Skip to content

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic, Including Food Interaction, and Pharmacodynamic Profile of BIA 5-1058.

A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Combined Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic, Including Food Interaction, and Pharmacodynamic Profile of BIA 5-1058, in Healthy Male Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02151994
Enrollment
124
Registered
2014-06-02
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2016-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension and Chronic Heart Failure

Keywords

BIA 5-1058, hypertension, chronic heart failure, cardiovascular disorders

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to to assess the safety and tolerability of BIA 5 1058 after single and multiple oral doses

Detailed description

This was a Phase 1, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled combined single ascending dose (SAD), including food interaction (food effect, FE) analysis, and multiple ascending dose (MAD) study. SAD: This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, one study period involving administration of single doses of BIA 5-1058 or placebo according to a randomized design, and a follow-up period. Nine sequential groups of 8 healthy young male subjects were dosed. Within each group, 6 subjects were randomised to receive BIA 5-1058 and 2 subjects were randomised to receive placebo. In this first-in-human study, the subjects participating at the lowest dose level of 5 mg were dosed according to a sentinel dosing design to ensure optimal safety. Initially, 2 subjects were dosed; 1 subject with BIA 5-1058 and 1 subject with placebo. After the safety and tolerability results of the first 24 h following dosing for the initial subjects had been found to be acceptable to the MI, the other 6 subjects of the lowest dose level were dosed. MAD: This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, one study period involving administration of multiple doses of BIA 5-1058 or placebo once daily for 10 days, and a follow-up period. Five sequential groups of 8 healthy young male subjects were dosed. Within each group, 6 subjects were randomised to receive BIA 5-1058 and 2 subjects were randomised to receive placebo. The starting dose of 50 mg was chosen taking into consideration the dose range of the previous SAD sequential groups and was approved by the IEC. Escalation to the next higher dose and the determination of the next dose level was based on safety, tolerability and available PK results of the previously administered dose FE: This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, an open-label two-way crossover study period, and a follow-up period. One group of 12 subjects received single doses of 400 mg BIA 5-1058 during 2 treatment periods, once after having fasted overnight and once after consumption of a high fat breakfast. Each treatment was separated by a period of at least 7 days. The treatment sequence was determined by randomisation.

Interventions

oral administration

DRUGPlacebo

oral administration

Sponsors

Bial - Portela C S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects were eligible for the study if they met all the following inclusion criteria: * Gender - male * Age - 18 - 55 years, inclusive * Body Mass Index (BMI) - 18.0 - 30.0 kg m2 (BMI (kg m2) = Body weight (kg) - Heigh t2 (m 2)) * Ability and willingness to abstain from alcohol, methylxanthine-containing beverages or food (coffee, tea, cola, chocolate, power drinks), grapefruit (juice) and tobacco products from 48 h prior to entry in the clinical research centre until discharge * Medical history without major pathology * Normal resting supine blood pressure and pulse rate showing no clinically relevant deviations as judged by the MI * Computerised (12-lead) ECG recording without signs of clinically relevant pathology or showing no clinically relevant deviations as judged by the MI * All values for haematology and for clinical chemistry tests of blood and urine within the normal range or showing no clinically relevant deviations as judged by the MI * Willingness to sign the written ICF

Exclusion criteria

Subjects were excluded from participation if any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) PeriodJust before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administrationJust before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as mild, moderate or severe and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as not related, unlikely, possible, probable or ''definite.
Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) PeriodJust before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administrationJust before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as mild, moderate or severe and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as not related, unlikely, possible, probable or ''definite.
Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Food Effect (FE)Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administrationJust before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as mild, moderate or severe and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as not related, unlikely, possible, probable or ''definite.

Countries

Netherlands

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study period : Date of first screening to last follow-up: 03 March 2011 - 13 January 2012;

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Ascending Dose (SAD)
This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, one study period involving administration of single doses of BIA 5-1058 or placebo according to a randomised design, and a follow-up period. Nine sequential groups of 8 healthy young male subjects were dosed. Within each group, 6 subjects were randomised to receive BIA 5-1058 and 2 subjects were randomised to receive placebo.
72
Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD)
This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, one study period involving administration of multiple doses of BIA 5-1058 or placebo once daily for 10 days, and a follow-up period. Five sequential groups of 8 healthy young male subjects were dosed. Within each group, 6 subjects were randomised to receive BIA 5-1058 and 2 subjects were randomised to receive placebo.
40
Food Interaction (Food Effect, FE) Analysis
This part consisted of an eligibility screening period, an open-label two-way crossover study period, and a follow-up period. One group of 12 subjects received single doses of 400 mg BIA 5-1058 during 2 treatment periods, once after having fasted overnight and once after consumption of a high fat breakfast. Each treatment was separated by a period of at least 7 days. The treatment sequence was determined by randomisation.
12
Total124

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Ascending Dose (SAD)Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD)Food Interaction (Food Effect, FE) AnalysisTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
72 Participants38 Participants12 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants40 Participants12 Participants124 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
EG016
affected / at risk
EG017
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 180 / 62 / 63 / 62 / 64 / 64 / 63 / 61 / 64 / 63 / 125 / 128 / 105 / 63 / 65 / 63 / 66 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 120 / 120 / 100 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Food Effect (FE)

Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as mild, moderate or severe and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as not related, unlikely, possible, probable or ''definite.

Time frame: Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Food Effect (FE)0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
5 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Food Effect (FE)17 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
Primary

Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period

Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as mild, moderate or severe and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as not related, unlikely, possible, probable or ''definite.

Time frame: Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration

Population: No drug-related TEAEs were reported for the dose levels of 50 mg md and 400 mg md.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period30 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
5 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
25 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period50 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
50 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period33 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
100 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
200 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) Period33 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
Primary

Percentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period

Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration, subjects were asked non-leading questions to determine the occurrence of AEs. Subjects were asked in general terms about any AEs at regular intervals during each study period. In addition, all AEs reported spontaneously during the course of the study were recorded. All answers were assessed by the Medical Investigator (MI), coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; Version 14.0) and recorded in the AEs Record. The intensity of the AEs was rated as mild, moderate or severe and the relationship between the AEs and the study medication was indicated as not related, unlikely, possible, probable or ''definite.

Time frame: Just before drug administration and twice daily until 72 h after (last) drug administration

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period28 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
5 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
25 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
50 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
100 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
200 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
400 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period17 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
800 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period17 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
1600 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period0 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM
2400 mgPercentage (%) of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Study Medication (SM) - Single Ascending Dose (SAD) Period67 % of subject with TEAEs related to SM

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026