Skip to content

Effect of Reducing Uric Acid on Insulin Sensitivity and Oxidative Status

Effect of Plasma Uric Acid on Insulin Sensitivity, Endothelial Function and Inflammation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01931527
Acronym
UA
Enrollment
31
Registered
2013-08-29
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2018-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Hyperuricemia

Keywords

Obesity, Metabolic syndrome, Hyperuricemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about what is the effect of uric acid on oxidative stress and on the way the body metabolizes sugar in obese people. Understanding this may lead to better diseases such as diabetes.

Detailed description

It has been hypothesized that oxidative stress is involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance associated with obesity. Circulating uric acid (UA) is the body's major endogenous plasma antioxidant. Therefore, the investigators evaluated whether alterations in serum UA concentration affect: 1) systemic and skeletal muscle oxidative stress, 2) total antioxidant capacity, and 4) skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.

Interventions

one single infusion of rasburicase (0.19 mg/kg FFM) infused over 30 min

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* obese (BMI 30-45 kg/m²); * serum UA concentration either ≥5 mg/dL or ≤4.0 mg/dL (297 µmol/L)\],

Exclusion criteria

* renal dysfunction (serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL); * pregnancy or lactating; * take urate-lowering agents, thiazide diuretics, prednisone or medications containing aspirin or other salicylates; * history of xanthinuria, type 2 diabetes or other significant organ system dysfunction; * have G6PD deficiency; * use hormone-replacement or oral-contraceptive therapy; * smoke tobacco; * anemic (Hb \<10 g/dl)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Increase in Insulin-stimulated Glucose Uptake12 hours after reducing uric acidUric acid will be reduced to 0 with a 30 minute infusion of a uricase (Elitek, Sanofi-Aventis). A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp procedure in conjunction with stable isotope glucose tracer infusion will be used to measure percent increase in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in obese subjects with high uric acid before and after uric acid reduction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline Carbonylated Protein RatioBefore reducing uric acidBaseline ratio of total carbonylated proteins to the loading control protein Ran in skeletal muscle
AFTER Rasburicase Carbonylated Protein Ratio12 hours after reducing uric acidBaseline ratio of total carbonylated proteins to the loading control protein Ran in skeletal muscle
Baseline Plasma TRAPBefore reducing uric acidTotal Radical-Trapping Antioxidant Potential
The Effect of Reducing Uric Acid on Oxidative Status12 hours after reducing uric acidUric acid will be reduced to 0 with a 30 minute infusion of a uricase (Elitek, Sanofi-Aventis). Systemic (urinary isoprostanes) and skeletal muscle (carbonylated protein ratio) oxidative stress and total antioxidant capacity (plasma TRAP and FRAP) will be measured in obese subjects with high uric acid before and after uric acid reduction. Levels of isoprostanes were normalized to urinary creatinine and reported at ng/mg.
Baseline Plasma FRAPBefore reducing uric acidFerric-Reducing Antioxidant Potential
AFTER Rasburicase Plasma FRAP (Fe⁺² · Lˉ¹)12 hours after reducing uric acidFerric-Reducing Antioxidant Potential
AFTER Rasburicase Plasma TRAP12 hours after reducing uric acidTotal Radical-Trapping Antioxidant Potential

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Uric Acid
16 obese subjects (BMI 37.1±0.7 kg/m2) with uric acid \<5mg/dL
16
High Uric Acid
15 obese subjects (BMI 37.1±0.7 kg/m2) with uric acid \>6mg/dL
15
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLow Uric AcidHigh Uric AcidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants15 Participants31 Participants
Body mass index35.9 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
38.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
37.1 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Plasma uric acid concentration4.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
7.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants15 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants8 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants7 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Increase in Insulin-stimulated Glucose Uptake

Uric acid will be reduced to 0 with a 30 minute infusion of a uricase (Elitek, Sanofi-Aventis). A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp procedure in conjunction with stable isotope glucose tracer infusion will be used to measure percent increase in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in obese subjects with high uric acid before and after uric acid reduction.

Time frame: 12 hours after reducing uric acid

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With Normal Uric AcidPercent Increase in Insulin-stimulated Glucose UptakeBASAL Insulin Sensitivity231 % incr. in insulin-mediated gluc. uptakeStandard Error 23
Obese Subjects With Normal Uric AcidPercent Increase in Insulin-stimulated Glucose UptakeAFTER RASBURICASE Insulin SensitivityNA % incr. in insulin-mediated gluc. uptake
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidPercent Increase in Insulin-stimulated Glucose UptakeBASAL Insulin Sensitivity162 % incr. in insulin-mediated gluc. uptakeStandard Error 24
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidPercent Increase in Insulin-stimulated Glucose UptakeAFTER RASBURICASE Insulin Sensitivity156 % incr. in insulin-mediated gluc. uptakeStandard Error 17
Secondary

AFTER Rasburicase Carbonylated Protein Ratio

Baseline ratio of total carbonylated proteins to the loading control protein Ran in skeletal muscle

Time frame: 12 hours after reducing uric acid

Population: Analysis only completed on subjects in the High Uric Acid group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidAFTER Rasburicase Carbonylated Protein Ratio1085 RatioStandard Error 131
Secondary

AFTER Rasburicase Plasma FRAP (Fe⁺² · Lˉ¹)

Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Potential

Time frame: 12 hours after reducing uric acid

Population: AFTER rasburicase plasma FRAP only measured in subjects with high uric acid

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidAFTER Rasburicase Plasma FRAP (Fe⁺² · Lˉ¹)0.42 mmol Fe⁺² · Lˉ¹Standard Error 0.02
Secondary

AFTER Rasburicase Plasma TRAP

Total Radical-Trapping Antioxidant Potential

Time frame: 12 hours after reducing uric acid

Population: AFTER rasburicase plasma Total Radical-Trapping Antioxidant Potential (TRAP) was only measured in the subjects with high uric acid

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidAFTER Rasburicase Plasma TRAP0.71 mmol · Lˉ¹Standard Error 0.02
Secondary

Baseline Carbonylated Protein Ratio

Baseline ratio of total carbonylated proteins to the loading control protein Ran in skeletal muscle

Time frame: Before reducing uric acid

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With Normal Uric AcidBaseline Carbonylated Protein Ratio929 RatioStandard Error 86
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidBaseline Carbonylated Protein Ratio680 RatioStandard Error 56
Secondary

Baseline Plasma FRAP

Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Potential

Time frame: Before reducing uric acid

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With Normal Uric AcidBaseline Plasma FRAP1.03 mmol Fe⁺² · Lˉ¹Standard Error 0.02
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidBaseline Plasma FRAP1.39 mmol Fe⁺² · Lˉ¹Standard Error 0.05
Secondary

Baseline Plasma TRAP

Total Radical-Trapping Antioxidant Potential

Time frame: Before reducing uric acid

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With Normal Uric AcidBaseline Plasma TRAP1.11 mmol · Lˉ¹Standard Error 0.02
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidBaseline Plasma TRAP1.31 mmol · Lˉ¹Standard Error 0.05
Secondary

The Effect of Reducing Uric Acid on Oxidative Status

Uric acid will be reduced to 0 with a 30 minute infusion of a uricase (Elitek, Sanofi-Aventis). Systemic (urinary isoprostanes) and skeletal muscle (carbonylated protein ratio) oxidative stress and total antioxidant capacity (plasma TRAP and FRAP) will be measured in obese subjects with high uric acid before and after uric acid reduction. Levels of isoprostanes were normalized to urinary creatinine and reported at ng/mg.

Time frame: 12 hours after reducing uric acid

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Obese Subjects With Normal Uric AcidThe Effect of Reducing Uric Acid on Oxidative StatusBASELINE urinary isoprostanes1.0 ng/mgStandard Error 0.15
Obese Subjects With Normal Uric AcidThe Effect of Reducing Uric Acid on Oxidative StatusAFTER RASBURICASE isoprostanesNA ng/mg
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidThe Effect of Reducing Uric Acid on Oxidative StatusBASELINE urinary isoprostanes0.68 ng/mgStandard Error 0.07
Obese Subjects With High Uric AcidThe Effect of Reducing Uric Acid on Oxidative StatusAFTER RASBURICASE isoprostanes0.96 ng/mgStandard Error 0.12

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026