Skip to content

Calaspargase Pegol or Pegaspargase and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Younger Patients With Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A Pilot Study of Intravenous EZN-2285 (SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase) or Intravenous Oncaspar® in the Treatment of Patients With High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00671034
Enrollment
166
Registered
2008-05-02
Start date
2008-07-21
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2021-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Adult B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Childhood B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial is studying giving calaspargase pegol together with combination chemotherapy to see how well it works compared with giving pegaspargase together with combination chemotherapy in treating younger patients with newly diagnosed high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the pharmacokinetic comparability of EZN-2285 (calaspargase pegol) compared to Oncaspar (pegaspargase) given intravenously during induction and consolidation in patients with high-risk ALL receiving augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) therapy. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To describe the pharmacodynamics (PD) of EZN-2285 compared to Oncaspar given intravenously during induction and consolidation in patients with high-risk ALL receiving augmented BFM therapy. II. To determine end of induction therapy day 29 minimal residual disease (MRD) for patients randomized to the EZN-2285 containing regimen compared to the Oncaspar® containing regimen. III. To determine the complete remission (CR) rates for patients receiving EZN-2285 by day 29 of induction compared to Oncaspar. IV. To assess event-free survival (EFS) associated with the administration of EZN-2285 given during augmented post Induction intensification therapy to patients with high-risk ALL compared to Oncaspar. V. To determine the proportion of patients with an asparaginase level of at least 0.1 IU/mL and the proportion with at least 0.4 IU/mL on days 4, 15, 22 and 29 of induction compared to Oncaspar. VI. To determine the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of asparagine after administration of EZN-2285 compared to Oncaspar. VII. To assess the immunogenicity of EZN-2285 including the detection of binding and neutralizing antibodies compared to Oncaspar. VIII. To assess the tolerability and toxicities associated with the administration of EZN-2285 given during augmented post induction intensification therapy to patients with high risk ALL compared to Oncaspar. IX. To explore the relationship between the terminal pharmacokinetics (PK) of EZN-2285 and the presence of antibodies. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to response to induction therapy (slow early responders \[SER\] vs rapid early responders \[RER\]. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms in 2:1 ratio (arm I: arm II) (patients randomized to arm I receive study drug calaspargase pegol\*; patients randomized to arm II receive study drug pegaspargase). INDUCTION THERAPY\*\* (ALL PATIENTS): Patients receive cytarabine intrathecally (IT) on day 1; vincristine intravenously (IV) and daunorubicin hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; prednisone orally or IV twice daily (BID) on days 1-28; study drug IV over 1 hour on day 4; and methotrexate IT on days 8, 15\*, 22\*, and 29. Patients are assessed for response on day 8 and/or day 15 and day 29. Patients who achieve M1 marrow on day 8 or 15 and negative MRD (i.e., \< 0.1%) on day 29 are considered RER. Patients who achieve M2 or M3 marrow on day 15 OR MRD \>= 0.1% but \< 1% on day 29 are considered SER. Patients with M3 bone marrow are removed from the study. RER and SER proceed to consolidation therapy. Patients with M2 marrow or M1 marrow with \>= 1% MRD receive extended induction therapy. Patients also receive dexamethasone PO or IV BID on days 1-14 (patients \< 10 years) or prednisone BID on days 1-28 (patients \>= 10 years) NOTE: \*For patients with CNS3 disease only. EXTENDED INDUCTION THERAPY\*\*: Patients receive vincristine IV on days 1 and 8; prednisone orally (PO) or IV BID on days 1-14; daunorubicin hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes on day 1; and study drug IV over 1 hour on day 4. Patients are assessed for response on day 43. Patients who achieve M1 and MRD \< 1% are treated as SER (proceed to consolidation therapy). All other patients are removed from study. CONSOLIDATION THERAPY\*\* (ALL PATIENTS): Beginning on day 36 (after completion of induction therapy) or after completion of extended induction therapy, patients (RER and SER) receive cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 29; cytarabine IV or SC on days 1-4, 8-11, 29-32, and 36-39; mercaptopurine PO on days 1-14 and 29-42; vincristine IV on days 15, 22, 43, and 50; study drug IV over 1 hour on days 15 and 43; and methotrexate IT on days 1, 8, 15\*, and 22\*. Patients then proceed to interim maintenance I therapy. NOTE: \*Omit doses for patients with CNS3 disease. INTERIM MAINTENANCE I\*\* (ALL PATIENTS): Patients receive vincristine IV and methotrexate\*\* IV on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41; study drug IV over 1 hour on days 2 and 22; and methotrexate IT on days 1 and 31. Patients then proceed to delayed intensification I therapy. DELAYED INTENSIFICATION I\*\* (ALL PATIENTS): Patients receive vincristine IV on days 1, 8, 15, 43, and 50; dexamethasone PO or IV BID on days 1-21 for patients age 1-9, or on days 1-7 and 15-21 for patients age \>= 10; doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15; study drug IV over 1 hour on days 4 and 43; cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes on day 29; cytarabine IV or subcutaneously (SC) on days 29-32 and 36-39; thioguanine PO on days 29-42; and methotrexate IT on days 1, 29, and 36. Patients treated as RER proceed to maintenance therapy. Patients treated as SER (i.e., patients with CNS3 disease at diagnosis, or pre-treated with steroids, or who are RERs with mixed lineage leukemia \[MLL\] gene rearrangements) proceed to interim maintenance II followed by delayed intensification II. INTERIM MAINTENANCE II\*\* (SER ONLY): Patients receive vincristine IV, methotrexate IV, study drug IV, and methotrexate IT as in interim maintenance I. DELAYED INTENSIFICATION II\*\* (SER ONLY): Beginning on day 29, patients (except patients with CNS3 disease) receive 8 daily fractions of cranial radiotherapy. All patients then receive vincristine IV, dexamethasone PO or IV, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV, study drug IV, cyclophosphamide IV, cytarabine IV or SC, thioguanine PO, and methotrexate IT as in delayed intensification I. Patients who were initially diagnosed with CNS3 disease receive cranial radiotherapy on days 1-5 and 8-12. Patients then proceed to maintenance therapy. MAINTENANCE THERAPY\*\* (ALL PATIENTS): Patients receive vincristine IV on days 1, 29, and 57; oral dexamethasone on days 1-5, 29-33, and 57-61; mercaptopurine PO on days 1-84; methotrexate IT on day 29; and methotrexate PO on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78. Treatment repeats every 12 weeks for up to 2 years (for female patients) or up to 3 years (for male patients) from the start of interim maintenance I. NOTE: \*\* As per amendment #4, most patients receive high-dose methotrexate instead of Capizzi methotrexate at most stages of therapy. CNS3 patients and SER patients who have received cranial irradiation receive planned therapy with no modifications. NOTE: As per amendment #4, the maximum number of intrathecal treatments is limited by RER/SER/CNS3 status and gender. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples are collected periodically for correlative studies, including immunogenicity, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic studies. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 2 months for 2 years, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6-12 months for 2 years.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Given IV

DRUGCytarabine

Given IV, IT, PO, or SC

DRUGDaunorubicin Hydrochloride

Given IV

DRUGDexamethasone

Given PO or IV

DRUGDoxorubicin Hydrochloride

Given IV

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

DRUGMercaptopurine

Given PO

DRUGMethotrexate

Given IV, IT, or PO

DRUGPegaspargase

Given IV

OTHERPharmacological Study

Correlative studies

DRUGPrednisone

Given IV or PO

RADIATIONRadiation Therapy

Some patients undergo RT

DRUGThioguanine

Given PO

DRUGVincristine Sulfate

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must be eligible for and enrolled on AALL08B1 or the successor classification study * Patients must have newly diagnosed high-risk B lymphoblastic leukemia (World Health Organization \[WHO\] 2008 classification) (also termed B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia) * White blood cell (WBC) \>= 50,000/μL for patients age 1-9 OR any WBC count for patients age 10-30 or for patients treated with prior steroids * Patients shall have had no prior cytotoxic chemotherapy with the exception of steroids and intrathecal cytarabine; intrathecal chemotherapy with cytarabine is allowed prior to registration for patient convenience; this is usually done at the time of the diagnostic bone marrow or venous line placement to avoid a second lumbar puncture; (Note: the CNS status must be determined based on a sample obtained prior to administration of any systemic or intrathecal chemotherapy, except for steroid pretreatment) systemic chemotherapy must begin within 72 hours of this intrathecal therapy * Patients receiving prior steroid therapy are eligible for this study; the dose and duration of previous steroid therapy should be carefully documented * Pregnancy tests with a negative result must be obtained in all post-menarchal females * Lactating females must agree that they will not breastfeed a child while on this study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with Down syndrome are excluded from this study * Patients with testicular leukemia at diagnosis are excluded from this study * Pregnant female patients are excluded from this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)Post Day 29 of Induction and Post Day 22 of ConsolidationMean half-life of plasma asparaginase during consolidation and Induction; half-life is defined as the time taken for drug concentration to decrease by half.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)<0.01% at the End of InductionEnd of induction (Day 29)Percentage of participants with Negative MRD (MRD\<0.01%).
Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission at the End of InductionEnd of induction (Day 29)Complete Remission (CR) rate; where CR is defined as M1 marrow (\< 5% lymphoblasts in the bone marrow)
Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)5 YearsPercentage of participants who were event free. Event Free Probability defined as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignant neoplasm, remission death) or date of last contact for subjects who are event-free.
Asparaginase LevelDays 4, 15, 22 and 29 of InductionThe proportion of patients with an asparaginase level of at least 0.1 IU/mL and the proportion with at least 0.4 IU/mL on Days 4, 15, 22 and 29 of Induction compared to Oncaspar
Pharmacodynamics (PD)Day 29 of consolidation and inductionPlasma Asparaginase Concentration During consolidation and induction.
Immunogenicity25 Days Post-dose (Day 29)Number of Patients with Positive Immunogenicity tests
Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Up to 5 yearsThe calculation of AE incidence will be based on the number of patients per AE category. For each patient who has multiple AEs classified to the same category, that patient will be tabulated under the worst toxicity grade for that AE category. The incidence of AEs will be tabulated by treatment arm and by organ class. Special attention will be paid to hypersensitivity, pancreatitis, coagulopathy, infection, neurologic dysfunction and thromboembolic events.
Relationship Between PK and Presence of AntibodiesDay 29 of consolidationPatients with presence of Antibodies.
Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/ml25 Days Post-dose (Day 29)The plasma and CSF concentrations of asparagine in ug/ml after administration of EZN-2285 compared to Oncaspar.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)
calaspargase pegol 2100
69
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)
calaspargase pegol 2500
42
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)
pegaspargase 2500
55
Total166

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event571
Overall StudyDeath321
Overall Studyincludes Alternative therapy, etc.617
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1245
Overall StudyRefusal535
Overall StudyVHR ALL feature835

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
62 Participants40 Participants51 Participants153 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants2 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Age, Continuous11.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.58
9.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.09
10.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.54
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants12 Participants18 Participants44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
53 Participants28 Participants35 Participants116 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants1 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants35 Participants43 Participants134 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants28 Participants23 Participants82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants14 Participants32 Participants84 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
64 / 6940 / 4251 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
54 / 6934 / 4232 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)

Mean half-life of plasma asparaginase during consolidation and Induction; half-life is defined as the time taken for drug concentration to decrease by half.

Time frame: Post Day 29 of Induction and Post Day 22 of Consolidation

Population: Analysis restricted to patients who had PK data collected

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)Asparaginase half-life during Consolidation415.8 hoursStandard Deviation 148.51
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)Asparaginase half-life during Induction305.1 hoursStandard Deviation 98.33
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)Asparaginase half-life during Induction321.5 hoursStandard Deviation 118.22
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)Asparaginase half-life during Consolidation355.9 hoursStandard Deviation 133
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)Asparaginase half-life during Induction126.9 hoursStandard Deviation 50.51
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)Asparaginase half-life during Consolidation117.2 hoursStandard Deviation 49.36
Secondary

Asparaginase Level

The proportion of patients with an asparaginase level of at least 0.1 IU/mL and the proportion with at least 0.4 IU/mL on Days 4, 15, 22 and 29 of Induction compared to Oncaspar

Time frame: Days 4, 15, 22 and 29 of Induction

Population: Patients who had data collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 1598.4 percentage of patients
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 1575.8 percentage of patients
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 40 percentage of patients
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 2913.6 percentage of patients
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 2298.2 percentage of patients
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 40 percentage of patients
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 2237.5 percentage of patients
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 2994.9 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 15100 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 22100 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 2995.0 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 40 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 1595.0 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 2262.5 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 2927.5 percentage of patients
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 40 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 2295.1 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 290 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 2214.6 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 15100 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 40 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 2928.6 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.1 IU/mL day 40 percentage of patients
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Asparaginase LevelLevel at least 0.4 IU/mL day 1593.0 percentage of patients
Secondary

Immunogenicity

Number of Patients with Positive Immunogenicity tests

Time frame: 25 Days Post-dose (Day 29)

Population: Patients who had data collected.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Immunogenicity2 Participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Immunogenicity2 Participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Immunogenicity4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission at the End of Induction

Complete Remission (CR) rate; where CR is defined as M1 marrow (\< 5% lymphoblasts in the bone marrow)

Time frame: End of induction (Day 29)

Population: Patients who had data collected

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission at the End of Induction92.4 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission at the End of Induction97.6 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission at the End of Induction94.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)

Percentage of participants who were event free. Event Free Probability defined as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignant neoplasm, remission death) or date of last contact for subjects who are event-free.

Time frame: 5 Years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)72.35 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)80.8 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)79.34 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)<0.01% at the End of Induction

Percentage of participants with Negative MRD (MRD\<0.01%).

Time frame: End of induction (Day 29)

Population: Patients who had data collected.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)<0.01% at the End of Induction65.2 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)<0.01% at the End of Induction81 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)<0.01% at the End of Induction72.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics (PD)

Plasma Asparaginase Concentration During consolidation and induction.

Time frame: Day 29 of consolidation and induction

Population: Patients who had data collected

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Pharmacodynamics (PD)Plasma Asparaginase Concentration- Consolidation575.9 mIU/mLStandard Deviation 233.91
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Pharmacodynamics (PD)Plasma Asparaginase Concentration- Induction271.6 mIU/mLStandard Deviation 118.17
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Pharmacodynamics (PD)Plasma Asparaginase Concentration- Consolidation617.2 mIU/mLStandard Deviation 321.41
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Pharmacodynamics (PD)Plasma Asparaginase Concentration- Induction339.6 mIU/mLStandard Deviation 126.83
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Pharmacodynamics (PD)Plasma Asparaginase Concentration- Consolidation562.1 mIU/mLStandard Deviation 296.82
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Pharmacodynamics (PD)Plasma Asparaginase Concentration- Induction72.8 mIU/mLStandard Deviation 47.94
Secondary

Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/ml

The plasma and CSF concentrations of asparagine in ug/ml after administration of EZN-2285 compared to Oncaspar.

Time frame: 25 Days Post-dose (Day 29)

Population: Patients who had data collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/mlCSF asparagine concentration (ug/mL)0.2 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.108
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/mlPlasma asparagine concentration (ug/mL)0.2 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.784
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/mlCSF asparagine concentration (ug/mL)0.19 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.086
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/mlPlasma asparagine concentration (ug/mL)0.25 ug/mLStandard Deviation 1.231
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/mlCSF asparagine concentration (ug/mL)0.26 ug/mLStandard Deviation 0.26
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/mlPlasma asparagine concentration (ug/mL)0.83 ug/mLStandard Deviation 2.195
Secondary

Relationship Between PK and Presence of Antibodies

Patients with presence of Antibodies.

Time frame: Day 29 of consolidation

Population: These data will never be collected.

Secondary

Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)

The calculation of AE incidence will be based on the number of patients per AE category. For each patient who has multiple AEs classified to the same category, that patient will be tabulated under the worst toxicity grade for that AE category. The incidence of AEs will be tabulated by treatment arm and by organ class. Special attention will be paid to hypersensitivity, pancreatitis, coagulopathy, infection, neurologic dysfunction and thromboembolic events.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: Patients who had data collected. International normalized ratio (INR). Activated partial thromboplastin (APT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Consolidation44.9 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Consolidation2.0 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Consolidation20.4 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Delayed Intensification I4.4 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Consolidation0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Consolidation53.1 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Delayed Intensification I28.9 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Interim Maintenance I41.3 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Delayed Intensification I44.4 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Interim Maintenance I34.8 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Delayed Intensification I2.2 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis - Interim Maintenance I2.2 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/prolongation of APT time - Consolidation8.2 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/prolongation APT time -Delayed Intension I8.9 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)%pts w/prolongation APT time-Interim maintenance I6.5 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Consolidation0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Delayed Intensification I2.2 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Interim Maintenance I2.2 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% patients w/INR increase - Consolidation6.1 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/INR increase - Delayed Intensification I6.7 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% patients w/INR increase - Interim Maintenance I2.2 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis - Consolidation10.2 Percentage of participants
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis -Delayed Intensification I2.2 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Consolidation0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% patients w/INR increase - Consolidation3.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis - Interim Maintenance I3.4 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Consolidation42.4 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Delayed Intensification I61.5 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Consolidation3.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Delayed Intensification I38.5 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/prolongation of APT time - Consolidation9.1 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Consolidation27.3 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Interim Maintenance I27.6 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% patients w/INR increase - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis - Consolidation6.1 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/prolongation APT time -Delayed Intension I26.9 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Consolidation0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Interim Maintenance I44.8 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/INR increase - Delayed Intensification I3.8 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Delayed Intensification I3.8 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)%pts w/prolongation APT time-Interim maintenance I6.9 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis -Delayed Intensification I7.7 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Consolidation45.5 Percentage of participants
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Interim Maintenance I3.4 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Consolidation30.2 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Delayed Intensification I10.5 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% patients w/INR increase - Interim Maintenance I2.6 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperbilirubinemia - Interim Maintenance I33.3 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Consolidation46.5 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Delayed Intensification I36.8 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Interim Maintenance I2.6 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis -Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis - Interim Maintenance I2.6 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% patients w/INR increase - Consolidation7.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/prolongation of APT time - Consolidation7.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/prolongation APT time -Delayed Intension I18.4 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)%pts w/prolongation APT time-Interim maintenance I7.7 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)% pts w/INR increase - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Consolidation2.3 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Pancreatitis - Consolidation7.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperglycemia - Interim Maintenance I33.3 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Consolidation7.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Consolidation23.3 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Alergic Reaction - Interim Maintenance I2.1 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Consolidation0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Thrombosis - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Delayed Intensification I2.6 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)CNS - Interim Maintenance I0.0 Percentage of participants
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)Hyperlipidemia - Delayed Intensification I0.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026