Pancreatic Cancer, Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm
Conditions
Keywords
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, Imaging techniques, Pancreatic surgical resection, Synthetic human secretin
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the utility of secretin-enhanced MRI (S-MRI) in detecting and measuring pancreatic lesions in patients with known adenocarcinoma or Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) lesions. The hypothesis is that S-MRI is superior to MRI without secretin enhancement (N-MRI) in increasing tumor conspicuity, allowing for improved identification and more accurate measurement of lesions or precursor lesions in the pancreas.
Detailed description
Pancreatic cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States and is marked by advanced stage at diagnosis and a high mortality rate. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a cystic lesion that can be potentially cancerous, leading to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Currently, there is no existing imaging modality that is both sensitive and cost-effective enough in accurately measuring or detecting adenocarcinoma and IPMN. Improving the methods used in identification and localization of this disease is critical. Secretin, a hormone produced by duodenal mucosal cells increases blood-flow to the pancreas. The investigators' hypothesis is that as secretin increases blood flow to the pancreas, there will be increased conspicuity in areas of dysplasia/cancer where there is minimal blood-flow, enhancing tumor detection. The investigators are conducting a prospective, randomized-control pilot study of thirty subjects with IPMN or pancreatic cancer who are undergoing surgical resection at Columbia University's Pancreas Center. Fifteen subjects will be randomly selected to undergo S-MRI prior to surgery and fifteen subjects will be selected as controls, undergoing MRI without secretin-enhancement and matched for age, sex, race and tumor-type. The investigators will first evaluate if secretin allows for increased tumor conspicuity, enhanced visualization of the lesion, by comparing the calculated tumor conspicuity of S-MRI to N-MRI groups. The investigators will then assess if S-MRI imaging allows for increased accuracy in lesion measurements by looking at the concordance in measurements between S-MRI and tumor specimens post-resection as compared to the concordance in measurements between N-MRI and tumor specimens post-resection.
Interventions
DRUGSecretin
Subjects will each undergo an S-MRI evaluation, at a dose of 0.2 ucg/kg per exam. Secretin will be administered by IV bolus injection over 1 minute followed by a 30 second saline flush. The maximum dose of secretin will be 18.5 ucg.
Sponsors
Elizabeth Hecht
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older * Histologically confirmed IPMN/pancreatic adenocarcinoma by biopsy or fine needle or suspected IPMN/pancreatic adenocarcinoma based on imaging * Scheduled for surgical resection * Willingness to provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Any contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including but not limited to implanted metal devices (e.g. pacemaker, berry aneurysm clips, neural stimulator or cochlear implants) * Unresectable tumor * Other abdominal neoplasm in addition to neoplasm in pancreas * Contraindication to surgery, including but not limited to recent myocardial infarction (MI) (within 6 weeks) or poor pulmonary function * History of sensitivity to secretin * Pregnancy * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (as per Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation) * Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in lesion conspicuity between S-MRI and N-MRI | 30 days | The primary outcome is whether S-MRI allows for better tumor detection secondary to anticipated increased conspicuity of tumor due to secretin's effect on increasing blood flow to the normal pancreas as compared to N-MRI. Determining S-MRI's efficacy versus that of N-MRI will be carried out by comparing tumor conspicuity measurements in S-MRI and N-MRI groups. Tumor conspicuity will be measured by calculating the contrast to noise ratio, placing region of interest (ROI) on tumor and adjacent tissue and dividing by image noise. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Concordance of tumor measurements between S-MRI images and tumor specimens post-resection vs. concordance of tumor measurements between N-MRI and tumor specimens post-resection | 45 days | The secondary outcome will be the discrepancy in tumor size estimated from MRI and confirmed from post-surgical specimens. Tumor size estimated from MRI scans will be determined by measuring the greatest linear dimension (metric) of the lesion. Tumor size estimated by pathology will be directly measured using a linear scale (metric), taking the greatest linear dimension of the resected tumor. The discrepancy in estimated versus confirmed tumor size will be compared between S-MRI and N-MRI groups. |
Outcome results
None listed