Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Ovulatory Dysfunction, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Endometrial Hemostatic Dysfunction
Conditions
Brief summary
This study is a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) for improving quality of life among women who report heavy menstrual bleeding.
Detailed description
This study is designed to be conducted within the context of a patient's standard/usual/typical care from their primary gynecologic care provider. We hypothesize that, compared to COCs, the LNG-IUS will be more effective at improving bleeding-related quality of life at 6 months and one year. To test this hypothesis, we plan to enroll 59 women from several sites who present for gynecologic care and self-report heavy menstrual bleeding into a RCT comparing LNG-IUS to COCs. The eligible study population includes women with heavy menstrual bleeding secondary to ovulatory disorders (AUB-O) or endometrial hemostatic disorders (AUB-E). Women meeting study eligibility will be randomized to receive LNG-IUS or COCs. Main study outcomes will be obtained at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.
Interventions
Sponsors
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 51 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Self-reported heavy menstrual bleeding * Age 18-51 years * Etiology of heavy menstrual bleeding from either ovulatory disorders (AUB-O) or endometrial hemostatic disorders (AUB-E)
Exclusion criteria
* Plan pregnancy in the next year * Menopausal * Currently has a copper IUD in place * History of ablation or hysterectomy or have any contraindications to COCs or LNG-IUS
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire | Completed 5 times over a one year time period | We will measure bleeding-specific quality of life using the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (MBQ), a validated tool to assess bleeding-related quality of life, which is the most important outcome for patients and for clinicians treating this symptom. We will measure MBQ score at randomization, and at 6 weeks, 3 month, 6 months, and 12 months post-randomization for both groups |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Failure | Information collected at four time points during a one year period post randomization | The goal of treating heavy menstrual bleeding is to utilize a treatment option that improves patient quality of life and avoids surgical intervention. We will look at treatment failure two different ways. We will determine the overall proportion of participants who discontinued their assigned treatment (opted for no treatment or chose a different treatment option, including surgery) and subset that opted for surgical intervention (endometrial ablation or hysterectomy) during the study period. This information will be recorded by the primary gynecologic provider (physical examination and physician form), by participants (interval health history form), and by the research team (medical record review). |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed