Skip to content

A Double Blind Study in Pediatric Subjects With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Studying Adalimumab vs. Methotrexate

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-dummy, Double-blind Study Evaluating Two Doses of Adalimumab Versus Methotrexate (MTX) in Pediatric Subjects With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (Ps)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01251614
Enrollment
114
Registered
2010-12-02
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2017-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plaque Psoriasis

Keywords

Randomized, Double-blind, Chronic plaque psoriasis, Pediatric

Brief summary

This study will compare how well adalimumab works versus methotrexate (MTX) in children with moderate to severe psoriasis in the short term. It will also study how safe and how well adalimumab works in the long term and how long disease response can be maintained after stopping therapy.

Detailed description

The study had a 30-day screening period and a multi-period study design, as described below: Period A - Primary Treatment Phase: Participants were randomized to receive adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg, adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg, or MTX in 1:1:1 ratio for 16 weeks. Period B - Treatment Withdrawal Phase: Responders were withdrawn from active treatment and monitored for loss of disease control for up to 36 weeks. Period C - Re-Treatment Phase: Participants who had experienced loss of disease control in Period B were re-treated with adalimumab for 16 weeks. Period D - Long-Term Follow-Up Phase: Participants received adalimumab or were observed off-treatment (if disease remained under control) for 52 weeks.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAdalimumab

Adalimumab by subcutaneous injection every other week (eow)

DRUGMethotrexate

Methotrexate 0.1 mg/kg at Week 0 and up to 0.4 mg/kg per week (maximum dose of 25 mg/week) orally.

A single subcutaneous loading dose at Week 0 followed by eow dosing beginning at Week 1.

Orally once a week

Sponsors

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is ≥ 4 years and \< 18 years of age; 2. Subject weighs ≥ 13 kg; 3. Subject must have failed to respond to topical therapy; 4. Subject must need systemic treatment to control his/her disease and meet one of the following: * Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) ≥ 4 * Body surface area (BSA) involved \> 20% * Very thick lesions with BSA \> 10% * Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) \> 20 * PASI \> 10 and at least one of the following: * Active psoriatic arthritis unresponsive to non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) * Clinically relevant facial involvement * Clinically relevant genital involvement * Clinically relevant hand and/or foot involvement * Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) \> 10 5. If subject is \< 12 years of age and resides in a geographic region where heliotherapy is practical, subject must have failed to respond, be intolerant, or have a contraindication to heliotherapy, or is not a suitable candidate for heliotherapy; 6. If ≥ 12 years of age, subject must have failed to respond, be intolerant, or have a contraindication to phototherapy, or is not a suitable candidate for phototherapy; 7. Subject must have a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis for at least 6 months as determined by the subject's medical history and confirmation of diagnosis through physical examination by the Investigator; 8. Subject must have stable plaque psoriasis for at least 2 months prior to Baseline

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior biologic use other than prior treatment with etanercept; 2. Treatment with etanercept therapy within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline visit; 3. Methotrexate (MTX) use within the past year or prior MTX use at any time where the subject did not respond, or did not tolerate MTX; 4\. Contraindication for treatment with MTX during the study; 5. Erythrodermic psoriasis, generalized or localized pustular psoriasis, medication-induced or medication exacerbated psoriasis or new onset guttate psoriasis; 6. Infection(s) requiring treatment with intravenous (IV) anti-infectives within 30 days prior to the Baseline Visit or oral anti-infectives within 14 days prior to the Baseline Visit; 7. Treatment of psoriasis with topical therapies such as corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, or retinoids within 7 days prior to the Baseline visit; 8. Treatment of psoriasis with ultraviolet (UV)B phototherapy, excessive sun exposure, or the use of tanning beds within 7 days prior to the Baseline visit; 9. Treatment of psoriasis with ultraviolet A with psoralen (PUVA) phototherapy, non-biologic systemic therapies for the treatment of psoriasis, or systemic therapies known to improve psoriasis within 14 days prior to the Baseline visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16Baseline and Week 16PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score at Week 16.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16Week 16The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: * 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; * 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \<5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; * 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; * 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; * 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; * 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) or minimal (1) is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) is a 10-item questionnaire to measure the quality of life in children aged from 4 to 16 years. Each question is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.
Change From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16The PedsQL Measurement Model measures health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents. The 23-item PedsQL Generic Core Scale includes Physical, Emotional, Social, School Functioning dimensions. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL; the total score therefore ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Upon Re-Treatment in Period CPeriod C, Week 16The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \< 5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) or minimal (1) is reported.
Time to Loss of Disease Control for Participants Who Entered Period BPeriod B (36 weeks) and Period D (52 weeks)Loss of disease control was defined as a worsening of PGA scores in comparison to Week 16 of Period A by at least 2 grades after treatment withdrawal. The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. Scores range from 0 (no evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation) to 5 (very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation). Participants who did not lose disease control in period B continued off drug into period D and were observed off-drug until they finally lost disease control or until the end of the 52 weeks of period D.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Weeks 4, 8 and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \<5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) or minimal (1) is reported.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Weeks 4, 8, 11 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \<5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) is reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimeBaseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, 11 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 50 response is at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimeBaseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 75 response is at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response at Week 16Baseline and Week 16PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 90 response is at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score at Week 16.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimeBaseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 100 response is a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimeBaseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, 11 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis).
Change From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimeBaseline, Period A, Weeks 4, and 8, Period C, Weeks 0 and 4, Period D, Weeks 0, 11, 28, and 52The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) is a 10-item questionnaire to measure the quality of life in children aged from 4 to 16 years. Each question is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.
Percentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Weeks 4, 8 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 4, Period D, Weeks 0, 11, 28, and 52The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) is a 10-item questionnaire to measure the quality of life in children aged from 4 to 16 years. Each question is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired and a score of 0 indicates no impairment in quality of life.
Time to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APeriod A, 16 weeksParticipants who did not have a response during Period A were censored.
Change From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimeBaseline, Period A, Weeks 4 and 8, Period C, Weeks 0 and 4, Period D, Weeks 0, 11, 28, and 52The PedsQL Measurement Model measures health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents. The 23-item PedsQL Generic Core Scale includes Physical, Emotional, Social, School Functioning dimensions. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL; the total score therefore ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Change From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, and 16The CDI:S is a short 10-item self-rated symptom-oriented scale used to screen for depressive symptoms. CDI:S scores range from 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating fewer depressive symptoms.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimeBaseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8 and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 90 response is at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response at Week 16Baseline and Week 16PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 100 response is a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score at Week 16.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 38 sites in Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, and Turkey.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized to receive adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg, adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg, or methotrexate (MTX) in a 1:1:1 ratio and were stratified according to prior history of etanercept treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Methotrexate
Participants received 0.1 mg/kg methotrexate at Baseline (Week 0), and up to 0.4 mg/kg weekly (maximum dose of 25 mg/week) in Period A. Participants also received adalimumab placebo as a single subcutaneous loading dose at Week 0, followed by every other week (eow) dosing from Week 1. Participants who were non-responders in period A entered Period D directly and received open-label adalimumab at 0.8 mg/kg eow for up to 52 weeks. Participants who responded in Period A entered the Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Period B) for up to 36 weeks. Participants who experienced a loss of disease control in Period B entered the Re-treatment Phase (Period C) and received blinded adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg eow for 16 weeks. Participants who completed Period B with no loss of disease control entered Period D and were observed off study medication for up to 52 weeks. Participants who completed Period C entered Period D for an additional 52 weeks of treatment with blinded adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg eow.
37
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg
In Period A participants received a single subcutaneous loading dose of adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 20 mg) at Week 0 followed by every other week dosing beginning at Week 1. To maintain the blind, participants also received weekly dosing of methotrexate placebo tablets. Participants who were non-responders in Period A entered Period D directly and received open-label adalimumab at 0.8 mg/kg eow for up to 52 weeks. Participants who responded in Period A entered the Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Period B) for up to 36 weeks. Participants who experienced a loss of disease control in Period B entered the Re-treatment Phase (Period C) and received blinded adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg eow for 16 weeks. Participants who completed Period B with no loss of disease control entered Period D and were observed off study medication for up to 52 weeks. Participants who completed Period C entered Period D for an additional 52 weeks of treatment with blinded adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg eow.
39
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg
In Period A participants received a single subcutaneous loading dose of adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 40 mg) at Week 0 followed by every other week dosing beginning at Week 1. To maintain the blind, participants also received weekly dosing of methotrexate placebo tablets. Participants who were non-responders in Period A entered Period D directly and received open-label adalimumab at 0.8 mg/kg eow for up to 52 weeks. Participants who responded in Period A entered the Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Period B) for up to 36 weeks. Participants who experienced a loss of disease control in Period B entered the Re-treatment Phase (Period C) and received blinded adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg eow for 16 weeks. Participants who completed Period B with no loss of disease control entered Period D and were observed off study medication for up to 52 weeks. Participants who completed Period C entered Period D for an additional 52 weeks of treatment with blinded adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg eow.
38
Total114

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event101
Overall StudyClearing of Psoriatic Lesions100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy194
Overall StudyLoss of Disease Control010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010
Overall StudyPregnancy002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject021

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdalimumab 0.4 mg/kgTotalMethotrexateAdalimumab 0.8 mg/kg
Age, Continuous12.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.43
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.76
13.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.49
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.29
Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis
Cleared
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis
Marked
15 Participants49 Participants17 Participants17 Participants
Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis
Mild
3 Participants7 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis
Minimal
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis
Moderate
18 Participants54 Participants19 Participants17 Participants
Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis
Severe
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)16.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.76
18.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.78
19.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.02
18.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mutli Race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
34 Participants103 Participants34 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants65 Participants26 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants49 Participants11 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 3727 / 3923 / 386 / 136 / 186 / 235 / 1116 / 278 / 1364 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 373 / 390 / 380 / 130 / 181 / 230 / 110 / 270 / 135 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: * 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; * 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \<5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; * 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; * 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; * 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; * 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) or minimal (1) is reported.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1640.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1641.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 1660.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: The a priori defined order of the statistical hypotheses was as follows:~1. Superiority of adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg versus MTX for the percentage of participants achieving a ≥ PASI 75 response at Week 16.~2. Superiority of adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg versus MTX, for the percentage of participants achieving a PGA cleared or minimal at Week 16.~This order was adhered to for confirmatory testing, all statistical tests were at a level of significance of 5% and the overall type I error was preserved.p-value: 0.08395% CI: [-42.2, 2.2]Chi-squared
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score at Week 16.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 1632.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 1643.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 1657.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: The a priori defined order of the statistical hypotheses was as follows:~1. Superiority of adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg versus MTX for the percentage of participants achieving a ≥ PASI 75 response at Week 16.~2. Superiority of adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg versus MTX, for the percentage of participants achieving a PGA cleared or minimal at Week 16.~This order was adhered to for confirmatory testing, all statistical tests were at a level of significance of 5% and the overall type I error was preserved.p-value: 0.02795% CI: [-47.2, -3.7]Chi-squared
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CDLQI Over Time

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) is a 10-item questionnaire to measure the quality of life in children aged from 4 to 16 years. Each question is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, and 8, Period C, Weeks 0 and 4, Period D, Weeks 0, 11, 28, and 52

Population: LOCF imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with available data at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod A, Week 4-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod A, Week 8-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod C, Week 0-6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.55
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod C, Week 4-9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.92
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 0-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.55
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 11-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.37
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 28-8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.93
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 52-8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.08
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod C, Week 0-4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.08
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 28-6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.91
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod C, Week 4-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.24
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 0-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 11-6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod A, Week 4-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod A, Week 8-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.29
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 52-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.12
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod C, Week 0-6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.92
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod A, Week 8-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.66
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod A, Week 4-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod C, Week 4-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.63
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 28-8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.72
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 11-7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.21
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 0-6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in CDLQI Over TimePeriod D, Week 52-8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PedsQL Over Time

The PedsQL Measurement Model measures health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents. The 23-item PedsQL Generic Core Scale includes Physical, Emotional, Social, School Functioning dimensions. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL; the total score therefore ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4 and 8, Period C, Weeks 0 and 4, Period D, Weeks 0, 11, 28, and 52

Population: LOCF imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with available data at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 02.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.93
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod C, Week 03.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.45
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 528.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.93
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod C, Week 45.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.08
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod A, Week 4-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.75
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 288.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod A, Week 80.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 115.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.36
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 5214.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod A, Week 87.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.16
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod A, Week 44.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod C, Week 08.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.35
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod C, Week 411.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.19
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 09.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 1112.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.03
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 2814.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.19
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 010.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.86
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod A, Week 48.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.95
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 5213.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.36
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 1112.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.13
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod C, Week 014.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.25
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod C, Week 416.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.35
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod A, Week 88.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.45
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in PedsQL Over TimePeriod D, Week 2813.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)

The CDI:S is a short 10-item self-rated symptom-oriented scale used to screen for depressive symptoms. CDI:S scores range from 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating fewer depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, and 16

Population: LOCF imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with available data at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 16-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.88
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 80.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.26
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 40.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.85
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 16-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.12
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 4-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.64
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 8-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.52
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 8-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.52
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 4-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.86
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Depression Inventory: Short (CDI:S)Period A, Week 16-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) is a 10-item questionnaire to measure the quality of life in children aged from 4 to 16 years. Each question is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population; only participants with Baseline and at least one post-baseline value are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.11
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score at Week 16-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.22
Comparison: Statistical comparisons for the ranked secondary endpoints were carried out in hierarchical order. All statistical tests were 2-sided with the significance level of 5%. Statistically significant results (p-value ≤ 0.05) must have been achieved for a comparison in the higher rank in order to initiate the next comparison in the lower rank.p-value: 0.30495% CI: [-1.48, 4.7]ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score at Week 16

The PedsQL Measurement Model measures health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents. The 23-item PedsQL Generic Core Scale includes Physical, Emotional, Social, School Functioning dimensions. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL; the total score therefore ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: LOCF imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population; only participants with Baseline and at least one post-baseline value are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexateChange From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score at Week 161.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.41
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score at Week 169.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.25
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score at Week 1610.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.38
Comparison: Statistical comparisons for the ranked secondary endpoints were carried out in hierarchical order. All statistical tests were 2-sided with the significance level of 5%. Statistically significant results (p-value ≤ 0.05) must have been achieved for a comparison in the higher rank in order to initiate the next comparison in the lower rank.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-14.94, -2.82]ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over Time

The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \<5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) or minimal (1) is reported.

Time frame: Period A, Weeks 4, 8 and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 1118.9 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 5275.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 1677.8 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod C, Week 1662.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 88.1 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 030.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 4069.4 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 2869.4 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 48.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 1638.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 2850.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 4050.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 1130.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 5250.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod C, Week 1627.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 420.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 019.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 835.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 5255.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 428.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 844.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod A, Week 1147.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod C, Week 1652.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 038.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 1650.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 2863.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimePeriod D, Week 4061.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Upon Re-Treatment in Period C

The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \< 5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) or minimal (1) is reported.

Time frame: Period C, Week 16

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population who entered Period C.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Upon Re-Treatment in Period C62.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Upon Re-Treatment in Period C27.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Upon Re-Treatment in Period C52.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: The difference between the combined adalimumab 0.8 mg/kg + MTX groups versus the adalimumab 0.4 mg/kg group.~Statistical comparisons for the ranked secondary endpoints were carried out in hierarchical order. All statistical tests were to be 2-sided with the significance level of 5%. Statistically significant results (P value ≤ 0.05) must have been achieved for a comparison in the higher rank in order to initiate the next comparison in the lower rank.p-value: 0.11395% CI: [-60.6, 4]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over Time

The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. The degree of overall lesion severity was evaluated using the following categories: 0 (Cleared): No evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation; 1 (Minimal): Occasional fine scale over \<5% of lesions, faint erythema, minimal plaque elevation; 2 (Mild): Fine scale dominates, light red coloration, mild plaque elevation; 3 (Moderate): Course scale dominates, moderate red coloration, moderate plaque elevation; 4 (Marked): Thick non-tenacious scale dominates, bright red coloration, marked plaque elevation; 5 (Severe): Very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation. The percentage of participants achieving a score of clear (0) is reported.

Time frame: Period A, Weeks 4, 8, 11 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 80.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 08.3 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 2833.3 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 40.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 110.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 168.1 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod C, Week 1625.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 1625.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 4033.3 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 5241.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 2816.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 1110.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 5225.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 1612.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 4016.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod C, Week 169.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 05.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 1611.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 42.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 812.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 85.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 1110.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 5225.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 011.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 1618.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod A, Week 42.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 2822.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 4027.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod D, Week 1625.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving a PGA of Cleared (0) Over TimePeriod C, Week 1615.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response at Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 100 response is a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score at Week 16.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response at Week 162.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response at Week 1610.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response at Week 1618.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Statistical comparisons for the ranked secondary endpoints were carried out in hierarchical order. All statistical tests were 2-sided with the significance level of 5%. Statistically significant results (p-value ≤ 0.05) must have been achieved for a comparison in the higher rank in order to initiate the next comparison in the lower rank.p-value: 0.05695% CI: [-29.1, -2.3]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over Time

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 100 response is a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5241.7 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1613.9 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 80.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 08.3 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1625.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4030.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 110.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 40.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2827.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 40.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 85.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 115.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 169.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 05.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1611.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2813.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4013.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5225.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1625.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1110.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 42.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2819.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 85.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1615.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5222.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 011.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 100 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4022.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over Time

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 50 response is at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, 11 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1691.7 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1654.1 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4091.7 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 052.8 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 062.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1687.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 840.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 416.2 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2888.9 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1151.4 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5291.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 090.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5266.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 441.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 856.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1161.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1666.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1690.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 063.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1669.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2872.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4063.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 452.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 075.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1171.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5277.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1688.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 865.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 052.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4083.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1689.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2886.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1678.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over Time

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 75 response is at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1686.1 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 037.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4077.8 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 030.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1675.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 813.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 40.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2880.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1121.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5286.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1654.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 415.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 838.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1143.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 018.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5247.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 027.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1650.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2858.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4052.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1160.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5272.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1661.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 847.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4075.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2877.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1678.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 021.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 423.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 75 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 050.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response at Week 16

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 90 response is at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score at Week 16.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response at Week 1621.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response at Week 1630.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response at Week 1628.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Statistical comparisons for the ranked secondary endpoints were carried out in hierarchical order. All statistical tests were 2-sided with the significance level of 5%. Statistically significant results (p-value ≤ 0.05) must have been achieved for a comparison in the higher rank in order to initiate the next comparison in the lower rank.p-value: 0.46695% CI: [-26.9, 12.3]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over Time

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 90 response is at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8 and 11, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2855.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 82.7 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1662.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 112.7 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5266.7 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 025.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4055.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1663.9 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 40.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1636.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2833.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4036.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1128.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5233.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1627.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 820.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 016.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 45.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 5244.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 45.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 823.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod A, Week 1128.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 010.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod C, Week 1657.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 1638.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 2841.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 4047.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 90 Response Over TimePeriod D, Week 036.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over Time

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) is a 10-item questionnaire to measure the quality of life in children aged from 4 to 16 years. Each question is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CDLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired and a score of 0 indicates no impairment in quality of life.

Time frame: Period A, Weeks 4, 8 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 4, Period D, Weeks 0, 11, 28, and 52

Population: Non-responder imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 1125.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 2830.6 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 1610.8 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 5241.7 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 45.4 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod C, Week 00.0 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 810.8 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod C, Week 412.5 percentage of participants
MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 016.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 022.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 1116.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 45.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod C, Week 436.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 2822.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod C, Week 036.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 812.8 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 5216.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 1620.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 5233.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 410.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 85.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod A, Week 1623.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod C, Week 021.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod C, Week 431.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 1133.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 2830.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With CDLQI = 0 Over TimePeriod D, Week 027.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over Time

PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis).

Time frame: Baseline, Period A, Weeks 4, 8, 11 and 16, Period C, Weeks 0 and 16, Period D, Weeks 0, 16, 28, 40 and 52

Population: LOCF imputation was used, the analysis was conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 8-30.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 45.89
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 16-82.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.38
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod C, Week 0-59.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.61
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 4-14.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 36.71
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 0-41.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 54.99
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod C, Week 16-87.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.47
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 40-83.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.94
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 11-36.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 51.69
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 52-86.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.92
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 28-81.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.86
MethotrexatePercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 16-42.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 54.24
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 28-65.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 36.99
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 4-36.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.62
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 8-48.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 44.74
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 11-51.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 50.19
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 16-52.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 51.79
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod C, Week 0-65.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.16
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod C, Week 16-74.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.79
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 0-46.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 49.27
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 16-66.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.51
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 40-64.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.46
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 52-58.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 53.21
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 16-65.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 39.44
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 4-48.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.96
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 16-74.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 37.44
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 11-62.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.02
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 28-81.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.06
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod A, Week 8-60.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.98
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 52-80.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.17
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod C, Week 16-69.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 69.79
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod C, Week 0-45.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 39.64
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 40-82.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.99
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline in PASI Score Over TimePeriod D, Week 0-61.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.96
Secondary

Time to Loss of Disease Control for Participants Who Entered Period B

Loss of disease control was defined as a worsening of PGA scores in comparison to Week 16 of Period A by at least 2 grades after treatment withdrawal. The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of disease at the time of the evaluation. Scores range from 0 (no evidence of scaling, erythema, or plaque elevation) to 5 (very thick tenacious scale predominates, dusky to deep red coloration, severe plaque elevation). Participants who did not lose disease control in period B continued off drug into period D and were observed off-drug until they finally lost disease control or until the end of the 52 weeks of period D.

Time frame: Period B (36 weeks) and Period D (52 weeks)

Population: This analysis was conducted in the ITT population who entered period B, no imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MethotrexateTime to Loss of Disease Control for Participants Who Entered Period B184 days
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgTime to Loss of Disease Control for Participants Who Entered Period B217 days
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgTime to Loss of Disease Control for Participants Who Entered Period B118 days
Comparison: Statistical comparisons for the ranked secondary endpoints were carried out in hierarchical order. All statistical tests were 2-sided with the significance level of 5%. Statistically significant results (P value ≤ 0.05) must have been achieved for a comparison in the higher rank in order to initiate the next comparison in the lower rank.p-value: 0.34395% CI: [0.66, 3.17]Log Rank
Comparison: Statistical comparisons for the ranked secondary endpoints were carried out in hierarchical order. All statistical tests were 2-sided with the significance level of 5%. Statistically significant results (P value ≤ 0.05) must have been achieved for a comparison in the higher rank in order to initiate the next comparison in the lower rank.p-value: 0.27695% CI: [0.71, 3.21]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period A

Participants who did not have a response during Period A were censored.

Time frame: Period A, 16 weeks

Population: Analysis was conducted in the intent to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MethotrexateTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 5076 days
MethotrexateTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 75116 days
MethotrexateTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 90NA days
MethotrexateTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 100NA days
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 100NA days
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 5055 days
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 90NA days
Adalimumab 0.4 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 75107 days
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 100NA days
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 7559 days
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 90NA days
Adalimumab 0.8 mg/kgTime to PASI 50/75/90/100 Response in Period APASI 5030 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026