Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of LUM001 in the Treatment of Cholestatic Liver Disease in Patients With Alagille Syndrome

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LUM001, an Apical Sodium-dependent Bile Acid Transporter Inhibitor (ASBTi), in the Treatment of Cholestatic Liver Disease in Paediatric Patients With Alagille Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01903460
Acronym
IMAGO
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-07-19
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2019-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alagille Syndrome

Brief summary

The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LUM001. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating the effect of LUM001 versus placebo on the biochemical markers and pruritus associated with Alagille Syndrome.

Interventions

DRUGLUM001
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Months to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of Alagille Syndrome 2. Evidence of cholestasis 3. Moderate to severe pruritus 4. Ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent/assent prior to initiation of any study procedures

Exclusion criteria

1. Surgical disruption of the enterohepatic circulation 2. Liver transplant 3. History or presence of other concomitant liver disease 4. Females who are pregnant or lactating 5. Known HIV infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid LevelBaseline to 13 weeks or end of treatmentParticipants were required to fast for at least 4 hours; only water was permitted prior to collection. A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of bile acid decreased.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesBaseline to 13 weeks or end of treatmentAnalysis of liver enzymes included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of that enzyme decreased.
Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresBaseline to 13 weeks or end of treatmentThe ItchRO was administered as a twice daily electronic diary (eDiary). Children ≥9 years of age completed the patient ItchRO; those between the ages of 5 and 8 completed the patient ItchRO with the assistance of their caregiver. There was no patient report for subjects under the age of 5. ItchRO scores range from 0 to 4, with the higher score indicating increasing itch severity. ItchRO average daily scores were calculated as the sum of daily scores (ie, the maximum of morning and evening scores) divided by the number of days. The average daily score was calculated by using the 7 days pre-treatment for baseline, and the last 7 days of treatment for Week 13. A negative change from Baseline indicates that itch severity decreased.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LUM001 140ug/kg/Day
Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 140ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 140ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 140ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
6
LUM001 280ug/kg/Day
Participants received an escalating dose of LUM001 over 3 to 5 weeks, from 14ug/kg/day to 280ug/kg/day, then received 8 to 10 weeks of treatment at either 280ug/kg/day or the highest tolerated dose below 280ug/kg/day. Participants were then followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
8
Placebo Cohort A
Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
3
Placebo Cohort B
Participants received LUM001-matching placebo for up to 13 weeks, then were followed for 4 weeks after treatment.
3
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlacebo Cohort BLUM001 140ug/kg/DayPlacebo Cohort ALUM001 280ug/kg/Day
Age, Continuous5.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.93
4.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.21
5.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.49
5.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
6.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.73
Age, Customized
13 to 18 years
3 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants
Age, Customized
2 to 4 years
7 participants2 participants3 participants1 participants1 participants
Age, Customized
< 2 years
3 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants
Age, Customized
5 to 8 years
5 participants1 participants1 participants2 participants1 participants
Age, Customized
9 to 12 years
2 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
20 participants3 participants6 participants3 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 67 / 84 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 80 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid Level

Participants were required to fast for at least 4 hours; only water was permitted prior to collection. A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of bile acid decreased.

Time frame: Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population, defined as all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The Safety population was defined as all participants who were randomly assigned to study treatment and who received any amount of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LUM001 140ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid Level-82.864 umol/LStandard Error 50.1513
LUM001 280ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid Level-49.388 umol/LStandard Error 43.4732
LUM001 OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid Level-66.126 umol/LStandard Error 33.1208
Placebo OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Fasting Serum Bile Acid Level-42.157 umol/LStandard Error 50.0903
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/dayp-value: 0.57495% CI: [-191.679, 110.265]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/dayp-value: 0.914795% CI: [-148.726, 134.264]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of all doses of LUM001p-value: 0.695495% CI: [-151.969, 104.031]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver Enzymes

Analysis of liver enzymes included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). A negative change from baseline indicates that the level of that enzyme decreased.

Time frame: Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment

Population: The mITT population, defined as all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The Safety population was defined as all participants who were randomly assigned to study treatment and who received any amount of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LUM001 140ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALT59.3 U/LStandard Error 20.99
LUM001 140ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALP71.4 U/LStandard Error 53.35
LUM001 140ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesAST37.2 U/LStandard Error 13.64
LUM001 280ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALT10.5 U/LStandard Error 18.06
LUM001 280ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALP31.6 U/LStandard Error 43.59
LUM001 280ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesAST-2.7 U/LStandard Error 11.7
LUM001 OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesAST17.3 U/LStandard Error 8.98
LUM001 OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALT34.9 U/LStandard Error 13.86
LUM001 OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALP51.5 U/LStandard Error 36.13
Placebo OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALT2.7 U/LStandard Error 21.06
Placebo OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesALP19.7 U/LStandard Error 60.76
Placebo OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Liver EnzymesAST13.2 U/LStandard Error 13.63
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for ALTp-value: 0.078395% CI: [-7.2, 120.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for ALTp-value: 0.782795% CI: [-51.4, 67]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for ALTp-value: 0.223595% CI: [-21.9, 86.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for ASTp-value: 0.237295% CI: [-17.5, 65.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for ASTp-value: 0.391495% CI: [-54.1, 22.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for ASTp-value: 0.808195% CI: [-31, 39.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for ALPp-value: 0.574895% CI: [-140.3, 243.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for ALPp-value: 0.883595% CI: [-158.4, 182.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for ALPp-value: 0.691795% CI: [-135.8, 199.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily Scores

The ItchRO was administered as a twice daily electronic diary (eDiary). Children ≥9 years of age completed the patient ItchRO; those between the ages of 5 and 8 completed the patient ItchRO with the assistance of their caregiver. There was no patient report for subjects under the age of 5. ItchRO scores range from 0 to 4, with the higher score indicating increasing itch severity. ItchRO average daily scores were calculated as the sum of daily scores (ie, the maximum of morning and evening scores) divided by the number of days. The average daily score was calculated by using the 7 days pre-treatment for baseline, and the last 7 days of treatment for Week 13. A negative change from Baseline indicates that itch severity decreased.

Time frame: Baseline to 13 weeks or end of treatment

Population: The mITT population, defined as all participants in the Safety population who had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. The Safety population was defined as all participants who were randomly assigned to study treatment and who received any amount of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LUM001 140ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresObserver ItchRO-0.802 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2732
LUM001 140ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresPatient ItchRO-1.159 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5396
LUM001 280ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresObserver ItchRO-0.419 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2318
LUM001 280ug/kg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresPatient ItchRO-0.608 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4399
LUM001 OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresPatient ItchRO-0.883 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3484
LUM001 OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresObserver ItchRO-0.610 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1776
Placebo OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresObserver ItchRO-0.592 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.269
Placebo OverallChange From Baseline to Week 13 (End of Treatment) in Pruritus as Measured by The Patient And Observer Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO) Average Daily ScoresPatient ItchRO-0.811 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5684
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for Patient ItchROp-value: 0.690795% CI: [-2.468, 1.772]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for Patient ItchROp-value: 0.789795% CI: [-1.647, 2.052]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for Patient ItchROp-value: 0.920395% CI: [-1.85, 1.705]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 140ug/kg/day for Observer ItchROp-value: 0.596695% CI: [-1.038, 0.618]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of LUM001 280ug/kg/day for Observer ItchROp-value: 0.63295% CI: [-0.58, 0.926]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of all doses of LUM001 for Observer ItchROp-value: 0.954795% CI: [-0.71, 0.673]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026