Skip to content

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Design, Dose Response Study of the Efficacy of E2006 in Adults and Elderly Subjects With Chronic Insomnia

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Design, Dose Response Study of the Efficacy of E2006 in Adults and Elderly Subjects With Chronic Insomnia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01995838
Enrollment
291
Registered
2013-11-27
Start date
2013-11-13
Completion date
2014-04-29
Last updated
2020-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Insomnia, Adults, Elderly

Keywords

Chronic Insomnia, Adults, Elderly

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, multiple dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Bayesian adaptive, dose response study in subjects with chronic insomnia. Subjects will be randomized to 1 of 6 doses of E2006 (1 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, or 25 mg) or placebo.

Detailed description

The study will have 2 phases, Prerandomization and Randomization. The Prerandomization Phase will last up to 21 days and will consist of a Screening Period (Days -21 to -2) and a Baseline Period (Day -1). Following the Baseline Period, all eligible subjects will be randomized, in a double-blind manner, to receive E2006 or placebo for 15 nights during the Treatment Period (Days 1 to 15), then all subjects will receive placebo, in a single-blind manner, for 2 nights (Days 16 to 17) during the Rebound Insomnia Assessment Period (Days 16 to 18). Subjects will not receive any treatment during the Follow-up Period (Days 19 to 29). All subjects will come to the clinic for screening procedures. During the Screening Period, subjects will complete the Sleep Diary each day. Polysomnographic sleep will be measured during the Screening Period on 2 consecutive nights between Day -9 and Day -3. These 8-hour polysomnograms (PSGs) will start at the median habitual bedtime calculated from responses on the Sleep Diary completed 7 days immediately prior to the first PSG night. Subjects may leave the clinic between the screening/baseline PSG nights.

Interventions

DRUGE2006

E2006 1 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, or 25 mg, in tablet form, taken orally, 30 minutes prior to bedtime, each night for 15 consecutive nights

DRUGPlacebo

E2006-matched placebo in tablet form, taken orally, 30 minutes prior to bedtime, each night for 15 consecutive nights

Sponsors

Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be included in this study: 1. Male or female subjects age 18 to 80 years at the time of informed consent 2. Meets the 5th Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for Insomnia Disorder 3. Subjective Sleep Onset Latency (sSOL) typically greater than or equal to 30 minutes in the last 4 weeks and/or subjective WASO (sWASO) typically greater than or equal to 60 minutes in the last 4 weeks 4. Regular time in bed between 6.5 and 9.0 hours 5. Regular bedtime between 21:00 and 24:00 and regular waketime between 05:00 and 09:00 6. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score greater than or equal to 15 at Screening 7. Confirmation of current insomnia symptoms as determined from responses on the Sleep Diary completed for 7 nights prior to the first screening/baseline PSG 8. Objective (PSG) evidence of insomnia at the screening/baseline PSGs as follows: 1. LPS average greater than or equal to 30 minutes on the 2 consecutive screening/baseline PSGs, with neither night lesser than 15 minutes and/or 2. WASO average greater than or equal to 30 minutes on the 2 consecutive screening/baseline PSGs, with neither night lesser than 20 minutes 3. SE average lesser than or equal to 85% on the 2 consecutive screening/baseline PSGs, with neither night greater than 87.5% 9. Females of childbearing potential must not have had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and must agree to use two highly effective method of contraception 10. Male subjects must have had a successful vasectomy (confirmed azoospermia) or they and their female partners must meet the criteria above (i.e., not of childbearing potential or practicing highly effective contraception throughout the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation). No sperm donation is allowed during the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. 11. Provide written informed consent 12. Willing to stay in bed for at least 8 hours each night spent in the clinic 13. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from this study: 1. Females who are pregnant (positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[B-hCG\] test) or breastfeeding 2. Any lifetime diagnosis of sleep-related breathing disorder, periodic limb movement disorder, restless legs syndrome, nightmare disorder, sleep terror disorder, sleepwalking disorder, rapid eye movement (REM) behavior disorder, or narcolepsy 3. Aged 18 to 64 years: Apnea-Hypopnea Index greater than or equal to 10, or Periodic Limb Movements with Arousal Index greater than or equal to 10 on first (diagnostic) PSG night at Screening. Aged 65 to 80 years: Apnea-Hypopnea Index greater than 15, or Periodic Limb Movements with Arousal Index greater than 15 on first (diagnostic) PSG night at Screening 4. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) - II score greater than 19 at Screening 5. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) score greater than 15 at Screening 6. Used a prescription for any modality of treatment for insomnia, including cognitive behavioral therapy, within 2 weeks prior to screening/baseline PSG, or between Screening and Baseline 7. Used any medication or sleep aid with known effects on sleep, within 2 weeks prior to screening/baseline PSG, or between Screening and Baseline 8. Used any prohibited prescription or over-the-counter concomitant medications within the week prior to the first screening/baseline PSG. 9. Transmeridian travel across 3 or more time zones in the 2 weeks prior to Screening, or plans to travel across 3 or more time zones during study 10. Unwilling to limit caffeine consumption to lesser than or equal to 600 mg caffeine (approximately four 6-oz cups of caffeinated coffee, or three 12-oz caffeinated sodas, or three 8-oz caffeinated tea beverages), avoid caffeine after 18:00 throughout the study, and avoid caffeine after 13:00 on PSG visits 11. Unwilling to limit alcohol intake to two or fewer drinks per day throughout the study, or to refrain from any alcohol for 3 hours prior to bedtime while at home throughout the study, or any alcohol on days and nights spent in the clinic. A drink is defined as approximately 12 oz (360 mL) of beer, 4 oz (120 mL) of wine, or 1 oz (30 mL) of liquor. 12. Any subject that has a known history of malaria or has traveled to a country with known malarial risk (i.e., are designated as 'high' or 'moderate' risk country according to the list available at http://www.cdc.gov/malaria) within the last year. 13. A prolonged QT/QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) interval (QTc greater than 450 ms) as demonstrated by a repeated electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening (repeated only if initial ECG indicates a QTc interval greater than 450 ms). A history of risk factors for torsade de pointes (e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of long QT Syndrome) or the use of concomitant medications that prolong the QT/QTc interval. 14. Any suicidal ideation with intent with or without a plan at Screening, Baseline, or within 6 months before Screening (i.e., answering Yes to questions 4 or 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale \[C-SSRS\]) 15. Any lifetime suicidal behavior (per the Suicidal Behavior Section of the C-SSRS) 16. Evidence of clinically significant disease (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal disease) that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the subject's safety or interfere with the study assessments 17. Hypersensitivity to the study drug or any of the excipients 18. Any history of a medical condition or a concomitant medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator(s) would compromise the subject's ability to safely complete the study 19. Scheduled for surgery during the study 20. Known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive 21. Active viral hepatitis (B or C) as demonstrated by positive serology 22. Psychotic disorder(s) or unstable recurrent affective disorder(s) evident by use of antipsychotics or prior suicide attempt(s) within approximately the last 2 years 23. History of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the last 2 years 24. Unwilling to refrain from use of illegal (or legalized) recreational drugs during the study or test positive for illegal (or legalized) drugs at Screening, Baseline, or Day 14 25. Currently enrolled in another clinical trial or used any investigational drug or device within 30 days or 5x the half-life, whichever is longer preceding informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian AnalysisBaseline up to Day 3The utility of a dose was a function of both Sleep Efficiency (SE) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), constructed by specifying the 1-dimensional component for each outcome measure and then combining them multiplicatively. Sufficient utility was defined as a probability of having utility function \>1. Probability of having utility function \>1 at the end of study visit (full analysis) was reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment1 hour after morning wake time at Baseline and Days 15-16The KSS was used to measure next-day residual effects at prespecified time points. The KSS was a 9-point scale on which the participant rated their sleepiness from 1 (extremely alert) to 9 (extremely sleepy/fighting sleep), where higher scores indicated an increase in sleepiness. The end of treatment score was calculated by the mean scores at the timepoint at 1 hour after morning wake time of Day 15 and 16.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15Sleep efficiency was calculated as total sleep time divided by time spent in bed multiplied by 100. An increase in SE indicated improvement in sleeping, such that, the participant spends more time in bed asleep. Mean scores of Days 1-2 and Days 14-15 were used to evaluate change from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15LPS was calculated as minutes from lights off to the first 30-second epoch of 20 consecutive epochs of non-wakefulness. A decrease in LPS indicated improvement in time needed to fall asleep. Mean scores of Days 1-2 and Days 14-15 were used to evaluate change from baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15WASO was calculated as minutes of wakefulness from the onset of persistent sleep until lights on. A decrease in WASO indicated improvement in sleep maintenance. Mean scores of Days 1-2 and Days 14-15 were used to evaluate change from baseline.
Potential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15Potential habituation effect evaluated the possibility of participants being habituated to changes in sleep during the 15 days of treatment with lemborexant. Data reported here was calculated as change from baseline of mean SE of Days 14-15 minus change from baseline of mean SE of Days 1-2. An increase in SE indicated improvement in sleeping, such that, the participant spends more time in bed asleep.
Potential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-15Baseline and Days 1-2, and Days 14-15Potential habituation effect evaluated the possibility of participants being habituated to changes in sleep during the 15 days of treatment with lemborexant. Data reported here was calculated as change from baseline of mean LPS of Days 14-15 minus change from baseline of mean LPS of Days 1-2. LPS was calculated as minutes from lights off to the first 30-second epoch of 20 consecutive epochs of non-wakefulness. A decrease in LPS indicated improvement in time needed to fall asleep.
Potential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-15Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15Potential habituation effect evaluated the possibility of participants being habituated to changes in sleep during the 15 days of treatment with lemborexant. Data reported here was calculated as change from baseline of mean WASO of Days 14-15 minus change from baseline of mean WASO of Days 1-2. WASO was calculated as minutes of wakefulness from the onset of persistent sleep until lights on. A decrease in WASO indicated improvement in sleep maintenance.
Rebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-17Baseline and Days 16-17Rebound insomnia was assessed by comparing the change from baseline of the mean SE on Days 16-17. Sleep efficiency was calculated as total sleep time divided by time spent in bed multiplied by 100. An increase in SE indicated improvement in sleeping, such that, the participant spends more time in bed asleep. A negative change from baseline in SE indicated that SE was worse on Days 16 and 17 than at Baseline, which was considered as evidence for rebound insomnia.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAEs: Baseline up to Day 30, SAEs: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 47 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory ParametersBaseline up to Day 30
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsBaseline up to Day 30
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)Baseline up to Day 30

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 23 investigative sites in the United States from 13 Nov 2013 to 29 Apr 2014.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 616 participants were screened, of which 325 were screen failures and 291 were randomized to receive study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lemborexant 1 mg
Participants received lemborexant 1 mg tablets, orally, once daily on Day 1 to Day 15 in the double-blind treatment phase, followed by lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once on Days 16 and 17 in the single-blind placebo run-out phase.
32
Lemborexant 2.5 mg
Participants received lemborexant 2.5 mg tablets, orally, once daily on Day 1 to Day 15 in the double-blind treatment phase, followed by lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily on Days 16 and 17 in the single-blind placebo run-out phase.
27
Lemborexant 5 mg
Participants received lemborexant 5 mg tablets, orally, once daily on Day 1 to Day 15 in the double-blind treatment phase, followed by lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily on Days 16 and 17 in the single-blind placebo run-out phase.
38
Lemborexant 10 mg
Participants received lemborexant 10 mg tablets, orally, once daily on Day 1 to Day 15 in the double-blind treatment phase, followed by lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily on Days 16 and 17 in the single-blind placebo run-out phase.
32
Lemborexant 15 mg
Participants received lemborexant 15 mg tablets, orally, once daily on Day 1 to Day 15 in the double-blind treatment phase, followed by lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily on Days 16 and 17 in the single-blind placebo run-out phase.
56
Lemborexant 25 mg
Participants received lemborexant 25 mg tablets, orally, once daily on Day 1 to Day 15 in the double-blind treatment phase, followed by lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily on Days 16 and 17 in the single-blind placebo run-out phase.
50
Placebo
Participants received lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily on Day 1 to Day 15 in the double-blind treatment phase, followed by lemborexant placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily on Days 16 and 17 in the single-blind placebo run-out phase.
56
Total291

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse Event0000001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0100001
Overall StudyOther3102112
Overall StudyParticipant choice2000011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0000100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLemborexant 1 mgLemborexant 2.5 mgLemborexant 5 mgLemborexant 10 mgLemborexant 15 mgLemborexant 25 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous53.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
49.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
51.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
47.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
44.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
48.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
47.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
48.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants17 Participants23 Participants20 Participants32 Participants31 Participants36 Participants182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants10 Participants15 Participants12 Participants24 Participants19 Participants20 Participants109 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 270 / 380 / 320 / 560 / 500 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 3211 / 2716 / 3819 / 3231 / 5630 / 5021 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 270 / 380 / 320 / 561 / 501 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment

The KSS was used to measure next-day residual effects at prespecified time points. The KSS was a 9-point scale on which the participant rated their sleepiness from 1 (extremely alert) to 9 (extremely sleepy/fighting sleep), where higher scores indicated an increase in sleepiness. The end of treatment score was calculated by the mean scores at the timepoint at 1 hour after morning wake time of Day 15 and 16.

Time frame: 1 hour after morning wake time at Baseline and Days 15-16

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) represents participants who were available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgMean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment0.29 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.219
Lemborexant 2.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment-0.10 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
Lemborexant 5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment0.20 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Lemborexant 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment-0.22 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.219
Lemborexant 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment0.16 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.166
Lemborexant 25 mgMean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment0.45 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score at End of Treatment-0.23 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
p-value: 0.065195% CI: [-0.03, 1.06]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.64995% CI: [-0.44, 0.7]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.105995% CI: [-0.09, 0.94]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.9818ANCOVA
p-value: 0.107195% CI: [-0.08, 0.85]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.006395% CI: [0.19, 1.17]ANCOVA
Primary

Probability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian Analysis

The utility of a dose was a function of both Sleep Efficiency (SE) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), constructed by specifying the 1-dimensional component for each outcome measure and then combining them multiplicatively. Sufficient utility was defined as a probability of having utility function \>1. Probability of having utility function \>1 at the end of study visit (full analysis) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 3

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose primary efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lemborexant 1 mgProbability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian Analysis0.8789 probability
Lemborexant 2.5 mgProbability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian Analysis0.8920 probability
Lemborexant 5 mgProbability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian Analysis0.9032 probability
Lemborexant 10 mgProbability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian Analysis0.9406 probability
Lemborexant 15 mgProbability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian Analysis0.9866 probability
Lemborexant 25 mgProbability of Having Utility Function Greater Than (>) 1 Based on Bayesian Analysis0.9675 probability
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15

LPS was calculated as minutes from lights off to the first 30-second epoch of 20 consecutive epochs of non-wakefulness. A decrease in LPS indicated improvement in time needed to fall asleep. Mean scores of Days 1-2 and Days 14-15 were used to evaluate change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement with both baseline and post baseline data available for analysis at each timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-42.92 minutesStandard Deviation 41.855
Lemborexant 1 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-41.23 minutesStandard Deviation 34.618
Lemborexant 2.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-52.74 minutesStandard Deviation 50.149
Lemborexant 2.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-54.24 minutesStandard Deviation 44.918
Lemborexant 5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-47.72 minutesStandard Deviation 39.389
Lemborexant 5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-51.86 minutesStandard Deviation 41.994
Lemborexant 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-46.80 minutesStandard Deviation 46.106
Lemborexant 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-56.14 minutesStandard Deviation 45.553
Lemborexant 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-51.59 minutesStandard Deviation 36.728
Lemborexant 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-51.95 minutesStandard Deviation 41.926
Lemborexant 25 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-50.16 minutesStandard Deviation 43.14
Lemborexant 25 mgMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-50.79 minutesStandard Deviation 40.16
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-22.90 minutesStandard Deviation 44.457
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-22.43 minutesStandard Deviation 29.045
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.140795% CI: [0.54, 1.09]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.001895% CI: [0.38, 0.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.002595% CI: [0.43, 0.83]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.000695% CI: [0.38, 0.76]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.38, 0.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2:p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.29, 0.54]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.115895% CI: [0.49, 1.08]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.33, 0.75]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.32, 0.69]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.21, 0.47]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.29, 0.57]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.24, 0.48]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15

Sleep efficiency was calculated as total sleep time divided by time spent in bed multiplied by 100. An increase in SE indicated improvement in sleeping, such that, the participant spends more time in bed asleep. Mean scores of Days 1-2 and Days 14-15 were used to evaluate change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement with both baseline and post baseline data available for analysis at each timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-218.72 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.366
Lemborexant 1 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-1514.43 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.428
Lemborexant 2.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-218.59 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.487
Lemborexant 2.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-1518.02 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.528
Lemborexant 5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-219.89 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.25
Lemborexant 5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-1519.85 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.302
Lemborexant 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-222.25 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.361
Lemborexant 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-1521.87 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.421
Lemborexant 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-224.22 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.029
Lemborexant 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-1521.97 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.077
Lemborexant 25 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-224.28 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.091
Lemborexant 25 mgMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-1522.96 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.169
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-214.16 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.031
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-1514.08 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.1
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.008395% CI: [1.19, 7.94]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.015195% CI: [0.86, 8.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.000595% CI: [2.54, 8.93]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.73, 11.45]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [7.2, 12.93]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [7.18, 13.08]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.850595% CI: [-3.22, 3.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.03895% CI: [0.22, 7.66]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.000895% CI: [2.4, 9.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.24, 11.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.86, 10.92]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.72, 12.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15

WASO was calculated as minutes of wakefulness from the onset of persistent sleep until lights on. A decrease in WASO indicated improvement in sleep maintenance. Mean scores of Days 1-2 and Days 14-15 were used to evaluate change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) represents participants who were available for analysis at the specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-52.11 minutesStandard Error 5.441
Lemborexant 1 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-32.46 minutesStandard Error 6.159
Lemborexant 2.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-43.33 minutesStandard Error 5.915
Lemborexant 2.5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-40.47 minutesStandard Error 6.581
Lemborexant 5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-52.29 minutesStandard Error 5.423
Lemborexant 5 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-48.84 minutesStandard Error 5.609
Lemborexant 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-60.84 minutesStandard Error 1.302
Lemborexant 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-52.88 minutesStandard Error 6.129
Lemborexant 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-70.38 minutesStandard Error 4.103
Lemborexant 15 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-58.95 minutesStandard Error 4.651
Lemborexant 25 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-66.87 minutesStandard Error 4.342
Lemborexant 25 mgMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-59.67 minutesStandard Error 5.039
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 1-2-41.03 minutesStandard Error 4.095
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) After Dosing on Days 1-2 and Days 14-15Days 14-15-38.15 minutesStandard Error 4.728
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.10595% CI: [-24.48, 2.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.750195% CI: [-16.46, 11.87]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.081895% CI: [-23.94, 1.43]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: 0.003895% CI: [-33.18, -6.43]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-40.75, 17.93]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 1-2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-37.59, -14.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.464295% CI: [-9.6, 20.98]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.775495% CI: [-18.27, 13.64]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.146195% CI: [-25.14, 3.75]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.058195% CI: [-29.97, 0.51]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.001995% CI: [-33.86, -7.74]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 14-15p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-35.12, -7.91]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 30

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lemborexant 1 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters0 participants
Lemborexant 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters0 participants
Lemborexant 5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters0 participants
Lemborexant 10 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters0 participants
Lemborexant 15 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters0 participants
Lemborexant 25 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 30

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lemborexant 1 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 participants
Lemborexant 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 participants
Lemborexant 5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 participants
Lemborexant 10 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 participants
Lemborexant 15 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 participants
Lemborexant 25 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECGs)0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 30

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lemborexant 1 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs0 participants
Lemborexant 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs0 participants
Lemborexant 5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs0 participants
Lemborexant 10 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs0 participants
Lemborexant 15 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs0 participants
Lemborexant 25 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

Time frame: TEAEs: Baseline up to Day 30, SAEs: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 47 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lemborexant 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE34.4 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE0 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE40.7 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE0 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE42.1 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE0 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE59.4 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE0 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE55.4 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE0 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE60.0 percentage of participants
Lemborexant 25 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE2.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)TEAE37.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE1.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Potential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-15

Potential habituation effect evaluated the possibility of participants being habituated to changes in sleep during the 15 days of treatment with lemborexant. Data reported here was calculated as change from baseline of mean LPS of Days 14-15 minus change from baseline of mean LPS of Days 1-2. LPS was calculated as minutes from lights off to the first 30-second epoch of 20 consecutive epochs of non-wakefulness. A decrease in LPS indicated improvement in time needed to fall asleep.

Time frame: Baseline and Days 1-2, and Days 14-15

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-152.71 minutesStandard Deviation 24.333
Lemborexant 2.5 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-15-1.50 minutesStandard Deviation 22.12
Lemborexant 5 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-15-4.60 minutesStandard Deviation 22.337
Lemborexant 10 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-15-7.93 minutesStandard Deviation 17.415
Lemborexant 15 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-15-1.11 minutesStandard Deviation 24.568
Lemborexant 25 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-151.38 minutesStandard Deviation 12.046
PlaceboPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in LPS on Days 14-150.57 minutesStandard Deviation 40.855
Secondary

Potential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15

Potential habituation effect evaluated the possibility of participants being habituated to changes in sleep during the 15 days of treatment with lemborexant. Data reported here was calculated as change from baseline of mean SE of Days 14-15 minus change from baseline of mean SE of Days 1-2. An increase in SE indicated improvement in sleeping, such that, the participant spends more time in bed asleep.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15-4.04 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 8.194
Lemborexant 2.5 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15-0.54 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 10.505
Lemborexant 5 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-150.06 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.888
Lemborexant 10 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15-0.68 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.883
Lemborexant 15 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15-2.33 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 6.6
Lemborexant 25 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15-2.15 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 5.388
PlaceboPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in SE on Days 14-15-1.05 percentage of sleep timeStandard Deviation 7.192
Secondary

Potential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-15

Potential habituation effect evaluated the possibility of participants being habituated to changes in sleep during the 15 days of treatment with lemborexant. Data reported here was calculated as change from baseline of mean WASO of Days 14-15 minus change from baseline of mean WASO of Days 1-2. WASO was calculated as minutes of wakefulness from the onset of persistent sleep until lights on. A decrease in WASO indicated improvement in sleep maintenance.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 1-2, and Days 14-15

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-1517.98 minutesStandard Deviation 34.299
Lemborexant 2.5 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-152.16 minutesStandard Deviation 44.054
Lemborexant 5 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-152.68 minutesStandard Deviation 29.726
Lemborexant 10 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-159.30 minutesStandard Deviation 25.89
Lemborexant 15 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-1511.76 minutesStandard Deviation 26.187
Lemborexant 25 mgPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-159.28 minutesStandard Deviation 23.119
PlaceboPotential Habituation Effect: Comparison Between Mean Change From Baseline in Wakefulness After Sleep Onset (WASO) on Days 1-2 and Mean Change From Baseline in WASO on Days 14-155.99 minutesStandard Deviation 31.417
Secondary

Rebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-17

Rebound insomnia was assessed by comparing the change from baseline of the mean SE on Days 16-17. Sleep efficiency was calculated as total sleep time divided by time spent in bed multiplied by 100. An increase in SE indicated improvement in sleeping, such that, the participant spends more time in bed asleep. A negative change from baseline in SE indicated that SE was worse on Days 16 and 17 than at Baseline, which was considered as evidence for rebound insomnia.

Time frame: Baseline and Days 16-17

Population: The FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose primary efficacy measurement. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) represents participants who were available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lemborexant 1 mgRebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-1713.12 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.661
Lemborexant 2.5 mgRebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-1715.53 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.777
Lemborexant 5 mgRebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-1717.67 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.535
Lemborexant 10 mgRebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-1713.78 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.653
Lemborexant 15 mgRebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-1718.58 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.253
Lemborexant 25 mgRebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-1717.12 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.374
PlaceboRebound Insomnia: Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency (SE) After Dosing on Days 16-1716.17 percentage of sleep timeStandard Error 1.28
Comparison: Days 16-17p-value: 0.148395% CI: [-7.2, 1.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 16-17p-value: 0.77295% CI: [-4.96, 3.69]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 16-17p-value: 0.454895% CI: [-2.44, 5.44]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 16-17p-value: 0.25395% CI: [-6.51, 1.72]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 16-17p-value: 0.179495% CI: [-1.11, 5.93]ANCOVA
Comparison: Days 16-17p-value: 0.614895% CI: [-2.74, 4.63]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026