Skip to content

Delafloxacin vs Vancomycin and Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy + Safety of IV + Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Vancomycin + Aztreonam in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01984684
Enrollment
850
Registered
2013-11-15
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections

Keywords

Bacterial skin infection, infection, skin, delafloxacin, vancomycin, aztreonam, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria, bacterial infection, Anti-Infective Agents

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Delafloxacin versus Vancomycin plus Aztreonam in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if delafloxacin, an investigational drug, is safe and effective in the treatment of skin and nearby tissue infections compared with a combination of other antibiotics, vancomycin and aztreonam.

Interventions

DRUGvancomycin

Sponsors

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (≥ 18 years of age) men or women with a diagnosis of ABSSSI (cellulitis/erysipelas, wound infection, major cutaneous abscess, or burn infection) with surrounding redness of a minimum surface area of 75 cm\^2 and at least two signs of systemic infection * In the opinion of the investigator, the subject must require and be a suitable candidate for IV antibiotic therapy, and the subject must be able and willing to comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

* A medical history of significant hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to quinolones, beta-lactams, vancomycin, or vancomycin derivatives according to the judgment of the investigator. * Women who are pregnant or lactating. * Any chronic or underlying skin condition at the site of infection that may complicate the assessment of response, including infection involving a prosthetic joint, human or animal bite, osteomyelitis, decubitus ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer, septic arthritis, mediastinitis, necrotizing fasciitis, anaerobic cellulitis, or synergistic necrotizing cellulitis, myositis, tendinitis, endocarditis, sustained shock, gangrene or gas gangrene; burns covering ≥10% of body surface area; severely compromised immune system, severely impaired arterial blood supply to an extremity with an ABSSSI, deep vein thrombosis or superficial thrombophlebitis, and requiring either an amputation or multiple debridement procedures. * Receipt of systemic antibiotic therapy in the 14 days before enrollment unless 1 of the following was documented: * Received ≥ 48 hours of antibiotic therapy for ABSSSI AND clinical progression is documented (i.e., not by patient history alone). * Recently (within 14 days) completed a treatment course with an antibacterial drug for an infection other than ABSSSI and the drug does not have activity against bacterial pathogens that cause ABSSSI. * Received only 1 dose of either a single, potentially effective, short-acting antimicrobial drug or drug regimen for ABSSSI. * Any underlying disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the subject's ability to participate in the study including severe cardiac disease, known history of liver disease, end-stage renal disease, malignancy, psychiatric disorder, ongoing treatment for seizures or untreated history of seizures, or life expectancy of \< 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.48 to 72 hrs after starting treatmentA patient was considered a responder if s/he had a ≥20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI, as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge and had none of the reasons for clinical failure; a patient was considered a non-responder (failure) if s/he had \<20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge, or had major intervention such as another antibiotic or surgical intervention or died within 74 hours after initiation of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Study Day 14 ± 1A patient was considered a Cure if all baseline signs and symptoms of ABSSSI had resolved; if some symptoms remained, but the patient was improved to the extent that no additional antibiotic treatment was necessary, the response was Improved. A patient was considered a Failure for any of the following reasons: nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy was required because of lack of efficacy after at least 4 doses of study drug or for a treatment-related AE; study antibacterial drug therapy was required for longer than 28 doses; and/or unplanned surgical intervention was needed after study entry except for limited bedside debridement and standard wound care. Improved and Indeterminate responses were considered failures in the primary analysis. A sensitivity analysis was also performed, in which the assigned responses were Success (Cure + Improved) or Failure (Failure + Indeterminate/Missing).
Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitStudy Day 21 to 28A patient was considered a Cure if all baseline signs and symptoms of ABSSSI had resolved; if some symptoms remained, but the patient was improved to the extent that no additional antibiotic treatment was necessary, the response was Improved. A patient was considered a Failure for any of the following reasons: nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy was required because of lack of efficacy after at least 4 doses of study drug or for a treatment-related AE; study antibacterial drug therapy was required for longer than 28 doses; and/or unplanned surgical intervention was needed after study entry except for limited bedside debridement and standard wound care. Improved and Indeterminate responses were considered failures in the primary analysis. A sensitivity analysis was also performed, in which the assigned responses were Success (Cure + Improved) or Failure (Failure + Indeterminate/Missing).

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Mexico, Moldova, Peru, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Delafloxacin
300mg iv Q12H for 6 doses, 450mg oral tablet Q12H for a minimum of 10 up to a maximum of 28 doses total
423
Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam
Vancomycin 15mg/kg iv plus two grams Aztreonam every 12 hours for a minimum of 10 up to a maximum of 28 doses total
427
Total850

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event812
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy36
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2524
Overall StudyNoncompliance with study drug21
Overall StudyPhysician Decision42
Overall StudyProtocol Violation42
Overall StudyStudy drug not available at site11
Overall StudySubject had inadequate IV access01
Overall StudySubject incarcerated10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject99

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDelafloxacinVancomycin Plus AztreonamTotal
Age, Continuous51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.98
50.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.03
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Age, Customized
<= 65 years
344 Participants352 Participants696 Participants
Age, Customized
> 65 years
79 Participants75 Participants154 Participants
Age, Customized
> 75 years
35 Participants31 Participants66 Participants
BMI (Body Mass Index)30.4 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.44
30.7 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.54
30.5 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.49
BMI category
< 30 kg/m2
212 Participants213 Participants425 Participants
BMI category
>= 30 kg/m2
211 Participants214 Participants425 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
132 Participants99 Participants231 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
291 Participants328 Participants619 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Presence of diabetes53 Participants54 Participants107 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
11 Participants15 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
37 Participants30 Participants67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
348 Participants355 Participants703 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
165 Participants173 Participants338 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
202 Participants196 Participants398 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
34 Participants29 Participants63 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
8 Participants13 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
161 Participants151 Participants312 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
262 Participants276 Participants538 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4172 / 425
other
Total, other adverse events
55 / 41732 / 425
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 41717 / 425

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.

A patient was considered a responder if s/he had a ≥20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI, as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge and had none of the reasons for clinical failure; a patient was considered a non-responder (failure) if s/he had \<20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge, or had major intervention such as another antibiotic or surgical intervention or died within 74 hours after initiation of study drug.

Time frame: 48 to 72 hrs after starting treatment

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinObjective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.Responder354 Participants
DelafloxacinObjective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.Nonresponder69 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamObjective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.Responder344 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamObjective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.Nonresponder83 Participants
95% CI: [-2, 8.3]
Secondary

Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)

A patient was considered a Cure if all baseline signs and symptoms of ABSSSI had resolved; if some symptoms remained, but the patient was improved to the extent that no additional antibiotic treatment was necessary, the response was Improved. A patient was considered a Failure for any of the following reasons: nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy was required because of lack of efficacy after at least 4 doses of study drug or for a treatment-related AE; study antibacterial drug therapy was required for longer than 28 doses; and/or unplanned surgical intervention was needed after study entry except for limited bedside debridement and standard wound care. Improved and Indeterminate responses were considered failures in the primary analysis. A sensitivity analysis was also performed, in which the assigned responses were Success (Cure + Improved) or Failure (Failure + Indeterminate/Missing).

Time frame: Study Day 14 ± 1

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Improved125 Participants
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Indeterminate/Missing37 Participants
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Failure17 Participants
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Cure244 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Cure255 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Improved107 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Failure21 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)Indeterminate/Missing44 Participants
95% CI: [-8.6, 4.6]
Secondary

Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up Visit

A patient was considered a Cure if all baseline signs and symptoms of ABSSSI had resolved; if some symptoms remained, but the patient was improved to the extent that no additional antibiotic treatment was necessary, the response was Improved. A patient was considered a Failure for any of the following reasons: nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy was required because of lack of efficacy after at least 4 doses of study drug or for a treatment-related AE; study antibacterial drug therapy was required for longer than 28 doses; and/or unplanned surgical intervention was needed after study entry except for limited bedside debridement and standard wound care. Improved and Indeterminate responses were considered failures in the primary analysis. A sensitivity analysis was also performed, in which the assigned responses were Success (Cure + Improved) or Failure (Failure + Indeterminate/Missing).

Time frame: Study Day 21 to 28

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitCure287 Participants
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitImproved66 Participants
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitFailure21 Participants
DelafloxacinInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitIndeterminate/Missing49 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitIndeterminate/Missing52 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitCure303 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitFailure24 Participants
Vancomycin Plus AztreonamInvestigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up VisitImproved48 Participants
95% CI: [-9.3, 3.1]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026