Skip to content

A Trial of Negative Ion Generation Versus Light-Emitting Diode Phototherapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)

A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of Negative Ion Generation Versus Light-Emitting Diode Phototherapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00809523
Enrollment
106
Registered
2008-12-17
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2013-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Affective Disorder

Keywords

SAD, winter depression

Brief summary

This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial of inactivated negative ion generation or light-emitting photodiode therapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD, winter depression), for subjects with a DSM IV diagnosis of Major Depression, with Seasonal Pattern, Winter type, to examine efficacy of treatments for this condition. The trial has a 1 week baseline phase and a 4 week treatment phase.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing an inactivated negative ion generation (placebo condition) and light-emitting photodiode therapy (active condition), for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD, winter depression), for subjects with a DSM IV diagnosis of Major Depression, with Seasonal Pattern, Winter type, to examine efficacy of treatments for this condition. Exclusion criteria included any other current treatment for SAD, as well as bipolar disorder, type 1, a chronic psychotic disorder, or a substance use not if full remission for at least one year. The trial has a 1 week baseline phase and subjects were seen weekly during a 4 week treatment phase. The study was double-blind. The study was conducted at 8 sites in the US, Canada and The Netherlands.

Interventions

Equivalent exposure to inactivated Negative Ion Generator

DEVICELight-emitting Photodiode light treatment device

Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment device, used for 30 min before 8 am

Sponsors

The Litebook Company Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of British Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Harvard University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Clinical Associates Research, Maryland
CollaboratorNETWORK
Dalhousie University
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Seasonal Affective Disorder * Age 18 to 65

Exclusion criteria

* Psychotropic medication treatment * History of light treatment for SAD * History of mania or psychosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change SIGH SAD Depression Rating4 weeksSIGH SAD Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)version. The items are augmented with additional items to reflect better the atypical depressive symptoms usually seen in SAD, eg, increased sleep, weight, appetite and fatigue. On this scale, higher scores reflect increased depression intensity. The maximum score attainable is 63, and the minimum is 0. A score of less than 9 is regarded as consistent with normal mood, the absence of major depression. Calculated: SIGH SAD score at trial end - SIGH SAD score at randomization x 100 / SIGH SAD score at randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SIGH SAD Depression RatingWeeklySIGH SAD Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)version. This is a structured interview, which is an interview in which the clinician is provided exact questions to use to inquire about symptoms of depression and explicit standards for rating the intensity of each symptom item. The interview assesses the symptoms which make up the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, which is the standard in the majority of clinical trials in depression. The items are augmented with additional items to reflect better the atypical depressive symptoms usually seen in SAD, eg, increased sleep, weight, appetite and fatigue. On this scale, higher scores reflect increased depression intensity. The maximum score attainable is 63, and the minimum is 0. A score of less than 9 is regarded as consistent with normal mood, the absence of major depression.
Clinical Global Impression of SeverityRandomization and at 4 weeksThe Clinical Global Impression of Severity is a 7-point scale in which the clinician gives an overall impression of depression severity, with the following anchor points: (1)Normal, not at all ill, (2)Borderline ill, (3) Mildly ill, (4)Moderately ill, (5) Markedly ill, (6)Severely ill, and (7)Among the most severely ill patients. The minimum is therefore 1 and the maximum is 7, which represents very severe depression.

Countries

Canada, Netherlands, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Inactivated Negative Ion Generator
Equivalent exposure to inactivated Negative Ion Generator
54
LED Phototherapy Device
Light-emitting photodiode light treatment device, used for 30 min before 8 am
52
Total106

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInactivated Negative Ion GeneratorLED Phototherapy DeviceTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
54 Participants52 Participants106 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
26 participants25 participants51 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
8 participants9 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants18 participants38 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants38 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 547 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change SIGH SAD Depression Rating

SIGH SAD Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)version. The items are augmented with additional items to reflect better the atypical depressive symptoms usually seen in SAD, eg, increased sleep, weight, appetite and fatigue. On this scale, higher scores reflect increased depression intensity. The maximum score attainable is 63, and the minimum is 0. A score of less than 9 is regarded as consistent with normal mood, the absence of major depression. Calculated: SIGH SAD score at trial end - SIGH SAD score at randomization x 100 / SIGH SAD score at randomization

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Intent to treat analysis last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorPercentage Change SIGH SAD Depression Rating-36.4 percentage of change on SIGH SADStandard Deviation 34.9
LED Phototherapy DevicePercentage Change SIGH SAD Depression Rating-52.7 percentage of change on SIGH SADStandard Deviation 31.7
p-value: 0.014t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Severity

The Clinical Global Impression of Severity is a 7-point scale in which the clinician gives an overall impression of depression severity, with the following anchor points: (1)Normal, not at all ill, (2)Borderline ill, (3) Mildly ill, (4)Moderately ill, (5) Markedly ill, (6)Severely ill, and (7)Among the most severely ill patients. The minimum is therefore 1 and the maximum is 7, which represents very severe depression.

Time frame: Randomization and at 4 weeks

Population: intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorClinical Global Impression of SeverityRandomization4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorClinical Global Impression of SeverityWeek 43.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
LED Phototherapy DeviceClinical Global Impression of SeverityRandomization4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
LED Phototherapy DeviceClinical Global Impression of SeverityWeek 42.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Comparison: Data were analyzed at the follow up timepoint (4 weeks) to test for differences between the experimental groups.p-value: 0.007t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

SIGH SAD Depression Rating

SIGH SAD Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)version. This is a structured interview, which is an interview in which the clinician is provided exact questions to use to inquire about symptoms of depression and explicit standards for rating the intensity of each symptom item. The interview assesses the symptoms which make up the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, which is the standard in the majority of clinical trials in depression. The items are augmented with additional items to reflect better the atypical depressive symptoms usually seen in SAD, eg, increased sleep, weight, appetite and fatigue. On this scale, higher scores reflect increased depression intensity. The maximum score attainable is 63, and the minimum is 0. A score of less than 9 is regarded as consistent with normal mood, the absence of major depression.

Time frame: Weekly

Population: Intent to treat analysis last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorSIGH SAD Depression RatingRandomization28.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 219.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 123.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 318.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Inactivated Negative Ion GeneratorSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 417.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
LED Phototherapy DeviceSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 315.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
LED Phototherapy DeviceSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 413.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
LED Phototherapy DeviceSIGH SAD Depression RatingRandomization27.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
LED Phototherapy DeviceSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 120.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
LED Phototherapy DeviceSIGH SAD Depression RatingWeek 217.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026