Skip to content

Study 33: Adherence to Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment 3HP SAT Versus 3HP DOT

TBTC Study 33. An Evaluation of Adherence to Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) Treatment With 12 Doses of Once Weekly Rifapentine (RPT) and Isoniazid (INH) Given as Self-administered (SAT) Versus Directly-observed Therapy (DOT): iAdhere.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01582711
Acronym
iAdhere
Enrollment
1002
Registered
2012-04-23
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Keywords

LTBI, LTB, Latent TB, TB infection

Brief summary

The study is an open label, multicenter, randomized (three arms: DOT (standard control), SAT, SAT with SMS reminders) controlled clinical trial. The trial is conducted in patients diagnosed with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) who are recommended for treatment. The primary objective is to evaluate adherence to a three-month (12-dose) regimen of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid (3RPT/INH) given by directly observed therapy (DOT) compared to self-administered therapy (SAT). The secondary objectives: * To compare the treatment completion rates between participants randomized to SAT without reminders versus SAT with weekly SMS reminders * To evaluate the timing of doses and patterns of adherence to once weekly RPT/INH among participants who complete treatment and those who discontinue therapy prior to completion. * To determine the availability and acceptability of using SMS reminders among all patients consenting to participate in the study. * To determine the toxicity and tolerability by comparing the rates of any drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events or death between the DOT arm and the SAT arms (both combined and individually) * To compare the frequency, timing, and causes for failure to complete treatment between the DOT arm and the SAT arms * To collect patient-specific cost data related to the 3 treatment arms * To describe the pattern of antituberculosis drug resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains cultured from participants who develop active TB.

Detailed description

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that approximately 2.3 billion people are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Approximately 1.7 million people die of TB each year, the second most common infectious cause of death in the world. In order to improve TB control worldwide, an affordable, effective, short course treatment for latent TB infection (LTBI) is a global priority. Candidates for LTBI treatment are those persons with a positive TST or IGRA, particularly if they also have risk factors for progressing to active TB, including individuals likely to be recently infected. The Prevent TB Study (TBTC Study 26) was an open-label, randomized, phase III controlled clinical trial with over 8,000 high risk TST reactors enrolled. The study compared rifapentine and INH (3RPT/INH) given once-weekly by directly observed treatment (DOT) for 3 months (12 doses) compared with 9 months of daily, self-administered INH. The results demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the shorter regimen. Moreover, the once weekly therapy had significantly higher treatment completion rates than the standard 9 INH regimen. One of the most effective strategies for assuring adherence with therapy is to have each dose of medication directly administered by a health care worker who observes and records the ingestion of the drugs. DOT for active TB has been successfully used in many settings to improve treatment completion, however cost and logistical constraints of DOT remain. The estimated cost of giving 12 weekly DOT doses to all LTBI patients is likely prohibitive for TB control programs worldwide. This may lead to a decreased uptake of the new regimen or implementation using SAT where adherence has not been studied. Therefore, to apply the Prevent TB study results more broadly, a new study evaluating treatment completion of 3 RPT/INH given as SAT is conducted. Medication adherence is defined by whether patients take a treatment as prescribed. The effectiveness of any treatment is determined largely by adherence. In clinical practice and research, indirect measures of adherence are commonly used. Indirect measures of adherence include patient self-report, evaluation of pharmacy dispensation records, pill counts, and the use of electronic prescription bottle monitors. Patient self-reported adherence is accurate when non-adherence is reported but tends to overestimate true adherence. Self-report is not discerning enough to be utilized as a sole measure of adherence in research settings where adherence is the primary outcome. Pill counts have been utilized successfully in research and clinical settings for real-time assessment but also tend to overestimate adherence. Electronic drug monitors such as the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) are the best available tools to assess the timing and patterns of adherence. This study uses a combination of indirect measures including MEMS, pill counts, and self-report to provide the most accurate assessment of adherence to once weekly, self-administered RPT/INH. The number of cellular phone users globally has increased dramatically in the last decade. Cell phones and SMS reminders have been used successfully in randomized controlled clinical trials to improve adherence to vaccines, HIV medications, and asthma treatment. SMS appear to be cost-effective ways to reach patients in remote locations. This study examines effect of SMS on medication adherence. The goal of this open label clinical trial is to compare the adherence to 3RPT/INH given by DOT versus SAT or SAT with a weekly SMS reminder. The primary assessment of adherence will be treatment completion which is defined as taking at least 90% of the doses (11/12 doses of each drug) within 16 weeks of initiation. Secondary objectives include evaluating the patterns of adherence in participants who fail to complete, determining the feasibility and impact of using SMS reminders on treatment completion with SAT, evaluating the tolerability and any adverse events associated with each treatment arm, monitoring for the development of active TB, determining the drug susceptibility for participants who develop active TB, and measuring important patient-related expenditures associated with each study arm. The trial will be conducted in patients diagnosed with LTBI and recommended for treatment.

Interventions

Self Administered Therapy (SAT)

BEHAVIORALSMS reminders

Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders

rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)

Sponsors

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and non-pregnant, non-nursing females * Age \> 18 years * Weight \> 45kg and considered appropriate to receive RPT 900mg and INH 900mg once weekly by the local site investigator * Willingness to provide signed informed consent. * Clinical indication for LTBI treatment such as: 1) persons with a positive tuberculin skin test (TST) as defined by CDC criteria or a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) defined per the manufacturers' guidelines AND one of the following: close contact to someone with culture confirmed TB, HIV infection, or \> 2 cm2 of pulmonary parenchymal fibrosis on chest X-ray and no prior history of TB treatment; 2) TST or IGRA converters defined as a documented change from negative to positive within a two-year period; 3) Persons with any other clinical indication for LTBI treatment as locally defined including persons with a negative TST and/or IGRA (e.g. HIV-infected close contacts to an active pulmonary TB cases)

Exclusion criteria

* Confirmed or suspected active TB * Contacts to a source case with known resistance to isoniazid or rifampin * Persons with a history (by written documentation or self-report) of ever receiving \> 1 week of treatment for active or latent TB, regardless of whether the course was completed, because adherence may be different in people who previously took TB treatment * Persons who are not considered candidates for SAT by the local investigator * History of sensitivity or intolerance to isoniazid or rifamycins * Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT, SGPT) \> 5x upper limit of normal among persons in whom an ALT is determined * Persons with HIV-infection who 1) have a CD4 \< 350 or 2) are currently receiving or planning to receive antiretroviral therapy in the first 120 days after study initiation (e.g., HIV-1 protease inhibitors, nucleoside or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, CCR5 inhibitors or integrase inhibitors)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Completion Rate.Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.To compare the treatment completion rates between participants randomized to DOT vs SAT without reminders and DOT versus SAT with weekly SMS reminders. Treatment completion is defined as taking at least 90% of the doses (11/12 doses of each drug) within 16 weeks of treatment initiation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMSUp to 16 weeks from start of treatment.The number and proportion of participants who adhered (completed treatment) based on pill count and self-report, considered to be standard of care (SOC) vs. the number of participants who completed treatment based on SOC plus MEMS cap.
Availability and AcceptabilityUp to 16 weeks from start of treatment.To determine the availability and acceptability of using SMS reminders among all patients consenting to participate in the study.
Patient-specific CostUp to 20 weeks from start of treatment.To collect patient-specific cost data related to the DOT and SAT arms
Treatment Completion Rates Between Participants Randomized to SAT Without Reminders Versus SAT With Weekly SMS RemindersUp to 16 weeks from start of treatment.To compare the treatment completion rates between participants randomized to SAT without reminders versus SAT with weekly SMS reminders
Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentUp to 16 weeks from start of treatment.To compare the frequency, timing, and causes for failure to complete treatment between the DOT arm and the SAT arms (both combined and individually) including discontinuation due to: * non-adherence * any adverse event (AE) * a diagnosis of active TB * other reasons
Antituberculosis Drug ResistanceUp to 16 weeks from start of treatment.To describe the pattern of antituberculosis drug resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains cultured from participants who develop active TB.
Number and Percentage of Participants With Drug-related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or DeathUp to 16 weeks from start of treatment.To determine the toxicity and tolerability by comparing the rates of any drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events or death between the DOT arm and the SAT arms (both combined and individually)

Countries

China, South Africa, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)
900mg of isoniazid plus 900mg of rifapentine given weekly for 3 months (12 weeks, 12 doses) under Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) isoniazid and rifapentine: rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)
337
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
900mg of isoniazid plus 900mg of rifapentine given weekly for 3 months (12 weeks, 12 doses) as patient Self Administered Therapy (SAT) Self Administered Therapy (SAT): Self Administered Therapy (SAT) isoniazid and rifapentine: rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)
337
3HP SAT With SMS Reminders
900mg of isoniazid plus 900mg of rifapentine given weekly for 3 months (12 weeks, 12 doses) as patient Self Administered Therapy (SAT). In addition, patient receives phone Short Message Service (SMS) reminders weekly. Self Administered Therapy (SAT): Self Administered Therapy (SAT) SMS reminders: Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders isoniazid and rifapentine: rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)
328
Total1,002

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)3HP SAT With SMS RemindersTotal
Age, Continuous36 years36 years38 years36 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
62 Participants68 Participants70 Participants200 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
91 Participants84 Participants75 Participants250 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
9 Participants14 Participants11 Participants34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
175 Participants171 Participants172 Participants518 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
14 participants15 participants16 participants45 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
29 participants26 participants28 participants83 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
32 participants35 participants33 participants100 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
262 participants261 participants251 participants774 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
161 Participants153 Participants168 Participants482 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
176 Participants184 Participants160 Participants520 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3370 / 3371 / 328
other
Total, other adverse events
42 / 33754 / 33756 / 328
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 3375 / 3376 / 328

Outcome results

Primary

Treatment Completion Rate.

To compare the treatment completion rates between participants randomized to DOT vs SAT without reminders and DOT versus SAT with weekly SMS reminders. Treatment completion is defined as taking at least 90% of the doses (11/12 doses of each drug) within 16 weeks of treatment initiation.

Time frame: Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.

Population: Participants analyzed excludes 4 participants (2 in each SAT groups) who were enrolled as contacts of a person with active TB before susceptibility results had returned showing resistance to isoniazid or rifampin in source patient. These participants were excluded from treatment completion analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Treatment Completion Rate.294 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Treatment Completion Rate.248 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersTreatment Completion Rate.250 Participants
Secondary

Antituberculosis Drug Resistance

To describe the pattern of antituberculosis drug resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains cultured from participants who develop active TB.

Time frame: Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.

Population: Participants analyzed excludes 4 participants (2 in each SAT groups) who were enrolled as contacts of a person with active TB before susceptibility results had returned showing resistance to isoniazid or rifampin in source patient. These participants were excluded from drug resistance analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Antituberculosis Drug ResistanceDeveloped TB but not drug resistant0 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Antituberculosis Drug ResistanceAntituberculosis Drug Resistant0 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Antituberculosis Drug ResistanceDeveloped TB but not drug resistant0 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Antituberculosis Drug ResistanceAntituberculosis Drug Resistant0 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersAntituberculosis Drug ResistanceDeveloped TB but not drug resistant1 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersAntituberculosis Drug ResistanceAntituberculosis Drug Resistant0 Participants
Secondary

Availability and Acceptability

To determine the availability and acceptability of using SMS reminders among all patients consenting to participate in the study.

Time frame: Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.

Population: 'Proportion of Participants willing to use SMS (Acceptability) (eSAT arm ONLY)' analysis was only done in '3HP SAT with SMS Reminders'.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Availability and AcceptabilityProportion of Participants have cell SMS phone (Availability)34 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Availability and AcceptabilityProportion of Participants willing to use SMS (Acceptability) (eSAT arm ONLY)0 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Availability and AcceptabilityProportion of Participants have cell SMS phone (Availability)29 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Availability and AcceptabilityProportion of Participants willing to use SMS (Acceptability) (eSAT arm ONLY)229 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersAvailability and AcceptabilityProportion of Participants have cell SMS phone (Availability)28 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersAvailability and AcceptabilityProportion of Participants willing to use SMS (Acceptability) (eSAT arm ONLY)0 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete Treatment

To compare the frequency, timing, and causes for failure to complete treatment between the DOT arm and the SAT arms (both combined and individually) including discontinuation due to: * non-adherence * any adverse event (AE) * a diagnosis of active TB * other reasons

Time frame: Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentStudy therapy not started3 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentDrug toxicities causing permanent discontinuation12 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentFailure to complete minimum number of PP doses4 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentNot advisable to continue study drugs2 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentRefused further study therapy6 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentPatient became pregnant2 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentOther9 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentUnknown/Missing2 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentFailure to complete minimum number of PP doses7 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentOther12 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentNot advisable to continue study drugs5 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentRefused further study therapy7 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentPatient became pregnant1 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentStudy therapy not started7 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentDrug toxicities causing permanent discontinuation18 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentUnknown/Missing6 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentFailure to complete minimum number of PP doses9 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentDrug toxicities causing permanent discontinuation14 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentStudy therapy not started4 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentNot advisable to continue study drugs2 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentOther11 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentPatient became pregnant2 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentRefused further study therapy11 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants Reason for Failure to Complete TreatmentUnknown/Missing6 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Participants With Drug-related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or Death

To determine the toxicity and tolerability by comparing the rates of any drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events or death between the DOT arm and the SAT arms (both combined and individually)

Time frame: Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Number and Percentage of Participants With Drug-related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or Death23 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Number and Percentage of Participants With Drug-related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or Death23 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersNumber and Percentage of Participants With Drug-related Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or Death29 Participants
Secondary

Patient-specific Cost

To collect patient-specific cost data related to the DOT and SAT arms

Time frame: Up to 20 weeks from start of treatment.

Population: This analysis was conducted in 81 (DOT-40, SAT-41) participants from 7 study sites. As pre-specified in the protocol, DOT cost maybe prohibitive to TB programs, and SAT cost may provide a cost-effective alternative. Data was collected and analyzed to assess DOT costs vs SAT costs, such that the distinction between SAT and eSAT arms were not appropriate. As a result, participants in the SAT arms were combined to find total cost.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Patient-specific Cost361.50 U.S. Dollar
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Patient-specific Cost257.82 U.S. Dollar
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMS

The number and proportion of participants who adhered (completed treatment) based on pill count and self-report, considered to be standard of care (SOC) vs. the number of participants who completed treatment based on SOC plus MEMS cap.

Time frame: Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)The Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMSTreatment completion proportion based on pill count/self-report294 Participants
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)The Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMSTreatment completion proportion based on pill count/self-report and MEMS cap294 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)The Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMSTreatment completion proportion based on pill count/self-report271 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)The Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMSTreatment completion proportion based on pill count/self-report and MEMS cap248 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersThe Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMSTreatment completion proportion based on pill count/self-report266 Participants
3HP SAT With SMS RemindersThe Percentage of Participants Who Completed Treatment Based on SOC vs SOC Plus MEMSTreatment completion proportion based on pill count/self-report and MEMS cap249 Participants
Secondary

Treatment Completion Rates Between Participants Randomized to SAT Without Reminders Versus SAT With Weekly SMS Reminders

To compare the treatment completion rates between participants randomized to SAT without reminders versus SAT with weekly SMS reminders

Time frame: Up to 16 weeks from start of treatment.

Population: Participants analyzed excludes 4 participants (2 in each SAT groups) who were enrolled as contacts of a person with active TB before susceptibility results had returned showing resistance to isoniazid or rifampin in source patient. These participants were excluded from treatment completion analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)Treatment Completion Rates Between Participants Randomized to SAT Without Reminders Versus SAT With Weekly SMS Reminders248 Participants
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)Treatment Completion Rates Between Participants Randomized to SAT Without Reminders Versus SAT With Weekly SMS Reminders250 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026