Skip to content

Sexual Function and Wellbeing in Females With Rectal Cancer

Sexual Function and Wellbeing in Females Diagnosed With Rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01216189
Enrollment
142
Registered
2010-10-07
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2021-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Rectal cancer, Preoperative radiotherapy, Pelvic surgery, Sexual function, Wellbeing, Hormone levels

Brief summary

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and pelvic surgery is recommended to many patients with rectal cancer. For women there are theoretical reasons to believe that the treatment may affect hormone levels, sexual function and wellbeing. To address these questions a longitudinal observational study was initiated where androgen levels and sexual function were assessed before treatment (baseline) and during a follow-up period of two years.

Detailed description

Women with rectal cancer stage I to III planned for abdominal surgery was included in the study. Women treated with preoperative RT were assigned to the exposed group and women treated with surgery alone were assigned to the unexposed group. 142 participants were enrolled at five outpatient rectal cancer centres in Sweden between 2008 and 2013. Patient data, fasting venous blood samples and questionnaires regarding sexual function and well-being were collected at a baseline visit before start of oncologic treatment, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery (only questionnaires). Women treated with preoperative RT for rectal cancer had an additional venous blood sample taken the day before surgery. Changes in serum levels of testosterone and sexual function during follow-up was assessed and compared between exposed and unexposed participants.

Interventions

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) was administered as either short course (5Gy x5) or long-course (2Gy x25 or 1.8 Gy x25 with or without 3 fractions of boost to the primary tumor and radiologically malignant lymph nodes) treatment with or without concomitant or sequential chemotherapy. Oncological treatment was decided at a multidisciplinary team conference.

Sponsors

Swedish Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Females diagnosed with rectal cancer stadium I-III, planned surgery with or without preoperative radiotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Rectal cancer stadium IV * Previous radiotherapy to the pelvic region * Inability to provide informed consent. * Life expectancy less than 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.Baseline, the week before surgery and 1 year after surgery.Fasting venous blood samples were collected at baseline visit (prior to oncological treatment) and 1 year follow-up. Participants treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) had an additional blood sample taken the day before surgery. Serum testosterone levels (T) were measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using the LC-MS/MS Quattro Premier Xevo TQ MS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The total coefficients of variation (CVtot) were 7% at 2.8 nmol/L and 6% at 15 nmol/L.
Change in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.Baseline, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery.Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI questionnaire is a 19-item multiple-choice, self-assessment tool validated for use in the general population as well as for patients with cancer. It covers six domains of sexual function in women; desire (2 items), arousal (4 items), lubrication (4 items), orgasm (3 items), satisfaction (3 items) and pain (3 items). Items scores between 0 or 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score can be calculated when all items are completed. Minimal total score is 4 points and maximal score is 95 points, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score of less than 26.55 points was used to define overall sexual dysfunction.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from five Swedish outpatient rectal cancer centres in Sweden (Karolinska University Hospital, Ersta Hospital, Örebro University Hospital, Linköping University Hospital and Norrköping Hospital) between June 2008 and August 2013. Of 404 women with rectal cancer assessed for eligibility, 142 were included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Preoperative Radiotherapy
Women with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery.
110
No Preoperative Radiotherapy
Women with rectal cancer treated with surgery alone (no RT).
32
Total142

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath42
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up213

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPreoperative RadiotherapyNo Preoperative Radiotherapy
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Missing
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Adjuvant chemotherapy
No
94 Participants73 Participants21 Participants
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Yes
45 Participants36 Participants9 Participants
Age, Continuous65.5 years62 years69 years
ASA score
I
42 Participants35 Participants7 Participants
ASA score
II
71 Participants58 Participants13 Participants
ASA score
III
25 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
ASA score
Missing
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
BMI24.3 kg/m224.2 kg/m224.4 kg/m2
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Missing
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
No
103 Participants74 Participants29 Participants
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Yes
36 Participants35 Participants1 Participants
Pathological tumour stage
0
11 Participants10 Participants1 Participants
Pathological tumour stage
I
32 Participants24 Participants8 Participants
Pathological tumour stage
II
35 Participants29 Participants6 Participants
Pathological tumour stage
III
52 Participants39 Participants13 Participants
Pathological tumour stage
IV
5 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Pathological tumour stage
Missing
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Resection of gynaecological organs
Hysterectomy
18 Participants13 Participants5 Participants
Resection of gynaecological organs
Missing
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Resection of gynaecological organs
No resection
92 Participants71 Participants21 Participants
Resection of gynaecological organs
Partial vaginal resection
9 Participants9 Participants0 Participants
Resection of gynaecological organs
Unilateral/bilateral oophorectomy
20 Participants16 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
142 Participants110 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Tumour distance from anal verge
0-4 cm
49 Participants45 Participants4 Participants
Tumour distance from anal verge
11-15 cm
35 Participants23 Participants12 Participants
Tumour distance from anal verge
5-10 cm
54 Participants40 Participants14 Participants
Tumour distance from anal verge
Missing
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Type of preoperative RT
Long course (2 Gy x25 or 1.8 x28)
37 Participants37 Participants0 Participants
Type of preoperative RT
No RT
32 Participants0 Participants32 Participants
Type of preoperative RT
Short course (5Gy x5)
73 Participants73 Participants0 Participants
Type of Surgery
Abdominal excision
61 Participants53 Participants8 Participants
Type of Surgery
Anterior resection
74 Participants54 Participants20 Participants
Type of Surgery
Missing
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Type of Surgery
No abdominal surgery
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 1102 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.

Fasting venous blood samples were collected at baseline visit (prior to oncological treatment) and 1 year follow-up. Participants treated with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) had an additional blood sample taken the day before surgery. Serum testosterone levels (T) were measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using the LC-MS/MS Quattro Premier Xevo TQ MS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The total coefficients of variation (CVtot) were 7% at 2.8 nmol/L and 6% at 15 nmol/L.

Time frame: Baseline, the week before surgery and 1 year after surgery.

Population: 17 of the included 142 participants were excluded due to history of oophorectomy, resulting in 125 participants analysed. Participants in the group No preoperative radiotherapy had no blood samples taken at the time point After RT/before surgery.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.Baseline0.6 nmol/l
Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.After RT/before surgery0.6 nmol/l
Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.1 year after surgery0.5 nmol/l
No Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.Baseline0.6 nmol/l
No Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Serum Testosterone Levels Between Baseline and 1 Year After Surgery.1 year after surgery0.6 nmol/l
Comparison: The change in serum testosterone levels between baseline and 1 year was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE).p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.232, -0.044]Regression, Linear
Comparison: The change in serum testosterone levels between baseline and 1 year was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE).p-value: 0.80595% CI: [-0.097, 0.075]Regression, Linear
Primary

Change in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.

Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI questionnaire is a 19-item multiple-choice, self-assessment tool validated for use in the general population as well as for patients with cancer. It covers six domains of sexual function in women; desire (2 items), arousal (4 items), lubrication (4 items), orgasm (3 items), satisfaction (3 items) and pain (3 items). Items scores between 0 or 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score can be calculated when all items are completed. Minimal total score is 4 points and maximal score is 95 points, with lower scores indicating worse function. A total FSFI score of less than 26.55 points was used to define overall sexual dysfunction.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year after surgery and 2 years after surgery.

Population: Of the 142 participants included in the study, 3 were excluded due to not answering FSFI questionnaires at any timepoint. Total FSFI scores were only calculated for available questionnaires without missing items.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.Baseline18.5 score on a scale
Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.1 year after surgery11.1 score on a scale
Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.2 years after surgery10.8 score on a scale
No Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.Baseline6.7 score on a scale
No Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.1 year after surgery5.8 score on a scale
No Preoperative RadiotherapyChange in Sexual Function (Total FSFI Scores) Between Baseline and 2 Years Follow-up.2 years after surgery6.5 score on a scale
Comparison: The association between mean change in total FSFI score and preoperative RT was assessed using longitudinal regression analysis (GEE), using no preoperative radiotherapy as the reference group.p-value: 0.01395% CI: [-16.66, -1.99]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026