Skip to content

A Pharmacokinetic Substudy of the TDE-PH-304 Protocol

A Pharmacokinetic Substudy of Subjects Transitioning From Twice Daily to Three Times Daily Dosing of UT-15C SR (Treprostinil Diethanolamine) in the TDE-PH-304 Protocol

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01934582
Enrollment
13
Registered
2013-09-04
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2024-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Brief summary

A sub-study to the TDE-PH-304 protocol to assess the pharmacokinetics of patients transitioning from a twice daily dosing regimen of oral treprostinil to a three times daily dosing regimen.

Detailed description

As noted above in Brief Summary.

Interventions

Open label study drug.

Sponsors

United Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\) Only subjects who are eligible for and have entered into Protocol TDE-PH-304 may participate in this substudy.

Exclusion criteria

1. The subject must voluntarily give informed consent to participate in the substudy. 2. No dose changes to study drug are made within 5 days of the pharmacokinetic (PK)substudy visits. 3. No additions or deletions to concurrent medications are made within 7 days of the pharmacokinetic substudy visit. Note: changes to diuretics and/or anticoagulants are permitted. 4. The preceding evening dose of study drug should have been taken 9 to 13 hours prior to the BID dose and 6-10 hours prior to the TID morning dose of study drug to ensure a trough level of study drug for PK sampling. 5. Subject dosing of study drug on the day of PK sampling must be observed in the clinic by study personnel. 6. Subject has not experienced a significant loss of blood (\> 450 mL) within the last 6 weeks of the pharmacokinetic substudy visit. 7. The subject must not be receiving any CYP 2C8 inducers or inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Mean AM Dose) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.
To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Cmin) in Subjects During BID Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to TID Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing Regiment (PK Visit 2)Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.
To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (AUClast) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours post-dose at up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and at up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Assess 6-minute Walk Distance for Both Groups (BID and TID) 3 to 6 Hours Post-morning Dose.The 6MWT was conducted during BID dosing PK collection (up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 1]) and during TID dosing PK collection (up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 2]).The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was conducted at PK Visits 1 and 2, and was performed between hours 3 to 6 post-morning dose to correlate with the predicted peak plasma concentration of oral treprostinil.
To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.The AEs were recorded for up to 50 days.AE diaries including 8 therapy-specific terms were collected during both BID and TID dosing to allow for comparison of events from both regimens. The therapy-specific events included: diarrhea, extremity pain, flushing, headache, hypotension, jaw pain, nausea, and vomiting.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Open-label Extension PK Population
The PK population included all subjects enrolled in the PK substudy having met the study criteria, who had sufficient treprostinil concentration-time data to derive noncompartmental PK parameters for at least 1 treatment of open-label treprostinil diethanolamine.
13
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen-label Extension PK Population
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants
Age, Continuous60.6 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 1313 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (AUClast) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).

The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.

Time frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours post-dose at up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and at up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PK Visit 1To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (AUClast) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).47.8 h*ng/mL
PK Visit 2To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (AUClast) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).58.0 h*ng/mL
Primary

To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Cmin) in Subjects During BID Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to TID Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing Regiment (PK Visit 2)

The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.

Time frame: Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
PK Visit 1To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Cmin) in Subjects During BID Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to TID Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing Regiment (PK Visit 2)Cmax8.60 ng/mL
PK Visit 1To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Cmin) in Subjects During BID Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to TID Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing Regiment (PK Visit 2)Cmin1.19 ng/mL
PK Visit 2To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Cmin) in Subjects During BID Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to TID Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing Regiment (PK Visit 2)Cmax8.94 ng/mL
PK Visit 2To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Cmin) in Subjects During BID Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to TID Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing Regiment (PK Visit 2)Cmin2.14 ng/mL
Primary

To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Mean AM Dose) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).

The PK sampling occurred over a 12-hour period in subjects during BID dosing (PK Visit 1) and during TID dosing (PK Visit 2). Prior to each PK sampling day, subjects must have been receiving a stable dose for at least 5 days.

Time frame: Up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen (PK Visit 1) and up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regiment (PK Visit 2)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PK Visit 1To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Mean AM Dose) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).8.12 mg
PK Visit 2To Assess the Pharmacokinetics (Mean AM Dose) in Subjects During Twice Daily (BID) Dosing (up to 14 Days Prior to Transitioning to Three Times Daily [TID] Dosing Regimen at PK Visit 1) and up to 35 Days After Transitioning to TID Dosing (at PK Visit 2).6.75 mg
Secondary

To Assess 6-minute Walk Distance for Both Groups (BID and TID) 3 to 6 Hours Post-morning Dose.

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was conducted at PK Visits 1 and 2, and was performed between hours 3 to 6 post-morning dose to correlate with the predicted peak plasma concentration of oral treprostinil.

Time frame: The 6MWT was conducted during BID dosing PK collection (up to 14 days prior to transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 1]) and during TID dosing PK collection (up to 35 days after transitioning to TID dosing regimen [PK Visit 2]).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PK Visit 1To Assess 6-minute Walk Distance for Both Groups (BID and TID) 3 to 6 Hours Post-morning Dose.332.5 Meters
PK Visit 2To Assess 6-minute Walk Distance for Both Groups (BID and TID) 3 to 6 Hours Post-morning Dose.347.9 Meters
Secondary

To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.

AE diaries including 8 therapy-specific terms were collected during both BID and TID dosing to allow for comparison of events from both regimens. The therapy-specific events included: diarrhea, extremity pain, flushing, headache, hypotension, jaw pain, nausea, and vomiting.

Time frame: The AEs were recorded for up to 50 days.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Diarrhea46 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Extremity pain54 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Flushing85 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Headache69 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Hypotension23 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Jaw Pain38 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Nausea38 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 1To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Vomiting0 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Vomiting0 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Diarrhea38 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Hypotension23 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Extremity pain38 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Nausea77 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Flushing54 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Jaw Pain46 percentage of subjects
PK Visit 2To Compare the Adverse Event (AE) Profile of BID Versus TID Dosing.Headache85 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026