Depression
Conditions
Keywords
Depression, Antidepressant Therapy, Herbal Treatment, Rhodiola rosea, Alternative Therapy
Brief summary
Prior research has shown that Rhodiola rosea may be an effective, short-term, anti-depressant therapy. This study will examine the anti-depressant effect of Rhodiola rosea vs. a conventional, anti-depressant drug in the treatment of major depression.
Detailed description
We will study the antidepressant action of R. rosea in patients with MDD. Depression affects more than a billion people world wide, and is now recognized as one of the most disabling medical conditions. It accounts for more than 11% of the total disease burden worldwide, and can result in devastating consequences and functional impairment exceeded only by that of cancer and cardiovascular disease. It results in substantial social, occupational, and personal disability and in increased medical co-morbidity and death by suicide. It is considered to be a multi-systemic disorder characterized by neurotransmitter, neuroendocrine, immunologic, and autonomic, and infectious disturbances. Although the development of antidepressant drug therapy has simplified the treatment of MDD, a substantial segment of the world's population remains untreated for economic, cultural, or personal reasons. As a result, many individuals seek CAM for relief of their symptoms. The identification of effective CAM therapies for MDD is of public health relevance. R. rosea belongs to the family Crassulaceae, and has a long history as a folk remedy for enhancing physical and emotional endurance. Its adaptogen, or preventive, properties have also led to its use in treating cancer, infection, depression, and other nervous system disorders. Several animal and human studies suggest that R. rosea may have antidepressant properties. For specific aim #1, we will ask: Is R. rosea a safe and effective short-term therapy (vs. sertraline and placebo) for patients with MDD? To answer this question, patients meeting DSM IV criteria for mild to moderate MDD will be enrolled in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-escalation study of R. rosea extract 340-1,360 mg daily vs. sertraline 50-200 mg daily. The primary outcome measure will be change over time in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating score. We hypothesize that R. rosea will have superior efficacy vs. placebo and comparable efficacy vs. sertraline. For specific aim #2, we will ask: Does R. rosea therapy result in a favorable tolerability and quality of life (QOL) profile vs. sertraline and placebo? To answer this question, we will obtain safety and QOL measures across treatment conditions that include: (i) frequency, duration, and severity of adverse events, (ii) frequency of serious adverse events, (iii) frequency of dosage reduction, (iv) frequency of treatment discontinuation, and (v) QOL and sexual performance measures. We hypothesize that R. rosea will have a superior tolerability profile vs. sertraline, and similar tolerability vs. placebo. We further hypothesize that R. rosea will have superior QOL and sexual performance ratings vs. sertraline and placebo. Results from this study will be used to inform future research hypotheses and to estimate the effect size necessary to power a future, large scale study.
Interventions
340-1,360 mg daily
50-200 mg daily
1-4 capsules daily
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Men and women (all races and ethnicity) ≥ 18 years old * DSM IV Axis I diagnosis of mild to moderate Major Depressive Disorder * Baseline CGI/S rating of 3 ('mild') or 4 ('moderate') * Baseline Hamilton Depression Rating score ≥ 10 * Not receiving other antidepressant therapy * Able to provide signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients \< 18 years old * Current primary DSM IV Axis I diagnosis other than Major Depressive Disorder * CGI/S rating of 5 ('marked'), 6 ('severe') or 7 ('very severe') * Actively suicidal or requiring hospitalization * Uncontrolled medical condition * Pregnant or nursing women * Women of child-bearing potential not using a medically acceptable form of contraception * Concurrent use of herbal remedies or mineral supplements \[Note: Use of mineral supplements prescribed for medical purposes (e.g., osteoporosis) will not be excluded\] * Current use of chemotherapy or other medication (e.g., interferon) known to produce fatigue or mood changes * Known sensitivity to R. rosea or sertraline * History of non-response to sertraline in the current depressive episode
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12. | 12 weeks | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a validated, clinician-rated instrument for ascertaining the severity of MDD symptoms. The 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to determine the primary outcome of 17-item HAM-D score. The HAM-D will serves as the primary outcome measure. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0 to 68. Higher score indicates more depressed symptom. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change | 12 weeks | A clinician-rated measure of global symptom severity (CGI/S) and symptom change (CGI/C) of MDD. Severity was rated as Not ill; Borderline ill; Mild; Moderate; Moderately severe; Severe and Extremely severe. Global change was rates as Very much improved; Much improved; Minimally improved; Unchanged;Minimally worse;Much worse and Very much worse. Here in severity, we reported the N(%) of subjects who were not ill or borderline ill. In change, we reported N(%) of subjects who were Very much improved or Much imp\[roved.Subjects started the study with mild to moderate MDD (moderate or above rating in the CGI-S). At WK12, the #/% of subjects in each treatment group who were not ill at WK12 (CGI-S) and who had much improved or very much improved at WK12 (CGI-C) was reported. |
| Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory | 12 weeks | All enrolled subjects were analyzed. Mean change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total scores were reported. BDI is a self-reported outcome measuring the severity of depression. A negative # means a reduction in BDI score at the end of treatment compared to baseline which represents an improvement in depression symptoms. BDI total score ranges from 0-63. BDI score of 1-16 represents low level of depression;17-30 represents moderate level of depression; \>=31 represents significant level of depression. A reduction in the BDI score represents improvement in the depression symptoms. |
| Change in Sexual Function | 12 weeks | This is a patient completed rating of sexual function and satisfaction. It is used to assess current sexual health and changes in sexual health over time measured by the overall sexual satisfaction score. The reported score is the overall degree of sexual satisfaction attained. The score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates more sexual satisfaction. |
| Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form | 12 weeks | Descriptive analysis of number of subjects in each treatment group who had suicidal ideation at baseline and WK12. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects | 12 weeks | — |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
There are actually 58 subjects who signed consents. However, one subject withdrew consent immediately after signed it due to change of mind. This subject didn't take any medication, therefore, only 57 subject received study intervention.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Rhodiola Rosea Herbal extract
Herbal extract: 340-1,360 mg daily | 20 |
| Sertraline Conventional anti-depressant
Sertraline: 50-200 mg daily | 19 |
| Sugar Pill Lactose monohydrate
Lactose monohydrate: 1-4 capsules daily | 18 |
| Total | 57 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Rhodiola Rosea | Sertraline | Sugar Pill | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 46.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9 | 41.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 | 46.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2 | 45.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 12 Participants | 9 Participants | 10 Participants | 31 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 6 / 20 | 12 / 19 | 3 / 18 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 19 | 0 / 18 |
Outcome results
Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a validated, clinician-rated instrument for ascertaining the severity of MDD symptoms. The 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to determine the primary outcome of 17-item HAM-D score. The HAM-D will serves as the primary outcome measure. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0 to 68. Higher score indicates more depressed symptom.
Time frame: 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhodiola Rosea | Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12. | HAM-D17@WK8 | 8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| Rhodiola Rosea | Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12. | HAM-D17@WK12 | 7.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Sertraline | Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12. | HAM-D17@WK8 | 8.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Sertraline | Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12. | HAM-D17@WK12 | 7.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Sugar Pill | Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12. | HAM-D17@WK8 | 8.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Sugar Pill | Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items) at Week 8 and Week 12. | HAM-D17@WK12 | 8.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory
All enrolled subjects were analyzed. Mean change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) total scores were reported. BDI is a self-reported outcome measuring the severity of depression. A negative # means a reduction in BDI score at the end of treatment compared to baseline which represents an improvement in depression symptoms. BDI total score ranges from 0-63. BDI score of 1-16 represents low level of depression;17-30 represents moderate level of depression; \>=31 represents significant level of depression. A reduction in the BDI score represents improvement in the depression symptoms.
Time frame: 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhodiola Rosea | Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory | -14.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Sertraline | Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory | -13.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Sugar Pill | Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory | -7.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
Change in Sexual Function
This is a patient completed rating of sexual function and satisfaction. It is used to assess current sexual health and changes in sexual health over time measured by the overall sexual satisfaction score. The reported score is the overall degree of sexual satisfaction attained. The score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates more sexual satisfaction.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: All enrolled subjects were analyzed
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhodiola Rosea | Change in Sexual Function | Baseline | 48 scores on a scale |
| Rhodiola Rosea | Change in Sexual Function | WK12 | 49 scores on a scale |
| Sertraline | Change in Sexual Function | Baseline | 36 scores on a scale |
| Sertraline | Change in Sexual Function | WK12 | 25.5 scores on a scale |
| Sugar Pill | Change in Sexual Function | Baseline | 17 scores on a scale |
| Sugar Pill | Change in Sexual Function | WK12 | 12 scores on a scale |
Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form
Descriptive analysis of number of subjects in each treatment group who had suicidal ideation at baseline and WK12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: All enrolled subjects were analyzed
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhodiola Rosea | Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form | Baseline | 6 Participants |
| Rhodiola Rosea | Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form | WK12 | 0 Participants |
| Sertraline | Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form | WK12 | 0 Participants |
| Sertraline | Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form | Baseline | 6 Participants |
| Sugar Pill | Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form | Baseline | 9 Participants |
| Sugar Pill | Number of Participants With Suicide Ideation as Determined by the Columbia Suicide Form | WK12 | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: All enrolled subjects were analyzed
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Rhodiola Rosea | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects | 6 Participants |
| Sertraline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects | 12 Participants |
| Sugar Pill | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Side Effects | 3 Participants |
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change
A clinician-rated measure of global symptom severity (CGI/S) and symptom change (CGI/C) of MDD. Severity was rated as Not ill; Borderline ill; Mild; Moderate; Moderately severe; Severe and Extremely severe. Global change was rates as Very much improved; Much improved; Minimally improved; Unchanged;Minimally worse;Much worse and Very much worse. Here in severity, we reported the N(%) of subjects who were not ill or borderline ill. In change, we reported N(%) of subjects who were Very much improved or Much imp\[roved.Subjects started the study with mild to moderate MDD (moderate or above rating in the CGI-S). At WK12, the #/% of subjects in each treatment group who were not ill at WK12 (CGI-S) and who had much improved or very much improved at WK12 (CGI-C) was reported.
Time frame: 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhodiola Rosea | The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change | WK12 CGI-Severity (Not ill and Borderline ill) | 9 Participants |
| Rhodiola Rosea | The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change | WK12 CGI-C (Much improved and very much improved) | 10 Participants |
| Sertraline | The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change | WK12 CGI-Severity (Not ill and Borderline ill) | 6 Participants |
| Sertraline | The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change | WK12 CGI-C (Much improved and very much improved) | 7 Participants |
| Sugar Pill | The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change | WK12 CGI-Severity (Not ill and Borderline ill) | 7 Participants |
| Sugar Pill | The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity and Change | WK12 CGI-C (Much improved and very much improved) | 7 Participants |