Skip to content

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis of Intravenous Esomeprazole in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients

Effect of Intravenous Esomeprazole Versus Cimetidine in Prevention of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients - a Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02157376
Acronym
SUP
Enrollment
343
Registered
2014-06-06
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2017-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

Keywords

SUP, Upper GI bleeding, Seriously ill patients

Brief summary

The efficacy of esomeprazole will be compared versus cimetidine (a drug that previously demonstrated prevention of bleeding events) during treatment period in proportion of patients for the prevention of upper GI bleeding.

Detailed description

Stress related upper Gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings are important events associated with morbidity and mortality among seriously ill patients. Data from the literature suggest that stress ulcer prevention with effective acid suppressive treatment can reduce bleeding events and is thus an important therapy in high-risk patients. Esomeprazole has the potential to reduce gastric acidity for prolonged periods of time adequate for both preventing mucosal damage and facilitating coagulation. This study is to reveal whether intravenous (iv) esomeprazole is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding and if it is tolerated by Chinese seriously ill patients.

Interventions

DRUGEsomeprazole

iv esomeprazole 30 min intermittent infusions given for maximum 14 days

iv cimetidine 30 min bolus infusion followed by iv cimetidine continuous infusion given for maximum 14 days

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Critically ill patients 2. Requirement for mechanical ventilation 3. At least one major risk factor for stress ulcer related bleeding

Exclusion criteria

1. History of gastric or oesophageal surgery 2. Evidence of active GI bleeding 3. Advanced renal disease 4. Treatment with any Proton Pump Inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase1-14 daysCriteria for a clinically significant upper GI bleeding as: 1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that did not clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of at least 100 ml lavage with room temperature normal saline-or, 2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material During IMP treatment Day 1-2: Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material for at least eight consecutive hours that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline. During IMP treatment Day 3-14: Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material in at least three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60 ±20 minutes apart), that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase1-14 daysCriteria for a significant upper GI bleeding as described in primary outcome measure or, Criteria for a non-significant upper GI bleeding as: 1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of lavage with room temperature normal saline or, 2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material During IMP treatment Day 1-2: Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material for at less than eight consecutive hours or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline. During IMP treatment Day 3-14: Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material in less than three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60±20 minutes apart), or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline or, 3. Any clinical signs of hematemesis or melena or haematochezia judged (by the Investigator) to be from an upper GI source.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Overall, 343 patients were enrolled from 27 centres in China. The first patient entered the study on 15 July 2014 and the last patient completed the study on 18 February 2016. Of the 343 patients enrolled into the study, 311 (90.7%) patients were randomised to treatment.

Pre-assignment details

32 patients were not randomised to treatment due to eligibility criteria not being fulfilled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Esomeprazole
iv Esomeprazole 40 mg bid 30 min intermittent infusion given for maximum 14 days
147
Cimetidine
iv Cimetidine 300 mg 30 min bolus infusion, followed by iv Cimetidine continuous infusion (50 mg/h) given for maximum 14 days
153
Total300

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath104
Overall StudyEligibility criteria not fulfilled01
Overall StudyInvestigator's misjudgement12
Overall StudyNot treated83
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject38

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEsomeprazoleCimetidineTotal
Age, Continuous50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Age, Customized
<65 years
131 participants132 participants263 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
16 participants21 participants37 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Chinese
147 participants153 participants300 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants38 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
104 Participants115 Participants219 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
88 / 15385 / 147
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 15314 / 147

Outcome results

Primary

The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase

Criteria for a clinically significant upper GI bleeding as: 1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that did not clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of at least 100 ml lavage with room temperature normal saline-or, 2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material During IMP treatment Day 1-2: Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material for at least eight consecutive hours that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline. During IMP treatment Day 3-14: Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material in at least three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60 ±20 minutes apart), that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline.

Time frame: 1-14 days

Population: Full analysis set (FAS). All randomized patients in whom at least one dose of randomized treatment has been initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EsomeprazoleThe Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase2.7 % of participants
CimetidineThe Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase4.6 % of participants
Comparison: Assuming a bleeding percent of 6.3% for the active comparator, a risk reduction of 3.7% for esomeprazole, and a 5% non-inferiority margin, 150 patients per treatment arm will provide 94% power to demonstrate non-inferiority. The null hypothesis is that the bleeding rate for iv esomeprazole 40 mg bid exceeds the rate for iv cimetidine by an amount at least as large as 5%.p-value: 0.39395% CI: [-2.8, 6.5]Pearson's Chi-square
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase

Criteria for a significant upper GI bleeding as described in primary outcome measure or, Criteria for a non-significant upper GI bleeding as: 1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of lavage with room temperature normal saline or, 2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material During IMP treatment Day 1-2: Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material for at less than eight consecutive hours or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline. During IMP treatment Day 3-14: Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material in less than three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60±20 minutes apart), or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline or, 3. Any clinical signs of hematemesis or melena or haematochezia judged (by the Investigator) to be from an upper GI source.

Time frame: 1-14 days

Population: Full analysis set (FAS). All randomized patients in whom at least one dose of randomized treatment has been initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EsomeprazoleProportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase0.109 proportion of participants
CimetidineProportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase0.105 proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026