Skip to content

Evaluation of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

A Randomized, Double-Blind Evaluation of the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Placebo in Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00734162
Enrollment
106
Registered
2008-08-14
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)

Keywords

tenofovir, adolescents, chronic hepatitis B

Brief summary

The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The optimal treatment for adolescents with chronic HBV infection is currently unknown. Treatment with interferon alfa, lamivudine, and adefovir dipivoxil in pediatric populations has been shown to be less than optimal. Further, the safety and efficacy of entecavir and telbivudine have not been established in patients \< 16 years of age. A study evaluating TDF in adolescents (ages 12-17) was needed to assess the safety and efficacy of this agent in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in this patient population. In addition, the study will help to further elucidate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and resistance profiles of TDF. Through their participation, study participants will help generate critical new information to help guide the most optimal treatment of chronic HBV infection in adolescents. This is a randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of TDF versus placebo in adolescents with chronic HBV infection. TDF treatment-naive participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to TDF or placebo. After 72 weeks of blinded treatment, participants were to switch to open-label TDF for an additional 2.5 years of treatment, provided that no safety concerns are identified by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee monitoring the study.

Interventions

TDF administered as a 300-mg tablet once daily

DRUGPlacebo

TDF placebo tablet once daily

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 12 through 17 years of age, inclusive (consent of parent/legal guardian required) * Documented chronic HBV infection * HBeAg positive or HBeAg negative * Weight \> 35 kg * Able to swallow oral tablets * HBV DNA \> 100,000 copies/mL (polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2 × upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening, OR any history of ALT \> 2 × ULN over the past 24 months * Willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent (child and parent/legal guardian) * Negative serum pregnancy test (for postmenarchal females only) * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (creatinine clearance \[using the Schwartz formula\]) \> 80 mL/min/1.73m\^2 * Adequate hematologic function (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3; hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL) * No prior TDF therapy (participants may have received prior interferon or oral anti-HBV nucleoside/nucleotide therapy; participants must have discontinued interferon therapy ≥ 6 months prior to screening; participants experienced on anti-HBV nucleoside/nucleotide therapy must have discontinued therapy ≥ 16 weeks prior to screening to avoid flare if randomized to the placebo arm)

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding or who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study * Males and females of reproductive potential who are not willing to use an effective method of contraception during the study * Decompensated liver disease * Receipt of interferon (pegylated or not) therapy within 6 months of the Screening Visit * Receipt of anti-HBV nucleoside/nucleotide therapy within 16 weeks of the Screening Visit * Alpha fetoprotein \> 50 ng/mL * Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) * Coinfection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis D virus (HDV) * History of significant renal disease (eg, nephrotic syndrome, renal dysgenesis, polycystic kidney disease, congenital nephrosis, acute tubular necrosis, other renal disease) * History of significant bone disease (eg, osteomalacia, chronic osteomyelitis, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteochondroses, multiple bone fractures) * Significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease * Evidence of a gastrointestinal malabsorption syndrome that may interfere with absorption of orally administered medications * History of solid organ or bone marrow transplantation * Ongoing therapy with nephrotoxic agents, competitors of renal excretion, systemic chemotherapeutic agents, systemic corticosteroids, interleukin-2 (IL-2), or other immunomodulating or investigational agents * Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs, the metabolites or formulation excipients * Any other condition (including alcohol or substance abuse) or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the participants unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with dosing requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 72Week 72The percentage of participants with HBV DNA \< 400 copies/mL at Week 72 was summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis), using the missing = failure (M = F) analysis with the double-blind efficacy evaluation (DBEE) algorithm. In the M = F analysis method, all missing data were considered as failure to meet the outcome measure threshold. This method was combined with the DBEE algorithm, which included all available data for the double-blind period, and any data for the open-label period were not included; data generated during treatment-free follow-up from subjects who achieved HBsAg loss and entered treatment-free follow-up during double-blind treatment period were included.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 72Baseline to Week 72Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis). In contrast with what was previously reported in the interim results posting, 1 participant met the primary safety endpoint of at least a 6% decrease from baseline in spine BMD at Week 72, based on the final BMD data analysis. The apparent discrepancy was due to the correction factor applied to the subject-specific BMD calculations performed at the time of the Interim Week 72 clinical study report that could not take into account the actual Week 72 phantom data (ie, calibration test used in longitudinal clinical trials to monitor and adjust for shifts in the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner calibration over time), which were not provided by the site at that time. The correction factor applied to the final analysis has been properly based on all phantom data through the end of Week 72, as well as through the end of Week 192.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis), using the M = F.
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis), using the M = F.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192The percentage of participants reported is the cumulative incidence from baseline to the respective time point. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192The percentage of participants reported is the cumulative incidence from baseline to the respective time point. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 72Baseline; Week 72Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 96Baseline; Week 96Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 144Baseline; Week 144Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 192Baseline; Week 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 72Baseline; Week 72Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 96Baseline; Week 96Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 144Baseline; Week 144Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96Baseline; Week 96Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 48Baseline; Week 48To assess any effect of treatment on growth, Z-scores were used to express the deviation from a reference population for lumbar spine BMD. A Z-score of 0 indicated that a subject was typical of the population for their age, ethnicity, and gender. A negative Z-score indicated that the subject's recorded value was lower than typical for their age, ethnicity, and gender. A positive Z-score indicates that the subject's recorded value was higher than typical for their age, ethnicity, and gender. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 72Baseline; Week 72Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144Baseline; Week 144Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 192Baseline; Week 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 72Baseline; Week 72Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 96Baseline; Week 96Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144Baseline; Week 144Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192Baseline; Week 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Number of Participants With Changes in Drug-Resistant Mutations During the StudyBaseline through Week 192The number of participants with changes in drug-resistant mutations during the study was summarized.
Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.
Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 192Baseline; Week 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Countries

Bulgaria, France, Poland, Romania, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 3 sites in the United States, 8 sites in Poland, 3 sites in Romania, 2 sites in Bulgaria, 2 sites in France, 2 sites in Spain, and 1 site in Turkey. The first participant was screened on 03 December 2008. The last study visit occurred on 02 December 2015.

Pre-assignment details

149 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TDF 12-14 Years
TDF 300 mg tablet once daily in participants 12-14 years of age in the Randomized Phase, followed by TDF 300 mg tablet once daily in the Open-Label Phase
10
TDF 15-17 Years
TDF 300 mg tablet once daily in participants 15-17 years of age in the Randomized Phase, followed by TDF 300 mg tablet once daily in the Open-Label Phase
42
Placebo 12-14 Years
TDF placebo tablet once daily in participants 12-14 years of age in the Randomized Phase, followed by TDF 300 mg tablet once daily in the Open-Label Phase
13
Placebo 15-17 Years
TDF placebo tablet once daily in participants 15-17 years of age in the Randomized Phase, followed by TDF 300 mg tablet once daily in the Open-Label Phase
41
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Open-Label PhaseDid Not Meet Entrance Criteria0001
Open-Label PhaseLost to Follow-up1201
Open-Label PhaseSafety, Tolerability or Efficacy Reasons1000
Open-Label PhaseWithdrew Consent1011
Randomized Phase (Through Week 72)Investigator's Discretion0102
Randomized Phase (Through Week 72)Per protocol ALT elevation0002

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlacebo 15-17 YearsPlacebo 12-14 YearsTDF 12-14 YearsTDF 15-17 Years
Age, Continuous15.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38
15.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82
13.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.69
13.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82
16.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level at baseline101 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 98.5
101 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 89.5
101 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 95.4
77 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.8
106 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 116.4
ALT normal at baseline
Abnormal
77 participants33 participants9 participants7 participants28 participants
ALT normal at baseline
Normal
29 participants8 participants4 participants3 participants14 participants
HBV DNA level at baseline8.13 Log_10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.403
8.12 Log_10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.451
8.61 Log_10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.166
8.26 Log_10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.455
7.95 Log_10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.421
HBV Genotype
Genotype A
69 participants29 participants5 participants5 participants30 participants
HBV Genotype
Genotype B
3 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
HBV Genotype
Genotype C
1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
HBV Genotype
Genotype D
33 participants11 participants7 participants5 participants10 participants
Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) status at baseline
Negative
10 participants6 participants0 participants1 participants3 participants
Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) status at baseline
Positive
96 participants35 participants13 participants9 participants39 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 participants4 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
98 participants37 participants12 participants10 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
7 participants1 participants3 participants0 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
101 participants39 participants12 participants10 participants40 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
2 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
5 participants2 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
74 participants31 participants6 participants6 participants31 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
14 participants4 participants2 participants4 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
2 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants2 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants15 Participants4 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants26 Participants9 Participants7 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 5240 / 5430 / 5131 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 5211 / 548 / 5110 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 72

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis). In contrast with what was previously reported in the interim results posting, 1 participant met the primary safety endpoint of at least a 6% decrease from baseline in spine BMD at Week 72, based on the final BMD data analysis. The apparent discrepancy was due to the correction factor applied to the subject-specific BMD calculations performed at the time of the Interim Week 72 clinical study report that could not take into account the actual Week 72 phantom data (ie, calibration test used in longitudinal clinical trials to monitor and adjust for shifts in the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner calibration over time), which were not provided by the site at that time. The correction factor applied to the final analysis has been properly based on all phantom data through the end of Week 72, as well as through the end of Week 192.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 72

Population: Safety Analysis Set: participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 720 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 722.4 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 720 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 721.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Spine at Week 720 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 72

The percentage of participants with HBV DNA \< 400 copies/mL at Week 72 was summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis), using the missing = failure (M = F) analysis with the double-blind efficacy evaluation (DBEE) algorithm. In the M = F analysis method, all missing data were considered as failure to meet the outcome measure threshold. This method was combined with the DBEE algorithm, which included all available data for the double-blind period, and any data for the open-label period were not included; data generated during treatment-free follow-up from subjects who achieved HBsAg loss and entered treatment-free follow-up during double-blind treatment period were included.

Time frame: Week 72

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 7290.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 7288.1 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 720 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 7288.5 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 720 percentage of participants
Comparison: Analysis is the difference between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who met the outcome measure criterion, controlling for randomization age group.p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 144

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144-0.20 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.56
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144-0.05 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.417
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144-0.16 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.625
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144-0.04 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.405
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144-0.08 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.447
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 144-0.06 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.455
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 192

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 192-0.24 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.518
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 1920.08 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.544
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 192-0.26 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.654
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 192-0.05 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.504
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 1920.02 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.548
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 192-0.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.543
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 48

To assess any effect of treatment on growth, Z-scores were used to express the deviation from a reference population for lumbar spine BMD. A Z-score of 0 indicated that a subject was typical of the population for their age, ethnicity, and gender. A negative Z-score indicated that the subject's recorded value was lower than typical for their age, ethnicity, and gender. A positive Z-score indicates that the subject's recorded value was higher than typical for their age, ethnicity, and gender. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 480.02 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.247
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 48-0.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.255
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 480.04 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.393
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 480.05 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.322
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 48-0.08 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.256
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 480.05 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.337
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 72

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 72

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 72-0.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.312
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 72-0.05 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.325
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 720.09 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.498
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 720.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.339
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 72-0.06 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.32
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 720.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.378
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96-0.19 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.365
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96-0.07 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.356
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96-0.02 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.498
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96-0.13 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.414
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96-0.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.357
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Spine BMD at Week 96-0.11 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.431
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 144

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144-0.27 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.431
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144-0.21 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.473
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144-0.06 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.554
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144-0.16 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.468
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144-0.22 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.462
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 144-0.14 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.484
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 192

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192-0.34 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.499
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192-0.11 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.524
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192-0.21 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.486
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192-0.19 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.517
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192-0.16 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.521
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 192-0.19 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.504
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 48

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 480.02 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.426
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 48-0.15 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.257
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 480.10 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.37
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 480.04 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.308
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 48-0.12 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.298
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 480.05 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.322
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 72

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 72

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 720.02 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.398
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 72-0.19 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.338
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 720.20 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.45
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 720.06 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.306
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 72-0.16 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.355
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 720.09 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.349
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 96

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 96-0.12 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.294
TDF 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 96-0.19 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.451
Placebo 12-14 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 960.09 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.528
Placebo 15-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 96-0.06 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.432
Total TDF 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 96-0.18 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.424
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsChange From Baseline in Z-score for Whole Body BMD at Week 96-0.03 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.456
Secondary

Number of Participants With Changes in Drug-Resistant Mutations During the Study

The number of participants with changes in drug-resistant mutations during the study was summarized.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 192

Population: Participants with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, with confirmed virologic breakthrough (defined as 2 consecutive increases in HBV DNA of at least 10-fold from nadir, or confirmed values ≥ 400 copies/mL after being \< 400 copies/mL while on study medication), or subjects who discontinued early (after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL) were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsNumber of Participants With Changes in Drug-Resistant Mutations During the StudyNew TDF Drug-Resistant Mutations0 participants
TDF 12-14 YearsNumber of Participants With Changes in Drug-Resistant Mutations During the StudyEnrichment of TDF Drug-Resistant Mutations0 participants
TDF 15-17 YearsNumber of Participants With Changes in Drug-Resistant Mutations During the StudyNew TDF Drug-Resistant Mutations0 participants
TDF 15-17 YearsNumber of Participants With Changes in Drug-Resistant Mutations During the StudyEnrichment of TDF Drug-Resistant Mutations0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set who were HBeAg-positive at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14444.4 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7211.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4811.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19233.3 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9644.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7223.1 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14438.5 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4817.9 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19243.6 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9630.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7223.1 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14453.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19253.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9638.5 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 487.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9628.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 488.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7211.4 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14434.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19237.1 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14439.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4816.7 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19241.7 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7220.8 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9633.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 488.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14439.6 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7214.6 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19241.7 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9631.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set who were HBeAg-positive at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14433.3 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7211.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4811.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19233.3 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9644.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7223.1 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14438.5 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4815.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19238.5 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9630.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7223.1 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14453.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19253.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9638.5 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 487.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9625.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 488.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7211.4 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14434.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19237.1 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14437.5 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4814.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19237.5 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7220.8 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9633.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 488.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14439.6 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7214.6 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19241.7 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline and Who Had HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9629.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set who were HBeAg-positive at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14422.2 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7211.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4811.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19233.3 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9644.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7215.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14430.8 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4812.8 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19228.2 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9628.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14446.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19246.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9630.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9622.9 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14425.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19225.7 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14429.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4812.5 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19229.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7214.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9631.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14431.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19231.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normal ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9625.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set who were HBeAg-Positive with abnormal ALT at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14433.3 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7216.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4816.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19250.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9650.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7222.2 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14429.6 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4818.5 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19229.6 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9633.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14455.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19255.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9633.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9624.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14427.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19227.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14430.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4818.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19233.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7221.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9636.4 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14433.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19233.3 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants Who Were HBeAg-Positive With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL, Normalized ALT, and HBeAg Loss/Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9626.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with abnormal ALT at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14457.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7285.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4885.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19285.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9685.7 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7271.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14471.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4871.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19267.9 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9678.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14466.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19277.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9655.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9654.5 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14469.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19257.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14468.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4874.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19271.4 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7274.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9680.0 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14469.0 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19261.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9654.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set with abnormal ALT at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14457.1 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7285.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4885.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19285.7 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9685.7 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7271.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14471.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4871.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19275.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9678.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7222.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14466.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19277.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9666.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4811.1 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9663.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4821.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7233.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14472.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19269.7 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14468.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4874.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19277.1 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7274.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9680.0 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4819.0 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14471.4 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7231.0 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19271.4 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Abnormal ALT at Baseline Who Had Normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9664.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192

The percentage of participants reported is the cumulative incidence from baseline to the respective time point. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1442.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 962.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1924.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1924.9 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1441.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1923.8 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 961.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 1923.7 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Spine BMD at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

The percentage of participants reported is the cumulative incidence from baseline to the respective time point. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1442.4 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1922.4 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1441.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1921.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 6% Decrease From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive. Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis), using the M = F.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 722.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1442.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 962.4 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1441.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 721.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 961.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14490.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7290.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4880.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19290.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9690.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7283.3 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14488.1 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4881.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19283.3 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9688.1 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14469.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19276.9 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9653.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9663.4 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14482.9 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19273.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14488.5 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4880.8 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19284.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7284.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9688.5 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14479.6 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19274.1 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 169 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9661.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14460.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7280.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4870.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19280.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9680.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7269.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14469.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4869.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19264.3 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9673.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14453.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19269.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9646.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9651.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14468.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19263.4 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14467.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4869.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19267.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7271.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9675.0 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14464.8 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19264.8 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Normal ALT at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9650.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 4890.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 9690.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 144100.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 19290.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 14490.5 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 9688.1 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 4885.7 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 19285.7 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 19276.9 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 14469.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 9653.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 19273.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 9668.3 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 14485.4 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 14492.3 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 19286.5 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 9688.5 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 4886.5 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 9664.8 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 14481.5 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 19274.1 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis), using the M = F.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 722.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1442.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1922.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 962.4 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1441.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1921.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 721.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 961.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 480 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1440 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 720 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 1920 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 960 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis) using the missing = failure method.

Time frame: Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14460.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7280.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4870.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19280.0 percentage of participants
TDF 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9680.0 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7276.2 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14471.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4876.2 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19271.4 percentage of participants
TDF 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9676.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7230.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14469.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19284.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9669.2 percentage of participants
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4830.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9665.9 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4826.8 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7241.5 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14475.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19275.6 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14469.2 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4875.0 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19273.1 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7276.9 percentage of participants
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9676.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 4827.8 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 14474.1 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 7238.9 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 19277.8 percentage of participants
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercentage of Participants With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Weeks 48, 72, 96, 144, and 192Week 9666.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 144

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 144

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 14419.224 percentage changeStandard Deviation 8.7594
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 1445.289 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.8084
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 14421.346 percentage changeStandard Deviation 13.4709
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 1446.144 percentage changeStandard Deviation 8.3286
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 1448.133 percentage changeStandard Deviation 8.5611
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 1449.311 percentage changeStandard Deviation 11.3262
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 192

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 19223.933 percentage changeStandard Deviation 8.5166
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 1926.673 percentage changeStandard Deviation 7.287
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 19225.036 percentage changeStandard Deviation 14.2346
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 1926.867 percentage changeStandard Deviation 9.3736
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 19210.050 percentage changeStandard Deviation 10.1637
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 19211.212 percentage changeStandard Deviation 13.1459
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 72

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 72

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 7211.516 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.8818
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 723.589 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.5633
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 7214.131 percentage changeStandard Deviation 9.9563
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 726.117 percentage changeStandard Deviation 6.0624
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 725.144 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.4291
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 728.080 percentage changeStandard Deviation 7.8996
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 96

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 9613.811 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.6712
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 964.196 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.8021
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 9616.687 percentage changeStandard Deviation 10.4359
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 964.272 percentage changeStandard Deviation 7.0463
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 966.119 percentage changeStandard Deviation 6.12
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine BMD at Week 967.003 percentage changeStandard Deviation 9.3658
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 48

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 489.234 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.4782
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 482.114 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.6023
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 489.038 percentage changeStandard Deviation 6.6575
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 484.435 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.9091
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 483.510 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.5507
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 485.562 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.6772
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 144

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 144

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 14410.940 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.8819
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1443.529 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.1734
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 14412.638 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.9973
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1444.730 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.2213
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1444.949 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.5753
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1446.505 percentage changeStandard Deviation 6.2944
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 192

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 192

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 19213.923 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.6139
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1924.295 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.7318
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 19214.797 percentage changeStandard Deviation 6.4993
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1924.549 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.4494
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1926.086 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.4029
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 1927.223 percentage changeStandard Deviation 7.2666
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 48

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 485.123 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.8309
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 481.339 percentage changeStandard Deviation 1.9324
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 485.470 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.4958
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 483.236 percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.8573
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 482.048 percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.783
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 483.817 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.1576
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 72

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 72

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 727.282 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.9156
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 722.141 percentage changeStandard Deviation 2.6284
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 728.480 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.477
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 724.335 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.4073
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 723.067 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.4819
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 725.391 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.0902
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 96

Data were summarized by treatment and age group (grouped by baseline age for analysis).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 968.034 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.4973
TDF 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 963.023 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.2063
Placebo 12-14 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 9610.056 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.4296
Placebo 15-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 964.291 percentage changeStandard Deviation 4.3195
Total TDF 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 963.943 percentage changeStandard Deviation 3.773
Total Placebo 12-17 YearsPercent Change From Baseline in Whole Body BMD at Week 965.675 percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.1858

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026