Skip to content

Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02053493
Acronym
NEAT-HFpeF
Enrollment
110
Registered
2014-02-03
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2016-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Heart Failure, Preserved Ejection Fraction

Brief summary

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study to assess effect of isosorbide mononitrate with dose up-titration on activity tolerance as assessed by (hip-worn, tri-axial) accelerometry.

Detailed description

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo.

Interventions

Dispense phase 1 study drug: Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg ISMN Week 4: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg ISMN Dispense phase-2 study drug: Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg ISMN Week 10: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg ISMN

DRUGPlacebo

Dispense phase 1 study drug: Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg Placebo Week 4: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg Placebo Dispense phase-2 study drug: Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg Placebo Week 10: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg Placebo

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Vermont
CollaboratorOTHER
Adrian Hernandez
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 50 years 2. Symptoms of dyspnea (NYHA class II-IV) without evidence of a non-cardiac or ischemic explanation for dyspnea 3. Ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% as determined on imaging study within 12 months of enrollment with no change in clinical status suggesting potential for deterioration in systolic function 4. Stable medical therapy for 30 days as defined by: * No addition or removal of ACE, Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or aldosterone antagonists * No change in dosage of ACE, ARBs, beta-blockers,CCBs or aldosterone antagonists of more than 100% 5. One of the following within the last 12 months * Previous hospitalization for heart failure (HF) with radiographic evidence of pulmonary congestion (pulmonary venous hypertension, vascular congestion, interstitial edema, pleural effusion) or * Catheterization documented elevated filling pressures at rest (LVEDP≥15 or PCWP≥20) or with exercise (PCWP≥25) or * Elevated NT-proBNP (\> 400 pg/ml) or BNP (\> 200 pg/ml) or * Echo evidence of diastolic dysfunction / elevated filling pressures (at least two) E/A \> 1.5 + decrease in E/A of \> 0.5 with valsalva Deceleration time ≤ 140 ms Pulmonary vein velocity in systole \< diastole (PVs\<PVd)sinus rhythm) E/e'≥15 Left atrial enlargement (≥ moderate) Pulmonary artery systolic pressure \> 40 mmHg Evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy * LV mass/BSA ≥ 96 (♀) or ≥ 116 (♂) g/m2 * Relative wall thickness ≥ 0.43 (♂ or ♀) \[(IVS+PW)/LVEDD\] * Posterior wall thickness ≥ 0.9 (♀) or 1.0 (♂) cm 6. No chronic nitrate therapy or infrequent (≤ 1x week) use of intermittent sublingual nitroglycerin within last 3 months 7. Ambulatory (not wheelchair / scooter / walker / cane dependent) 8. HF is the primary factor limiting activity as indicated by answering # 2 to the following question: My ability to be active is most limited by: 1. Joint, foot, leg, hip or back pain 2. Shortness of breath and/or fatigue and/or chest pain 3. Unsteadiness or dizziness 4. Lifestyle, weather, or I just don't like to be active 9\. Body size allows wearing of the accelerometer belt as confirmed by ability to comfortably fasten the test belt provided for the screening process (belt designed to fit persons with BMI 20-40 Kg/m2 but belt may fit some persons outside this range) 10\. Willingness to wear the accelerometer belt for the duration of the trial 11. Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Recent (\< 3 months) hospitalization for HF 2. Hemoglobin \< 8.0 g/dl 3. Glomerular filtration rate \< 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 on most recent clinical laboratories 4. SBP \< 110 mmHg or \> 180 mmHg at consent 5. Diastolic blood pressure \< 40 mmHg or \> 100 mmHg at consent 6. Resting HR \> 110 bpm at consent 7. Previous adverse reaction to nitrates necessitating withdrawal of therapy 8. Chronic therapy with phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (intermittent use of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction is allowable if the patient is willing to hold for the duration of the trial) 9. Regularly (\> 1x per week) swims or does water aerobics 10. Significant COPD thought to contribute to dyspnea 11. Ischemia thought to contribute to dyspnea 12. Documentation of previous EF \< 50% 13. Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months defined by electrocardiographic changes and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g. troponin) in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent) 14. Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or new biventricular pacing within past 3 months 15. Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 16. Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (amyloid) 17. Constrictive pericarditis or tamponade 18. Active myocarditis 19. Complex congenital heart disease 20. Active collagen vascular disease 21. More than mild aortic or mitral stenosis 22. Intrinsic (prolapse, rheumatic) valve disease with moderate to severe or severe mitral, tricuspid or aortic regurgitation 23. Acute or chronic severe liver disease as evidenced by any of the following: encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, INR \> 1.7 in the absence of anticoagulation treatment 24. Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year 25. Enrollment or planned enrollment in another therapeutic clinical trial in the next 3 months 26. Inability to comply with planned study procedures 27. Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)5-6 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)11-12 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.Week 13Self reported participant preference for study period 1 vs. study period 2.
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)Week 7To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)Week 13To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)Week 7To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)Week 13To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. • The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).Higher values of the overall KCCQ score are considered to be better than lower values.
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)Week 7To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)Week 7To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)5-6 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)11-12 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)3-6 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)9-12 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)3-6 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14\*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28
Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)9-12 weeksTo evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14\*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)Week 13To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo
Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)Week 13To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All patients admitted to the participating HFN centers with signs and symptoms suggestive of HFpEF will be screened including their ability to wear the accelerometer belt. Patients meeting eligibility criteria will be approached regarding participation in this study.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects who fulfill all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will undergo the baseline studies and then be randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to Placebo
Isosorbide Mononitrate with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks) Isosorbide Mononitrate: Dispense phase 1 study drug: Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg ISMN Week 4: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg ISMN Dispense phase-2 study drug: Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg ISMN Week 10: 60 mg ISMN Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg ISMN
51
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide Mononitrate
Isosorbide Mononitrate placebo with dose up-titration (30 to 120 mg/day over 4 weeks) Placebo: Dispense phase 1 study drug: Weeks 1 and 2: No study drug (baseline) Week 3: 30 mg Placebo Week 4: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 5 and 6: 120 mg Placebo Dispense phase-2 study drug: Weeks 7 and 8: No study drug (washout) Week 9: 30 mg Placebo Week 10: 60 mg Placebo Weeks 11 and 12: 120 mg Placebo
59
Total110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIsosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboPlacebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateTotal
Age, Continuous69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
68.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
69.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Region of Enrollment
United States
51 participants59 participants110 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants38 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants21 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 511 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

Time frame: 5-6 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboArbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)9370 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 4601
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateArbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase I)9538 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 6286
Primary

Arbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate increases daily activity as assessed by 14-day averaged arbitrary accelerometry units in comparison to placebo. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

Time frame: 11-12 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboArbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)8824 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 3877
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateArbitrary Accelerometry Units (AAU) (Phase II)8900 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 5457
Secondary

Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.

Time frame: Week 7

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboBorg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateBorg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase I)4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Borg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10 (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). Lower values are considered to be better than higher values.

Time frame: Week 13

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboBorg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateBorg Score During 6 Minute Walk Test (Phase II)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14\*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28

Time frame: 3-6 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboImprovement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)9621.4 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 4367.8
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateImprovement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase I)9714.0 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 6273.6
Secondary

Improvement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Area under the curve (AUC) of arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement. Area under the curve is defined as ((7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 30 mg) + (7\*average acceleromtery units/day during 60 mg) + (14\*average acceleromtery units/day during 120 mg))/28

Time frame: 9-12 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboImprovement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)9146.5 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 3695.3
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateImprovement in Daily Activity - Area Under the Curve (Phase II)9325.9 accelerometry unitsStandard Deviation 5668.2
Secondary

Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug

Time frame: 5-6 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboImprovement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)9.4 Hours/dayStandard Deviation 2.4
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateImprovement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase I)9.1 Hours/dayStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Improvement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Hours active per day during maximal dose of study drug

Time frame: 11-12 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboImprovement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)9.4 Hours/dayStandard Deviation 2.4
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateImprovement in Daily Activity - Hours Active Per Day (Phase II)8.8 Hours/dayStandard Deviation 2.5
Secondary

Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

Time frame: 3-6 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboImprovement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)-3.4 accelerometry units/dayStandard Deviation 23.1
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateImprovement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase I)-1.3 accelerometry units/dayStandard Deviation 26.9
Secondary

Improvement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate in comparison to placebo improves daily activity as measured by Slope of daily averaged arbitrary accelerometry units during study drug administration. An arbitrary accelerometer unit is calculated within the accelerometer device that is worn by the patient and represents level of activity based on patient movement. Higher values indicate more movement. 0 indicates no movement.

Time frame: 9-12 weeks

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboImprovement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)2.6 accelerometry units/dayStandard Deviation 20.1
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateImprovement in Daily Activity - Slope of Daily Average (Phase II)-3.9 accelerometry units/dayStandard Deviation 16.4
Secondary

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).

Time frame: Week 7

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)57.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase I)64.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Secondary

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. • The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (eg, better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life).Higher values of the overall KCCQ score are considered to be better than lower values.

Time frame: Week 13

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)59.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (Phase II)61.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Secondary

N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo

Time frame: Week 7

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboN-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)513.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 803.2
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateN-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase I)542.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 710.9
Secondary

N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate improves natriuretic peptide levels in comparison to placebo

Time frame: Week 13

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboN-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)466.1 pg/mLStandard Deviation 677.4
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateN-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Level (Phase II)573.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 756.1
Secondary

Patient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.

Self reported participant preference for study period 1 vs. study period 2.

Time frame: Week 13

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboPatient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.Phase114 participants
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboPatient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.Phase218 participants
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboPatient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.No Preference16 participants
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitratePatient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.Phase114 participants
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitratePatient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.Phase224 participants
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitratePatient Preference for Isosorbide Mononitrate Treatment at the End of Study.No Preference19 participants
Secondary

Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.

Time frame: Week 7

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboSix Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)307.8 metersStandard Deviation 125.5
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateSix Minute Walk Distance (Phase I)327.1 metersStandard Deviation 126
Secondary

Six Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)

To evaluate whether isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) improves functional capacity by 6 minute walk distance in comparison to placebo.

Time frame: Week 13

Population: Participants with usable data included in the results

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isosorbide Mononitrate Crossover to PlaceboSix Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)321.3 metersStandard Deviation 132.4
Placebo Crossover to Isosorbide MononitrateSix Minute Walk Distance (Phase II)329.7 metersStandard Deviation 132.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026