Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AZD1386 in Patients With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

A Phase IIa Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AZD1386 After 3 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Posttraumatic Neuralgia (PTN) and Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00976534
Acronym
AVANT
Enrollment
90
Registered
2009-09-14
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2009-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain, Pain

Keywords

Analgesic effect, Peripheral Neuropathic pain, Posttraumatic Neuralgia (PTN), Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study is to investigate if AZD1386 is efficacious as an analgesic in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. This will be done by comparing the effect of AZD1386 to placebo (inactive substance) on pain.

Interventions

90 mg, capsules, oral, during 3 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

capsules, oral, during 3 weeks

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with painful symptoms due to neuropathic pain * Provision of signed informed consent * Non pregnant females

Exclusion criteria

* Other pain conditions that may confound assessment of neuropathic pain, as judged by the investigator * History, and/or presence of somatic disease, which may interfere with the objectives of the study as judged by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in NRS pain (12 h-recall)Morning and evening 12 hour recall

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Response rate, defined as any of the following:NRS (12 h recall) reduced by 30% compared to baseline and NRS (12 h recall) reduced by 50% compared to baselineMorning and evening 12 hour recall
Response rate, defined as any of the following: At least much improved on Patient Global Impression of Change global and at least much improved on PGIC painDay 8, 15 and 22
Response rate, defined as any of the following: Change from baseline in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form and Change from baseline in Pain Quality Assessment ScaleDay 1 and 22

Countries

Canada, Denmark, France, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026