Skip to content

Axillary Lymph Node Preservation Surgery in Reducing Lymphedema in Patients With Breast Cancer

Reducing Extremity Lymphedema Through Axillary Lymphatic Preservation Surgery

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00932035
Enrollment
39
Registered
2009-07-02
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2017-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

breast cancer, axillary mapping, lymphedema

Brief summary

This pilot phase I and randomized phase II trial studies the best way to perform axillary lymph node preservation surgery and to see how well it works in preventing lymphedema in patients with breast cancer. Lymph node mapping may help in planning surgery to remove breast cancer and affected lymph nodes. It is not yet known whether reverse mapping guided axillary lymph node dissection is more effective than standard axillary lymph node dissection in preventing lymphedema.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To produce a map of the lymphatic drainage of the upper extremity as it relates to breast drainage, to determine the proportion of women undergoing axillary lymphadenectomy at risk for lymphedema. II. To determine if blue lymphatics contain lymph node metastases. III. To evaluate the incidence of lymphedema and associated other surgical related quality of life in those undergoing this procedure as compared to the current standard of care. OUTLINE: This is a phase I study followed by a randomized phase II study. PILOT PORTION: Patients receive isosulfan blue dye subcutaneously (SC) and then undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection. RANDOMIZED PORTION: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive isosulfan blue dye subcutaneously (SC) and then undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection. ARM II: Patients undergo standard axillary lymph node dissection and then receive isosulfan blue dye SC. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.

Interventions

Undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection

DRUGisosulfan blue based lymphatic mapping
PROCEDUREquality-of-life assessment

Ancillary studies

OTHERQuestionnaire administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
City of Hope Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Patients diagnosed with breast cancer with a planned axillary lymph node dissection planned for breast cancer

Exclusion criteria

* Prior lymphedema in either arm * Prior history of axillary surgery (except for sentinel node biopsies) * Prior history of chest/axillary radiation * Need for bilateral axillary node dissection surgery * Prior neurologic deficits (either motor or sensory) in ipsilateral arm * Known allergy to vital blue dyes * No prior diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer * Cannot be pregnant or planning to continue breast-feeding immediately after surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Arm Lymphatics Above, at, or Below the Axillary VeinUp to 4 yearsA Fisher's exact test with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 will be used to determine if the percentage of patients with arm lymphatics above, around, or below the axillary vein in the standard dissection group is superior to the experimental dissection group.
Percentage of Patients With Positive Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) Identified NodesUp to 4 yearsA Fisher's exact test with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 will be used to determine if the percentage of patients with positive ARM identified nodes excised in the standard dissection group is superior to the experimental dissection group.
Percentage of Patients With LymphedemaUp to 4 yearsDifference between arms in patients developing lymphedema at any point during the study will be evaluated using chi-squared tests.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)
Patients receive isosulfan blue dye SC and then undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection. axillary lymph node dissection: Undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection isosulfan blue based lymphatic mapping quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
18
Arm II (Control)
Patients undergo standard axillary lymph node dissection and then receive isosulfan blue dye SC. isosulfan blue based lymphatic mapping axillary lymph node dissection: Undergo standard axillary lymph node dissection quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire administration: Ancillary studies
21
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)Arm II (Control)Total
Age, Continuous52 years47 years50 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants21 participants39 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants21 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 1815 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 181 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Arm Lymphatics Above, at, or Below the Axillary Vein

A Fisher's exact test with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 will be used to determine if the percentage of patients with arm lymphatics above, around, or below the axillary vein in the standard dissection group is superior to the experimental dissection group.

Time frame: Up to 4 years

Population: Because of early termination the study did not accrue the planned number of subjects.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)Percentage of Patients With Arm Lymphatics Above, at, or Below the Axillary VeinBlue Lymphatic Channels Seen9 Participants
Arm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)Percentage of Patients With Arm Lymphatics Above, at, or Below the Axillary VeinBlue Lymphatic Channels Not Seen2 Participants
Arm II (Control)Percentage of Patients With Arm Lymphatics Above, at, or Below the Axillary VeinBlue Lymphatic Channels Seen10 Participants
Arm II (Control)Percentage of Patients With Arm Lymphatics Above, at, or Below the Axillary VeinBlue Lymphatic Channels Not Seen4 Participants
p-value: 0.45Fisher Exact
Primary

Percentage of Patients With Lymphedema

Difference between arms in patients developing lymphedema at any point during the study will be evaluated using chi-squared tests.

Time frame: Up to 4 years

Population: Because of early termination the study did not accrue the planned number of subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)Percentage of Patients With LymphedemaLymphedema Present4 Participants
Arm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)Percentage of Patients With LymphedemaLymphedema Not Present14 Participants
Arm II (Control)Percentage of Patients With LymphedemaLymphedema Present6 Participants
Arm II (Control)Percentage of Patients With LymphedemaLymphedema Not Present14 Participants
p-value: 0.59Chi-squared
Primary

Percentage of Patients With Positive Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) Identified Nodes

A Fisher's exact test with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 will be used to determine if the percentage of patients with positive ARM identified nodes excised in the standard dissection group is superior to the experimental dissection group.

Time frame: Up to 4 years

Population: Because of early termination the study did not accrue the planned number of subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)Percentage of Patients With Positive Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) Identified NodesBlue Lymph Nodes Seen4 Participants
Arm I (Reverse Mapping Guided Axillary Lymph Node Dissection)Percentage of Patients With Positive Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) Identified NodesBlue Lymph Nodes Not Seen7 Participants
Arm II (Control)Percentage of Patients With Positive Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) Identified NodesBlue Lymph Nodes Seen4 Participants
Arm II (Control)Percentage of Patients With Positive Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) Identified NodesBlue Lymph Nodes Not Seen10 Participants
p-value: 0.5Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026