Skip to content

Post-treatment Effects of Ivermectin (IVM) or Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) in Loiasis

Comparison Between the Post-Treatment Reactions After Single-dose Ivermectin or DEC in Subjects With Loa Loa Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01593722
Enrollment
155
Registered
2012-05-08
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2016-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Loiasis

Keywords

Loa loa, Immune Response, Therapy

Brief summary

Background: * Loa loa is a small worm that infects people in West and Central Africa. It is spread by the bite of a fly. Adult worms live under the skin and can cause swelling in the arms, legs, and face. Some people have more serious infections in the heart, kidneys, or brain. Most people with Loa loa infection have no symptoms at all. The standard treatment for Loa loa infection is a medicine called diethylcarbamazine (DEC). Some people have bad reactions to DEC, including itching, muscle pains, and in severe cases coma and death. * Another drug, ivermectin, is used in mass drug treatment programs to prevent the spread of worm infections that cause blindness and massive swelling (elephantiasis). However, people who also have Loa loa have had serious bad reactions to ivermectin. Researchers want to study both DEC and ivermectin to find out why these reactions occur. If they can be prevented, mass drug treatment programs will be able to be used in areas in Africa where Loa loa exists. Objectives: \- To study the side effects of DEC and ivermectin treatment for Loa loa infection. Eligibility: \- Individuals who live in 4 villages in Cameroon where Loa loa infection is known to exist, who are between 20 and 60 years of age, not pregnant or breastfeeding and have a low level of Loa loa parasites in the blood, but are otherwise healthy. Design: * Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history. Blood samples will be collected to check for Loa loa infection. Participants will also have an eye exam and provide skin samples to check for other worm infections that may interfere with the study treatment. * Participants will be admitted to the hospital for 4 days (during and after the treatment). They will receive a single dose of either DEC or ivermectin. * After treatment, regular blood samples will be collected. Participants will be asked questions about how they feel after treatment. Physical exams will be performed. If side effects develop, participants will be treated at the hospital. * After leaving the hospital, participants will have followup visits. These visits will happen on days 5, 7, 9, and 14 after receiving the study medicine. They will involve a short physical exam and collection of blood samples. * At the end of the study, participants will be offered a full 21-day DEC treatment to cure the Loa loa infection.

Detailed description

Ivermectin is currently used for mass drug distribution for the control of onchocerciasis and elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Africa. Due to the occurrence of severe neurologic adverse events in individuals with concomitant Loa loa infection and high levels of circulating microfilariae, drug distribution has been halted in many areas in Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo and other Loa-endemic countries. Diethylcarbamazine citrate (DEC) is the treatment of choice for Loa loa infection in the United States and other non-endemic countries, but can also be associated with the development of severe adverse reactions, including fatal encephalopathy, that are correlated with the number of circulating microfilariae in the blood. The cause of these reactions is unknown, and it is not known if post-treatment reactions to DEC and ivermectin both have the same underlying mechanism. Post-treatment reactions to both medications are accompanied by a dramatic interleukin-5 (IL-5)-dependent increase in eosinophilia and evidence of eosinophil activation. Preliminary data suggests that, unlike post-treatment responses in Wolbachia-containing filariae, inflammatory mediators commonly seen in bacterial infections and malaria, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and IL-1-beta, are not increased post-treatment with DEC. The aim of this study is to characterize the immunologic mechanisms of ivermectin and DEC posttreatment reactions so that it can be established whether or not these posttreatment reactions have the same underlying mechanism. An understanding of the pathophysiology of these post-treatment reactions is necessary in order to develop strategies to prevent these reactions in the future. We plan to randomize 20 subjects with low- to- moderate numbers of circulating Loa loa microfilariae to receive a single oral dose of either ivermectin (200 mcg/kg) or DEC (8 mg/kg) in an inpatient setting in Cameroon. Signs and symptoms, blood microfilarial levels, complete blood counts, intracellular and serum cytokine levels and markers of eosinophil activation will be assessed at baseline, 4 and 8 hours, and 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9 and 14 days post-treatment and compared between the two treatment groups. Subjects who received ivermectin will be treated with single dose DEC (8 mg/kg) on day 14. All subjects will then be followed at 6 and 12 months post-hospitalization to determine whether they have experienced Loa-specific symptoms (eyeworm or Calabar swellings). Mf count and complete blood count (CBC) with differential will be obtained at each follow-up visit. Subjects with Loa-specific symptoms or mf counts \> 100 mf/mL at the 6 month time point will be offered a full treatment course. If \> 50% of subjects meet criteria for full DEC treatment at the 6, month time point, all subjects will be treated and the study will enter a follow-up phase with a visit at 12 months (6 months after the full treatment course ).

Interventions

single dose

DRUGIvermectin

single dose

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA (SCREENING): A subject will be eligible for participation in the screening portion of this protocol if all of the following criteria apply: 1. male or non-pregnant and not breastfeeding female subjects, 2. age 20-60 years (per participant self-report) 3. resident of Akonolinga 4. Loa microfilaremia from 20 to 5000 mf/mL from the prior screening in the village or did not participate in the prior screening 5. consent to a blood draw to screen for infection with Loa loa 6. must be willing to have blood samples stored

Exclusion criteria

(SCREENING): A subject will not be eligible for participation in the screening portion of this study if any of the following conditions apply: 1. Known to be pregnant (by history) or breastfeeding 2. Chronic medical conditions, including but not limited to diabetes, renal or hepatic insufficiency, immunodeficiency, psychiatric disorder, seizure, that in the investigators judgments are deemed to be clinically significant 3. History of hypersensitivity reaction to DEC or IVM INCLUSION CRITERIA (INTERVENTIONAL STUDY): A subject will be eligible for participation in the interventional portion of the study only if all of the following additional inclusion criteria apply: 1. Loa loa microfilaremia between 20 and 2,000 mf/mL blood drawn between 11:30 am and 2:30 pm measured within 30 days prior to the baseline visit 2. The subject agrees to storage of samples for study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Peak % of Baseline Eosinophil Count Measured During the First 7 Days Post-treatment.7 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Frequency of Adverse Events7 daysSymptoms, signs and laboratory abnormalities occurring in the 7 days post-treatment
Eosinophil Activation3 daysLevels of surface marker expression on eosinophils
Proportion of Subjects Who Clear Microfilaremia14 days

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Efficacy6 monthsProportion of subjects without signs of infection

Countries

Cameroon

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Of the155 subjects recruited, 92 were eligible for screening and signed consent. Thirty had loiasis, of which 16 were excluded because their microfilarial counts were \>5000 mf/mL. One subject was excluded because of age and one declined to participate. The remaining 12 patients were enrolled in the treatment arm of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Dose DEC
diethylcarbamazine 8 mg/kg single oral dose Diethylcarbamazine: single dose
6
SIngle Dose IVM
ivermectin 200 mcg/kg single oral dose Ivermectin: single dose
6
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Dose DECTotalSIngle Dose IVM
Absolute eosinophil count3.27 cells x 10^9/L2.40 cells x 10^9/L1.76 cells x 10^9/L
Age, Continuous44.5 years44.5 years38.5 years
Loa microfilarial count1074 mf/ml618 mf/ml355 mf/ml
Region of Enrollment
Cameroon
6 participants12 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 66 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

The Peak % of Baseline Eosinophil Count Measured During the First 7 Days Post-treatment.

Time frame: 7 days

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DiethylcarbamazineThe Peak % of Baseline Eosinophil Count Measured During the First 7 Days Post-treatment.196 percentage of baseline
IvermectinThe Peak % of Baseline Eosinophil Count Measured During the First 7 Days Post-treatment.165 percentage of baseline
p-value: 0.68Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Eosinophil Activation

Levels of surface marker expression on eosinophils

Time frame: 3 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
DiethylcarbamazineEosinophil Activation%CD69 expression on eosinophils at peak21.5 % cells expressing CD69
DiethylcarbamazineEosinophil Activation%CD69 expression on eosinophils at baseline1.7 % cells expressing CD69
IvermectinEosinophil Activation%CD69 expression on eosinophils at peak21.5 % cells expressing CD69
IvermectinEosinophil Activation%CD69 expression on eosinophils at baseline1.5 % cells expressing CD69
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Clear Microfilaremia

Time frame: 14 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DiethylcarbamazineProportion of Subjects Who Clear Microfilaremia3 participants
IvermectinProportion of Subjects Who Clear Microfilaremia0 participants
Secondary

The Frequency of Adverse Events

Symptoms, signs and laboratory abnormalities occurring in the 7 days post-treatment

Time frame: 7 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DiethylcarbamazineThe Frequency of Adverse Events115 events
IvermectinThe Frequency of Adverse Events103 events
Other Pre-specified

Treatment Efficacy

Proportion of subjects without signs of infection

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Microfilarial count and symptoms

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DiethylcarbamazineTreatment Efficacy0 participants
IvermectinTreatment Efficacy1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026