Skip to content

Pilot Study of Entacapone for Methamphetamine Abuse

Pilot Study of the Dose Response of Entacapone on Methamphetamine Induced Interest, Mood Elevation, and Reward

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02058966
Enrollment
29
Registered
2014-02-11
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2019-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Methamphetamine Dependence

Keywords

Entacapone, COMT val158met, Methamphetamine

Brief summary

Addiction to methamphetamine is a serious health problem. There are no medications that a doctor can give someone to help them stop using methamphetamine. Entacapone (Comtan©) is a medication that could help people addicted to methamphetamine. This study will see how entacapone works in healthy people who are given methamphetamine. We think that the study drug will be well tolerated, and that it will prevent some of the effects of methamphetamine that make it so addictive. We also want to see how differences in people's genes may cause differences in the ways the study drug and methamphetamine work for them. The study has six total visits. The first visit is for screening. Tests and procedures will make sure it is safe for subjects to participate. The second visit is a familiarization day. Subjects will receive methamphetamine, but no entacapone. This is done to make sure they can tolerate the drug and recognize its effects before being given a second drug on the same day. Subjects will take surveys and computer tests to see how the medications change mood, thinking, and liking the drug. The final four visits are the actual study days. Subjects will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to the different ways to get either 1) study medication or placebo (placebo contains no active study medication) and then 2) methamphetamine or placebo. Subjects will be in all four groups during the study, which means that each day a subject will get a different group.

Interventions

Entacapone 200 mg oral dose

Methamphetamine 20 mg oral dose

DRUGPlacebo

capsules compounded to be of similar appearance to the active drugs

Sponsors

Portland VA Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* No history of pre-existing physical (including cardiovascular) illness * No history of drug abuse or dependence * Ability to read and write English * Have had at least one exposure to a stimulant (e.g. cocaine, methamphetamine, ecstasy, methylphenidate or any medication in the stimulant class) in their lifetime

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant * Taking any psychotropic medication * Meeting DSM-IV criteria for active substance abuse or dependence * On any stimulant medication * History or current hypertension (BP \> 140/90 mm Hg) or systolic hypotension (SBP \< 90 mm Hg) * Subjects with resting pulse rate \> 90/min * Any active medical illness * Family history of abnormal heart rhythms, or sudden cardiac death * Subjects who anticipate they may require the emergent use of epinephrine (such as an Epi-Pen®) for the treatment of severe allergic reactions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced MoodMeasurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.Profile of Mood States is a 65 item questionnaire using a Likert rating scale to assess transient, distinct moods. The questionnaire contains 65 words/statements that describe feelings people have. The test requires you to indicate for each word or statement how you have been feeling in the past week including today. A Total Mood Disturbance score is calculated by adding scores for Tension, Depression, Anger, Fatigue and Confusion and then subtracting the Vigour score. The Total Mood Disturbance scale ranges from -32 to 200 with lower scores indicative of people with more stable mood profiles.
Effect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineMeasurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.The subjective effects of the study drug were evaluated with the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI-49), a 49 item questionnaire consisting of true/false items. True items receive a score of 1 if answer is 'True', false items receive a score of 1 if answer is 'False'. No points are given when answer is opposite to scoring direction. There are 5 subscales: Morphine Benzedrine group scale to measure euphoria (range: 0-16 with higher numbers indicating more euphoria), A Lysergic Acid Diethylamide group scale to estimate dysphoria and agitation (range: 0-14 with higher scores indicating more dysphoria), a Pentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol group scale to measure sedation (range: 0-15 with higher scores indicating more sedation), and a Benzedrine group scale and an Amphetamine Scale to assess stimulant effects (range: 0-13 and 0-11, respectively, with higher scores indicating higher stimulant effects) .
Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced StimulationMeasurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.The Global Rating of Stimulation is a 1-item question I feel light-headed, restless, or speeded-up in which the participant is asked to circle one answer on a scale from 0-4, 0 is 'normal', 1 is 'slightly', 2 is 'moderately', 3 is 'very much', and 4 is 'extremely'. Whichever number they circled is their reported score. A higher score is indicative of a greater stimulating effect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive FunctionMeasurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.Two computer tests were administered to measure how each medication intervention effects cognitive functioning. The tests administered included the Rapid Visual Information Processing Task (RVIPT), a 6 minute test of sustained attention in which participants are requested to detect target sequences of digits and the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), a 2 minute test of psychomotor speed and sustained attention consisting of digit-symbol pairs followed by a list of digits where the subject identifies the symbol that corresponds to each digit as fast as possible. The number of correct responses within the allowed time is measured. Higher scores on both tasks indicate better performance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study staff screened 80 subjects over the phone between June 2014 to June 2016 at a clinical hospital in Portland, OR.

Pre-assignment details

51 subjects failed the pre-screen primarily due to history of substance use disorder, time commitment conflicts, or unwilling to take methamphetamine. 14 of 29 subjects completed first randomization. Of the 29, 6 declined to participate, 4 did not meet inclusion criteria, 1 was excluded due to an adverse event, and 6 dropped out.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants who completed all four study arms including: 1. Placebo followed by Placebo 2. Placebo followed by Methamphetamine (20 mg) 3. Entacapone (200 mg) followed by Placebo 4. Entacapone (200 mg) followed by Methamphetamine (20 mg)
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
First InterventionWithdrawal by Subject1
Open-Label MethamphetamineAdverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous29.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.12
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 130 / 130 / 120 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 190 / 130 / 130 / 120 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 130 / 130 / 120 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood

Profile of Mood States is a 65 item questionnaire using a Likert rating scale to assess transient, distinct moods. The questionnaire contains 65 words/statements that describe feelings people have. The test requires you to indicate for each word or statement how you have been feeling in the past week including today. A Total Mood Disturbance score is calculated by adding scores for Tension, Depression, Anger, Fatigue and Confusion and then subtracting the Vigour score. The Total Mood Disturbance scale ranges from -32 to 200 with lower scores indicative of people with more stable mood profiles.

Time frame: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

Population: The analysis population includes only the 12 subjects that completed each intervention of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood12.500 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.187
Placebo Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood13.750 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.037
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood7.500 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.166
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood9.833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.783
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood8.750 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.309
Primary

Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation

The Global Rating of Stimulation is a 1-item question I feel light-headed, restless, or speeded-up in which the participant is asked to circle one answer on a scale from 0-4, 0 is 'normal', 1 is 'slightly', 2 is 'moderately', 3 is 'very much', and 4 is 'extremely'. Whichever number they circled is their reported score. A higher score is indicative of a greater stimulating effect.

Time frame: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

Population: The analysis population includes only the 12 subjects that completed each arm, or intervention, of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation0.1667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5586
Placebo Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation0.1667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5774
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation1.4167 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1645
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation0.4167 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9003
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation1.3333 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1547
Primary

Effect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine

The subjective effects of the study drug were evaluated with the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI-49), a 49 item questionnaire consisting of true/false items. True items receive a score of 1 if answer is 'True', false items receive a score of 1 if answer is 'False'. No points are given when answer is opposite to scoring direction. There are 5 subscales: Morphine Benzedrine group scale to measure euphoria (range: 0-16 with higher numbers indicating more euphoria), A Lysergic Acid Diethylamide group scale to estimate dysphoria and agitation (range: 0-14 with higher scores indicating more dysphoria), a Pentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol group scale to measure sedation (range: 0-15 with higher scores indicating more sedation), and a Benzedrine group scale and an Amphetamine Scale to assess stimulant effects (range: 0-13 and 0-11, respectively, with higher scores indicating higher stimulant effects) .

Time frame: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

Population: The analysis population includes only the 12 subjects that completed each arm, or intervention, of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineBenzedrine4.9583 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4869
BaselineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineMorphine Benzedrine1.9375 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.661
BaselineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineAmphetamine2.0000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8451
BaselineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineLysergic Acid Diethylamide3.0625 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1923
BaselineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetaminePentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol4.8125 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5066
Placebo Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineBenzedrine5.1667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0817
Placebo Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetaminePentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol5.0000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9233
Placebo Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineLysergic Acid Diethylamide3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1382
Placebo Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineAmphetamine2.1667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4802
Placebo Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineMorphine Benzedrine1.8333 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8868
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetaminePentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol1.5833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.832
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineMorphine Benzedrine7.9167 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9308
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineLysergic Acid Diethylamide4.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0944
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineBenzedrine8.6667 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6013
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineAmphetamine5.9167 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4499
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineAmphetamine2.5833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6097
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineMorphine Benzedrine2.5833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineBenzedrine5.3333 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1462
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetaminePentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol4.0833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.811
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineLysergic Acid Diethylamide3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1382
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetaminePentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol2.0000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.132
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineBenzedrine7.8333 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7376
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineMorphine Benzedrine6.9167 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2879
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineAmphetamine5.5833 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.0104
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineEffect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of MethamphetamineLysergic Acid Diethylamide3.8333 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3371
Secondary

Cognitive Function

Two computer tests were administered to measure how each medication intervention effects cognitive functioning. The tests administered included the Rapid Visual Information Processing Task (RVIPT), a 6 minute test of sustained attention in which participants are requested to detect target sequences of digits and the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), a 2 minute test of psychomotor speed and sustained attention consisting of digit-symbol pairs followed by a list of digits where the subject identifies the symbol that corresponds to each digit as fast as possible. The number of correct responses within the allowed time is measured. Higher scores on both tasks indicate better performance.

Time frame: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

Population: The analysis population includes only the 12 subjects that completed each arm, or intervention, of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineCognitive FunctionRapid Visual Information Processing Task38.813 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 11.23
BaselineCognitive FunctionDigital Symbol Substitution Task73.167 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 17.765
Placebo Followed by PlaceboCognitive FunctionRapid Visual Information Processing Task40.500 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 13.215
Placebo Followed by PlaceboCognitive FunctionDigital Symbol Substitution Task72.000 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 20.662
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineCognitive FunctionRapid Visual Information Processing Task41.333 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 11.073
Placebo Followed by MethamphetamineCognitive FunctionDigital Symbol Substitution Task71.167 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 27.788
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboCognitive FunctionDigital Symbol Substitution Task72.750 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 14.973
Entacapone Followed by PlaceboCognitive FunctionRapid Visual Information Processing Task42.583 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 10.423
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineCognitive FunctionRapid Visual Information Processing Task40.083 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 10.396
Entacapone Followed by MethamphetamineCognitive FunctionDigital Symbol Substitution Task72.750 number of correct answersStandard Deviation 15.004

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026