Glioblastoma Multiforme
Conditions
Brief summary
This randomized, non-comparative study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin (bevacizumab) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients will be randomized to receive Avastin 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks or fotemustine 75 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, followed by, after a 5 weeks interval, 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment with fotemustine serves as a calibration arm and no formal efficacy comparison will be made between the two treatment arms. The anticipated time of study treatment is until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Interventions
10 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
75 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 followed by, after a 5 weeks interval, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-weeks cycle. Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients, \>/=18 years of age * Diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (Grade IV) * Previous treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy * First recurrence after standard adjuvant treatment (surgery, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy) * Adequate hematological, biochemical and organ functions
Exclusion criteria
* Previous treatment with Avastin or other anti-angiogenic drugs * Residual relevant toxicity resulting from previous therapy * Radiotherapy within the 3 months prior to the diagnosis of disease progression * Chemotherapy in the previous 4 weeks * Other active or inactive malignancies (except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, of the prostate or basal cell carcinoma) * Clinically significant cardiovascular diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment | 6 months | Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Baseline until death (up to 691 days) | OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment | 9 months | OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment | 12 months | OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug | 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 600) | OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) | Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days) | Percentage of participants achieving CR or PR as overall response between first drug administration and documented disease progression were calculated. Tumor response was evaluated according to both the RANO and the Macdonald response criteria. As per Macdonald criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all enhancing disease, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesions along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with no corticosteroid; PR was defined as a 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesion along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with stable or reduced corticosteroids. RANO criteria defined CR and PR the same as Macdonald criteria with the following additions: CR - improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR - no progression of non-measurable disease, stable or improved non enhancing FLAIR/T2 lesions. |
| Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Screening, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global QOL/functional scales indicates better level of QOL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale indicates greater degree of symptoms. |
| Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period | Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days) | Corticosteroid initiation was assessed in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage greater than equal to (\>/=) 2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment | 6 months | Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per the RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per the Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration. |
| Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, post-treatment follow-up (up to Day 691) | Corticosteroid use was classified as: 1. No Change (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was equal to baseline); 2. Decreased (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was lower than baseline); 3. Increased (corticosteroid dose at each assessment was greater than baseline). |
| Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration | Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days) | Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. |
| Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration | Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days) | Time to KPS deterioration was defined as the time from screening to the first date of deterioration of the KPS score. Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Time to KPS deterioration was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. If the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. |
| Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration | Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days) | WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. |
| Time to WHO PS Deterioration | Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days) | Time to WHO PS deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of deterioration of the WHO performance status score. WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. |
| Time to Corticosteroid Initiation | Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days) | Time to corticosteroid initiation was defined as the time from screening to the start date of the first corticosteroid administration in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage ≥2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. Instead, if the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. Time to corticosteroid initiation was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days) | PFS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using the RANO or the Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration. |
Countries
Italy
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Study included 28-day screening period. Participants were randomized according to a 2:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment groups. A total of 99 participants were screened, of which 91 were randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Bevacizumab Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation. | 59 |
| Fotemustine Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation. | 32 |
| Total | 91 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 12 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Clinical Disease Progression | 7 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 37 | 25 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal for Economic Reason | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Bevacizumab | Fotemustine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.86 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 | 55.63 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64 | 56.43 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 20 Participants | 9 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 39 Participants | 23 Participants | 62 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 35 / 59 | 25 / 32 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 17 / 59 | 6 / 32 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline until death (up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Overall Survival (OS) | 7.26 months |
| Fotemustine | Overall Survival (OS) | 8.66 months |
Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants with at least one administration of the study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment | 62.07 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment | 73.33 percentage of participants |
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global QOL/functional scales indicates better level of QOL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale indicates greater degree of symptoms.
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome, and n signified participants with evaluable data for specified category for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.33 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 67.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.04 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 6.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.01 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 2.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.87 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 14.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.88 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.87 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.05 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 36 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | -12.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.96 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | -50.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | -50.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 73.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.47 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -8.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.62 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -0.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 10.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.63 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -5.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.65 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 14.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.53 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.64 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 8.33 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 8.33 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 70.40 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.18 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 4.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.49 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 2.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.67 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 10.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.11 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.67 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -1.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.44 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.97 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 72.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.07 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 1.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.12 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 1.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.07 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 13.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 39.32 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -7.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.32 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -5.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.05 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.96 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | -12.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.46 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | -66.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | -66.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Screening (n=58,31) | 58.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.4 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -3.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.17 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -4.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.39 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.11 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 3.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.91 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -2.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.34 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 10.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.23 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 2.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.94 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Screening (n=58,31) | 31.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -3.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.59 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 2.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -6.35 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.79 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 3.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.82 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 9.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.2 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.98 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 2.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.6 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Screening (n=58,31) | 2.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 1.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.68 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -5.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.56 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -9.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.78 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | -16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | -16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Screening (n=58,31) | 6.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.82 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -1.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.61 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -10.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.72 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.31 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.67 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -7.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.84 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -29.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.46 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | -16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | -16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Screening (n=58,31) | 11.49 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.12 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 4.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.2 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -9.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.51 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.22 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 3.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.03 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.67 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.22 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Screening (n=58,31) | 18.39 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.73 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 1.23 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.29 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 2.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.04 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -9.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 46.09 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 28.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 14.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.22 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 25.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.91 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 33.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.22 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Screening (n=58,31) | 7.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.79 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.65 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -2.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.61 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -7.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -7.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | -16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Screening (n=58,31) | 17.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.36 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 8 (n=26,16) | 3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.52 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 4.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.21 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.52 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.49 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 3.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.06 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.22 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | -33.33 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | -33.33 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Screening (n=58,31) | 1.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.14 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -6.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.69 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -7.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 17.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.91 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 6.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.21 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 2.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.26 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -3.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.06 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.25 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.91 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Functioning (Fn): Screening (n=58,31) | 71.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.65 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 10.37 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.07 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 7.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.17 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 13.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.17 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 18.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.21 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 4.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.72 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 3.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.78 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | 6.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.43 |
| Bevacizumab | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.79 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 8 (n=26,16) | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.87 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 73.66 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.14 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.52 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.23 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -9.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.2 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 25.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.11 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Role Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 74.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.41 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Screening (n=58,31) | 3.23 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.02 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.91 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.57 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.52 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -6.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.84 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -33.33 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.39 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 8.33 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 8.33 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Emotional Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 79.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.33 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 7.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.55 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 9.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 46 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.31 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.79 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Functioning (Fn): Screening (n=58,31) | 78.92 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.07 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Dyspnea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Screening (n=58,31) | 81.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.24 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Screening (n=58,31) | 18.28 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.51 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.96 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.23 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.33 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 13.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.43 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.79 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -4.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.99 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Screening (n=58,31) | 2.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.32 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 16.67 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -33.33 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.57 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.57 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Social Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Screening (n=58,31) | 66.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 33.33 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 6.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.87 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | 7.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.76 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 7.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.78 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 33.33 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -12.50 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.68 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Insomnia: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | QOL: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 6.67 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Screening (n=58,31) | 24.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.05 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Screening (n=58,31) | 5.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.46 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -13.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.73 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -9.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.48 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -10.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.47 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | -11.11 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | -5.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.86 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -14.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.23 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | -11.11 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | -11.11 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | 8.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.72 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Fatigue: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Screening (n=58,31) | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.16 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.91 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -14.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.25 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2) | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 0.00 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Physical Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1) | 6.67 units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Nausea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Diarrhea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Screening (n=58,31) | 14.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.47 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Appetite loss: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16) | -6.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.44 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Financial Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0) | NA units on a scale | — |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Pain: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7) | -2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.25 |
| Fotemustine | Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72 | Constipation: Screening (n=58,31) | 17.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.63 |
Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment | 25.86 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment | 40.00 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 600)
Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug | 93.10 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug | 90.00 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: 9 months
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment | 37.93 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment | 46.67 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Corticosteroid use was classified as: 1. No Change (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was equal to baseline); 2. Decreased (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was lower than baseline); 3. Increased (corticosteroid dose at each assessment was greater than baseline).
Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, post-treatment follow-up (up to Day 691)
Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome, and n signified participants with evaluable data for specified category for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Follow-up: Decreased (n=9,3) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 8: Increased (n=52,28) | 17.31 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 8: Decreased (n=52,28) | 23.08 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 8: No Change (n=52,28) | 59.62 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 16: Increased (n=33,18) | 21.21 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 16: Decreased (n=33,18) | 36.36 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 16: No Change (n=33,18) | 42.42 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 24: Increased (n=21,5) | 28.57 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 24: Decreased (n=21,5) | 33.33 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 24: No Change (n=21,5) | 38.10 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 32: Increased (n=14,3) | 14.29 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 32: Decreased (n=14,3) | 42.86 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 32: No Change (n=14,3) | 42.86 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 40: Increased (n=10,2) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 40: Decreased (n=10,2) | 60.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 40: No Change (n=10,2) | 40.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 48: Increased (n=8,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 48: Decreased (n=8,1) | 50.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 48: No Change (n=8,1) | 50.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 56: Increased (n=6,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 56: Decreased (n=6,1) | 33.33 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 56: No Change (n=6,1) | 66.67 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 64: Increased (n=3,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 64: Decreased (n=3,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 64: No Change (n=3,1) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 72: Increased (n=3,0) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 72: Decreased (n=3,0) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 72: No Change (n=3,0) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 80: Increased (n=1,0) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 80: Decreased (n=1,0) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 80: No Change (n=1,0) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 88: Increased (n=1,0) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 88: Decreased (n=1,0) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 88: No Change (n=1,0) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Follow-up: Increased (n=9,3) | 33.33 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Follow-up: No Change (n=9,3) | 66.67 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 48: No Change (n=8,1) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 8: Increased (n=52,28) | 17.86 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 88: Decreased (n=1,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 56: Increased (n=6,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 8: Decreased (n=52,28) | 21.43 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 80: Increased (n=1,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 8: No Change (n=52,28) | 60.71 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 56: Decreased (n=6,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 16: Increased (n=33,18) | 22.22 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Follow-up: Decreased (n=9,3) | 33.33 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 16: Decreased (n=33,18) | 27.78 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 56: No Change (n=6,1) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 16: No Change (n=33,18) | 50.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 80: Decreased (n=1,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 24: Increased (n=21,5) | 20.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 64: Increased (n=3,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 24: Decreased (n=21,5) | 40.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 88: No Change (n=1,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 24: No Change (n=21,5) | 40.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 64: Decreased (n=3,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 32: Increased (n=14,3) | 33.33 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 80: No Change (n=1,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 32: Decreased (n=14,3) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 64: No Change (n=3,1) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 32: No Change (n=14,3) | 66.67 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Follow-up: No Change (n=9,3) | 66.67 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 40: Increased (n=10,2) | 50.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 72: Increased (n=3,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 40: Decreased (n=10,2) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 88: Increased (n=1,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 40: No Change (n=10,2) | 50.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 72: Decreased (n=3,0) | NA percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 48: Increased (n=8,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Follow-up: Increased (n=9,3) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 48: Decreased (n=8,1) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use | Week 72: No Change (n=3,0) | NA percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per the RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per the Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment | 26.32 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment | 10.71 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Percentage of participants achieving CR or PR as overall response between first drug administration and documented disease progression were calculated. Tumor response was evaluated according to both the RANO and the Macdonald response criteria. As per Macdonald criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all enhancing disease, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesions along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with no corticosteroid; PR was defined as a 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesion along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with stable or reduced corticosteroids. RANO criteria defined CR and PR the same as Macdonald criteria with the following additions: CR - improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR - no progression of non-measurable disease, stable or improved non enhancing FLAIR/T2 lesions.
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) | RANO Evaluation | 28.81 percentage of participants |
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) | MacDonald Evaluation | 28.81 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) | RANO Evaluation | 9.38 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) | MacDonald Evaluation | 6.25 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period
Corticosteroid initiation was assessed in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage greater than equal to (\>/=) 2 mg dexamethasone equivalent.
Time frame: Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population. Number of participants analyzed signified participants who were not receiving corticosteroids at screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period | 58.82 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period | 41.67 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time frame: Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration | 18.92 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration | 14.29 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration
WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time frame: Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration | 47.46 percentage of participants |
| Fotemustine | Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration | 37.50 percentage of participants |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using the RANO or the Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 3.38 months |
| Fotemustine | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 3.45 months |
Time to Corticosteroid Initiation
Time to corticosteroid initiation was defined as the time from screening to the start date of the first corticosteroid administration in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage ≥2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. Instead, if the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. Time to corticosteroid initiation was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population. Number of participants analyzed signified participants who were not receiving corticosteroids at screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Time to Corticosteroid Initiation | 4.49 months |
| Fotemustine | Time to Corticosteroid Initiation | 5.93 months |
Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
Time to KPS deterioration was defined as the time from screening to the first date of deterioration of the KPS score. Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Time to KPS deterioration was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. If the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date.
Time frame: Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration | NA months |
| Fotemustine | Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration | NA months |
Time to WHO PS Deterioration
Time to WHO PS deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of deterioration of the WHO performance status score. WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time frame: Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Time to WHO PS Deterioration | 8.87 months |
| Fotemustine | Time to WHO PS Deterioration | NA months |