Skip to content

Steroid-free and Long-term Calcineurin-free Trial in Islet Cell Transplantation

Steroid-free and Long-term Calcineurin-free Trial in Islet Cell Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00315627
Enrollment
3
Registered
2006-04-18
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2017-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Islet Transplantation

Brief summary

The purposes of this study are: 1. To reverse hyperglycemia and insulin dependency in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus through islet transplantation utilizing steroid free, calcineurin-inhibitor free immunosuppression. 2. To assess the long-term function of successful islet transplants in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus utilizing islets that have undergone a period of culture. 3. To determine whether the natural history of the microvascular, macrovascular, and neuropathic complications are altered following the successful transplantation of islets.

Detailed description

STUDY DESIGN: The initial proposal submitted to the JDRFI was to compare 3 different groups of patients receiving islet cell transplants utilizing steroid-free, calcineurin-free protocols. The 3 groups were as follows: 1. Zenapax, Rapamycin & MMF 2. Campath, Rapamycin & MMF, and 3. Thymoglobulin, Rapamycin & MMF. The grant was awarded in December 2003, however the recommendations were to focus on a single group (group 3 or 4) in order to determine the relative efficacy and toxicity of a new immunosuppressive drug combination. We elected to perform the group utilizing Campath, since we have a similar protocol utilizing the same immunosuppressive regimen with the addition of CD34+ enriched donor bone marrow cells (2000/0024). The results of this trial utilizing a steroid-free/calcineurin-free protocol will be compared with the standard Edmonton Protocol (2000/0196), which we are currently conducting (14 patients have been transplanted). In addition, the results will be compared with those in 2000/0024. Protocol 2000/0024 (utilizing the same immunosuppressive regimen; Campath, Rapamycin, Tacrolimus-switched to MMF at 3 months) is being followed by a DSMB established at the NIH. We propose to evaluate 12 patients with steroid free, long term calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression regimens which can be directly compared to our historical group of patients who underwent the Miami version of the Edmonton protocol (Islet Cell Transplantation Alone in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Steroid-Free Immunosuppression - Protocol # 2000/196) and with the concurrent tolerogenic protocol (Islet Cell Transplantation Alone and CD34+ Enriched Donor Bone Marrow Cell Infusion in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus; Steroid Free Regimen - Protocol # 2000/0024) which uses the same immunosuppressive regimen combined with CD34+ stem cell enriched donor bone marrow infusions. The regimen will consist of Campath 1-H induction, maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus and tacrolimus for 3 months with subsequent introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and removal of tacrolimus completely and TNF-alpha inhibition (etanercept) in the peri-transplant period.

Interventions

Islet transplantation

Sponsors

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Rodolfo Alejandro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Potential candidates must have type 1 diabetes mellitus and fulfill one or more of the following: 1. Manifest signs and symptoms that are severe enough to be incapacitating. Incapacitating signs and symptoms include hypoglycemic episodes requiring assistance by others and hypoglycemia unawareness (the inability to recognize low blood glucoses; glucoses \< 54 mg/dl). These patients are at high risk for involvement in accidents (they can lose consciousness or act irrationally), thus causing harm to themselves and/or others. 2. Patients with poor diabetes control (HbA1c \> 8.0% but \< 12%), despite intensive insulin therapy, as defined by: self monitoring of blood glucose ≥ 4 times/day, multiple insulin injections (≥ 3/day) or insulin pump, and close monitoring of blood glucose control by an endocrinologist. These patients can experience acute, rapid hyperglycemia secondary to several stress factors, that can lead to dehydration, disorientation, and in some instances, ketoacidosis. 3. Progressive diabetic complications. These patients with chronically poor glycemic control are at higher risk for the development of a wide variety of complications (retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular disease) associated with diabetes.

Exclusion criteria

Potential candidates will be excluded as per the following criteria: 1. Age \< 18 or \> 65 years 2. Duration of diabetes \< 5 years 3. Do not have a physician that is monitoring diabetes for \> 6 months 4. Body mass index \> 26 5. Weight \> 80 kg 6. Insulin requirement \> 1.0 u/kg/d 7. HbA1c \> 12% 8. Stimulated or basal C-peptide \> 0.3 ng/ml 9. Corrected creatinine clearance \< 60 ml/min 10. Serum creatinine consistently above 1.6 mg/dl 11. Macroalbuminuria (\> 300 mg/24 hours) 12. Anemia (hemoglobin \< 12.0 g/dl for males; \< 11 g/dl for females) 13. Hyperlipidemia (fasting low-density lipoprotein \[LDL\] cholesterol \> 130 mg/dl and/or fasting triglycerides \> 200 mg/dl) 14. Abnormal liver function tests (consistently \> 1.5 x normal range) 15. Serological evidence of HIV, HBsAg and/or HBcAb, HBsAb without history of vaccination, human t cell lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) 16. Negative serology for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or evidence of acute or chronic infection (IgM ≥ IgG) 17. Lack of updated immunizations per current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines (including lack of immunization against hepatitis B, pneumococcus and influenza - during season) 18. Presence of panel reactive antibodies \> 20% 19. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \> 4 ng/ml unless malignancy is ruled out 20. Positive tuberculin test (unless proof of adequate treatment for latent tuberculosis can be provided) 21. X-ray evidence of pulmonary infection or other significant pathology 22. Gall stones and/or portal hypertension and/or hemangioma on liver ultrasound 23. Abnormal abdominal or pelvic ultrasound (evidence of masses that are considered suspicious for malignancy or adenopathy) 24. Active peptic ulcer disease 25. Active infections 26. Unstable cardiovascular status (including positive stress echocardiography if age \> 35) 27. Untreated or unstable proliferative diabetic retinopathy 28. Previous/concurrent organ transplantation (except for failed islet cell or pancreas transplantation) 29. Malignancy or previous malignancy 30. Any medical condition requiring chronic use of steroids 31. Active alcohol or substance abuse; smoking in the last 6 months. 32. Sexually active females who are not: * post-menopausal, * surgically sterile, or * not using an acceptable method of contraception (oral contraceptives, Norplant, Depo-Provera, and barrier devices with spermicide are acceptable; condoms used alone are not acceptable) 33. Positive pregnancy test or intent for future pregnancy, or male subject's intent to procreate 34. Any condition or any circumstances that make it unsafe to undergo an islet cell transplant 35. Psychogenically unable to comply 36. Failed psychological evaluation 37. Persistent leukopenia (white blood cell count \< 3,000/uL on more than 3 occasions)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of Glycemic Control by HbA1c and Prevention of Severe Hypoglycemia1 yearNumber of subjects at 1 year with HbA1c \< 6.5% and absence of severe hypoglycemia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Islet Allograft Function1 yearNumber of subjects with basal C-peptide greater than 0.5 ng/ml
Improvement in Metabolic Control as Evidenced by Hemoglobin A1c < 6.5%1 yearNumber of subjects with a hemoglobin A1c \< 6.5% at 1year after islet transplantation
Elimination of Severe Hypoglycemia1 yearThe number of subjects with severe hypoglycemia after transplantation
Restoration of Hypoglycemia Awareness 1 Year After Transplantation1 yearThe number of subjects with restoration of hypoglycemia awareness 1 year after islet transplantation

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Islet Transplantation
Islet transplantation: Islet transplantation
3
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIslet Transplantation
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Measurement of Glycemic Control by HbA1c and Prevention of Severe Hypoglycemia

Number of subjects at 1 year with HbA1c \< 6.5% and absence of severe hypoglycemia

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Islet TransplantationMeasurement of Glycemic Control by HbA1c and Prevention of Severe Hypoglycemia3 participants
Secondary

Elimination of Severe Hypoglycemia

The number of subjects with severe hypoglycemia after transplantation

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Islet TransplantationElimination of Severe Hypoglycemia0 Participants
Secondary

Improvement in Metabolic Control as Evidenced by Hemoglobin A1c < 6.5%

Number of subjects with a hemoglobin A1c \< 6.5% at 1year after islet transplantation

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Islet TransplantationImprovement in Metabolic Control as Evidenced by Hemoglobin A1c < 6.5%3 Participants
Secondary

Islet Allograft Function

Number of subjects with basal C-peptide greater than 0.5 ng/ml

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Islet TransplantationIslet Allograft Function3 Participants
Secondary

Restoration of Hypoglycemia Awareness 1 Year After Transplantation

The number of subjects with restoration of hypoglycemia awareness 1 year after islet transplantation

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Islet TransplantationRestoration of Hypoglycemia Awareness 1 Year After Transplantation3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026