Skip to content

Sulfadoxine- Pyrimethamine Versus Weekly Chloroquine for Malaria Prevention in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia

Presumptive Treatment With Sulfadoxine- Pyrimethamine Versus Weekly Chloroquine for Malaria Prophylaxis in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00399074
Enrollment
220
Registered
2006-11-14
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2007-02-28
Last updated
2009-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Anemia, Malaria

Keywords

Sickle Cell anemia, Malaria, Presumptive treatment, Sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine, Children, Uganda

Brief summary

Malaria is fatal and increases the risk of death among children with sickle cell anemia. Chemoprophylaxis significantly improves quality of life in these children. In Uganda Chloroquine is the drug of choice for prophylaxis and yet it's effectiveness is limited due to high levels of resistance throughout the country. Intermittent presumptive treatment with sulfadoxine - Pyrimethamine a new approach to malaria prevention, has shown great potential in reducing incidence of malaria and anaemia among high risk groups such as pregnant women and infants. However no studies have been done in Uganda to determine if presumptive treatment with sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine reduces the incidence of malaria in children with sickle cell anaemia. Hypothesis : Presumptive treatment with sulfadoxine- Pyrimethamine is better than weekly chloroquine in reducing incidence of malaria in children with sickle cell anaemia.

Detailed description

Malaria is fatal and increases the risk of death among children with sickle cell anemia. Chemoprophylaxis significantly improves quality of life in these children. In Uganda Chloroquine is the drug of choice for prophylaxis and yet it's effectiveness is limited due to high levels of resistance throughout the country. Intermittent presumptive treatment with sulfadoxine - pyrimethamine a new approach to malaria prevention, has shown great potential in reducing incidence of malaria and anemia among high risk groups such as pregnant women and infants. However no studies have been done in Uganda to determine if presumptive treatment with sulfadoxine- pyrimethamine reduces incidence of malaria among high risk group such as children with sickle cell anaemia. We calculated a sample size of 110 patients in each group for a power of 95% assuming that the incidence of malaria in children receiving weekly chloroquine will be 0.36 and those receiving presumptive treatment with sulfadoxine - pyrimethamine the incidence would be 0.16 according to (schellenberg et al )

Interventions

Sponsors

Makerere University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 6 months to 12 years attending sickle cell clinic in Mulago Hospital during the study period with a negative peripheral smear for parasites, adherence to appointment visits, consent by care takers to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known allergy to sulfonamides, Patients with severe illnesses requiring urgent admission, Patients with documented treatment for malaria in the past one month with Sulfadoxine- Pyrimethamine. Patients on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Malaria episodes4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Malaria related admissions1 month
Adverse drug effects4 weeks

Countries

Uganda

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026