Skip to content

Analysis of 18F-AV-1451 PET Imaging in Cognitively Healthy, MCI, and AD Subjects

An Open Label, Multicenter Study, Evaluating the Safety and Imaging Characteristics of 18F-AV-1451 in Cognitively Healthy Volunteers, Subjects With Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02016560
Acronym
MCI
Enrollment
383
Registered
2013-12-20
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2017-07-28
Last updated
2020-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Brief summary

A Phase 2/3 cross-sectional and longitudinal observational study evaluating imaging characteristics of flortaucipir in control subjects and patients with clinically defined MCI and AD dementia (AD).

Detailed description

This study was conducted in 2 phases: a Phase 2 Exploratory Phase and a Phase 3 Confirmatory Phase. An overarching goal of the Exploratory Phase of this protocol was to further investigate the pattern of flortaucipir PET imaging across the disease course, in cognitively healthy subjects through patients with cognitive decline. To accomplish this goal, the protocol investigated flortaucipir results in younger and older cognitively healthy normal volunteers and patients with clinical diagnoses for cognitive complaints, ranging from MCI to mild and moderate AD dementia. Additionally, the Exploratory Phase of this protocol investigated relationships between flortaucipir PET signal and cognitive decline over the 18-month study period. The second, Confirmatory Phase of the study was designed to provide independent validation of the relationships observed in the exploratory analyses of the first phase. In particular, the goal of the second phase was to confirm the relationship between flortaucipir uptake in the brain as measured by PET signals at baseline and the subsequent rate of cognitive decline observed over the 18-month longitudinal follow up.

Interventions

DRUGflorbetapir F 18
DRUGFlortaucipir F18

positron emission tomography (PET) scan of the brain

Sponsors

Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Applies only to confirmatory phase: the independent readers are blinded to all clinical information.

Intervention model description

All subjects in both the exploratory and confirmatory phases of the study, receive both florbetapir and florbetapir scans, regardless of subgroup assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Exploratory Cognitively Healthy Subjects * ≥ 20 to ≤ 40 years of age OR ≥ 50 years of age * Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) ≥ 29 * No significant history of cognitive impairment Exploratory MCI Subjects * ≥ 50 years of age * MMSE ≥ 24 * Have MCI consistent with National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) working group's diagnostic guidelines for AD * Have a study partner that can report on subject's activities of daily living Exploratory AD Subjects * ≥ 50 years of age * MMSE \> 10 * Have possible or probable AD based on the NIA-AA working group's diagnostic guidelines for AD * Have a study partner that can report on subject's activities of daily living Confirmatory Subjects * ≥ 50 years of age * MMSE ≥ 20 and ≤ 27 * Cognitively impaired subjects with either MCI or dementia with a suspected neurodegenerative cause * Have a study partner that can report on subject's activities of daily living

Exclusion criteria

* Current clinically significant psychiatric disease * Evidence of structural brain abnormalities * History of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury * Current clinically significant cardiovascular disease or ECG abnormalities, or additional risk factors for Torsades de Pointes * Current clinically significant infectious disease, endocrine or metabolic disease, pulmonary, renal or hepatic impairment, or cancer * History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence * Females of childbearing potential who are not surgically sterile, not refraining from sexual activity or not using reliable methods of contraception * Have received or participated in a trial with investigational medications in the past 30 days * Have had a non-study related radiopharmaceutical imaging or treatment procedure within 7 days prior to the study imaging session.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confirmatory Phase: Relationship Between Neocortical Flortaucipir Uptake and the Subsequent Rate of Cognitive Declinebetween baseline and 18 monthsConfirm the relationship between neocortical flortaucipir uptake and the subsequent rate of cognitive decline at longitudinal follow up that was observed in the Exploratory Phase of the study. Patients were assigned to groups by majority classification of the flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) scan by five independent imaging physicians. Clinically meaningful cognitive and functional deterioration was defined as a 1 point or greater worsening on clinical dementia rating - sum of boxes (CDR-SB) score over the follow-up period.
Exploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging Resultsbaseline scanFlortaucipir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr). A value of 1 signifies no flortaucipir activity above background, values greater than 1 signify increasing flortaucipir activity in the brain.
Exploratory Phase: Longitudinal Change in Tau Deposition Over Time, by Amyloid Statusbaseline and 18 monthsAssess the rate of change of tau deposition as measured by flortaucipir uptake (SUVr) over time. Change = 18 months SUVr - baseline SUVr.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual Readbaseline and 18 monthsThis analysis used dichotomized CDR-SB change as a truth standard (1 point or more worsening = true positive vs. less than 1 point worsening = true negative) to assess the diagnostic performance of baseline Advanced AD tau status (τAD++) as determined by flortaucipir scan interpretation. Sensitivity and Specificity were calculated for each of the 5 independent imaging readers. Sensitivity is the percentage of true positive cases correctly identified by an Advanced AD pattern scan. Specificity is the percentage of true negative cases correctly identified by scans that were not classified as Advanced AD pattern.
Exploratory Phase: Correlation Between Flortaucipir SUVr and Agebaseline scanFlortaucipir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr). A value of 1 signifies no flortaucipir activity above background, values greater than 1 signify increasing flortaucipir activity in the brain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Exploratory cohort subjects were enrolled starting in Dec 2013. Confirmatory cohort subjects were enrolled Dec 2014-July 2017. Exploratory cohort subjects were not eligible for the confirmatory phase.

Pre-assignment details

To ensure a distribution of disease severity in the confirmatory phase, a target was set to recruit at least one-third of the enrolled subjects with dementia

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exploratory Young Cognitively Healthy Subjects
Male or female subjects ≥20 to ≤40 years of age with MMSE ≥29
16
Exploratory Older Cognitively Healthy Subjects
Male or female subjects ≥50 years of age with MMSE ≥29
58
Exploratory MCI Subjects
Subjects with mild cognitive impairment consistent with National Institute of Aging (NIA)-Alzheimer's Association working group's diagnostic guidelines for AD (Albert et al. 2011) and MMSE ≥24
98
Exploratory AD Subjects
Subjects with possible or probable AD dementia based on the NIA-Alzheimer's Association working group's diagnostic guidelines for AD (McKhann et al. 2011) and MMSE \>10
51
Confirmatory Subjects MCI
Clinically diagnosed mild cognitive impairment with a suspected neurodegenerative cause with an MMSE score ≥20 and ≤27
98
Confirmatory Subjects AD
Clinically diagnosed dementia with a suspected neurodegenerative cause with an MMSE score ≥20 and ≤27
62
Total383

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExploratory Young Cognitively Healthy SubjectsExploratory Older Cognitively Healthy SubjectsExploratory MCI SubjectsExploratory AD SubjectsTotalConfirmatory Subjects MCIConfirmatory Subjects AD
Age, Continuous28.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.88
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.29
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
73.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.01
72.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61
72.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.69
73.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.53
Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
4.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants15 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants57 Participants94 Participants51 Participants368 Participants93 Participants58 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants9 Participants7 Participants2 Participants24 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
11 Participants47 Participants89 Participants47 Participants349 Participants94 Participants61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants26 Participants49 Participants28 Participants184 Participants44 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants32 Participants49 Participants23 Participants199 Participants54 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 580 / 980 / 510 / 980 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 1617 / 5821 / 9813 / 5113 / 980 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 581 / 980 / 510 / 980 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Confirmatory Phase: Relationship Between Neocortical Flortaucipir Uptake and the Subsequent Rate of Cognitive Decline

Confirm the relationship between neocortical flortaucipir uptake and the subsequent rate of cognitive decline at longitudinal follow up that was observed in the Exploratory Phase of the study. Patients were assigned to groups by majority classification of the flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET) scan by five independent imaging physicians. Clinically meaningful cognitive and functional deterioration was defined as a 1 point or greater worsening on clinical dementia rating - sum of boxes (CDR-SB) score over the follow-up period.

Time frame: between baseline and 18 months

Population: Subjects from the confirmatory phase with valid flortaucipir visual read and 9 or 18 month clinical follow-up.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Relationship Between Neocortical Flortaucipir Uptake and the Subsequent Rate of Cognitive DeclineClinically meaningful progression36 Participants
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Relationship Between Neocortical Flortaucipir Uptake and the Subsequent Rate of Cognitive DeclineDid Not Progress27 Participants
Not Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Relationship Between Neocortical Flortaucipir Uptake and the Subsequent Rate of Cognitive DeclineClinically meaningful progression31 Participants
Not Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Relationship Between Neocortical Flortaucipir Uptake and the Subsequent Rate of Cognitive DeclineDid Not Progress37 Participants
Comparison: The specific hypothesis tested was that the hazard of progressing to the clinically meaningful event (defined as CDR-SB value change of at least 1 within 18 months) will be significantly greater for subjects with flortaucipir scans rated by majority interpretation as predicted to progress (Advanced AD scan pattern), as compared to subjects with scans rated as not predicted to progress (Moderate or Not AD scan pattern).p-value: 0.06795% CI: [0.968, 2.581]Cox proportional hazards
Primary

Exploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging Results

Flortaucipir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr). A value of 1 signifies no flortaucipir activity above background, values greater than 1 signify increasing flortaucipir activity in the brain.

Time frame: baseline scan

Population: Analysis included all subjects who received an injection of flortaucipir, had valid quantifiable flortaucipir imaging data available, and valid quantifiable florbetapir PET data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging ResultsAβ- SUVr1.03 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.051
Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging ResultsAβ+ SUVr1.53 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.037
Not Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging ResultsAβ- SUVr0.99 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.029
Not Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging ResultsAβ+ SUVr1.26 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.03
Exploratory Older Cognitively Healthy SubjectsExploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging ResultsAβ+ SUVr1.08 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.093
Exploratory Older Cognitively Healthy SubjectsExploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging ResultsAβ- SUVr0.98 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.029
Exploratory Young Cognitively Healthy SubjectsExploratory Phase: Cross-sectional Flortaucipir Imaging ResultsAβ- SUVr1.01 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.039
Comparison: ANCOVA model comparing the mean SUVr between AD and Older Cognitively Healthy within amyloid positive group.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model comparing the mean SUVr between MCI and Older Cognitively Healthy within the amyloid positive group.p-value: 0.0622ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model comparing the mean SUVr between AD and MCI within the amyloid positive group.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Primary

Exploratory Phase: Longitudinal Change in Tau Deposition Over Time, by Amyloid Status

Assess the rate of change of tau deposition as measured by flortaucipir uptake (SUVr) over time. Change = 18 months SUVr - baseline SUVr.

Time frame: baseline and 18 months

Population: Analysis of flortaucipir SUVr Change Over Time by Amyloid Status, Exploratory Phase Efficacy Population (AD and MCI subjects only)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Longitudinal Change in Tau Deposition Over Time, by Amyloid Status0.052359 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.008536
Not Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Longitudinal Change in Tau Deposition Over Time, by Amyloid Status0.000655 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Error 0.002394
Comparison: SUVr change from baseline as dependent variable, baseline SUVr, age, and visit as independent variables, using an unstructured covariance structure for amyloid positive subjects only.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: SUVr change from baseline as dependent variable, baseline SUVr, age, and visit as independent variables, using an unstructured covariance structure for amyloid negative subjects only.p-value: 0.7851Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Confirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual Read

This analysis used dichotomized CDR-SB change as a truth standard (1 point or more worsening = true positive vs. less than 1 point worsening = true negative) to assess the diagnostic performance of baseline Advanced AD tau status (τAD++) as determined by flortaucipir scan interpretation. Sensitivity and Specificity were calculated for each of the 5 independent imaging readers. Sensitivity is the percentage of true positive cases correctly identified by an Advanced AD pattern scan. Specificity is the percentage of true negative cases correctly identified by scans that were not classified as Advanced AD pattern.

Time frame: baseline and 18 months

Population: All confirmatory phase subjects who completed 18 months of follow-up for the cognitive endpoint were read by each reader

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 1 Sensitivity59.6 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 1 Specificity65.5 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 2 Sensitivity53.8 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 2 Specificity65.5 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 3 Sensitivity55.8 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 3 Specificity65.5 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 4 Sensitivity59.6 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 4 Specificity65.5 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 5 Sensitivity50.0 percentage of cases correctly identified
Predicted to ProgressConfirmatory Phase: Diagnostic Performance of Flortaucipir Visual ReadReader 5 Specificity65.5 percentage of cases correctly identified
Secondary

Exploratory Phase: Correlation Between Flortaucipir SUVr and Age

Flortaucipir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr). A value of 1 signifies no flortaucipir activity above background, values greater than 1 signify increasing flortaucipir activity in the brain.

Time frame: baseline scan

Population: Exploratory Young and Old healthy control subjects with a valid flortaucipir PET scan

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Correlation Between Flortaucipir SUVr and Age1.0083 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Deviation 0.03905
Not Predicted to ProgressExploratory Phase: Correlation Between Flortaucipir SUVr and Age1.0203 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Deviation 0.03693
Exploratory Older Cognitively Healthy SubjectsExploratory Phase: Correlation Between Flortaucipir SUVr and Age1.0110 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Deviation 0.04149
Exploratory Young Cognitively Healthy SubjectsExploratory Phase: Correlation Between Flortaucipir SUVr and Age1.0010 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Deviation 0.02604
Exploratory Older Cognitively Healthy Subjects >=80Exploratory Phase: Correlation Between Flortaucipir SUVr and Age1.0048 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr)Standard Deviation 0.03978
Comparison: Pearson's correlation coefficientp-value: 0.4361Pearson

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026