Skip to content

Bosentan in Digital Ulcers

Long-term Bosentan Open Label Extension of the AC-052-331 Study in Systemic Sclerosis Patients With Ischemic Digital Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00319696
Acronym
RAPIDS 2 OL
Enrollment
116
Registered
2006-04-27
Start date
2004-07-08
Completion date
2009-01-22
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only โ€” not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Digital Ulcers

Keywords

digital ulcers, systemic sclerosis, finger ulcers, bosentan, open label

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to collect long-term efficacy, tolerability and safety data of bosentan in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients suffering from ischemic digital ulcers (DUs).

Interventions

Bosentan 62.5-mg oral tablets twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks (initial dose)

Bosentan 125-mg oral tablets administered b.i.d. (target dose)

Sponsors

Actelion
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with SSc according to the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology 2. SSc patients with at least one DU at baseline qualifying as a CU (see definition section 3.2.2) 3. CU occurred \< 3 months and \> 1 week prior to randomization. The subset of patients with SSc felt to be at high risk for DUs will be identified in the screening period but will not be eligible for enrollment until a CU has developed 4. Male or female patients \>/= 18 years of age 5. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pre-treatment pregnancy test and use a reliable method of contraception during study treatment and for at least 3 months after study treatment termination 6. Women not of childbearing potential are defined as postmenopausal (i.e., amenorrhea for at least 1 year), or surgically or naturally sterile 7. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. DUs due to condition other than SSc 2. Severe PAH (WHO class III and IV) 3. Systolic blood pressure \< 85 mmHg 4. Hemoglobin concentration \< 75% of the lower limit of the normal range 5. AST and/or ALT values greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal 6. Moderate to severe hepatic impairment, i.e., Child-Pugh Class B or C 7. Severe malabsorption or any severe organ failure (e.g., lung, kidney) or any life-threatening condition 8. Pregnancy or breast-feeding 9. Previous treatment with bosentan 10. Treatment with any of the following: glibenclamide (glyburide), fluconazole, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus and any other calcineurin inhibitor 1 week prior to randomization 11. Local injection of botulinum toxin in an affected finger 1 month prior to randomization 12. Treatment with parenteral prostanoids (prostaglandin E, epoprostenol, treprostinil sodium or other prostacyclin analogs) 3 months prior to randomization 13. Treatment with inhaled or oral prostanoids one month prior to randomization 14. Systemic antibiotics to treat infection of DUs 2 weeks prior to randomization 15. Treatment with phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as sildenafil, except for intermittent treatment of male erectile dysfunction 16. Body weight \< 40 kg 17. Patient with conditions that prevent compliance with the protocol or adhering to therapy 18. Patient who received an investigational product within 1 month preceding screening 19. Known hypersensitivity to bosentan or any of the excipients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsAt planned visits up to week 80The total number of new DUs per patient observed by the investigator at planned visits and new transient DUs recorded in the patient diary (a patient diary was used to record DUs that might appear and disappear between two planned visits) were assessed at each clinic visit
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Activity80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
Mean Changes From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Overall Hand Pain Related to Finger Ulcers80 weeksOverall hand pain related to finger ulcers was assessed by the patient using a Visual Analogue Scale. Patients were instructed to score their pain by marking on the continuous 10-cm scale, where 0 (left) was no pain and 100 (right) very severe pain, in response to the question, How much pain have you had because of your finger ulcers in the past week? The investigator measured the distance in millimeters between 0 and the patient mark with the ruler provided and recorded the distance.
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in the UK Systemic Sclerosis Functional Score (UKFS)80 weeksUKFS relates to upper and lower extremity function and muscle weakness. For each item, the patient indicated the responses that best described their current ability: able to perform in a normal manner, able to perform with alteration in style, can only manage with difficulty, and impossible to achieve. Each response was given an integer from 0 (able to perform in a normal manner) to 3 (impossible to achieve), and the sum of individual responses provided an overall score of 0 to 33. Missing values were replaced with the worst value the patient reported on the other items at that visit.
Time to Complete Healing of Each Baseline DUBaseline to healingโ€”
Time to Complete Healing of Each New DUNew DU occurence to healingโ€”
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Dressing80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Arising80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Eating80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Walking80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Hygiene80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Reach80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Grip80 weeksSHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Events Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of the Study Medication80 weeksNumber of patients with an adverse event leading to permanent discontinuation of the study treatment
Serious Adverse Events up to 28 Days After Last Study Medication80 weeksNumber of patients with at least one treatment-emergent serious adverse event (TESAE) were reported. TESAEs are serious AEs that occurred after study drug initiation and up to 28 days after study drug discontinuation. More details on the SAEs are provided in the specific Adverse Events Section
Adverse Events up to 24 Hours After Last Study Medication80 weeksNumber of patients with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. All adverse events that occurred after study drug initiation and up to 24 hours after study drug discontinuation were to be recorded.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled at 33 centers in 7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, UK, and USA. The first patient enrolled and started treatment on 8 July 2004 and the last patient enrolled and started treatment on 20 October 2005.

Pre-assignment details

Patients who completed RAPIDS-2 and who still had digital ulcers (DUs) or developed a new digital ulcer (DU) after the last follow-up visit were eligible. After release of the RAPIDS-2 results, patients who were prematurely discontinued from RAPIDS-2 for treatment failure or, if on placebo, for an adverse event and had DUs were also eligible.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bosentan
Initial dose: bosentan 62.5 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for the first 4 weeks. Target dose: bosentan 125 mg b.i.d. thereafter
116
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studyadministrative7
Overall StudyAdverse Event36
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall Studywithdrawal of consent14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBosentan
Age, Continuous49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Age, Customized
Between 24 and 79 years
116 Participants
Overall hand pain58.62 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.8
Region of Enrollment
Canada
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
67 Participants
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Activity
1.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Arising
0.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Dressing
1.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Eating
1.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Grip
1.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Hygiene
0.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Reach
1.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score
Walking
0.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants
United Kingdom Scleroderma Functional Score (UKFS)11.06 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 116
other
Total, other adverse events
111 / 116
serious
Total, serious adverse events
45 / 116

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Activity

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Activitychange from baseline to week 16-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Activitychange from baseline to week 32-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Activitychange from baseline to week 48-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Activitychange from baseline to week 64-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Activitychange from baseline to week 80-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Arising

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Arisingchange from baseline to week 160.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Arisingchange from baseline to week 32-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Arisingchange from baseline to week 480.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Arisingchange from baseline to week 640.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Arisingchange from baseline to week 800.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Dressing

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Dressingchange from baseline to week 16-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Dressingchange from baseline to week 32-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Dressingchange from baseline to week 48-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Dressingchange from baseline to week 64-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Dressingchange from baseline to week 80-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Eating

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Eatingchange from baseline to week 16-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Eatingchange from baseline to week 32-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Eatingchange from baseline to week 48-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Eatingchange from baseline to week 64-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Eatingchange from baseline to week 80-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Grip

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Gripchange from baseline to week 16-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Gripchange from baseline to week 32-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Gripchange from baseline to week 48-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Gripchange from baseline to week 64-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Gripchange from baseline to week 80-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Hygiene

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Hygienechange from baseline to week 16-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Hygienechange from baseline to week 32-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Hygienechange from baseline to week 48-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Hygienechange from baseline to week 640.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Hygienechange from baseline to week 800.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Reach

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Reachchange from baseline to week 16-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Reachchange from baseline to week 320.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Reachchange from baseline to week 480.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Reachchange from baseline to week 640.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Reachchange from baseline to week 800.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Walking

SHAQ evaluates physical disability. Patients were instructed to rate their capacity to perform activities of daily living within the previous 7 days by checking one of the following descriptors: without any difficulty, with some difficulty, with much difficulty, or unable to do, equivalent to scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Items were categorized into 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 99, 93, 85, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Walkingchange from baseline to week 16-0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Walkingchange from baseline to week 320.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Walkingchange from baseline to week 480.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Walkingchange from baseline to week 640.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) Individual Domain Score: Walkingchange from baseline to week 800.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in the UK Systemic Sclerosis Functional Score (UKFS)

UKFS relates to upper and lower extremity function and muscle weakness. For each item, the patient indicated the responses that best described their current ability: able to perform in a normal manner, able to perform with alteration in style, can only manage with difficulty, and impossible to achieve. Each response was given an integer from 0 (able to perform in a normal manner) to 3 (impossible to achieve), and the sum of individual responses provided an overall score of 0 to 33. Missing values were replaced with the worst value the patient reported on the other items at that visit.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 116, 98, 93, 84, 82, and 78, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in the UK Systemic Sclerosis Functional Score (UKFS)change from baseline to week 16-1.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.64
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in the UK Systemic Sclerosis Functional Score (UKFS)change from baseline to week 32-1.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.01
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in the UK Systemic Sclerosis Functional Score (UKFS)change from baseline to week 48-0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.98
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in the UK Systemic Sclerosis Functional Score (UKFS)change from baseline to week 64-1.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
BosentanMean Change From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in the UK Systemic Sclerosis Functional Score (UKFS)change from baseline to week 80-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.66
Primary

Mean Changes From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Overall Hand Pain Related to Finger Ulcers

Overall hand pain related to finger ulcers was assessed by the patient using a Visual Analogue Scale. Patients were instructed to score their pain by marking on the continuous 10-cm scale, where 0 (left) was no pain and 100 (right) very severe pain, in response to the question, How much pain have you had because of your finger ulcers in the past week? The investigator measured the distance in millimeters between 0 and the patient mark with the ruler provided and recorded the distance.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: number of participants at baseline, week 16, week 32, week 48, week 64, and week 80 was 110, 94, 89, 81, 76, and 73, respectively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BosentanMean Changes From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Overall Hand Pain Related to Finger Ulcerschange from baseline to week 16-21.59 mmStandard Deviation 28.02
BosentanMean Changes From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Overall Hand Pain Related to Finger Ulcerschange from baseline to week 32-28.16 mmStandard Deviation 32.64
BosentanMean Changes From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Overall Hand Pain Related to Finger Ulcerschange from baseline to week 48-21.90 mmStandard Deviation 32.09
BosentanMean Changes From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Overall Hand Pain Related to Finger Ulcerschange from baseline to week 64-22.96 mmStandard Deviation 33.27
BosentanMean Changes From Baseline at Each 16 Week Interval up to Week 80 in Overall Hand Pain Related to Finger Ulcerschange from baseline to week 80-24.29 mmStandard Deviation 36.55
Primary

Time to Complete Healing of Each Baseline DU

Time frame: Baseline to healing

Population: Complete healing of each baseline was not calculated due to the lack of effect on healing variables seen in the previous placebo-controlled study (RAPIDS 2). In consequence, the endpoint on time to complete healing of baseline DUs was not evaluated.

Primary

Time to Complete Healing of Each New DU

Time frame: New DU occurence to healing

Population: Complete healing of each new DU was not calculated due to the lack of effect on healing variables seen in the previous placebo-controlled study (RAPIDS 2). In consequence, the endpoint on DU healing originally planned time to complete healing of new DUs was not evaluated.

Primary

Total Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned Visits

The total number of new DUs per patient observed by the investigator at planned visits and new transient DUs recorded in the patient diary (a patient diary was used to record DUs that might appear and disappear between two planned visits) were assessed at each clinic visit

Time frame: At planned visits up to week 80

Population: One patient did not have a DU at baseline (number of patients assessed at Weeks 0-4,4-8,8-16,16-24,24-32,32-40,40-48,48-56,56-64,64-72, and 72-80 were 114, 107, 103, 100, 97, 94, 88, 87, 86, 86, and 83, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 16-2464 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 32-4059 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 24-3256 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 64-7251 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 4-873 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 72-8051 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 56-6448 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 48-5650 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 8-1663 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 0-485 number of new digital ulcers
BosentanTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 40-4852 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 8-1640 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 0-429 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 32-4035 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 24-3241 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 48-5637 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 72-8032 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 64-7235 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 40-4836 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 56-6438 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 16-2436 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 1 New UlcerTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 4-834 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 64-7224 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 0-417 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 4-815 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 8-1622 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 16-2417 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 24-3222 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 32-4015 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 40-4820 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 48-5618 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 56-6414 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 2 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 72-8018 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 4-86 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 16-2411 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 24-3212 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 72-809 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 48-5613 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 0-46 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 64-7215 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 8-169 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 56-647 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 40-4811 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 3 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 32-407 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 48-567 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 32-405 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 8-167 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 40-485 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 4-84 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 72-804 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 56-644 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 0-44 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 16-244 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 64-7210 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 4 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 24-328 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 8-165 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 56-643 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 24-324 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 32-404 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 64-728 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 4-83 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 48-565 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 40-483 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 0-43 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 16-242 number of new digital ulcers
At Least 5 New UlcersTotal Number of New Digital Ulcers (DUs) Per Patient Observed by the Investigator at Planned VisitsWeek 72-802 number of new digital ulcers
Secondary

Adverse Events Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of the Study Medication

Number of patients with an adverse event leading to permanent discontinuation of the study treatment

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: Study population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BosentanAdverse Events Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of the Study Medication36 participants
Secondary

Adverse Events up to 24 Hours After Last Study Medication

Number of patients with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. All adverse events that occurred after study drug initiation and up to 24 hours after study drug discontinuation were to be recorded.

Time frame: 80 weeks

Population: Study population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BosentanAdverse Events up to 24 Hours After Last Study Medication111 participants
Secondary

Serious Adverse Events up to 28 Days After Last Study Medication

Number of patients with at least one treatment-emergent serious adverse event (TESAE) were reported. TESAEs are serious AEs that occurred after study drug initiation and up to 28 days after study drug discontinuation. More details on the SAEs are provided in the specific Adverse Events Section

Time frame: 80 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BosentanSerious Adverse Events up to 28 Days After Last Study Medication45 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ยท Data processed: Feb 4, 2026