Skip to content

Rhodiola Rosea Therapy of Major Depressive Disorder

Rhodiola Rosea Therapy of Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01098318
Enrollment
58
Registered
2010-04-02
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Depression, Antidepressant Therapy, Herbal Treatment, Rhodiola rosea, Alternative Therapy

Brief summary

Prior research has shown that Rhodiola rosea may be an effective, short-term, anti-depressant therapy. This study will examine the anti-depressant effect of Rhodiola rosea vs. a conventional, anti-depressant drug in the treatment of major depression.

Detailed description

We will study the antidepressant action of R. rosea in patients with MDD. Depression affects more than a billion people world wide, and is now recognized as one of the most disabling medical conditions. It accounts for more than 11% of the total disease burden worldwide, and can result in devastating consequences and functional impairment exceeded only by that of cancer and cardiovascular disease. It results in substantial social, occupational, and personal disability and in increased medical co-morbidity and death by suicide. It is considered to be a multi-systemic disorder characterized by neurotransmitter, neuroendocrine, immunologic, and autonomic, and infectious disturbances. Although the development of antidepressant drug therapy has simplified the treatment of MDD, a substantial segment of the world's population remains untreated for economic, cultural, or personal reasons. As a result, many individuals seek CAM for relief of their symptoms. The identification of effective CAM therapies for MDD is of public health relevance. R. rosea belongs to the family Crassulaceae, and has a long history as a folk remedy for enhancing physical and emotional endurance. Its adaptogen, or preventive, properties have also led to its use in treating cancer, infection, depression, and other nervous system disorders. Several animal and human studies suggest that R. rosea may have antidepressant properties. For specific aim #1, we will ask: Is R. rosea a safe and effective short-term therapy (vs. sertraline and placebo) for patients with MDD? To answer this question, patients meeting DSM IV criteria for mild to moderate MDD will be enrolled in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-escalation study of R. rosea extract 340-1,360 mg daily vs. sertraline 50-200 mg daily. The primary outcome measure will be change over time in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating score. We hypothesize that R. rosea will have superior efficacy vs. placebo and comparable efficacy vs. sertraline. For specific aim #2, we will ask: Does R. rosea therapy result in a favorable tolerability and quality of life (QOL) profile vs. sertraline and placebo? To answer this question, we will obtain safety and QOL measures across treatment conditions that include: (i) frequency, duration, and severity of adverse events, (ii) frequency of serious adverse events, (iii) frequency of dosage reduction, (iv) frequency of treatment discontinuation, and (v) QOL and sexual performance measures. We hypothesize that R. rosea will have a superior tolerability profile vs. sertraline, and similar tolerability vs. placebo. We further hypothesize that R. rosea will have superior QOL and sexual performance ratings vs. sertraline and placebo. Results from this study will be used to inform future research hypotheses and to estimate the effect size necessary to power a future, large scale study.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTHerbal extract

340-1,360 mg daily

DRUGSertraline

50-200 mg daily

1-4 capsules daily

Sponsors

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women (all races and ethnicity) ≥ 18 years old * DSM IV Axis I diagnosis of mild to moderate Major Depressive Disorder * Baseline CGI/S rating of 3 ('mild') or 4 ('moderate') * Baseline Hamilton Depression Rating score ≥ 10 * Not receiving other antidepressant therapy * Able to provide signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients \< 18 years old * Current primary DSM IV Axis I diagnosis other than Major Depressive Disorder * CGI/S rating of 5 ('marked'), 6 ('severe') or 7 ('very severe') * Actively suicidal or requiring hospitalization * Uncontrolled medical condition * Pregnant or nursing women * Women of child-bearing potential not using a medically acceptable form of contraception * Concurrent use of herbal remedies or mineral supplements \[Note: Use of mineral supplements prescribed for medical purposes (e.g., osteoporosis) will not be excluded\] * Current use of chemotherapy or other medication (e.g., interferon) known to produce fatigue or mood changes * Known sensitivity to R. rosea or sertraline * History of non-response to sertraline in the current depressive episode

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.12 weeksHamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a validated, clinician-rated instrument for ascertaining the severity of MDD symptoms. The 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to determine the primary outcome of 17-item HAM-D score. The HAM-D will serves as the primary outcome measure. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0 to 68. Higher score indicates more depressed symptom.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change12 weeksA clinician-rated measure of global symptom severity (CGI/S) and symptom change (CGI/C) of MDD. Severity was rated as Not ill; Borderline ill; Mild; Moderate; Moderately severe; Severe and Extremely severe. Global change was rates as Very much improved; Much improved; Minimally improved; Unchanged;Minimally worse;Much worse and Very much worse. Here in severity, we reported the N(%) of subjects who were not ill or borderline ill. In change, we reported N(%) of subjects who were Very much improved or Much imp\[roved.Subjects started the study with mild to moderate MDD (moderate or above rating in the CGI-S). At WK12, the #/% of subjects in each treatment group who were not ill at WK12 (CGI-S) and who had much improved or very much improved at WK12 (CGI-C) was reported.
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory12 weeksAll enrolled subjects were analyzed. Mean change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total scores were reported. BDI is a self-reported outcome measuring the severity of depression. A negative # means a reduction in BDI score at the end of treatment compared to baseline which represents an improvement in depression symptoms. BDI total score ranges from 0-63. BDI score of 1-16 represents low level of depression;17-30 represents moderate level of depression; \>=31 represents significant level of depression. A reduction in the BDI score represents improvement in the depression symptoms.
Change in Sexual Function12 weeksThis is a patient completed rating of sexual function and satisfaction. It is used to assess current sexual health and changes in sexual health over time measured by the overall sexual satisfaction score. The reported score is the overall degree of sexual satisfaction attained. The score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates more sexual satisfaction.
Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form12 weeksDescriptive analysis of number of subjects in each treatment group who had suicidal ideation at baseline and WK12.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects12 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

There are actually 58 subjects who signed consents. However, one subject withdrew consent immediately after signed it due to change of mind. This subject didn't take any medication, therefore, only 57 subject received study intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rhodiola Rosea
Herbal extract Herbal extract: 340-1,360 mg daily
20
Sertraline
Conventional anti-depressant Sertraline: 50-200 mg daily
19
Sugar Pill
Lactose monohydrate Lactose monohydrate: 1-4 capsules daily
18
Total57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRhodiola RoseaSertralineSugar PillTotal
Age, Continuous46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants9 Participants10 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 2012 / 193 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 190 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a validated, clinician-rated instrument for ascertaining the severity of MDD symptoms. The 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to determine the primary outcome of 17-item HAM-D score. The HAM-D will serves as the primary outcome measure. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0 to 68. Higher score indicates more depressed symptom.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rhodiola RoseaDepressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.HAM-D17@WK88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Rhodiola RoseaDepressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.HAM-D17@WK127.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
SertralineDepressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.HAM-D17@WK88.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
SertralineDepressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.HAM-D17@WK127.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Sugar PillDepressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.HAM-D17@WK88.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Sugar PillDepressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.HAM-D17@WK128.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory

All enrolled subjects were analyzed. Mean change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total scores were reported. BDI is a self-reported outcome measuring the severity of depression. A negative # means a reduction in BDI score at the end of treatment compared to baseline which represents an improvement in depression symptoms. BDI total score ranges from 0-63. BDI score of 1-16 represents low level of depression;17-30 represents moderate level of depression; \>=31 represents significant level of depression. A reduction in the BDI score represents improvement in the depression symptoms.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rhodiola RoseaChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-14.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
SertralineChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-13.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Sugar PillChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory-7.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Change in Sexual Function

This is a patient completed rating of sexual function and satisfaction. It is used to assess current sexual health and changes in sexual health over time measured by the overall sexual satisfaction score. The reported score is the overall degree of sexual satisfaction attained. The score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates more sexual satisfaction.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All enrolled subjects were analyzed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Rhodiola RoseaChange in Sexual FunctionBaseline48 scores on a scale
Rhodiola RoseaChange in Sexual FunctionWK1249 scores on a scale
SertralineChange in Sexual FunctionBaseline36 scores on a scale
SertralineChange in Sexual FunctionWK1225.5 scores on a scale
Sugar PillChange in Sexual FunctionBaseline17 scores on a scale
Sugar PillChange in Sexual FunctionWK1212 scores on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form

Descriptive analysis of number of subjects in each treatment group who had suicidal ideation at baseline and WK12.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All enrolled subjects were analyzed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rhodiola RoseaNumber of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide FormBaseline6 Participants
Rhodiola RoseaNumber of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide FormWK120 Participants
SertralineNumber of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide FormWK120 Participants
SertralineNumber of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide FormBaseline6 Participants
Sugar PillNumber of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide FormBaseline9 Participants
Sugar PillNumber of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide FormWK122 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All enrolled subjects were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rhodiola RoseaNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects6 Participants
SertralineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects12 Participants
Sugar PillNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects3 Participants
Secondary

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change

A clinician-rated measure of global symptom severity (CGI/S) and symptom change (CGI/C) of MDD. Severity was rated as Not ill; Borderline ill; Mild; Moderate; Moderately severe; Severe and Extremely severe. Global change was rates as Very much improved; Much improved; Minimally improved; Unchanged;Minimally worse;Much worse and Very much worse. Here in severity, we reported the N(%) of subjects who were not ill or borderline ill. In change, we reported N(%) of subjects who were Very much improved or Much imp\[roved.Subjects started the study with mild to moderate MDD (moderate or above rating in the CGI-S). At WK12, the #/% of subjects in each treatment group who were not ill at WK12 (CGI-S) and who had much improved or very much improved at WK12 (CGI-C) was reported.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rhodiola RoseaThe Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and ChangeWK12 CGI-Severity (Not ill and Borderline ill)9 Participants
Rhodiola RoseaThe Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and ChangeWK12 CGI-C (Much improved and very much improved)10 Participants
SertralineThe Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and ChangeWK12 CGI-Severity (Not ill and Borderline ill)6 Participants
SertralineThe Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and ChangeWK12 CGI-C (Much improved and very much improved)7 Participants
Sugar PillThe Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and ChangeWK12 CGI-Severity (Not ill and Borderline ill)7 Participants
Sugar PillThe Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and ChangeWK12 CGI-C (Much improved and very much improved)7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026