Skip to content

A Double-Blind, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of DX-2930 in Hereditary Angioedema Participants

A Phase 1b, Double-Blind, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of DX-2930 in Hereditary Angioedema Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02093923
Enrollment
38
Registered
2014-03-21
Start date
2014-05-14
Completion date
2015-05-18
Last updated
2021-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)

Keywords

HAE

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of multiple subcutaneous administrations of DX-2930 across a range of doses in HAE participants.

Interventions

Participants will receive SC injection of DX-2930 (a recombinant, Chinese hamster ovary \[CHO\] cell expressed, fully human immunoglobulin IgG1, kappa light chain, monoclonal antibody) once and followed by the second dose after 2 week into the upper arm.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive matching placebo subcutaneously.

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 years of age at the time of screening * Documented diagnosis of HAE (Type I or II) * Experiencing ≥2 HAE attacks per year, with at least 1 attack in the past 6 months reported by the participant * Willing and able to read, understand, and sign an informed consent form * Females of childbearing potential must agree to be abstinent or else use acceptable forms of contraception throughout study * Males with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to be abstinent or use a medically acceptable form of contraception throughout study

Exclusion criteria

* Exposure to an investigational drug or device within 90 days prior to study * History of exposure within the past 5 years to a monoclonal antibody or recombinant protein bearing an Fc domain * Concomitant diagnosis of another form of chronic angioedema * Use of long-term prophylaxis for HAE within 90 days prior to study * Use of C1-INH that exceeds a total of 30 days within the past 90 days prior to study; any use of C1-INH within 7 days prior to study * Exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or any estrogen-containing medications with systemic absorption within 90 days prior to study * Exposure to androgens within 90 days prior to study * Presence of an indwelling catheter * Diagnosis of HIV * Active liver disease or liver function test abnormalities * History of substance abuse or dependence * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may compromise their safety or compliance, preclude successful conduct of the study, or interfere with interpretation of the results

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)From Day 1 up to final follow-up (Day 123)A SAE was any adverse experience occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: Death, Life-threatening experience, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity. Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Was considered to be an important medical event. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if the onset time was after administration of study drug through the Day 120 post-dose final follow-up visit or, in the event that onset time preceded study drug administration, the AE increased in severity during the 120-day post-dose follow-up period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120PK parameter Tmax data were reported.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120PK paramenter AUC data were reported.
Apparent Clearance (CL/F)Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120PK parameter CL/F data were reported.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120PK parameter Vd/F data were reported.
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2)Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120PK parameter t(1/2) data were reported.
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter Cmax data were reported.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Day 8 to Day 64This endpoint analysis was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the prespecified assessment period (Day 8 to Day 64 predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week is a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant is a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.
HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Day 1 to Day 50This endpoint analysis was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the prespecified assessment period (Day 1 to Day 50 predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week is a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant is a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.
HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Day 8 to Day 92This endpoint analysis was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the prespecified assessment period (Day 8 to Day 92 predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week is a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant is a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.
HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Day 8 to Day 50Analysis of this outcome measure was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the pre-specified assessment period (Days 8 to 50; predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week was a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant was a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.

Countries

Italy, Jordan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited in United States, Italy, and Jordan between 14 May 2014 (first participant first visit) and 18 May 2015 (last participant last visit).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 38 participants were randomized and 37 participants were treated out of them 36 participants completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DX-2930, Cohort 1
Participants received 30 mg dose of DX-2930 subcutaneous (SC) injection once and followed by the second dose after 2 week into the upper arm.
4
DX-2930, Cohort 2
Participants received 100 mg dose of DX-2930 subcutaneous (SC) injection once and followed by the second dose after 2 week into the upper arm.
4
DX-2930, Cohort 3
Participants received 300 mg dose of DX-2930 subcutaneous (SC) injection once and followed by the second dose after 2 week into the upper arm.
5
DX-2930, Cohort 4
Participants received 400 mg dose of DX-2930 subcutaneous (SC) injection once and followed by the second dose after 2 week into the upper arm.
11
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to 30, 100, 300 and 400 mg dose of DX-2930 subcutaneous (SC) injection once and followed by the second dose after 2 week into the upper arm.
13
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00010
Overall StudyScreen failure after randomization00010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDX-2930, Cohort 1DX-2930, Cohort 2DX-2930, Cohort 3DX-2930, Cohort 4PlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
<18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
>65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants10 Participants12 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants10 Participants13 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants11 Participants13 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants1 Participants9 Participants7 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 40 / 50 / 110 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 43 / 42 / 58 / 1110 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 40 / 50 / 111 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

A SAE was any adverse experience occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: Death, Life-threatening experience, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity. Was a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Was considered to be an important medical event. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if the onset time was after administration of study drug through the Day 120 post-dose final follow-up visit or, in the event that onset time preceded study drug administration, the AE increased in severity during the 120-day post-dose follow-up period.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to final follow-up (Day 123)

Population: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DX-2930, Cohort 1Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
DX-2930, Cohort 1Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Treatment Emergent Adverse Events1 Participants
DX-2930, Cohort 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
DX-2930, Cohort 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Treatment Emergent Adverse Events3 Participants
DX-2930, Cohort 3Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
DX-2930, Cohort 3Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Treatment Emergent Adverse Events2 Participants
DX-2930, Cohort 4Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Treatment Emergent Adverse Events8 Participants
DX-2930, Cohort 4Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Treatment Emergent Adverse Events10 Participants
Secondary

Apparent Clearance (CL/F)

PK parameter CL/F data were reported.

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120

Population: Pharmacokinectic (PK) population included all randomized HAE participants in the safety population who had sufficient blood samples to obtain a plasma concentration versus time profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1Apparent Clearance (CL/F)0.5720 Liter per day (L/day)Standard Deviation 0.26829
DX-2930, Cohort 2Apparent Clearance (CL/F)0.8110 Liter per day (L/day)Standard Deviation 0.28258
DX-2930, Cohort 3Apparent Clearance (CL/F)1.0036 Liter per day (L/day)Standard Deviation 0.9087
DX-2930, Cohort 4Apparent Clearance (CL/F)0.5514 Liter per day (L/day)Standard Deviation 0.14318
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)

PK parameter Vd/F data were reported.

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120

Population: Pharmacokinectic (PK) population included all randomized HAE participants in the safety population who had sufficient blood samples to obtain a plasma concentration versus time profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)11.553 Liter (L)Standard Deviation 4.9218
DX-2930, Cohort 2Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)16.125 Liter (L)Standard Deviation 2.6949
DX-2930, Cohort 3Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)17.436 Liter (L)Standard Deviation 10.5609
DX-2930, Cohort 4Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F)11.696 Liter (L)Standard Deviation 2.76
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)

PK paramenter AUC data were reported.

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120

Population: Pharmacokinectic (PK) population included all randomized HAE participants in the safety population who had sufficient blood samples to obtain a plasma concentration versus time profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)64100.0 day*nanogram per milliliter (day*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 34731.16
DX-2930, Cohort 2Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)135425.0 day*nanogram per milliliter (day*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 48616.76
DX-2930, Cohort 3Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)451800.0 day*nanogram per milliliter (day*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 226801.01
DX-2930, Cohort 4Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)762777.8 day*nanogram per milliliter (day*ng/mL)Standard Deviation 166713.66
Secondary

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter Cmax data were reported.

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120

Population: Pharmacokinectic (PK) population included all randomized HAE participants in the safety population who had sufficient blood samples to obtain a plasma concentration versus time profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)3895.0 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2159.76
DX-2930, Cohort 2Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)7890.0 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2058.43
DX-2930, Cohort 3Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)27460.0 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 14542.46
DX-2930, Cohort 4Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)45322.2 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 8704.56
Secondary

Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2)

PK parameter t(1/2) data were reported.

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120

Population: Pharmacokinectic (PK) population included all randomized HAE participants in the safety population who had sufficient blood samples to obtain a plasma concentration versus time profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2)14.225 DayStandard Deviation 0.8261
DX-2930, Cohort 2Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2)14.625 DayStandard Deviation 3.4082
DX-2930, Cohort 3Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2)13.802 DayStandard Deviation 3.2535
DX-2930, Cohort 4Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2)14.967 DayStandard Deviation 2.4377
Secondary

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

PK parameter Tmax data were reported.

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 16, 18, 22, 29, 36, 50, 64, 92, and 120

Population: Pharmacokinectic (PK) population included all randomized HAE participants in the safety population who had sufficient blood samples to obtain a plasma concentration versus time profile.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)17.930 DaysStandard Deviation 1.14
DX-2930, Cohort 2Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)18.020 DaysStandard Deviation 0.4596
DX-2930, Cohort 3Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)18.172 DaysStandard Deviation 1.4526
DX-2930, Cohort 4Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)17.700 DaysStandard Deviation 0.9804
Other Pre-specified

HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50

This endpoint analysis was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the prespecified assessment period (Day 1 to Day 50 predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week is a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant is a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 50

Population: All randomized participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks in the 3 months prior to enrollment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.3269 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.24627
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0 HAE attacks per week
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0 HAE attacks per week
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.5455 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.17356
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.0525 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.03998
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.0541 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.17634
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.0392 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.15105
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.4872 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.211
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.0382 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.02898
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.3916 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.17694
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.3588 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.08864
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 1 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.3506 HAE attacks per weekStandard Deviation 0.32803
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-100, -100]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: 0.014195% CI: [-96.79, -32.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-97.68, -51.13]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50

Analysis of this outcome measure was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the pre-specified assessment period (Days 8 to 50; predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week was a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant was a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.

Time frame: Day 8 to Day 50

Population: All randomized participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks in the 3 months prior to enrollment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.3269 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.24627
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0 HAE attacks per week
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0 HAE attacks per week
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.5455 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.17356
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.0454 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.03319
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.0476 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.1504
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.0345 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.12894
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.4872 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.211
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.0333 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.02404
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.3916 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.17694
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.3712 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.09596
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attack Rate Per Week From Day 8 to Day 50Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.3636 HAE attacks per weekStandard Error 0.36376
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-100, -100]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-97.18, -46.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: 0.001295% CI: [-97.93, -61.57]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64

This endpoint analysis was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the prespecified assessment period (Day 8 to Day 64 predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week is a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant is a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.

Time frame: Day 8 to Day 64

Population: All randomized participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks in the 3 months prior to enrollment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean baseline HAE attack rate0.3269 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.24627
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Estimated mean rate based on GEE0 HAE Attacks per Week
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted0 HAE Attacks per Week
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean baseline HAE attack rate0.5455 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.17356
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Estimated mean rate based on GEE0.0661 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.02759
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted0.0723 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.13227
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted0.0522 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.11651
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean baseline HAE attack rate0.4872 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.211
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Estimated mean rate based on GEE0.0490 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.02002
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean baseline HAE attack rate0.3916 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.17694
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Estimated mean rate based on GEE0.3773 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.09518
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 64Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted0.3636 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.33752
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-100, -100]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-92.5, -58.64]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-94.55, -69.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92

This endpoint analysis was based on participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo dose groups with a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks over the last 3 months prior to enrollment. The result is based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis of repeated counts per week during the prespecified assessment period (Day 8 to Day 92 predicted to correspond to a period of notable drug exposure). Baseline HAE attack rate per week is a covariate, treatment group is a fixed effect, and participant is a random effect in the GEE model with independence working correlation structure.

Time frame: Day 8 to Day 92

Population: All randomized participants in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and placebo groups who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had a historical baseline attack rate of at least 2 attacks in the 3 months prior to enrollment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.3269 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.24627
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0 HAE Attacks per Week
DX-2930, Cohort 1HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0 HAE Attacks per Week
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.5455 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.17356
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.0603 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.02438
DX-2930, Cohort 2HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.0732 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.12665
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.0526 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.11206
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.4872 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.211
DX-2930, Cohort 3HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.0461 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.01826
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean baseline HAE attack rate (attacks/week)0.3916 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.17694
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Estimated mean rate based on GEE (attacks/week)0.3787 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.10957
DX-2930, Cohort 4HAE Attacks Per Week From Day 8 to Day 92Mean HAE attack rate, unadjusted (attacks/week)0.3636 HAE Attacks per WeekStandard Deviation 0.36945
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-100, -100]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-93.07, -63.46]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The result was based on General Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) approach with Poisson distribution assumption was applied to the repeated-measures mixed model with independence working correlation structure. The treatment group was a fixed effect and the number of baseline HAE attacks per week was included as a covariate in the GEE.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-94.81, -71.5]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026