Skip to content

Comparing Two Forms of Head Immobilization for Stereotactic Radiotherapy

A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Forms of Immobilization of the Head for Fractioned Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00328510
Enrollment
83
Registered
2006-05-22
Start date
2005-02-28
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2016-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients Receiving Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy, for Brain Tumors

Keywords

Stereotactic radiotherapy

Brief summary

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) requires extremely precise and reproducible immobilization of the patient's head. This randomized study compares the efficacy of two commonly used forms of immobilization used for SRT.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: 1\) To compare the efficacy of two commonly used, generally accepted forms of immobilization for the treatment of lesions in the head with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Specifically, this study will use the ExacTRAC kilovoltage imaging system to assess positioning accuracy for these two systems. OUTLINE: Two routinely used methods of immobilization, which differ in their approach to reproduce head position from day-to-day are the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC)frame and the BrainLab thermoplastic mask. The GTC frame fixates on the patient upper detention and thus us in direct mechanical contact with the cranium. The BrainLab mask is a two-part masking system custom-fitted to the front and back of the participant's head. After patients sign an IRB-approved informed consent form, eligible participants are either randomized to either the GTC frame or the mask for their course of SRT. Participants are treated as per standard procedure; however, prior to each treatment, a set of digital kV images (ExacTrac, BrainLabAB, Germany) is taken. These images are fused with reference digitally constructed radiographs obtained from treatment planning CT to yield lateral, longitudinal, and vertical deviations of isocenter and head rotations about respective axes. The primary endpoint of the study is to compare the two systems with respect to mean and standard deviations (SDs) using the distance to isocenter measure.

Interventions

DEVICEGTC frame
DEVICEThermoplastic facemask

Sponsors

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are eligible for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

Exclusion criteria

* Severe claustrophobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distance From Ideal to Center of GTC Frame and BrainLab Thermoplastic Mask With Respect to Average and VariabilityMeasurements taken during SRTThis study uses the ExacTRAC imaging system to assess positioning of frame or mask during SRT. Images yield lateral, longitudinal, and vertical deviations of the isocenter as well as head rotations about respective axes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GTC Frame
Participant undergoes SRT using a GTC frame to immobilize the participant's heading during radiation therapy
42
BrainLab Thermoplastic Mask
Participant undergoes SRT using the BrainLab thermoplastic mask to immobilize the participant's head during radiation therapy
41
Total83

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDentition problems, could not use frame10
Overall StudyGag disorder, could not use frame40
Overall StudySevere kyphosis, could not use mask01
Overall StudyTreatment changed to a single fraction11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBrainLab Thermoplastic MaskGTC FrameTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants31 Participants61 Participants
Age, Continuous56.94 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.07
55.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.93
56.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.44
Region of Enrollment
United States
41 participants42 participants83 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants25 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants17 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 320 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Distance From Ideal to Center of GTC Frame and BrainLab Thermoplastic Mask With Respect to Average and Variability

This study uses the ExacTRAC imaging system to assess positioning of frame or mask during SRT. Images yield lateral, longitudinal, and vertical deviations of the isocenter as well as head rotations about respective axes.

Time frame: Measurements taken during SRT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GTC FrameDistance From Ideal to Center of GTC Frame and BrainLab Thermoplastic Mask With Respect to Average and Variability2.00 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.04
BrainLab Thermoplastic MaskDistance From Ideal to Center of GTC Frame and BrainLab Thermoplastic Mask With Respect to Average and Variability3.17 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.95

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026