 mg/kg of rivipansel (maximum of 840 mg) every 12 hours.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo (phosphate buffered saline) will be infused intravenously every 12 hours up to 15 doses maximum.

Sponsors

GlycoMimetics Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Biossil Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 6 years of age. * Documented diagnosis of sickle cell disease. * Diagnosis of vaso-occlusive crisis necessitating admission to the hospital with treatment including IV opioids. * Able to receive the first dose of study drug within 24 hours from the administration of IV opioids.

Exclusion criteria

* Serious systemic infection * Acute Chest Syndrome * Serious concomitant medical problems (for example, stroke) * SCD pain atypical of VOC * Severe renal or hepatic impairment * Chronic pain rather than a presentation of acute VOC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Readiness for Discharge From HospitalDay 1 up to the latest day when all 6 criteria of readiness-for-discharge were met (up to an average of Day 8)Time to readiness-for-discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date when all criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug. Criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met when all of the applicable 6 criteria (in relation to treatment of VOC and complications related to the VOC) were documented to have occurred. The six criteria were: 1) only oral pain medication was required, 2) acute complications related to the VOC (such as acute chest syndrome, stroke, priapism) had resolved to the extent that management could be in an outpatient setting, 3) IV opioids had been discontinued, 4) IV hydration had been discontinued, 5) IV antibiotics had been discontinued and 6) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was no longer required for treatment of this VOC.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Discharge From HospitalDay 1 up to the latest day when the order of hospital discharge was issued by a qualified healthcare provider (up to an average of Day 8)Time to discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date of the hospital discharge order from a qualified healthcare provider and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug.
Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From HospitalDay 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8)Cumulative IV opioid consumption was reported as cumulative IV opioid use (standardized using morphine equivalent units \[MEU\]), from the start of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug until hospital discharge.
Time to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) OpioidsDay 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8)Time to discontinuation of IV opioids was defined as the difference (in hours) between the stop time and date of the latest IV opioid dose and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug.
Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug24 hours post first IV infusion of loading dose of study drug on Day 1Cumulative IV opioid consumption (standardized using MEU) was reported as IV opioid use in the first 24 hours from the start time of the first IV infusion (loading dose) of study drug.
Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 3 days of discharge from hospital, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8Percentage of participants who were re-hospitalized for a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) within 3 days of discharge from hospital are reported.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS)Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)Investigator reported events of Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) and other reported respiratory events were sent for adjudication by the Acute Chest Syndrome Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of physicians with relevant SCD expertise, evaluated these events and determined whether they were consistent with cases of ACS.
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the StudyBaseline (Day 1) up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)Vital signs included temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by the Investigator.
Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 7 days of discharge; Within 14 days of discharge; Within 30 days of discharge, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8Percentage of participants re-hospitalized for VOC within 7, 14 and 30 days of hospital discharge.
Percentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous ManifestationsDay 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)Investigator reported cutaneous events were sent for adjudication by the Cutaneous Manifestations Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of dermatologists, evaluated these events and determined whether they were cases of severe and/or generalized cutaneous manifestations and specifically whether any event was consistent with Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeDay 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. An adverse event was considered a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) if the event started during the effective duration of treatment (all events that started on or after the first dosing). AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. Participants with AEs and SAEs were categorized by genotype categories. Category 1= participants with hemoglobin SS, hemoglobin S beta0 thalassemia and hemoglobin SD; category 2= participants with hemoglobin SC, hemoglobin S beta+ thalassemia and hemoglobin S-Variant (other than HbSD).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per SeverityDay 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. AEs were classified according to the severity in 3 categories a) mild - AEs did not interfere with participant's usual function, b) moderate - AEs interfered to some extent with participant's usual function, c) severe - AEs interfered significantly with participant's usual function.
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory AbnormalitiesDay 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), reticulocytes \<0.5\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, platelets\<0.5\*LLN\>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), reticulocytes/erythrocytes\<0.5\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin, indirect bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN, urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN\>1.1\*ULN, glucose\<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, estimated glomerular filtration rate \<=60. Urinalysis: urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase \>=1.
Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyBaseline up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)Hemoglobin(grade \[G\] 0:\>11g/dl,G1:\>9-11g/dl,G2:\>7-9g/dl,G3:5-7g/dl,G4:\<5g/dl),reticulocytes count(G0:\<1%,G1:1-5%,G2:\>5-10%,G3:\>10-20%,G4:\>20%),leukocytes(G0:\<=upper limit of normal \[ULN\],G1:\>ULN-15,000/mm\^3,G2:\>15,000- 20,000/mm\^3,G3:\>20,000- 50,000/mm\^, G4:\>50,000/mm\^3),neutrophils(G0:\>=LLN, G1:\<LLN-1,500/mm\^3, G2:\<1,500-1,000/mm\^3, G3:\<1,000-500/mm\^3, G4:\<500/mm\^3),blood urea nitrogen, creatinine(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*UL, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0\*ULN, G4:\>6.0\*ULN), lactate dehydrogenase, alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-3.0\*ULN, G2:\>3.0-5.0\*ULN, G3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN, G4:\>20.0\*ULN), bilirubin(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0-10.0\*ULN, G4:\>10.0\*ULN), urine protein(G0:0-15mg/dL, G1:\>15-30mg/dL, G2:\>30-100mg/dL, G3:\>100-300mg/dL, G4:\>300mg/dL), platelet(G0:\>=150K, G1:\>=100K-\<150K, G2:\>=50K \<100K, G3:\<50K), eGFR (G0:\>=90 mL/min/1.73m\^2, G1:\>=60-\<90mL/min/1.73m\^2, G2:\>=30-\<60mL/min/1.73m\^2, G3:\>=15-\<30mL/min/1.73m\^2, G4:\<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical ExaminationFrom Post-screening up to end of treatment (up to an average of Day 8), From Post-discharge up to 35 days post-discharge (up to an average of Day 43)Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, spine, neck, thyroid, chest, extremities, lymph nodes and abdomen (including liver and kidneys) plus the respiratory, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurological and genitourinary systems. Clinical significance was assessed by the Investigator.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a randomized, blinded study to treat subjects \>=6 years of age with SCD, experiencing an acute VOC event requiring hospitalization. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.

Pre-assignment details

Due to the short duration of time allowed to dose upon a VOC event, an optional screening may have occurred while the participant was well. Patients were neither enrolled nor randomized to study treatment until a VOC occurred, at which time the formal assessment of eligibility for enrollment into the study was performed. Of the 475 screened participants, 345 participants experiencing an acute VOC event were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rivipansel Treatment Arm
Participants with sickle cell disease (SCD) received intravenous (IV) infusion of rivipansel while hospitalized for treatment of a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC). Participants aged \>=12 years, with body weight \>40 kilogram (kg) received a loading dose of 1680 milligram (mg) rivipansel on Day 1 followed by maintenance doses of 840 mg rivipansel administered at 12 hourly intervals. Participants aged 6 to 11 years or any participant weighing \<=40 kg received a loading dose of 40 milligram per kilogram body weight (mg/kg) rivipansel on Day 1 (maximum of 1680 mg) followed by maintenance doses of 20 mg/kg rivipansel (maximum of 840 mg) administered at 12 hourly intervals. Participants received rivipansel until they met the protocol-defined criteria for readiness-for-discharge from hospital or up to a maximum of 15 doses (1 loading dose and 14 maintenance doses), whichever occurred first. Dosing therefore continued for a maximum of 8 days.
173
Placebo Treatment Arm
Participants with SCD received IV infusion of placebo (matched to rivipansel infusion) while hospitalized for treatment of a VOC. Participants received placebo on the same schedule used for rivipansel until they met the protocol-defined criteria for readiness-for- discharge from hospital or up to a maximum of 15 doses (1 loading dose and 14 maintenance doses), whichever occurred first. Dosing therefore continued for a maximum of 8 days
172
Total345

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1410
Overall StudyOther55
Overall StudyProtocol Violation24
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Parent/Guardian15
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo Treatment ArmTotalRivipansel Treatment Arm
Age, Continuous21.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
21.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
22.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants23 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
155 Participants320 Participants165 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Black
159 Participants326 Participants167 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Other
7 Participants13 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: White
6 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
99 Participants183 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants162 Participants89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1620 / 158
other
Total, other adverse events
137 / 162124 / 158
serious
Total, serious adverse events
52 / 16249 / 158

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Readiness for Discharge From Hospital

Time to readiness-for-discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date when all criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug. Criteria for readiness-for-discharge were met when all of the applicable 6 criteria (in relation to treatment of VOC and complications related to the VOC) were documented to have occurred. The six criteria were: 1) only oral pain medication was required, 2) acute complications related to the VOC (such as acute chest syndrome, stroke, priapism) had resolved to the extent that management could be in an outpatient setting, 3) IV opioids had been discontinued, 4) IV hydration had been discontinued, 5) IV antibiotics had been discontinued and 6) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was no longer required for treatment of this VOC.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when all 6 criteria of readiness-for-discharge were met (up to an average of Day 8)

Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmTime to Readiness for Discharge From Hospital87.78 Hours
Placebo Treatment ArmTime to Readiness for Discharge From Hospital93.47 Hours
Comparison: A Cox proportional hazards regression model with age group and genotype group as stratification covariates was used to estimate the hazard ratio (Placebo/Rivipansel) and the corresponding 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI). A stratified log-rank test with age group and genotype group as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P value.p-value: 0.794495% CI: [0.77, 1.22]Log Rank
Secondary

Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From Hospital

Cumulative IV opioid consumption was reported as cumulative IV opioid use (standardized using morphine equivalent units \[MEU\]), from the start of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug until hospital discharge.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8)

Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmCumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From Hospital2.30 MEU per kg
Placebo Treatment ArmCumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption From Time of Loading Dose of Study Drug to Discharge From Hospital2.36 MEU per kg
Comparison: The difference in medians (Rivipansel- Placebo) was estimated by the difference of treatment medians from summary statistics. The corresponding 95% CI was estimated by a bootstrap method with stratification for age and genotype groups. P-value was from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model based on rank-transformed values using age group and genotype group as the stratification covariates.p-value: 0.85295% CI: [-1.27, 0.88]ANCOVA
Secondary

Cumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug

Cumulative IV opioid consumption (standardized using MEU) was reported as IV opioid use in the first 24 hours from the start time of the first IV infusion (loading dose) of study drug.

Time frame: 24 hours post first IV infusion of loading dose of study drug on Day 1

Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmCumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug0.80 MEU per kg
Placebo Treatment ArmCumulative Intravenous (IV) Opioids Consumption Within First 24 Hours Post-Loading Dose of Study Drug0.82 MEU per kg
Comparison: The difference in medians (Rivipansel- Placebo) was estimated by the difference of treatment medians from summary statistics. The corresponding 95% CI was estimated by a bootstrap method with stratification for age and genotype groups. P value was from ANCOVA model based on rank-transformed values using age group and genotype group as the stratification covariates.p-value: 0.933295% CI: [-0.13, 0.16]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From Hospital

Percentage of participants who were re-hospitalized for a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) within 3 days of discharge from hospital are reported.

Time frame: Within 3 days of discharge from hospital, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8

Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From Hospital3 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 3 Days of Discharge From Hospital5 Participants
Comparison: P values and 95% CI for the difference in percentages were based on the exact method by Chan and Zhang.p-value: 0.534995% CI: [-5.19, 2.46]Chan and Zhang
Secondary

Time to Discharge From Hospital

Time to discharge from hospital was defined as the difference (in hours) between the time and date of the hospital discharge order from a qualified healthcare provider and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when the order of hospital discharge was issued by a qualified healthcare provider (up to an average of Day 8)

Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmTime to Discharge From Hospital86.75 Hours
Placebo Treatment ArmTime to Discharge From Hospital90.67 Hours
Comparison: A Cox proportional hazards regression model with age group and genotype group as stratification covariates was used to estimate the hazard ratio (Placebo/Rivipansel) and the corresponding 95% CI. A stratified log-rank test with age group and genotype group as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P- value.p-value: 0.715695% CI: [0.77, 1.19]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) Opioids

Time to discontinuation of IV opioids was defined as the difference (in hours) between the stop time and date of the latest IV opioid dose and the start time and date of the first infusion (loading dose) of study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the latest day when IV opioid was discontinued (up to an average of Day 8)

Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population in alignment with the primary study objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmTime to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) Opioids67.20 Hours
Placebo Treatment ArmTime to Discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) Opioids68.45 Hours
Comparison: A Cox proportional hazards regression model with age group and genotype group as stratification covariates was used to estimate the hazard ratio (Placebo/Rivipansel) and the corresponding 95% CI. A stratified log-rank test with age group and genotype group as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P- value.p-value: 0.859395% CI: [0.82, 1.26]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities

Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), reticulocytes \<0.5\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, platelets\<0.5\*LLN\>1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), reticulocytes/erythrocytes\<0.5\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN, lymphocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes \<0.8\*LLN \>1.2\*ULN, basophils, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin, indirect bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN, urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, sodium\<0.95\*LLN\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN\>1.1\*ULN, glucose\<0.6\*LLN\>1.5\*ULN, estimated glomerular filtration rate \<=60. Urinalysis: urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase \>=1.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities98 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities107 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination

Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, spine, neck, thyroid, chest, extremities, lymph nodes and abdomen (including liver and kidneys) plus the respiratory, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurological and genitourinary systems. Clinical significance was assessed by the Investigator.

Time frame: From Post-screening up to end of treatment (up to an average of Day 8), From Post-discharge up to 35 days post-discharge (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical ExaminationPost-screening up to end of treatment38 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical ExaminationPost-discharge to 35 days post-discharge25 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical ExaminationPost-screening up to end of treatment41 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical ExaminationPost-discharge to 35 days post-discharge25 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the Study

Hemoglobin(grade \[G\] 0:\>11g/dl,G1:\>9-11g/dl,G2:\>7-9g/dl,G3:5-7g/dl,G4:\<5g/dl),reticulocytes count(G0:\<1%,G1:1-5%,G2:\>5-10%,G3:\>10-20%,G4:\>20%),leukocytes(G0:\<=upper limit of normal \[ULN\],G1:\>ULN-15,000/mm\^3,G2:\>15,000- 20,000/mm\^3,G3:\>20,000- 50,000/mm\^, G4:\>50,000/mm\^3),neutrophils(G0:\>=LLN, G1:\<LLN-1,500/mm\^3, G2:\<1,500-1,000/mm\^3, G3:\<1,000-500/mm\^3, G4:\<500/mm\^3),blood urea nitrogen, creatinine(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*UL, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0\*ULN, G4:\>6.0\*ULN), lactate dehydrogenase, alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-3.0\*ULN, G2:\>3.0-5.0\*ULN, G3:\>5.0-20.0\*ULN, G4:\>20.0\*ULN), bilirubin(G0:\<=ULN, G1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, G2:\>1.5-3.0\*ULN, G3:\>3.0-10.0\*ULN, G4:\>10.0\*ULN), urine protein(G0:0-15mg/dL, G1:\>15-30mg/dL, G2:\>30-100mg/dL, G3:\>100-300mg/dL, G4:\>300mg/dL), platelet(G0:\>=150K, G1:\>=100K-\<150K, G2:\>=50K \<100K, G3:\<50K), eGFR (G0:\>=90 mL/min/1.73m\^2, G1:\>=60-\<90mL/min/1.73m\^2, G2:\>=30-\<60mL/min/1.73m\^2, G3:\>=15-\<30mL/min/1.73m\^2, G4:\<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2)

Time frame: Baseline up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of drug. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure; Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specific rows. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=3 grade1 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=2 grade3 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=1 grade12 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=2 grade1 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=3 grade1 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=1 grade11 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=2 grade1 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=1 grade20 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=2 grade4 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=1 grade60 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=1 grade32 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=2 grade7 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=3 grade1 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=1 grade23 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=2 grade1 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=1 grade22 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=2 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=1 grade23 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=2 grade1 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=1 grade16 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=2 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=1 grade2 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=2 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=1 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=2 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=1 grade3 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=2 grade2 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=1 grade3 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=2 grade3 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=4 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=1 grade4 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=2 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=3 grade0 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=1 grade6 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=1 grade47 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=1 grade19 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=2 grade5 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=2 grade4 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyHemoglobin : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=2 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=1 grade9 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=2 grade2 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAlanine Aminotransferase : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyReticulocytes/Erythrocytes : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=1 grade7 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=1 grade15 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=2 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=1 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=2 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyPlatelets : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=3 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=1 grade16 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=2 grade3 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=2 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLactate Dehydrogenase : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyLeukocytes : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=2 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=1 grade28 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=1 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=2 grade10 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=3 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=2 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyDirect Bilirubin : >=4 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=1 grade20 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=2 grade2 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrine Protein : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyUrea Nitrogen : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyIndirect Bilirubin : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyeGFR : >=4 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=1 grade25 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=1 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=2 grade2 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyNeutrophils : >=1 grade2 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=3 grade0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyCreatinine : >=2 grade1 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Increase in Grades From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Over the StudyAspartate Aminotransferase : >=4 grade0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per Severity

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. AEs were classified according to the severity in 3 categories a) mild - AEs did not interfere with participant's usual function, b) moderate - AEs interfered to some extent with participant's usual function, c) severe - AEs interfered significantly with participant's usual function.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per SeverityMild49 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per SeverityModerate58 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per SeveritySevere36 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per SeverityMild43 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per SeverityModerate53 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AEs) as Per SeveritySevere34 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per Genotype

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of a causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. An adverse event was considered a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) if the event started during the effective duration of treatment (all events that started on or after the first dosing). AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. Participants with AEs and SAEs were categorized by genotype categories. Category 1= participants with hemoglobin SS, hemoglobin S beta0 thalassemia and hemoglobin SD; category 2= participants with hemoglobin SC, hemoglobin S beta+ thalassemia and hemoglobin S-Variant (other than HbSD).

Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent AEsGenotype Category 1112 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent AEsGenotype Category 231 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent SAEsGenotype Category 144 Participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent SAEsGenotype Category 28 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent SAEsGenotype Category 29 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent AEsGenotype Category 1101 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent SAEsGenotype Category 140 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as Per GenotypeTreatment Emergent AEsGenotype Category 229 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the Study

Vital signs included temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by the Investigator.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the Study0 Participants
Placebo Treatment ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment Related Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Over the Study0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From Hospital

Percentage of participants re-hospitalized for VOC within 7, 14 and 30 days of hospital discharge.

Time frame: Within 7 days of discharge; Within 14 days of discharge; Within 30 days of discharge, where discharge from hospital was any day from Day 1 to an average of Day 8

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 7 Days3.7 Percentage of participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 14 Days6.8 Percentage of participants
Rivipansel Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 30 Days16.0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 7 Days5.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 14 Days8.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants Re-hospitalized for Vaso-Occlusive Crisis (VOC) Within 7, 14 and 30 Days of Discharge From HospitalWithin 30 Days17.1 Percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS)

Investigator reported events of Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) and other reported respiratory events were sent for adjudication by the Acute Chest Syndrome Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of physicians with relevant SCD expertise, evaluated these events and determined whether they were consistent with cases of ACS.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS)6.8 Percentage of participants
Placebo Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants With Adjudicated Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS)10.1 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.30295% CI: [-10.024, 2.968]Chan and Zhang
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous Manifestations

Investigator reported cutaneous events were sent for adjudication by the Cutaneous Manifestations Safety Endpoint Adjudication Committee. The committee, which consisted of dermatologists, evaluated these events and determined whether they were cases of severe and/or generalized cutaneous manifestations and specifically whether any event was consistent with Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis.

Time frame: Day 1 up to the 35-day post discharge visit (up to an average of Day 43)

Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 infusion of study drug. Participants aged 12 years and above were identified as Cohort 1 and participants aged 6-11 years were identified as Cohort 2; however, the primary analysis and study conclusions were based on the full study population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rivipansel Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous Manifestations2.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Treatment ArmPercentage of Participants With Severe Adjudicated and/or Generalized Cutaneous Manifestations1.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.542995% CI: [-2.379, 5.104]Chan and Zhang

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026