Skip to content

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) And Fotemustine in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

Randomized Non Comparative Phase II Trial With Bevacizumab and Fotemustine in the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01474239
Enrollment
91
Registered
2011-11-18
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2016-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma Multiforme

Brief summary

This randomized, non-comparative study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin (bevacizumab) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients will be randomized to receive Avastin 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks or fotemustine 75 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, followed by, after a 5 weeks interval, 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment with fotemustine serves as a calibration arm and no formal efficacy comparison will be made between the two treatment arms. The anticipated time of study treatment is until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions

DRUGbevacizumab [Avastin]

10 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

75 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 followed by, after a 5 weeks interval, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-weeks cycle. Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, \>/=18 years of age * Diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (Grade IV) * Previous treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy * First recurrence after standard adjuvant treatment (surgery, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy) * Adequate hematological, biochemical and organ functions

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with Avastin or other anti-angiogenic drugs * Residual relevant toxicity resulting from previous therapy * Radiotherapy within the 3 months prior to the diagnosis of disease progression * Chemotherapy in the previous 4 weeks * Other active or inactive malignancies (except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, of the prostate or basal cell carcinoma) * Clinically significant cardiovascular diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment6 monthsOverall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall Survival (OS)Baseline until death (up to 691 days)OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment9 monthsOS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment12 monthsOS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 600)OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)Percentage of participants achieving CR or PR as overall response between first drug administration and documented disease progression were calculated. Tumor response was evaluated according to both the RANO and the Macdonald response criteria. As per Macdonald criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all enhancing disease, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesions along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with no corticosteroid; PR was defined as a 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesion along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with stable or reduced corticosteroids. RANO criteria defined CR and PR the same as Macdonald criteria with the following additions: CR - improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR - no progression of non-measurable disease, stable or improved non enhancing FLAIR/T2 lesions.
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Screening, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global QOL/functional scales indicates better level of QOL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale indicates greater degree of symptoms.
Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study PeriodBaseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)Corticosteroid initiation was assessed in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage greater than equal to (\>/=) 2 mg dexamethasone equivalent.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment6 monthsProgression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per the RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per the Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, post-treatment follow-up (up to Day 691)Corticosteroid use was classified as: 1. No Change (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was equal to baseline); 2. Decreased (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was lower than baseline); 3. Increased (corticosteroid dose at each assessment was greater than baseline).
Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) DeteriorationBaseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) DeteriorationBaseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)Time to KPS deterioration was defined as the time from screening to the first date of deterioration of the KPS score. Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Time to KPS deterioration was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. If the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date.
Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) DeteriorationBaseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time to WHO PS DeteriorationBaseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)Time to WHO PS deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of deterioration of the WHO performance status score. WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time to Corticosteroid InitiationBaseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)Time to corticosteroid initiation was defined as the time from screening to the start date of the first corticosteroid administration in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage ≥2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. Instead, if the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. Time to corticosteroid initiation was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)PFS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using the RANO or the Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Study included 28-day screening period. Participants were randomized according to a 2:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment groups. A total of 99 participants were screened, of which 91 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bevacizumab
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
59
Fotemustine
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
32
Total91

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event123
Overall StudyClinical Disease Progression71
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyDisease Progression3725
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12
Overall StudyWithdrawal for Economic Reason10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBevacizumabFotemustineTotal
Age, Continuous56.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
55.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64
56.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants9 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants23 Participants62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 5925 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 596 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline until death (up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BevacizumabOverall Survival (OS)7.26 months
FotemustineOverall Survival (OS)8.66 months
Primary

Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants with at least one administration of the study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment62.07 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment73.33 percentage of participants
Comparison: The 6-month OS rate (OS-6) for bevacizumab was compared to the expected proportion of 0.60 under null hypothesis (ineffective treatment) with the application of the exact binomial test. The one-tailed statistical hypotheses was p0 less than or equal to (≤) 0.60 (null hypothesis) versus pA greater than or equal to (≥) 0.77 (alternative hypothesis), where p is the estimated probability of survival at 6 months.p-value: 0.4291Exact Binomial Test
Secondary

Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72

EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global QOL/functional scales indicates better level of QOL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale indicates greater degree of symptoms.

Time frame: Screening, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72

Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome, and n signified participants with evaluable data for specified category for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Screening (n=58,31)67.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.04
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)6.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.01
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.87
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)14.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.88
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.87
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.05
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)-12.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.96
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)-50.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)-50.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Screening (n=58,31)73.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.47
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-8.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.62
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)10.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.63
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-5.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.65
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)14.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.53
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.64
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)8.33 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)8.33 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Screening (n=58,31)70.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.18
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)4.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.49
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.67
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)10.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.11
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.67
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-1.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.44
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.97
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)16.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)16.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Screening (n=58,31)72.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.07
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)1.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.12
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.07
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)13.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.32
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-7.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.32
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-5.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.05
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.96
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)-12.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.46
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)-66.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)-66.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Screening (n=58,31)58.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-3.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.17
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-4.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.39
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)4.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.11
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)3.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.91
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-2.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.34
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)10.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.23
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.94
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Screening (n=58,31)31.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-3.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.59
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-6.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.79
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)3.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.82
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)9.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.98
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)2.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.6
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Screening (n=58,31)2.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)1.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.68
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-5.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.56
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-9.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.78
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)-16.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)-16.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Screening (n=58,31)6.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.82
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-1.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.61
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-10.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.72
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.31
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.67
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-7.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.84
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-29.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.46
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)-16.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)-16.67 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Screening (n=58,31)11.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.12
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)4.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.8
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-9.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.51
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.22
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)3.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.03
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.67
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.22
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Screening (n=58,31)18.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.73
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)1.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.29
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.04
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-9.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.09
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)28.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)14.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.22
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)25.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.91
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)33.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.22
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Screening (n=58,31)7.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.79
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.65
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-7.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-4.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-7.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)-16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Screening (n=58,31)17.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.36
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 8 (n=26,16)3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.52
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)4.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.21
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.52
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.49
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)3.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.06
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.22
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)-33.33 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)-33.33 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Screening (n=58,31)1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.14
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-6.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.69
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-7.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-4.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Screening (n=58,31)17.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.91
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)6.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.21
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)2.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.26
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-4.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-3.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.06
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.25
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.91
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Functioning (Fn): Screening (n=58,31)71.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.65
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)10.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.07
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)7.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.17
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)13.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.17
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)18.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.21
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)4.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.72
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.78
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)6.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
BevacizumabChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-16.67 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 8 (n=26,16)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.87
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Screening (n=58,31)73.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.14
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.52
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.23
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-9.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Screening (n=58,31)25.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.11
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Role Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Screening (n=58,31)74.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.41
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Screening (n=58,31)3.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.02
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.91
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.57
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.52
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-6.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.84
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-33.33 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.39
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)4.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)8.33 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)8.33 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Emotional Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Screening (n=58,31)79.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.33
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)7.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.55
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)9.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 46
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-4.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.31
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Functioning (Fn): Screening (n=58,31)78.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.07
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Dyspnea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Screening (n=58,31)81.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.24
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Screening (n=58,31)18.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.51
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.96
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.23
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.33
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)13.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-4.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.99
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)16.67 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Screening (n=58,31)2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.32
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)16.67 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-33.33 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.57
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.57
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Social Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Screening (n=58,31)66.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)33.33 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)6.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.87
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)7.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.76
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)7.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.78
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)33.33 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-12.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.68
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Insomnia: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72QOL: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)6.67 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Screening (n=58,31)24.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.05
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Screening (n=58,31)5.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.46
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-13.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.73
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-9.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.48
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-10.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.47
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)-11.11 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)-5.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.86
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-14.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.23
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)-11.11 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)-11.11 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)8.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.72
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Fatigue: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Screening (n=58,31)1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.16
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.91
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-14.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.25
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)0.00 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Physical Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)6.67 units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Nausea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Diarrhea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Screening (n=58,31)14.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.47
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Appetite loss: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)-6.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.44
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Financial Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)NA units on a scale
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Pain: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.25
FotemustineChange From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Constipation: Screening (n=58,31)17.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.63
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment

OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment25.86 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment40.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug

OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 600)

Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug93.10 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug90.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment

OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 9 months

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment37.93 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment46.67 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use

Corticosteroid use was classified as: 1. No Change (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was equal to baseline); 2. Decreased (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was lower than baseline); 3. Increased (corticosteroid dose at each assessment was greater than baseline).

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, post-treatment follow-up (up to Day 691)

Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome, and n signified participants with evaluable data for specified category for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseFollow-up: Decreased (n=9,3)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 8: Increased (n=52,28)17.31 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 8: Decreased (n=52,28)23.08 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 8: No Change (n=52,28)59.62 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 16: Increased (n=33,18)21.21 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 16: Decreased (n=33,18)36.36 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 16: No Change (n=33,18)42.42 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 24: Increased (n=21,5)28.57 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 24: Decreased (n=21,5)33.33 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 24: No Change (n=21,5)38.10 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 32: Increased (n=14,3)14.29 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 32: Decreased (n=14,3)42.86 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 32: No Change (n=14,3)42.86 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 40: Increased (n=10,2)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 40: Decreased (n=10,2)60.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 40: No Change (n=10,2)40.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 48: Increased (n=8,1)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 48: Decreased (n=8,1)50.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 48: No Change (n=8,1)50.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 56: Increased (n=6,1)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 56: Decreased (n=6,1)33.33 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 56: No Change (n=6,1)66.67 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 64: Increased (n=3,1)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 64: Decreased (n=3,1)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 64: No Change (n=3,1)100.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 72: Increased (n=3,0)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 72: Decreased (n=3,0)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 72: No Change (n=3,0)100.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 80: Increased (n=1,0)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 80: Decreased (n=1,0)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 80: No Change (n=1,0)100.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 88: Increased (n=1,0)100.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 88: Decreased (n=1,0)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 88: No Change (n=1,0)0.00 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseFollow-up: Increased (n=9,3)33.33 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseFollow-up: No Change (n=9,3)66.67 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 48: No Change (n=8,1)100.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 8: Increased (n=52,28)17.86 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 88: Decreased (n=1,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 56: Increased (n=6,1)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 8: Decreased (n=52,28)21.43 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 80: Increased (n=1,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 8: No Change (n=52,28)60.71 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 56: Decreased (n=6,1)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 16: Increased (n=33,18)22.22 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseFollow-up: Decreased (n=9,3)33.33 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 16: Decreased (n=33,18)27.78 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 56: No Change (n=6,1)100.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 16: No Change (n=33,18)50.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 80: Decreased (n=1,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 24: Increased (n=21,5)20.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 64: Increased (n=3,1)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 24: Decreased (n=21,5)40.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 88: No Change (n=1,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 24: No Change (n=21,5)40.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 64: Decreased (n=3,1)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 32: Increased (n=14,3)33.33 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 80: No Change (n=1,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 32: Decreased (n=14,3)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 64: No Change (n=3,1)100.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 32: No Change (n=14,3)66.67 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseFollow-up: No Change (n=9,3)66.67 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 40: Increased (n=10,2)50.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 72: Increased (n=3,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 40: Decreased (n=10,2)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 88: Increased (n=1,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 40: No Change (n=10,2)50.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 72: Decreased (n=3,0)NA percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 48: Increased (n=8,1)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseFollow-up: Increased (n=9,3)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 48: Decreased (n=8,1)0.00 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid UseWeek 72: No Change (n=3,0)NA percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per the RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per the Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment26.32 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment10.71 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

Percentage of participants achieving CR or PR as overall response between first drug administration and documented disease progression were calculated. Tumor response was evaluated according to both the RANO and the Macdonald response criteria. As per Macdonald criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all enhancing disease, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesions along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with no corticosteroid; PR was defined as a 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesion along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with stable or reduced corticosteroids. RANO criteria defined CR and PR the same as Macdonald criteria with the following additions: CR - improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR - no progression of non-measurable disease, stable or improved non enhancing FLAIR/T2 lesions.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)RANO Evaluation28.81 percentage of participants
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)MacDonald Evaluation28.81 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)RANO Evaluation9.38 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)MacDonald Evaluation6.25 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period

Corticosteroid initiation was assessed in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage greater than equal to (\>/=) 2 mg dexamethasone equivalent.

Time frame: Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population. Number of participants analyzed signified participants who were not receiving corticosteroids at screening.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period58.82 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period41.67 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration

Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.

Time frame: Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration18.92 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration14.29 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration

WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.

Time frame: Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BevacizumabPercentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration47.46 percentage of participants
FotemustinePercentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration37.50 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using the RANO or the Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BevacizumabProgression-Free Survival (PFS)3.38 months
FotemustineProgression-Free Survival (PFS)3.45 months
Secondary

Time to Corticosteroid Initiation

Time to corticosteroid initiation was defined as the time from screening to the start date of the first corticosteroid administration in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage ≥2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. Instead, if the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. Time to corticosteroid initiation was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population. Number of participants analyzed signified participants who were not receiving corticosteroids at screening.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BevacizumabTime to Corticosteroid Initiation4.49 months
FotemustineTime to Corticosteroid Initiation5.93 months
Secondary

Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration

Time to KPS deterioration was defined as the time from screening to the first date of deterioration of the KPS score. Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Time to KPS deterioration was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. If the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date.

Time frame: Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BevacizumabTime to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) DeteriorationNA months
FotemustineTime to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) DeteriorationNA months
Secondary

Time to WHO PS Deterioration

Time to WHO PS deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of deterioration of the WHO performance status score. WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.

Time frame: Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BevacizumabTime to WHO PS Deterioration8.87 months
FotemustineTime to WHO PS DeteriorationNA months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026