Skip to content

Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation for Patients With Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

A Phase I/II Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Matched, Partially HLA-mismatched, HLA-haploidentical or Matched Unrelated Bone Marrow for Patients With Refractory SLE

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02080195
Enrollment
1
Registered
2014-03-06
Start date
2016-09-13
Completion date
2017-03-29
Last updated
2019-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Erythematosus, Graft-versus-host Disease

Brief summary

The main goal of the study is to determine if bone marrow transplant (BMT) from a less specific pool of donors in combination with high dose cyclophosphamide can induce remission of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus.

Detailed description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a devastating systemic autoimmune disease that predominantly affects young women, is more common in African-Americans than in whites, and results in poor quality of life. Lupus has no cure, and up to 90% of patients require corticosteroids for disease control. More than half of patients with lupus have permanent organ damage, much of which is either directly due to or increased by corticosteroids. To satisfactorily manage moderate-to-severe SLE, the investigators need effective treatments that will allow corticosteroid-sparing. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous BMT or peripheral blood progenitor transplantation (PBSCT) has been proposed as a novel approach to treat severe autoimmune diseases. Allogeneic BMT is not currently utilized for the routine treatment of SLE because of the significant morbidity (GVHD) and mortality associated with the procedure. The investigators have recently developed an approach to BMT using post-transplant cyclophosphamide that allows us to safely perform allogeneic BMT from matched, mismatched, unrelated or haploidentical donors. Transplant-related mortality, graft-failure and risk of GVHD have been very low with this approach. Furthermore, this approach allows us to greatly expand the donor pool since any patient shares exactly one HLA haplotype with each biological parent or child and half of siblings, an eligible haploidentical donor can be identified rapidly in nearly all cases. This trial will employ a fludarabine + cyclophosphamide conditioning along with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide on for patients with refractory SLE. The purpose of this trial is to improve the salvage rate for patients with refractory SLE through a reformatting of the immune system.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide

14.5 mg/kg/day on Days -6 and -5. 50 mg/kg/day on Days 3 and 4.

DRUGFludarabine

30 mg/m\^2/day on Days -6 through -2.

DRUGTacrolimus

Starting on Day 5. Dose will be adjusted according to blood levels.

DRUGMycophenolate Mofetil

15 mg/kg three times per day from Day 5 to Day 35.

0.5 mg/kg on Day -9. 2 mg/kg/day on Days -8 and -7.

RADIATIONTotal body irradiation

200 centigray on Day -1.

Infusion on Day 0.

Sponsors

Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Four or more American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of SLE or 4 or more of the SLICE criteria * Involvement of one or more of the following organ systems: renal, neurologic, hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal * A lack of response to corticosteroids in moderate-to-high doses, and to either an equivalent degree of immunosuppression with azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, belimumab, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or appropriate other treatment * Patients should be eligible for transplantation according to the BMT Policy Manual

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years and over 75 years * Any risk of pregnancy * Patients who are preterminal or moribund

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching1 yearNumber of participants who were alive at 1 year after transplant and who had not suffered graft rejection, acute or chronic GVHD, or Grade 3 or higher (CTCAE V4.0) adverse events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival1 yearNumber of patients alive and alive without relapse, respectively.
Graft Failure60 daysNumber of participants with primary and/or secondary graft failure.
RIFLE Score1 yearChange in Responder Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosis (RIFLE) assessment. This is a qualitative assessment of organ function. The 12 month response will be assessed as: complete= complete or partial resolution in more than one organ, partial= complete or partial resolution in at least one organ, the same= no change or no worsening in any organ, worse= worsening in any organ
Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Up to 2 yearsPercentage of participants who developed grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is defined by the Przepiorka criteria, which stages the degree of organ involvement in the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, based on severity, with Stage 1+ being least severe and stage 4+ being the most severe. Grading of acute GVHD is as follows: Grade I (skin involvement stages 1+ to 2+, with no liver or GI involvement), Grade II (skin involvement stages 1+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 1+), Grade III (skin involvement stages 2+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 2+ to 4+), Grade IV (skin involvement stages 4+, Liver 4+).
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Up to 2 yearsPercentage of participants who developed chronic GVHD as defined by the NIH consensus criteria. This system gives scores from 0 to 3 for Karnofsky performance score, skin, mouth, eyes, gastrointestinal, liver, lungs, joints, and genitals, as well as an overall severity (mild, moderate, or severe). Mild chronic GVHD involves only 1 or 2 organs or sites (except the lung), with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum of score 1 in all affected organs or sites). Moderate chronic GVHD involves 1) at least 1 organ or site with clinically significant but no major disability (maximum score of 2 in any affected organ or site) OR 2) 3 or more organs or sites with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum score of 1 in all affected organs or sites). Severe chronic GVHD indicates major disability caused by chronic GVHD (score of 3 in any organ or site).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Bone Marrow Transplant in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients Cyclophosphamide: Cyclophosphamide (alkylating agent) conditioning regimen and post transplantation cyclophosphamide with matched, partially matched, haplo-identical or unrelated donors Sodium-2-mercapto ethane sulphonate: Antineoplastic detoxifying agent Fludarabine monophosphate: Purine antimetabolite Tacrolimus: Calcineurin inhibitor Mofetil: Immunosuppressant Rabbit antithymocyte globulin: Selective immunosuppressant
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMT
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

The Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching

Number of participants who were alive at 1 year after transplant and who had not suffered graft rejection, acute or chronic GVHD, or Grade 3 or higher (CTCAE V4.0) adverse events.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTThe Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching1 Participants
Secondary

Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Percentage of participants who developed grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is defined by the Przepiorka criteria, which stages the degree of organ involvement in the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, based on severity, with Stage 1+ being least severe and stage 4+ being the most severe. Grading of acute GVHD is as follows: Grade I (skin involvement stages 1+ to 2+, with no liver or GI involvement), Grade II (skin involvement stages 1+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 1+), Grade III (skin involvement stages 2+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 2+ to 4+), Grade IV (skin involvement stages 4+, Liver 4+).

Time frame: Up to 2 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTAcute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Grades II-IV acute GVHD0 Participants
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTAcute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Grades III-IV acute GVHD0 Participants
Secondary

Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Percentage of participants who developed chronic GVHD as defined by the NIH consensus criteria. This system gives scores from 0 to 3 for Karnofsky performance score, skin, mouth, eyes, gastrointestinal, liver, lungs, joints, and genitals, as well as an overall severity (mild, moderate, or severe). Mild chronic GVHD involves only 1 or 2 organs or sites (except the lung), with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum of score 1 in all affected organs or sites). Moderate chronic GVHD involves 1) at least 1 organ or site with clinically significant but no major disability (maximum score of 2 in any affected organ or site) OR 2) 3 or more organs or sites with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum score of 1 in all affected organs or sites). Severe chronic GVHD indicates major disability caused by chronic GVHD (score of 3 in any organ or site).

Time frame: Up to 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTChronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)0 Participants
Secondary

Graft Failure

Number of participants with primary and/or secondary graft failure.

Time frame: 60 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTGraft FailurePrimary graft failure0 Participants
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTGraft FailureSecondary graft failure0 Participants
Secondary

RIFLE Score

Change in Responder Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosis (RIFLE) assessment. This is a qualitative assessment of organ function. The 12 month response will be assessed as: complete= complete or partial resolution in more than one organ, partial= complete or partial resolution in at least one organ, the same= no change or no worsening in any organ, worse= worsening in any organ

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The only enrolled participant on this study was never assessed for a follow-up RIFLE scale, so no data was collected for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Survival

Number of patients alive and alive without relapse, respectively.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTSurvivalOverall Survival1 Participants
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTSurvivalEvent Free Survival1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026