Urinary Tract Infection Complicated, Acute Pyelonephritis
Conditions
Brief summary
Meropenem-vaborbactam is being compared to piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) or acute pyelonephritis (AP).
Detailed description
In the current era of increased resistance to extended spectrum cephalosporins, carbapenem antimicrobial agents are frequently the antibiotics of last defense for the most resistant pathogens in serious infections, including those found in cUTIs. The recent dissemination of serine carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae in many hospitals worldwide now poses a considerable threat to the carbapenems and other members of the beta-lactam class of antimicrobial agents. Rempex is developing meropenem-vaborbactam administered as a fixed combination by intravenous infusion to treat serious Gram-negative infections such as cUTIs, including those infections caused by bacteria resistant to currently available carbapenems.
Interventions
Meropenem-vaborbactam
Piperacillin-tazobactam
DRUGLevofloxacin
Levofloxacin
DRUGSaline
Saline
Sponsors
Department of Health and Human Services
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Double blind-double dummy
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. A signed informed consent form, the ability to understand the study conduct and tasks that are required for study participation, and a willingness to cooperate with all tasks, tests, and examinations as required by the protocol. 2. Male or female ≥18 years of age. 3. Weight ≤185 kilograms (kg). 4. Expectation, in the judgment of the Investigator, that the participant's cUTI or AP requires initial treatment with at least 5 days of IV antibiotics. 5. Documented or suspected cUTI or AP as defined below: cUTI Signs or symptoms evidenced by at least 2 of the following: * Chills, rigors, or fever (fever must be documented within 24 hours of the screening visit with a temperature of ≥38.0 degrees Celsius \[°C\] \[≥100.4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F)\] or rectal/core temperature ≥38.3°C \[≥100.9°F\], observed and documented by a health care provider); * Elevated white blood cell count (\>10,000/ cubic millimeters \[mm\^3\]) or left shift (\>15% immature polymorphonuclear leukocytes \[PMNs\]); * Nausea or vomiting; * Dysuria, increased urinary frequency, or urinary urgency; * Lower abdominal pain or pelvic pain Pyuria evidenced by 1 of the following: * Positive leukocyte esterase (LCE) on urinalysis; * White blood cell count ≥10 cells/mm\^3 in unspun urine; * White blood cell count ≥10 cells/high-power field (hpf) in urine sediment At least 1 of the following associated risks: * Indwelling urinary catheter; * Neurogenic bladder with presence or history of urine residual volume of ≥100 mL; * Obstructive uropathy (such as, nephrolithiasis, tumor, fibrosis) that is expected to be medically or surgically treated within 48 hours post randomization; * Azotemia due to intrinsic renal disease; * Urinary retention in men due to previously diagnosed benign prostatic hypertrophy AP Signs or symptoms evidenced by at least 2 of the following: * Chills, rigors, or fever (fever must be documented within 24 hours of the screening visit with a temperature of ≥38.0°C \[≥100.4°F\] or rectal/core temperature ≥38.3°C \[≥100.9°F\], observed and documented by a health care provider); * Elevated white blood cell count (\>10,000/mm\^3), or left shift (\>15% immature PMNs); * Nausea or vomiting; * Dysuria, increased urinary frequency, or urinary urgency; * Flank pain; * Costo-vertebral angle tenderness on physical examination Pyuria evidenced by 1 of the following: * Positive LCE on urinalysis; * White blood cell count ≥10 cells/mm\^3 in unspun urine; * White blood cell count ≥10 cells/hpf in urine sediment 6. Expectation, in the judgment of the Investigator, that any indwelling urinary catheter or instrumentation (including nephrostomy tubes and/or indwelling stents) will be removed or replaced (if removal is not clinically acceptable) before or as soon as possible, but not longer than 12 hours, after randomization. 7. Expectation, in the judgment of the Investigator that the participant will survive with effective antibiotic therapy and appropriate supportive care for the anticipated duration of the study. 8. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before randomization and be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception between randomization and for 7 days after the completion of the study. A highly effective method of contraception includes 2 of the following: hormonal implants/patch, injectable hormones, oral hormonal contraceptives, prior bilateral oophorectomy, prior hysterectomy, prior bilateral tubal ligation, intra-uterine device, approved cervical ring, condom, true abstinence (if approved by the Investigator), or a vasectomized partner. 9. Willingness to comply with all the study procedures, whether in the hospital or after discharge, for the duration of the study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Presence of any of the following conditions: 1. Perinephric abscess; 2. Renal corticomedullary abscess; 3. Uncomplicated urinary tract infection; 4. Polycystic kidney disease; 5. Chronic vesicoureteral reflux; 6. Previous or planned renal transplantation; 7. Participants receiving hemodialysis; 8. Previous or planned cystectomy or ileal loop surgery; or 9. Known candiduria. 2. Presence of suspected or confirmed acute bacterial prostatitis, orchitis, epididymitis, or chronic bacterial prostatitis as determined by history and/or physical examination. 3. Gross hematuria requiring intervention other than administration of study drug. 4. Urinary tract surgery within 7 days prior to randomization or urinary tract surgery planned during the study period (except surgery required to relieve an obstruction or place a stent or nephrostomy). 5. Renal function at screening as estimated by creatinine clearance \<50 mL/minute (min) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. 6. Known non-renal source of infection such as endocarditis, osteomyelitis, abscess, meningitis, or pneumonia diagnosed within 7 days prior to randomization. 7. Any of the following signs of severe sepsis: 1. Shock or profound hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 millimeters mercury (mmHg) or a decrease of \>40 mmHg from baseline (if known) that is not responsive to fluid challenge; 2. Hypothermia (temperature \<35.6°C or \<96.1°F); or 3. Disseminated intravascular coagulation as evidenced by prothrombin time or partial thromboplastin time ≥2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) or platelets \<50% of the lower limit of normal. 8. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 9. History of epilepsy or known seizure disorder requiring current treatment with anti-seizure medication. 10. Treatment within 30 days prior to enrollment with valproic acid. 11. Treatment within 30 days prior to enrollment with probenecid. 12. Treatment within 30 days prior to enrollment with any cancer chemotherapy, immunosuppressive medications for transplantation, or medications for rejection of transplantation. 13. Evidence of significant hepatic disease or dysfunction, including known acute viral hepatitis or hepatic encephalopathy. 14. Aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase \>5 × ULN or total bilirubin \>3 × ULN. 15. Receipt of any potentially therapeutic antibiotic agent within 48 hours before randomization. Participants with a pathogen-causing cUTI or AP that is resistant to the prior therapy may be enrolled in this study (assuming the organism is known to be sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam). Participants who develop signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP while on antibiotics may also be enrolled. 16. Prior exposure to vaborbactam alone or in combination with another product. 17. Receipt of any potentially therapeutic antibiotic agent within 48 hours before randomization. EXCEPTIONS: * Participants who received a single dose of a short-acting oral or IV antibiotic (an antibiotic that is typically dosed every 4 hours, every 6 hours, or q8h in a participant with normal renal function). No more than 25% of participants will be enrolled who meet this criterion. * Participants who received \>48 hours of prior systemic antibiotic therapy for the current episode of cUTI with unequivocal clinical evidence of treatment failure (that is, worsening signs and symptoms). * Participants who develop signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP while on antibiotics for another indication. 18. Requirement at time of enrollment for any reason for additional systemic antibiotic therapy (other than study drug) or antifungal therapy. Topical antifungal or a single oral dose of any antifungal treatment for vaginal candidiasis will be allowed. 19. Likely to require the use of an antibiotic for cUTI prophylaxis during the participant's participation in the study (from enrollment through the last follow up visit). 20. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus infection and known recent cluster of differentiation 4 count \<200/mm\^3. 21. Presence of immunodeficiency or an immunocompromised condition including hematologic malignancy, bone marrow transplant, or receiving immunosuppressive therapy such as cancer chemotherapy, medications for the rejection of transplantation, and long-term (≥2 weeks) use of systemic corticosteroids. 22. Presence of neutropenia (\<1,000 PMNs/mm\^3). 23. Presence of thrombocytopenia (\<60,000 platelets/mm\^3). 24. A corrected QT with Fridericia's Formula \>480 milliseconds. 25. History of significant hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to meropenem/vaborbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, any of the excipients used in the respective formulations, or any beta-lactam antibiotics (such as, cephalosporins, penicillins, carbapenems, or monobactams). 26. Known hypersensitivity or inability to tolerate all of the following: fluoroquinolones (including levofloxacin), trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, cefdinir, cefixime, or cefpodoxime, based on prescribing information. 27. Unable or unwilling, in the judgment of the Investigator, to comply with the protocol. 28. An employee of the Investigator or study center with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that Investigator or study center, or a family member of the employee or the Investigator. 29. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score \>30 (if clinically indicated) 30. Inability to tolerate intravenous fluids, due to medical reasons, of 1050 mL per day required for study drug administration. 31. Any recent history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment Visit | EOIVT (Days 5-14) | This was the primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For this composite outcome measure, overall success was achieved with a clinical outcome of Cure or Improvement and microbiologic outcome of Eradication at the end of intravenous treatment (EOIVT). Cure was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms. Eradication was defined using the FDA's colony-forming units (CFU)/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure Visit | Test of cure (TOC) (Days 15-23) | This was the primary outcome measure for the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For this measure, a microbiologic outcome of Eradication was defined using the EMA's CFU/mL criteria: bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was reduced to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC Visit | TOC (Days 15-23) | This was the primary outcome measure for the EMA. For this measure, a microbiologic outcome of Eradication was defined using the EMA's CFU/mL criteria: bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was reduced to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). The ME population included all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on a microbiological outcome of Eradication in the ME population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture (FDA) or \<10\^3 CFU/mL (EMA), and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the m-MITT Population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits. |
| Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the CE population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at the Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits. |
| Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the ME population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at the Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits. |
| Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall Success | EOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23) | This secondary outcome measure focused on the overall success in the ME population at the EOIVT and TOC visits. Overall success at TOC was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Overall success at EOIVT was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured or Improvement and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Cured was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP, but continued IV therapy was warranted. Eradication was defined using the FDA's CFU/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (E. cloacae, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the ME population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the FDA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (E. cloacae, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the m-MITT population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the EMA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (E. cloacae, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the ME population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the EMA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Pharmacokinetic (PK) Characterization Of Plasma Exposure Of Meropenem/Vaborbactam | Day 1 | This outcome measure focused on PK assessment of participants in the meropenem/vaborbactam group who met MITT criteria and had at least 1 plasma PK sample drawn. Sparse PK sampling on Day 1 was performed 3-3.5 hours and 5-6 hours after the start of the first 3-h IV study drug infusion. Samples were not collected around the 30-minute infusions. Samples were collected from both groups to maintain the blind; however, only PK samples for the meropenem/vaborbactam group were analyzed. The area under the curve (AUC) was generated using a Population PK model and post hoc estimates of each participants' PK parameters, including AUC0-24, were generated. The AUC during 24 hours (AUC0-24) for Day 1 and at steady-state are presented in micrograms (ug)·hour/mL. |
| Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (Enterobacter cloacae \[E. cloacae\], Enterococcus faecalis \[E. faecalis\], Escherichia coli \[E. coli\], Klebsiella pneumoniae \[K. pneumoniae\]) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the m-MITT population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the FDA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall Success | EOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23) | This secondary outcome measure focused on the overall success in the ME population at the EOIVT and TOC visits. Overall success was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured or Improvement and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Cured was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP, but continued IV therapy was warranted. Eradication was defined using the FDA's CFU/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
| Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30) | This secondary outcome measure focused on a microbiological outcome of Eradication in the m-MITT population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, end of treatment (EOT), TOC, and late follow up (LFU). Eradication was defined as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture (FDA) or \<10\^3 CFU/mL (EMA), and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as a uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). |
Countries
Belarus, Brazil, Bulgaria, Czechia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Peru, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam Meropenem-vaborbactam (meropenem 2 g plus vaborbactam 2 g), infused in 250 mL normal saline, administered IV over 3 hours, q8h, with 100 mL saline administered over 30 minutes q8h. Levofloxacin tablets administered orally as a 500-mg dose q24h after a minimum of 15 doses of IV meropenem-vaborbactam plus saline, if clinically indicated. Total treatment was 10 days, unless a participant had baseline bacteremia where up to 14 days of therapy could be administered IV. | 272 |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam Piperacillin-tazobactam (piperacillin 4 g plus tazobactam 0.5 g), infused in 100 mL normal saline, administered IV over 30 minutes, q8h, with 250 mL saline administered over 30 minutes q8h. Levofloxacin tablets administered orally as a 500-mg dose q24h after a minimum of 15 doses of IV piperacillin-tazobactam plus saline, if clinically indicated. Total treatment was 10 days, unless a participant had baseline bacteremia where up to 14 days of therapy could be administered IV. | 273 |
| Total | 545 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Unable to Come for Visit | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Total | Meropenem-Vaborbactam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 52.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.93 | 52.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.17 | 53.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.42 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 19 Participants | 43 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 254 Participants | 502 Participants | 248 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 5 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 12 Participants | 22 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 252 Participants | 506 Participants | 254 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 180 Participants | 361 Participants | 181 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 93 Participants | 184 Participants | 91 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 272 | 2 / 273 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 36 / 272 | 31 / 273 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 11 / 272 | 12 / 273 |
Outcome results
Primary
Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC Visit
This was the primary outcome measure for the EMA. For this measure, a microbiologic outcome of Eradication was defined using the EMA's CFU/mL criteria: bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was reduced to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). The ME population included all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
Time frame: TOC (Days 15-23)
Population: ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC Visit | 118 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC Visit | 102 Participants |
Comparison: Treatment comparison of the ME population95% CI: [-4.2, 16]
Primary
Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment Visit
This was the primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For this composite outcome measure, overall success was achieved with a clinical outcome of Cure or Improvement and microbiologic outcome of Eradication at the end of intravenous treatment (EOIVT). Cure was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms. Eradication was defined using the FDA's colony-forming units (CFU)/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: EOIVT (Days 5-14)
Population: The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment Visit | 189 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment Visit | 171 Participants |
Comparison: Treatment comparison of the m-MITT population95% CI: [0.7, 9.1]
Primary
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure Visit
This was the primary outcome measure for the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For this measure, a microbiologic outcome of Eradication was defined using the EMA's CFU/mL criteria: bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was reduced to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: Test of cure (TOC) (Days 15-23)
Population: The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure Visit | 128 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure Visit | 105 Participants |
Comparison: Treatment comparison of the m-MITT population95% CI: [-0.9, 18.7]
Secondary
Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population
This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (E. cloacae, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the ME population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the EMA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 9 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 8 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 4 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 8 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. coli | 117 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 117 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. coli | 107 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. coli | 82 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. coli | 83 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 28 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 28 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 26 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 18 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 15 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 24 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. coli | 101 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 23 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 106 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 11 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 2 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. coli | 99 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 26 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. coli | 67 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 13 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. coli | 66 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 9 Participants |
Secondary
Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population
This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (E. cloacae, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the m-MITT population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the EMA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 9 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 8 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 12 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 5 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 9 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. coli | 124 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 123 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. coli | 112 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. coli | 89 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. coli | 90 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 29 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 29 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 27 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 19 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 15 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 24 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. coli | 106 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 24 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 107 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 12 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 2 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. coli | 100 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 26 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. coli | 68 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. coli | 68 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (EMA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 9 Participants |
Secondary
Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population
This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (E. cloacae, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the ME population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the FDA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 9 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 8 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 6 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 9 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. coli | 117 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 117 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. coli | 108 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. coli | 84 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. coli | 84 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 28 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 28 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 26 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 18 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 15 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 24 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. coli | 101 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 25 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 106 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 12 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 2 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. coli | 99 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 26 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. coli | 71 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 12 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. coli | 67 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The ME Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 10 Participants |
Secondary
Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population
This secondary outcome measure focused on the per-pathogen (Enterobacter cloacae \[E. cloacae\], Enterococcus faecalis \[E. faecalis\], Escherichia coli \[E. coli\], Klebsiella pneumoniae \[K. pneumoniae\]) microbiological outcome of Eradication in the m-MITT population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined per the FDA criteria as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 10 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 9 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 8 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 13 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 7 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 11 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. coli | 124 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 123 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. coli | 113 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. coli | 91 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. coli | 91 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 29 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 29 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 27 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 19 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 15 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: K. pneumoniae | 24 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. coli | 106 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: K. pneumoniae | 26 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. cloacae | 5 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. coli | 107 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. cloacae | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: K. pneumoniae | 13 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. cloacae | 2 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. coli | 100 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: K. pneumoniae | 26 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. coli | 73 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | EOT: E. faecalis | 14 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: K. pneumoniae | 15 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | TOC: E. faecalis | 12 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. coli | 69 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Per-Pathogen Microbiological Outcome (FDA) In The m-MITT Population | LFU: E. faecalis | 10 Participants |
Secondary
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Characterization Of Plasma Exposure Of Meropenem/Vaborbactam
This outcome measure focused on PK assessment of participants in the meropenem/vaborbactam group who met MITT criteria and had at least 1 plasma PK sample drawn. Sparse PK sampling on Day 1 was performed 3-3.5 hours and 5-6 hours after the start of the first 3-h IV study drug infusion. Samples were not collected around the 30-minute infusions. Samples were collected from both groups to maintain the blind; however, only PK samples for the meropenem/vaborbactam group were analyzed. The area under the curve (AUC) was generated using a Population PK model and post hoc estimates of each participants' PK parameters, including AUC0-24, were generated. The AUC during 24 hours (AUC0-24) for Day 1 and at steady-state are presented in micrograms (ug)·hour/mL.
Time frame: Day 1
Population: PK population: Participants in the MITT population (all participants screened, randomized, and received at least 1 dose of study drug) and had at least 1 plasma PK sample drawn. Due to renal impairment, 28 participants received a reduced dose of the study drug (1 g meropenem/1 g vaborbactam).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Pharmacokinetic (PK) Characterization Of Plasma Exposure Of Meropenem/Vaborbactam | AUC0-24: Day 1 | 803 ug·hour/mL | Standard Deviation 45.3 |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Pharmacokinetic (PK) Characterization Of Plasma Exposure Of Meropenem/Vaborbactam | AUC0-24: Steady-State | 798 ug·hour/mL | Standard Deviation 60.6 |
Secondary
Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication
This secondary outcome measure focused on a microbiological outcome of Eradication in the ME population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture (FDA) or \<10\^3 CFU/mL (EMA), and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: FDA | 163 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: EMA | 174 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: FDA | 178 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: EMA | 178 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: FDA | 122 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: EMA | 160 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: FDA | 177 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: EMA | 118 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: FDA | 122 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: EMA | 120 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: EMA | 94 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: FDA | 160 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: FDA | 166 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: FDA | 156 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: FDA | 109 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: FDA | 99 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: EMA | 157 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: EMA | 166 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: EMA | 156 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: EMA | 102 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall Success
This secondary outcome measure focused on the overall success in the ME population at the EOIVT and TOC visits. Overall success was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured or Improvement and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Cured was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP, but continued IV therapy was warranted. Eradication was defined using the FDA's CFU/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: EOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23)
Population: ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall Success | EOIVT | 178 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall Success | TOC | 134 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall Success | TOC | 124 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall Success | EOIVT | 165 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication
This secondary outcome measure focused on a microbiological outcome of Eradication in the m-MITT population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, end of treatment (EOT), TOC, and late follow up (LFU). Eradication was defined as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture (FDA) or \<10\^3 CFU/mL (EMA), and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as a uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: FDA | 189 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: FDA | 188 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: FDA | 172 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: FDA | 132 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: FDA | 132 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: EMA | 186 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: EMA | 188 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: EMA | 169 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: EMA | 128 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: EMA | 129 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: EMA | 158 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: FDA | 167 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | Day 3: EMA | 164 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: FDA | 168 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: EMA | 98 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOT: FDA | 158 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | EOIVT: EMA | 168 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: FDA | 113 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | TOC: EMA | 105 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication | LFU: FDA | 103 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall Success
This secondary outcome measure focused on the overall success in the ME population at the EOIVT and TOC visits. Overall success at TOC was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Overall success at EOIVT was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured or Improvement and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Cured was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP, but continued IV therapy was warranted. Eradication was defined using the FDA's CFU/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
Time frame: EOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23)
Population: The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall Success | EOIVT | 189 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall Success | TOC | 143 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall Success | EOIVT | 171 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall Success | TOC | 128 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population
This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the CE population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at the Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits.
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: CE population: all participants who received ≥1 dose of drug (MITT), had no key inclusion/exclusion criteria violations, had a clinical outcome (Cure, Improvement, Failure) at EOIVT, received 80-120% of expected IV doses, missed ≤1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed ≤2 consecutive IV doses overall, received ≥6 doses (Failure) or ≥9 doses (Cure).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOIVT: Improvement | 45 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOT: Improvement | 7 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOIVT: Cure | 202 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | TOC: Cure | 231 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOT: Cure | 235 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | LFU: Cure | 220 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 3: Improvement | 243 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | LFU: Cure | 209 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | Day 3: Improvement | 250 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOIVT: Cure | 206 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOIVT: Improvement | 46 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOT: Cure | 239 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | EOT: Improvement | 6 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) Population | TOC: Cure | 224 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population
This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the ME population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at the Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits.
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOIVT: Improvement | 30 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOT: Improvement | 3 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOIVT: Cure | 148 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | TOC: Cure | 164 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOT: Cure | 170 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | LFU: Cure | 156 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | Day 3: Improvement | 175 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | LFU: Cure | 139 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | Day 3: Improvement | 164 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOIVT: Cure | 138 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOIVT: Improvement | 30 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOT: Cure | 161 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | EOT: Improvement | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME Population | TOC: Cure | 153 Participants |
Secondary
Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population
This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the m-MITT Population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits.
Time frame: Day 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
Population: The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: Improvement | 33 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOT: Improvement | 4 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: Cure | 156 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | TOC: Cure | 174 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOT: Cure | 179 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | LFU: Cure | 166 Participants |
| Meropenem-Vaborbactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: Improvement | 186 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | LFU: Cure | 143 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | Day 3: Improvement | 171 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: Cure | 144 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOIVT: Improvement | 30 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOT: Cure | 167 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | EOT: Improvement | 3 Participants |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | Proportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT Population | TOC: Cure | 157 Participants |