Skip to content

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy of SAR 1118 (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Conducted in a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE)

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked and Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Three Different Concentrations (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Using the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) Model

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00926185
Enrollment
230
Registered
2009-06-23
Start date
2009-08-03
Completion date
2010-02-18
Last updated
2021-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Keywords

Dry Eye, ophthalmic delivery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three different concentrations (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution compared to placebo in the treatment of dry eye.

Interventions

Ophthalmic Solution

DRUGPlacebo

Ophthalmic Solution

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed Informed Consent Form and HIPAA document * Willing and able to comply with all study procedures * Be at least 18 years of age * Patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes * Demonstrate a positive response when exposed to the Controlled Adverse Environment model * A negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential and must use adequate birth control throughout the study period

Exclusion criteria

* Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect study parameters including, but not limited to, active ocular infection, ocular inflammation, glaucoma, and/or diabetic retinopathy * Unwilling to avoid wearing contact lenses for 7 days prior to and for duration of the study period * Any blood donation or significant loss of blood within 56 days of Visit 1 * Any history of immunodeficiency disorder, positive HIV, hepatitis B, C, or evidence of acute active hepatitis A (anti-HAV IgM), or organ or bone marrow transplant. * Use of any topical ophthalmic preparations (including tear substitutes) 72 hrs prior to screening assessments and through the entire study period * Any significant illness that could interfere with study parameters * History of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or similar type of corneal refractive surgery within 12 months prior to Visit 1, and/or any other ocular surgical procedure within 12 months prior to Visit 1; or any scheduled ocular surgical procedure during the study period. * Known history of alcohol and/or drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 84Day 84Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study was conducted in a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lifitegrast 0.1%57
Lifitegrast 1.0%57
Lifitegrast 5.0%58
Placebo58
Total230

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLifitegrast 0.1%Lifitegrast 1.0%Lifitegrast 5.0%PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous63.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
63.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.883
62.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.22
60.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.93
62.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.523
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants40 Participants47 Participants45 Participants179 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants17 Participants11 Participants13 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 5713 / 5740 / 5811 / 58
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 571 / 570 / 581 / 58

Outcome results

Primary

Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 84

Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population with LOCF defined as all randomized subjects. For the efficacy analysis, the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method will be used to impute missing values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifitegrast 0.1%Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 842.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.868
Lifitegrast 1.0%Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 841.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.768
Lifitegrast 5.0%Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 841.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
PlaceboInferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 842.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.715
p-value: 0.938195% CI: [-0.26, 0.39]Dunnett's test
p-value: 0.358595% CI: [-0.13, 0.53]Dunnett's test
p-value: 0.137595% CI: [-0.06, 0.6]Dunnett's test
Secondary

Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84

Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84

Population: ITT set with LOCF was used for analysis of this outcome. Here, n signifies the number of participants evaluable for the respective time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifitegrast 0.1%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: Baseline1.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.473
Lifitegrast 0.1%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: CFB to Day 840.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.841
Lifitegrast 0.1%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Baseline3.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.417
Lifitegrast 0.1%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Day 842.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.962
Lifitegrast 1.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: CFB to Day 840.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.735
Lifitegrast 1.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Baseline3.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Lifitegrast 1.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Day 842.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Lifitegrast 1.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: Baseline1.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.508
Lifitegrast 5.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Baseline3.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.523
Lifitegrast 5.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: CFB to Day 840.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.773
Lifitegrast 5.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Day 842.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.918
Lifitegrast 5.0%Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: Baseline1.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.515
PlaceboInferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Day 842.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.855
PlaceboInferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: CFB to Day 840.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.802
PlaceboInferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Pre-CAE: Baseline1.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.513
PlaceboInferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84Post-CAE: Baseline3.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.602

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026