Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Radiochemotherapy for Cancer of the Esophagus or Cardia

Adjuvant Treatment of Cancer of the Esophagus or Cardia Before Resection With Curative Intent. Comparative Study Between Chemotherapy and Radiochemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01362127
Acronym
NeoRes
Enrollment
181
Registered
2011-05-27
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2018-06-25
Last updated
2020-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia

Keywords

Histologically confirmed squamos cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.Suitable for surgery.

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized study is to clarify if neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy gives a higher degree of complete histological response than neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery in patients undergoing treatment for cancer of the esophagus or cardia.

Interventions

DRUGChemotherapy

Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values.

Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Umeå
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Örebro County
CollaboratorOTHER
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ullevaal University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Haukeland University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Malarhospital Eskilstuna
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Karolinska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically verified squamos cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of the esopohagus or gastric cardia (type II) * Tumor located in cervical oesophagus, not requiring laryngo-esophagectomy. Patients with performance status 0-1 axxording to WHO scale and with resectable tumours, as assessed at the prerandomisation evaluation * Adequate haemotological function, defined as having WBC \> 3 x 10(9)/litre and platelets \> 100 x 10 (9)/litre. * Adequate renal function defined as having normal serum creatinine level and/or calculated glomerular filtration rate \> 60 ml/min. * Tumour stage: T1Ni, T2N0, T2N1, T3N0, T3N1, M1a

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy and/or lactation. Women of childbearing ages can be included and provided that adequate contraceptive methods are used * Patients with diabetes complications (e.g. rethinopathy, neuropathy) as well as patients with uncontrolled cardiac disease or myocard infarction within 12 months are considered unsuitable for chemoradiotherapy. * Concomitant malignancy (\< 5 years since diagnosis) that can interfere the interpretation of study results, ongoing antitumoral treatment. * Patients being unable tom comply with the protocol * Tumor stage T1 N0, T4 NX or TXNXM1b

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pathological Complete Histological Response (pCR) After Resection Than Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Resectable Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Cardia.Therapy followed in 14-16 weeks before surgery. After surgery the patients will be followed until 60 weeks after completed therapy.Chireac tumour regression grade

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of Respective Neoadjuvant Therapies.Five years follow upSafety profile of carrying out radical surgery after respective neoadjuvant therapy.
HRQOL and Swallowing FunctionEntry study up to Five years follow upThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and disease specific questionnaires (QLQ-OES24/OG25). All items included in the questionnaires are analysed and also separate analysis of dysphagia questionnaires for oesophageal cancer were used, both clinically and psychometrically validated. All questions have four response alternatives (1, not at all; 2:a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much), except global scales which comprise seven response alternatives from poor to excellent. Questionnaire responses were transformed lineraly into scores ranging from 0 to 100 according to the EORTC scoring manual. A higher score indicates either more symotoms or better function, depending on the question.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radiochemotherapy
Radiochemotherapy + Surgery Radiochemotherapy: Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values.
90
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy + surgery Chemotherapy: Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values. Radiochemotherapy: Cisplantin 100 mg/m2 day 1. 5-fluoracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours infusion day 1-5. Three cycles. In the chemoradiation arm the radiotherapy start week 4 and continuing until week 7. Dose adjustet according to current LPK and TPK values.
91
Total181

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadiochemotherapyChemotherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
38 Participants36 Participants74 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
52 Participants55 Participants107 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
90 participants91 participants181 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants14 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants77 Participants149 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 900 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
57 / 9041 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Pathological Complete Histological Response (pCR) After Resection Than Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Resectable Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Cardia.

Chireac tumour regression grade

Time frame: Therapy followed in 14-16 weeks before surgery. After surgery the patients will be followed until 60 weeks after completed therapy.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RadiochemotherapyPathological Complete Histological Response (pCR) After Resection Than Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Resectable Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Cardia.22 Participants
ChemotherapyPathological Complete Histological Response (pCR) After Resection Than Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Resectable Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Cardia.7 Participants
Secondary

HRQOL and Swallowing Function

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and disease specific questionnaires (QLQ-OES24/OG25). All items included in the questionnaires are analysed and also separate analysis of dysphagia questionnaires for oesophageal cancer were used, both clinically and psychometrically validated. All questions have four response alternatives (1, not at all; 2:a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much), except global scales which comprise seven response alternatives from poor to excellent. Questionnaire responses were transformed lineraly into scores ranging from 0 to 100 according to the EORTC scoring manual. A higher score indicates either more symotoms or better function, depending on the question.

Time frame: Entry study up to Five years follow up

Population: Number of patients who responded to quality of Life instruments the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the oesophageal specific instrument

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
RadiochemotherapyHRQOL and Swallowing FunctionMean global QoL67 units on a scale
RadiochemotherapyHRQOL and Swallowing FunctionDysphagia score all27 units on a scale
ChemotherapyHRQOL and Swallowing FunctionMean global QoL69 units on a scale
ChemotherapyHRQOL and Swallowing FunctionDysphagia score all31 units on a scale
Secondary

Safety of Respective Neoadjuvant Therapies.

Safety profile of carrying out radical surgery after respective neoadjuvant therapy.

Time frame: Five years follow up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RadiochemotherapySafety of Respective Neoadjuvant Therapies.79 Participants
ChemotherapySafety of Respective Neoadjuvant Therapies.81 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026