Skip to content

FOLFOX6m Plus SIR-Spheres Microspheres vs FOLFOX6m Alone in Patients With Liver Mets From Primary Colorectal Cancer

Assessment of Overall Survival of FOLFOX6m Plus SIR-Spheres Microspheres Versus FOLFOX6m Alone as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-resectable Liver Metastases From Primary Colorectal Carcinoma in a Randomised Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01721954
Acronym
FOXFIREGlobal
Enrollment
209
Registered
2012-11-06
Start date
2013-05-01
Completion date
2017-02-28
Last updated
2019-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer Metastatic

Keywords

colon, rectum, metastatic colorectal cancer, liver metastases

Brief summary

This study is a randomized, multi-center study that will compare the efficacy and safety of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using SIR-Spheres microspheres plus a standard chemotherapy regimen of FOLFOX6m versus FOLFOX6m alone as first-line therapy in patients with non-resectable liver metastases from primary colorectal carcinoma. Treatment with the biologic agent bevacizumab, if part of the standard of care at participating institutions, is allowed within this study at the discretion of the Investigator.

Interventions

DRUGFOLFOX6m

Sponsors

Sirtex Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older * Willing and able to provide written informed consent * Unequivocal and measurable CT evidence of liver metastases which are not treatable by surgical resection or local ablation * Limited extra-hepatic metastases in the lung and/or lymph nodes are permitted (Lung: 5 lesions total, \< 1 cm, or 1 single lesion of up to 1.7 cm; Lymph nodules in one single anatomic area (pelvis, abdomen or chest): any number, \< 2 cm) * All imaging evidence used as part of the screening process must be within 28 days * Suitable for either treatment regimen * WHO performance status 0-1 * Adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function * Life expectancy of at least 3 months without any active treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of ascites, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, main portal or venous involvement or thrombosis as determined by clinical or radiologic assessment * Previous radiotherapy delivered to the liver * Non-malignant disease that would render the patient unsuitable for treatment according to the protocol * Peripheral neuropathy \> grade 2 (NCI-CTC) * Dose-limiting toxicity associated with previous adjuvant 5-FU or oxaliplatin chemotherapy * Prior non-adjuvant chemotherapy for any malignancy. Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is permitted provided that it was completed more than 6 months before entry into the study * Pregnant or breast feeding * Concurrent or prior history of cancer other than adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Allergy to contrast media that would preclude angiography of the hepatic arteries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up 3 yrs 8 monthsOS defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free SurvivalFrom date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years 8 months.PFS defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as an increase in the sum of the longest diameters of ≥ 20% and an absolute increase in the sum of the longest diameters of ≥ 5 mm, or the appearance of a new lesion.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between 01May2013&24Dec2014,209 patients were screened&randomised from 87centres in Australia, Belgium,France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Korea, New Zealand, Portugal, Singapore, Spain,Taiwan &the US. 209 patients randomized in the Intent to treat (ITT) population. 5 patients who did not receive study medication were not included in safety population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
mFOLFOX6 Plus SIRT
Systemic chemotherapy with FOLFOX6m plus or minus bevacizumab plus SIR-Spheres microspheres. FOLFOX6m SIR-Spheres microspheres
105
mFOLFOX6 Alone
Systemic chemotherapy with FOLFOX6m plus or minus bevacizumab repeated every two weeks until evidence of treatment failure. FOLFOX6m
104
Total209

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyDeath5864
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject84

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicmFOLFOX6 Plus SIRTmFOLFOX6 AloneTotal
Age, Continuous62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.28
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.06
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66
Age, Customized
Age, Categorical
Below 65 years
60 Participants57 Participants117 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, Categorical
Greater than or equal to 65 years
45 Participants47 Participants92 Participants
Extra-hepatic Disease
No
73 participants77 participants150 participants
Extra-hepatic Disease
Yes
32 participants27 participants59 participants
ITT bevacizumab
No
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
ITT bevacizumab
Yes
87 Participants87 Participants174 Participants
Liver Involvement %
<=25%
74 participants74 participants148 participants
Liver Involvement %
>25%
31 participants30 participants61 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
88 Participants93 Participants181 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants44 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants60 Participants124 Participants
Tumor volume18.5 percentage of liver
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.77
17.9 percentage of liver
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.18
18.2 percentage of liver
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.96
WHO performance status
0
61 Participants53 Participants114 Participants
WHO performance status
1
44 Participants50 Participants94 Participants
WHO performance status
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
58 / 9264 / 112
other
Total, other adverse events
92 / 92111 / 112
serious
Total, serious adverse events
47 / 9247 / 112

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up 3 yrs 8 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
mFOLFOX6 Plus SIRTOverall Survival (OS)25.9 months
mFOLFOX6 AloneOverall Survival (OS)25.0 months
Comparison: The null hypothesis tested for the primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival (months) of SIRT/FOLFOX treatment versus FOLFOX is equal for both groups. The two-sided alternative hypothesis tested with 95% confidence is OS time for SIRT/FOLFOX treatment lower to that of FOLFOX.p-value: 0.43Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

PFS defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as an increase in the sum of the longest diameters of ≥ 20% and an absolute increase in the sum of the longest diameters of ≥ 5 mm, or the appearance of a new lesion.

Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years 8 months.

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
mFOLFOX6 Plus SIRTProgression-free Survival11.8 months
mFOLFOX6 AloneProgression-free Survival11.2 months
Comparison: A sample size of at least 209 patients for the SIRFLOX study was estimated to be needed to detect an increase in the median PFS at any site from 9.4 months to 14.5 months with 80% power and 95% confidence. Taking into account the number of patients who might receive the alternative treatment or lack of imaging data, the sample size was increased to 209. The Null hypothesis is no difference between the treatment arms with respect to PFS.p-value: <0.05Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026