Skip to content

Atacicept in Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-naïve Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (AUGUST II)

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-centre Phase II Study of Atacicept in Anti-TNFα-naïve Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00595413
Acronym
AUGUST II
Enrollment
311
Registered
2008-01-16
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2016-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis, Atacicept, Adalimumab, Humira®

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atacicept compared to placebo in the treatment of signs and symptoms in a subject population with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and no previous exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapy.

Interventions

Placebo matched to atacicept will be administered subcutaneously twice a week for initial 4 weeks, followed by once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.

DRUGAtacicept: with loading dose

Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 milligram (mg) twice a week for initial 4 weeks as loading dose, followed by 150 mg once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.

Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg once a week for 25 weeks.

BIOLOGICALAdalimumab

Adalimumab (Humira®) will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg every other week for 25 weeks.

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
EMD Serono
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years of age at the time of informed consent who have RA satisfying American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria with a disease history of at least 6 months * Subjects must have active disease, defined by \>=8 swollen joints (out of 66), \>=8 tender joints (out of 68) and CRP \>=10 milligram per liter (mg/L) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \>=28 millimeter per hour (mm/hr), despite treatment with MTX at a dose of \>=15 milligram per week (mg/week) for greater than (\>) 3 months * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

* Inflammatory joint disease other than RA * Previous or concurrent treatment with any approved or investigational biological compound for RA, including but not restricted to any anti-TNFalpha agents, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) and belimumab * Treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARDs) other than MTX * Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 1 month before study Day 1 * MTX dose \>25 mg/week, prednisone dose \>10 mg/day (or equivalent), or change in steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) dosing regimen within 28 days before study Day 1 * Immunization with live vaccine or immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment within 28 days before study Day 1 or need for such treatment during the study (including follow-up) * Any history or presence of active or latent tuberculosis, major infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectives within 28 days before study Day 1 * Other major concurrent illness or organ dysfunction as specified in the protocol * Serum IgG below 6 gram per liter (g/L) * Known hypersensitivity to atacicept or to any of the components of the formulated atacicept * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26Week 26ACR20-CRP response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=20% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26Week 26ACR50-CRP response is defined as \>=50% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=50% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26Week 26ACR70-CRP response is defined as \>=70% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=70% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26Week 26The EULAR response criteria evaluate change in DAS28 scores represented as good response, moderate response, or no response considering both the current DAS28 score and the observed improvement from baseline. Participants were considered to have good or moderate EULAR response if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1 and the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was greater than (\>) 0.6; or if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was \>5.1 and improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was \>1.2.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsFrom the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, assessed up to Week 38An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Countries

Germany, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matched to atacicept was administered subcutaneously twice a week for initial 4 weeks, followed by once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.
76
Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose
Atacicept was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 milligram (mg) twice a week for initial 4 weeks as loading dose, followed by 150 mg once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.
78
Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose
Atacicept was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg once a week for 25 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to atacicept subcutaneously once a week during initial 4 weeks for blinding purpose (placebo injections alternating with atacicept injections).
78
Adalimumab
Adalimumab (Humira®) was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg every other week for 25 weeks.
79
Total311

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0211
Overall StudyDeath0010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2213
Overall StudyOther5150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboAtacicept 150 mg With Loading DoseAtacicept 150 mg Without Loading DoseAdalimumabTotal
Age, Continuous54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants65 Participants66 Participants64 Participants259 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants13 Participants12 Participants15 Participants52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 7627 / 7824 / 7822 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 764 / 787 / 783 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26

ACR20-CRP response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=20% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

Time frame: Week 26

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 2646.1 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg With Loading DosePercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 2644.9 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading DosePercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 2657.7 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 2670.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, assessed up to Week 38

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAEs38 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs2 participants
Atacicept 150 mg With Loading DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs4 participants
Atacicept 150 mg With Loading DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAEs49 participants
Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAEs49 participants
Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading DoseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs7 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsTEAEs50 participants
AdalimumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs3 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26

ACR50-CRP response is defined as \>=50% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=50% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

Time frame: Week 26

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 2614.5 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg With Loading DosePercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 2629.5 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading DosePercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 2633.3 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 2638.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26

ACR70-CRP response is defined as \>=70% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=70% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).

Time frame: Week 26

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 265.3 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg With Loading DosePercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 2612.8 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading DosePercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 2612.8 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 2617.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26

The EULAR response criteria evaluate change in DAS28 scores represented as good response, moderate response, or no response considering both the current DAS28 score and the observed improvement from baseline. Participants were considered to have good or moderate EULAR response if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1 and the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was greater than (\>) 0.6; or if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was \>5.1 and improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was \>1.2.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 2659.2 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg With Loading DosePercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 2664.1 percentage of participants
Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading DosePercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 2667.9 percentage of participants
AdalimumabPercentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 2681.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026