Skip to content

A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) Versus Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Multi-center, Randomized, Blinded, Parallel-group Study of the Reduction of Signs and Symptoms During Monotherapy Treatment With Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg Intravenously Versus Adalimumab 40 mg Subcutaneously in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01119859
Enrollment
326
Registered
2010-05-10
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2013-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This randomized, blinded, parallel arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) versus adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are intolerant of methotrexate or where continued treatment with methotrexate was considered inappropriate. Patients were randomized to receive either tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks plus placebo subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks, or adalimumab 40 mg sc every 2 weeks plus placebo iv every 4 weeks. Treatment was anticipated to last 24 weeks. With regard to the blind, the study nurse was unblinded due to the nature of the treatment administration, but the investigator and the patient remained blinded.

Interventions

DRUGTocilizumab

The maximum dose was 800 mg for patients weighing more than 100 kg. Tocilizumab was infused into an arm vein over a 1-hour period.

DRUGAdalimumab

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age. * Rheumatoid arthritis of \> 6 months duration. * Intolerant of methotrexate or continued treatment with methotrexate is considered inappropriate. * All disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) are to be withdrawn prior to receiving study drug. * Weight ≤ 150 kg.

Exclusion criteria

* Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 12 weeks prior to baseline or planned major surgery within 6 months after baseline. * History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA). * Treatment with a biologic agent at any time prior to baseline. * Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids ≤ 4 weeks prior to baseline. * Active current infection or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal or mycobacterial infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)Baseline to Week 24The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis (RA) and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The analysis was adjusted for stratification factors of duration of RA (≤ 2 years and \> 2 years) and region (US and non-US).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 24Week 24The percentage of patients who achieved remission of their rheumatic arthritis at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score \< 2.6, is reported.
Percentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] ≤ 3.2) at Week 24Week 24The percentage of patients who had low rheumatic arthritis disease activity at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score of 3.2 or less, is reported.
Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24Baseline to Week 24Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the extreme left end of the line no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\] and the extreme right end maximum disease activity; patient assessment of pain in previous the 24 hours on a VAS (extreme left end of the line no pain and the extreme right end unbearable pain); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 24Baseline to Week 24Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 24Baseline to Week 24Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg
Patients received 6 infusions of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks and 12 injections of placebo to adalimumab subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
163
Adalimumab 40 mg
Patients received 12 injections of adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks and 6 infusions of placebo to tocilizumab intravenously every 4 weeks.
162
Total325

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event910
Overall StudyDeath20
Overall StudyFailure to return30
Overall StudyInsufficient therapeutic response714
Overall StudyRefused treatment36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab 8 mg/kgAdalimumab 40 mgTotal
Age Continuous54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.95
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.67
Sex: Female, Male
Female
129 Participants133 Participants262 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants29 Participants63 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 16265 / 162
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 16216 / 162

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)

The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis (RA) and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The analysis was adjusted for stratification factors of duration of RA (≤ 2 years and \> 2 years) and region (US and non-US).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab or adalimumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-3.3 Units on a scale
Adalimumab 40 mgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-1.8 Units on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 24

Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab or adalimumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 2477.9 Percentage of patients
Adalimumab 40 mgPercentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 2454.9 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 24

Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab or adalimumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 2451.5 Percentage of patients
Adalimumab 40 mgPercentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 2419.8 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24

Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the extreme left end of the line no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\] and the extreme right end maximum disease activity; patient assessment of pain in previous the 24 hours on a VAS (extreme left end of the line no pain and the extreme right end unbearable pain); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab or adalimumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24ACR 20 response65.0 Percentage of patients
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24ACR 50 response47.2 Percentage of patients
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24ACR 70 response32.5 Percentage of patients
Adalimumab 40 mgPercentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24ACR 20 response49.4 Percentage of patients
Adalimumab 40 mgPercentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24ACR 50 response27.8 Percentage of patients
Adalimumab 40 mgPercentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24ACR 70 response17.9 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 24

The percentage of patients who achieved remission of their rheumatic arthritis at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score \< 2.6, is reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab or adalimumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 2439.9 Percentage of patients
Adalimumab 40 mgPercentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 2410.5 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] ≤ 3.2) at Week 24

The percentage of patients who had low rheumatic arthritis disease activity at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score of 3.2 or less, is reported.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab or adalimumab and had at least 1 efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] ≤ 3.2) at Week 2451.5 Percentage of patients
Adalimumab 40 mgPercentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] ≤ 3.2) at Week 2419.8 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026