Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, Atacicept, Adalimumab, Humira®
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atacicept compared to placebo in the treatment of signs and symptoms in a subject population with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and no previous exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapy.
Interventions
Placebo matched to atacicept will be administered subcutaneously twice a week for initial 4 weeks, followed by once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.
Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 milligram (mg) twice a week for initial 4 weeks as loading dose, followed by 150 mg once a week for subsequent 21 weeks.
Atacicept will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg once a week for 25 weeks.
Adalimumab (Humira®) will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg every other week for 25 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female subjects greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years of age at the time of informed consent who have RA satisfying American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria with a disease history of at least 6 months * Subjects must have active disease, defined by \>=8 swollen joints (out of 66), \>=8 tender joints (out of 68) and CRP \>=10 milligram per liter (mg/L) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \>=28 millimeter per hour (mm/hr), despite treatment with MTX at a dose of \>=15 milligram per week (mg/week) for greater than (\>) 3 months * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria could apply
Exclusion criteria
* Inflammatory joint disease other than RA * Previous or concurrent treatment with any approved or investigational biological compound for RA, including but not restricted to any anti-TNFalpha agents, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) and belimumab * Treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARDs) other than MTX * Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 1 month before study Day 1 * MTX dose \>25 mg/week, prednisone dose \>10 mg/day (or equivalent), or change in steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) dosing regimen within 28 days before study Day 1 * Immunization with live vaccine or immunoglobulin (Ig) treatment within 28 days before study Day 1 or need for such treatment during the study (including follow-up) * Any history or presence of active or latent tuberculosis, major infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti-infectives within 28 days before study Day 1 * Other major concurrent illness or organ dysfunction as specified in the protocol * Serum IgG below 6 gram per liter (g/L) * Known hypersensitivity to atacicept or to any of the components of the formulated atacicept * Other protocol-defined
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26 | Week 26 | ACR20-CRP response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=20% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26 | Week 26 | ACR50-CRP response is defined as \>=50% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=50% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP). |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26 | Week 26 | ACR70-CRP response is defined as \>=70% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=70% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP). |
| Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26 | Week 26 | The EULAR response criteria evaluate change in DAS28 scores represented as good response, moderate response, or no response considering both the current DAS28 score and the observed improvement from baseline. Participants were considered to have good or moderate EULAR response if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1 and the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was greater than (\>) 0.6; or if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was \>5.1 and improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was \>1.2. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, assessed up to Week 38 | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. |
Countries
Germany, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo matched to atacicept was administered subcutaneously twice a week for initial 4 weeks, followed by once a week for subsequent 21 weeks. | 76 |
| Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose Atacicept was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 milligram (mg) twice a week for initial 4 weeks as loading dose, followed by 150 mg once a week for subsequent 21 weeks. | 78 |
| Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose Atacicept was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg once a week for 25 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to atacicept subcutaneously once a week during initial 4 weeks for blinding purpose (placebo injections alternating with atacicept injections). | 78 |
| Adalimumab Adalimumab (Humira®) was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 40 mg every other week for 25 weeks. | 79 |
| Total | 311 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Other | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose | Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose | Adalimumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 54.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 53.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 | 53.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 53.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 | 53.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 64 Participants | 65 Participants | 66 Participants | 64 Participants | 259 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 12 Participants | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 15 Participants | 52 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 23 / 76 | 27 / 78 | 24 / 78 | 22 / 79 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 76 | 4 / 78 | 7 / 78 | 3 / 79 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26
ACR20-CRP response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=20% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).
Time frame: Week 26
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26 | 46.1 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26 | 44.9 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26 | 57.7 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Based on C-reactive Protein (ACR20-CRP) at Week 26 | 70.9 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, assessed up to Week 38
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | TEAEs | 38 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Serious TEAEs | 2 participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Serious TEAEs | 4 participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | TEAEs | 49 participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | TEAEs | 49 participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Serious TEAEs | 7 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | TEAEs | 50 participants |
| Adalimumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | Serious TEAEs | 3 participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26
ACR50-CRP response is defined as \>=50% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=50% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).
Time frame: Week 26
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26 | 14.5 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26 | 29.5 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26 | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Based on CRP (ACR50-CRP) at Week 26 | 38.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26
ACR70-CRP response is defined as \>=70% improvement from Baseline in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with \>=70% improvement from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function; and 5) acute-phase marker (CRP).
Time frame: Week 26
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26 | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26 | 12.8 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26 | 12.8 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Based on CRP (ACR70-CRP) at Week 26 | 17.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26
The EULAR response criteria evaluate change in DAS28 scores represented as good response, moderate response, or no response considering both the current DAS28 score and the observed improvement from baseline. Participants were considered to have good or moderate EULAR response if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1 and the improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was greater than (\>) 0.6; or if at the time of assessment, their DAS28 score was \>5.1 and improvement from baseline in their DAS28 score was \>1.2.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 study treatment dose.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26 | 59.2 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg With Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26 | 64.1 percentage of participants |
| Atacicept 150 mg Without Loading Dose | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26 | 67.9 percentage of participants |
| Adalimumab | Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Responses at Week 26 | 81.0 percentage of participants |