Skip to content

Bumetanide Versus Furosemide in Heart Failure

Bumetanide Has a More Favourable Effect on Insulin Resistance Than Furosemide in Patients With Heart Failure - A Pilot Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00372762
Enrollment
0
Registered
2006-09-07
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Insulin resistance, heart failure, diuretic therapy

Brief summary

Patients with NYHA FC II-III heart failure will be randomized in a cross-over fashion to 8 weeks of bumetanide versus furosemide therapy (equipotent dose), to test whether bumetanide therapy has a superior effect on insulin resistance compared to furosemide. Patients will be subject to a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) with minimal model (MINMOD) analysis to assess insulin resistance and to a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to assess functional capacity; patient recruitment and retention success, as well as medication adherence, will also be assessed.

Detailed description

Insulin resistance is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with a worse functional capacity and more severe symptoms of heart failure. The majority of HF patients take furosemide on at least a daily basis for symptom relief. Bumetanide is a loop diuretic with a similar therapeutic diuretic effect to furosemide. There is evidence from observational and small comparative trials that bumetanide has a significantly less deleterious effect on indirect measures of insulin resistance compared with furosemide. However, a formal comparison between the 2 drugs using rigorous measures of insulin resistance has never been conducted in patients with HF. If bumetanide can be demonstrated to have a similar diuretic and a superior (less deleterious) effect on insulin resistance in patients with HF, the potential exists for bumetanide to have a significantly reduced morbidity in patients with heart failure compared to furosemide. In order to prepare for such a study, the variance of the MINMOD-derived insulin resistance from the FSIGT (26), in this group of patient needs to be determined along with the feasibility of conducting such a study. Functional capacity will be determined by duplicate 6-minute walk tests.

Interventions

DRUGFurosemide

Current dose of furosemide will be maintained and equivalent dose bumetanide will be used following crossover

Equivalent dose to pre-existing furosemide will be used

DRUGfurosemide

20mg to 80mg orally once or twice daily

0.5mg to 2mg orally once or twice daily

Sponsors

University of Western Ontario, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women ≥18 years of age 2. NHYA FC II or III HF AND documented LVEF ≤40% within 6 months prior to study entry 3. Taking 20 mg to 80 mg furosemide orally once or twice per day 4. No changes to cardiac medications for 3 months prior to study entry and no anticipated changes of medications for the duration of the study 5. No changes to oral anti-diabetic medications (if applicable) for 3 months prior to study entry, and no anticipated changes for the duration of the study (metformin, sulphonylurea type, glitazone type) 6. Ability to provide written consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Known sensitivity to bumetanide 2. Myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass surgery, admission for HF or unstable angina within a 3 month period prior to study recruitment 3. Planned coronary intervention within 6 months 4. Patients who are taking insulin 5. Patients with chronic renal (serum creatinine ≥ 200 μmol/L) or hepatic impairment (known cirrhosis or AST or ALT \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Insulin resistance, as determined by frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test with minimal model analysis (FSIGT MINMOD)3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)3 months
Serum creatinine, sodium, potassium, and chloride3 months
Submaximal exercise capacity as determined by the 6-minute walk test3 months
New York Heart Association Function Class heart failure (NYHA FC)3 months
Fasting blood glucose3 months

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026