Skip to content

Xyrem(Sodium Oxybate) and Ambien(Zolpidem Tartrate) in the Treatment of Chronic Insomnia.

Xyrem(Sodium Oxybate) and Ambien(Zolpidem Tartrate) in the Treatment of Chronic Insomnia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00383643
Enrollment
48
Registered
2006-10-03
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2017-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Brief summary

The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the long term efficacy of sodium oxybate (Xyrem®) and zolpidem tartrate (Ambien®) in treating chronic insomnia. We will compare the efficacy of sodium oxybate with zolpidem tartrate (Ambien®), and compare the efficacy of each of these two medications with placebos.

Detailed description

Primary aim: 1\. To assess the long term efficacy of sodium oxybate and zolpidem tartrate in reducing insomnia and improving sleep quality as assessed by a range of self-reported measures. Questionnaires and Rating Scales: Subjects completed the following questionnaires and scales: Insomnia Severity Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Beck Depression Inventory, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Profile of Mood States-Fatigue (POMS). These questionnaires were administered at study baseline, treatment week 4, 8 and 12. Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The CGI is a clinician-rated scale composed of two subscales that measure disease severity and degree of change, respectively. CGI-Severity (CGI-S) is a single-item, global scale of disease severity that requires the investigator to compare the patient's symptoms with those of all other patients who have the disorder. It is scored from 1 (normal) to 6 (among the most extremely ill of patients). CGI-Change (CGI-C) is a single-item scale of symptomatic improvement or worsening that requires the investigator to compare the patient's status at the time of assessment with baseline severity (baseline CGI-S). One study investigator performed all CGI-S and CGI-C ratings for all subjects. Randomization. After completing all baseline procedures, eligible subjects were randomized to receive either a combination of active SXB and placebo ZOL (pZOL), active ZOL and placebo SXB (pSXB), or pSXB and pZOL, in a 1:1:1 parallel double-dummy design. A member of the study team who had no contact with subjects and no other role in this study was responsible for preparing study medications according to a randomization schedule. ZOL was encapsulated in lactose powder filled gelatin capsules to be indistinguishable from placebo capsules. Liquid pSXB was designed to match active SXB in appearance, taste and consistency. Subjects were given both liquid and capsule study medications, to maintain the double dummy design. Due to the flexible dose design of this study, subjects and investigators were not blinded to the dosages of study medication/placebo. All subjects were instructed to start study medication at 2.25 grams of SXB/pSXB and 5mg of ZOL/pZOL at bedtime. One study investigator reviewed all potential known side effects of SXB and ZOL prior to dosing, and subjects were instructed to take study medications at the bedside immediately before attempting to sleep, as is the standard administration for SXB.

Interventions

DRUGsodium oxybate

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Written informed consent is obtained. 2. The patient is an outpatient, man or woman of any ethnic origin, 18-75 years of age (inclusive). 3. Patient reports insomnia for at least six months, and insomnia causes the patient distress. 4. The Investigator determines that the patient meets diagnostic criteria for Chronic Insomnia according to International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) criteria. 5. Sleep diary based screening shows sleep onset latency \>30 minutes, and /or wake after sleep onset \>30 minutes per night at least 3 nights per week, with combined wake-time-in-bed \_\> 45 minutes. 6. The patient is in good health as determined by a medical and psychiatric history, and physical examination. 7. Women must be surgically sterile, 2 years post-menopausal, or if of child-bearing potential, using a medically accepted method of birth control, and agree to continued use of this method for the duration of the study. 8. The patient is willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to attend regularly scheduled clinic visits as specified in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Has any clinically significant, uncontrolled medical or psychiatric conditions. (treated or untreated) 2. Has a probable diagnosis of a current sleep disorder other than Chronic Insomnia. 3. Used any prescription drugs disallowed by the protocol or clinically significant use of over-the counter(OTC) drugs within 14 days before the screening visit. 4. Has a history of alcohol, narcotic, or any other abuse as defined by the DSM-V. 5. Has a clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination. 6. Is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any woman becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.) 7. Has any disorder that may interfere with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion (including gastrointestinal surgery and succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency) 8. Has a known clinically significant drug sensitivity to sodium oxybate or sedative hypnotics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Clinical Global Impression-change.Baseline to week 12Clinician assessment of Clinical Global Impression-Change score at week 12 of treatment intervention. The Clinical Global Impression - Change scale is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the current time point. It is rated as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. One one clinician provided the ratings in this trial.
Assessment of Insomnia Severity Index12 weeksCurrent self-report on Insomnia Severity Index at week 12 of treatment intervention. This is a seven-item questionnaire where the sum of the answers indicate the severity of insomnia. Total score categories: 0-7 = No clinically significant insomnia 8-14 = Subthreshold insomnia 15-21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity) 22-28 = Clinical insomnia (severe)
Assessment of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)One monthCurrent self-report on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at week 12 of intervention. Consisting of 19 items, the PSQI measures several different aspects of sleep which can be combined into one global score. Each item measure is scored on a scale of 0 to 3 where 3 is the extreme negative. The composite PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Based on this questionnaire, a composite score of 5 or greater is indicative of poor sleep quality.
Assessment of FatigueOne monthCurrent self-report on Profile of Mood State -- Fatigue (POMS-F) at week 12 of intervention. This subscale of the POMS consists of 7 items each scored on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) which are summed to provide a composite score of fatigue. The range is 0 to 28 for this subscale. Higher scores indicate more fatigue.
Assessment of SleepinessOne monthCurrent self-report on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at week 12 of intervention. This measure consists of 8 scenarios in which the participant is asked to assess how likely s/he is to fall asleep. Scale: 0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing. Responses are summed for a total score ranging from 0 to 24. The higher the score, the greater the self-reported sleepiness. Scores of 9 and below are considered in the normal range.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited through local newspaper ads and from the Stanford Sleep Disorders Clinic. A general description of the study was provided. Preliminary screening was conducted by telephone. Interested and qualified persons were scheduled for an in-person screening visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Zolpidem Tartrate
Eligible subjects randomized to this arm received zolpidem as a gelatin capsule and a placebo liquid capsule to fully maintain the blind.
18
Placebo
Eligible subjects randomized to this arm received placebo (also known as a sugar pill) as gelatin capsule and a liquid capsule to fully maintain the blind.
16
Sodium Oxybate
Eligible subjects randomized to this arm received placebo as a gelatin capsule and a sodium oxybate capsule to fully maintain the blind.
14
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZolpidem TartratePlaceboSodium OxybateTotal
Age, Continuous52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
49.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnic Minorities
3 participants5 participants3 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants16 participants14 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants11 Participants9 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants5 Participants5 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 1812 / 1614 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 160 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Clinical Global Impression-change.

Clinician assessment of Clinical Global Impression-Change score at week 12 of treatment intervention. The Clinical Global Impression - Change scale is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the current time point. It is rated as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. One one clinician provided the ratings in this trial.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: All analysis are intent to treat. In the case of missing data, an average value of the available data points (weeks 4 \& 8) were used to replace the missing value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Zolpidem TartrateAssessment of Clinical Global Impression-change.3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboAssessment of Clinical Global Impression-change.4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Sodium OxybateAssessment of Clinical Global Impression-change.2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Primary

Assessment of Fatigue

Current self-report on Profile of Mood State -- Fatigue (POMS-F) at week 12 of intervention. This subscale of the POMS consists of 7 items each scored on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) which are summed to provide a composite score of fatigue. The range is 0 to 28 for this subscale. Higher scores indicate more fatigue.

Time frame: One month

Population: All analysis are intent to treat. In the case of missing data, an average value of the available data points (weeks 4 \& 8) were used to replace the missing value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Zolpidem TartrateAssessment of Fatigue9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
PlaceboAssessment of Fatigue8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Sodium OxybateAssessment of Fatigue5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Primary

Assessment of Insomnia Severity Index

Current self-report on Insomnia Severity Index at week 12 of treatment intervention. This is a seven-item questionnaire where the sum of the answers indicate the severity of insomnia. Total score categories: 0-7 = No clinically significant insomnia 8-14 = Subthreshold insomnia 15-21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity) 22-28 = Clinical insomnia (severe)

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All analysis are intent to treat. In the case of missing data, an average value of the available data points (weeks 4 \& 8) were used to replace the missing value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Zolpidem TartrateAssessment of Insomnia Severity Index10.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
PlaceboAssessment of Insomnia Severity Index10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Sodium OxybateAssessment of Insomnia Severity Index8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Primary

Assessment of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Current self-report on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at week 12 of intervention. Consisting of 19 items, the PSQI measures several different aspects of sleep which can be combined into one global score. Each item measure is scored on a scale of 0 to 3 where 3 is the extreme negative. The composite PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Based on this questionnaire, a composite score of 5 or greater is indicative of poor sleep quality.

Time frame: One month

Population: All analysis are intent to treat. In the case of missing data, an average value of the available data points (weeks 4 \& 8) were used to replace the missing value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Zolpidem TartrateAssessment of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
PlaceboAssessment of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)10.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Sodium OxybateAssessment of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Primary

Assessment of Sleepiness

Current self-report on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at week 12 of intervention. This measure consists of 8 scenarios in which the participant is asked to assess how likely s/he is to fall asleep. Scale: 0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing. Responses are summed for a total score ranging from 0 to 24. The higher the score, the greater the self-reported sleepiness. Scores of 9 and below are considered in the normal range.

Time frame: One month

Population: All analysis are intent to treat. In the case of missing data, an average value of the available data points (weeks 4 \& 8) were used to replace the missing value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Zolpidem TartrateAssessment of Sleepiness5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
PlaceboAssessment of Sleepiness2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Sodium OxybateAssessment of Sleepiness4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026