Skip to content

Caudal Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Supplementation of Caudal Analgesia in Children

Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Caudal Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Supplementation of Caudal Analgesia in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01701778
Enrollment
90
Registered
2012-10-05
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2018-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia, Cryptorchidism

Keywords

Dexmedetomidine, Postoperative pain reaction, anesthesia, children

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of caudal dexmedetomidine with intravenous dexmedetomidine on caudal levobupivacaine analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

Detailed description

Single shot caudal epidural block is one of the most widespread technique for pediatric pain management after infraumbilical surgical procedures.However, in a significant proportion of patients, despite good initial analgesia from a caudal block with local anesthetic, pain develops after the block resolves. Dexmedetomidine is used increasingly in pediatric anesthesia practice to prolong the duration of action of caudal block with a local anesthetic agent.But which route of administration of clonidine is the most beneficial remains unknown. The investigators performed prospective randomized double-blind study to compare the effects of caudal dexmedetomidine with intravenous dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after caudal levobupivacaine for inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchidopexy surgery. 90 children (ASAⅠorⅡ,aged 2-5 yr) undergoing unilateral orchiopexy or inguinal herniorrhaphy were included in this study. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane via a facemask, followed by placement of a laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 2-3% in oxygen-air.Then,caudal block was applied. Patients were randomly assigned in three groups. Group Cau-DEX (n = 30): Caudal Levobupivacaine 0.25% 1ml/kg plus dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg and 10 ml normal saline i.v.;Group IV-DEX(n = 30): Levobupivacaine 0.25% 1ml/kg and dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg(10 ml)i.v.;Group Placebo(n = 30): Levobupivacaine 0.25% and 10 ml normal saline intravenous.

Interventions

Caudal: Levobupivacaine 0.25% 1ml/kg and dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg Intravenous: 10 ml normal saline

Caudal: Levobupivacaine 0.25% 1ml/kg Intravenous: dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg

DRUGPlacebo

Caudal: Levobupivacaine 0.25% 1ml/kg Intravenous: 10 ml normal saline

DRUGsevoflurane

Induction and maintain anaesthesia

Sponsors

West China Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Yao Yusheng
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
2 Years to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA status I-II * aged 2-5 yr * Undergoing unilateral orchiopexy/inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity to any local anesthetics * Patient has history of allergy, intolerance, or reaction to dexmedetomidine * Infections at puncture sites * Bleeding diathesis * Preexisting neurological disease * Diabetes mellitus * Children with uncorrected cardiac lesions * Children with heart block or liver impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first rescue medicationFrom the administration of the caudal block to the first registration of a CHIPPS scores≥4,assessed up to 24hthe Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the sedation scoreAfter surgery, every 15min for the first 2 h, every 30min for the next 2h, hourly for the next 4hsedation was assessed using the Modified Ramsay Sedation Score
Residual motor blockAfter awake,participants will be followed every 30min for the first 2h, hourly for the next 4hthe degree of motor blockade was assessed using a modified Bromage scale
the number of patients not requiring rescue analgesiaAfter surgery,up to 24hthe quality of postoperative pain control
side effectsFrom the administration of the caudal block until the end of study period, assessed up to postoperative 24hside effects including bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxemia, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention
Pain intensityafter surgery, 30min for first 4h, hourly for the next 4h and thereafter every 2h,assessed up to 24hParticipants will be assessed with Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS)
the incidence of emergence agitationParticipants will be followed for the duration of PACU stay, an expected average of 2 hoursThe incidence of emergence agitation was evaluated by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale(PAED)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026